Holydarkness and Casino Disputes—Something’s Fishy

[slaman29]

If anybody knows me I stay 100% away as much as possible from forum meta and forum reputation because I have a life and if I fight with people I prefer to see them in front of me close enough so they can punch me and I can punch them back. Online everybody is a damn hero.

You didn't study OP's accusations enough... He complained about his bets not being provably fair over a year after they happened, and doesn't have evidence to back up the accusations. Holydarkness was very patient with OP, doing the best he could to assist, until the situation became a convoluted entanglement of accusations from both sides. Ultimately impossible to unravel, the fact remains: OP doesn't have evidence to support his claims, and we are not the only ones coming to this conclusion.

I'm just curious: if someone knew you were cheating or lying, could prove it, and called you out on it in real life, would you punch them?

I was only responding to the quote and to what he said to me, I did not want to discuss his accusations, yes they look very weak sorry OP, just what he said I said about Holydarkness.

My answer to your curious question: No I said nothing like that

[Horsbyname]

I would like to see the bets and since it is now available it means I can verify it myself and can find my losing streak of 158 bets happened at 15.5% wining chances-

 As they were saying earlier there is no data on earth which can show the bet result-Bet amount-Bet Chances-Bet Sides, I am wondering how it comes possible now and was not possible during last 3 months.


Now Let’s see why I doubted you that you are not neutral at all

Your Statements earlier

I would like to address the matter from my POV, if I may,

Imagine a piece of paper, or a book, if you may, titled "horsbyname". In it, DuckDice wrote all of your information. Your name, DoB, address, other KYC related things, your deposit and withdrawal history, your betting log, your bonuses, your chat, your complaints, your email, every single thing tha happened to a "horsbyname" during his stay in DuckDice.

At the end of that book, there is an entry, a line: "burn this book".

So, the book burned.

All of the content of the book, all of those betting records[/color and personal info, all of those chats and emails, including the very one that wrote "burn this book" are thrown into fire and extinguished.

That is the "right to be forgotten" of GDPR.

There were not a single entry of "horsbyname" in DuckDice following that request of removal. Not one. Nothing. Nada.

2. I hope you are still standing

All of the content of the book, all of those betting records and personal info, all of those chats and emails, including the very one that wrote "burn this book" are thrown into fire and extinguished.

If they can provide it, it means the data was not erased and their statement that your data is no longer exist is false, thus, a lie, and logically they will not say this as it'll be a reputation-suicide. Thus, even if they have it as you never asked for removal, they will not provide it.

The other way to disprove that, is for you to provide that proof, which another paradox by itself.
Paradoxical. Illogical. Moot.
Drop it.
A way out of this endless loop is to think a logic out of those illogical things.
They want to disprove your statement that you're on 158 losing streak. It'll be a piece of cake if they have your betting history. What benefit do they get from saying that your data has been wiped clean? When the key of their rebuttal is in that data itself?

The fact that they can't make a rebuttal of you having 158 losing streak because they can't look at it on your betting history in their database, would indicate that the history itself is, indeed, no longer exist.

Why is it no longer exist? Because it's removed.

Why is it removed? Because of the right to be forgotten.

Where's the proof of it? Nothing. Not from their side. It's being forgotten. Burned.

It's a really simple situation that I am sure everybody reading this case can easily understand. I hope you can understand the situation that applied now too.

Here you turned on all of your GDPR Statements for sake of Duckdice.io and ruined your 9 year reputations at all. It is not violation of GDPR anymore since it stand in fev of Duckdice?

With about thousands of entries that made my eyes water just to scan them, not only that the statement of playing in 15.5% chance is unfounded as the bets were made with 33% chance, the more important point that I think is better to be pointed out rather than the 33% v. 15.5% is that I can not find a losing streak of 158 times. Not even a 50 losing streak in a row.

With this, I believe I can safely say that the claim of 158 losing streak at 15.5% is unproven to be true.

May I know if you have now the bets showing the result of my bets? The way you confirm it that my bets were placed 33% wining chances not 15.5%
they maybe have provided you with a very limited number of bets which were placed on 33% at the beginning of my session,  Now there is data showing full result which will help me to verify that my loses were fair and it will bring peace to mind.




Your Statement is more like making me look like the scammer, You have not explained that Kirito89 Posted https://imgur.com/a/OKAlIXC this email and accused me that this email was received for 0.01 btc and it was me who sent it from a email similar to mine ( [email protected]) but different with one later.
Here is his accusation:

4. OP didn't take into account, that the blackmailer's email, and his email are unique, only separated by 1 letter, so if someone was trying to take advantage of his bitcointalk thread, there would be no way of guessing his unique email, I've actually asked him in the other thread if he gives me permission (due to GDPR constraints) to disclose his email, which he conviniently ignored, so regardless of any reason provided by you, or me, or anyone else for that matter, he will simply ignore it and spam the thread so he can push his narrative.
Again I'd like to thank you for objective support on this matter!
Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.

Do I have permission to publicly show the email address you've been in contact with us? that way I can show the blackmailer's email address, and let bitcointalk give their oppinion on it .
Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.

For full transparency,  the email connection I've had linking OP was due to the trustpilot review he has posted, the one he confirmed in this thread as being his aswell, where we can request further information and are able to see more info provided by OP, including email address he used to provide that review.  In the meantime ( and likely due to my big mouth as I've stated I can link him due to the emails) his trustpilot review dissapeared, making the information unavailable.[/colo]   I've currently contactd trustpilot in the hopes they restore the provided information.   But in the meantime OP, can you provide a confirmation email from trustpilot that they have removed the review? ( they send an email notification if one of your reviews gets taken down) And that it wasn't you who deleted it [/size] ?

Kirito89, Duckdice Support.[/quote]

[/quote]


Did you read those email of mine? was it sent on or before 28 December? Does time matter?

Of Fairness and Transparency as The Aim of The Thread
The player sent DuckDice an email asking for a refund if transparency can not be provided, despite the claim that the purpose of the threads are to get clarification of the losing streak. I can see that the emails are indeed sent from the players email address as shown on the other thread.

By the way you didn’t took into account, that you was suppose to get the evidances of accusations as well-Upon which we were agreed.

Anyway lets come to the proofs point.

Kirirto89 you have to show your evidences of me Sending blackmailing emails for 0.01btc
2. Trustpilot link- that my review was posted from the same email you was blackmailed from for 0.01 btc.
3. That I didn’t played on 15.5% chances but 33% chances.
4. You have provide evidences that the blackmailing email you have received is from the same email similar to mine but different with one later.


We are at the point where Kirito89 gotta back his accusations. I’ve accepted your deal, gave consent already Now the ball’s in his court.

Did he provide you the Email that I sent demanding 0.01 btc? was the email similar to mine?  Also how about trustpilot reviews link was it posted from my email? and You can see the bets is played on 33% chances right?

The 33% wining chances evidance you got was not this  https://imgur.com/a/Z852R43 that I provided earlier to disprove Kirito89 claim of me never played there. It was different and was provided by kirito89 showing thousand of bets were played on 33% causing eye pain to you?

[holydarkness]

I would like to see the bets and since it is now available it means I can verify it myself and can find my losing streak of 158 bets happened at 15.5% wining chances-

Unfortunately, that is not under my purview to whom can the log being shown. I am not the author and has no ownership of it, simply there to look at its content and verify.

But it should not be your concern anymore, is it?

You both give your consent in a writing statement; you allow me to verify the proof that shall be provided by DuckDice, that you'll trust that I'll stand on neutral ground and reported to the public what I see 100% based on what I see? And in response to this, as well as their part of consenting into the agreement, they provide the evidence.

And when the result came, you violated your part of agreement with, "Now Let’s see why I doubted you that you are not neutral at all"?

Still standing from neutral ground when I say that it's kinda ironic that you can end up with DuckDice actually raising a type-3 flag against you for violating a written agreement. And since I am still standing from the neutral ground, in the spirit of transparency, I "exported" the data to AI, since reading the line one by one proven to take a lot of time and put strain on my eyes so much, and I am not that good in writing spreadsheet formula that can easily pull the data off, this is the tally of the winning/losing streak according to the data being processed by AI:

Code:

Here are the five longest streaks of consecutive 1s and 0s in your data:

1s → 8 times
1s → 7 times
1s → 7 times
1s → 6 times
1s → 6 times

0s → 18 times
0s → 17 times
0s → 17 times
0s → 17 times
0s → 16 times

As they were saying earlier there is no data on earth which can show the bet result-Bet amount-Bet Chances-Bet Sides, I am wondering how it comes possible now and was not possible during last 3 months.


Now Let’s see why I doubted you that you are not neutral at all

Your Statements earlier

[...]

Here you turned on all of your GDPR Statements for sake of Duckdice.io and ruined your 9 year reputations at all. It is not violation of GDPR anymore since it stand in fev of Duckdice?

It's been addressed in my full explanation above, as well as Kirito89's that precedes mine. Kindly refer to it. But if I have to explain ELI5, the data was being pulled from the server seed, not the player's private data. This is the propietary of DuckDice, and not the players. The data does not being wiped when someone enact Right to be Forgotten as it is not the player's property. However, that data still got affected by the Right to be Forgotten as they became just a bunch of numbers that can not be associated to the former player.

They're simply numbers and sequences sitting in DuckDice hard disk [or do you guys use SSD?] with no ownership, just data for internal record.

It was until you gave your betID, which reveal your client seed and server seed that the ties that once severed can be re-established and those data can be pulled from the corner of their storage... wait, that's not precisely correct, it took several weeks before DuckDice realized that the betID you gave did not just serving as a way to emulate the bets like what Khaled compiled, but also help retracing the ownership of those nameless data on their server, through the server seed revealed upon checking that betID, that upon being pulled, "restored" your betting history.

If you still need details of it, I think Kirito89 will explain all of the technicalities to you, if you ask nicely.

With about thousands of entries that made my eyes water just to scan them, not only that the statement of playing in 15.5% chance is unfounded as the bets were made with 33% chance, the more important point that I think is better to be pointed out rather than the 33% v. 15.5% is that I can not find a losing streak of 158 times. Not even a 50 losing streak in a row.

With this, I believe I can safely say that the claim of 158 losing streak at 15.5% is unproven to be true.

May I know if you have now the bets showing the result of my bets? The way you confirm it that my bets were placed 33% wining chances not 15.5%
they maybe have provided you with a very limited number of bets which were placed on 33% at the beginning of my session,  Now there is data showing full result which will help me to verify that my loses were fair and it will bring peace to mind.

Uhh... how many times did you bet, if you don't mind me asking? Since I think that "thousands of entries" kinda give a good picture whether what they gave me is limited and selected few numbers of your bets or not.

Your Statement is more like making me look like the scammer, You have not explained that Kirito89 Posted https://imgur.com/a/OKAlIXC this email and accused me that this email was received for 0.01 btc and it was me who sent it from a email similar to mine ( [email protected]) but different with one later.
Here is his accusation:
[...]
Did you read those email of mine? was it sent on or before 28 December? Does time matter?

Of Fairness and Transparency as The Aim of The Thread
The player sent DuckDice an email asking for a refund if transparency can not be provided, despite the claim that the purpose of the threads are to get clarification of the losing streak. I can see that the emails are indeed sent from the players email address as shown on the other thread.

Forgive me, but... my narrative make you looking like a scammer? Kindly help me understand that email situation:

I asked you about it the day you made a post showing the intent of refund, that you assured us that all you seek is transparency over 158 losing streak. Of which, today, following the transparency that come unearthed, an edit of a post came:



A fair offer for what, if I may ask? I thought all you seek is transparency? A clarification of DuckDice Provable Fairness. So, what offer is that?

By the way you didn’t took into account, that you was suppose to get the evidances of accusations as well-Upon which we were agreed.

Anyway lets come to the proofs point.

Kirirto89 you have to show your evidences of me Sending blackmailing emails for 0.01btc
2. Trustpilot link- that my review was posted from the same email you was blackmailed from for 0.01 btc.
3. That I didn’t played on 15.5% chances but 33% chances.
4. You have provide evidences that the blackmailing email you have received is from the same email similar to mine but different with one later.


We are at the point where Kirito89 gotta back his accusations. I’ve accepted your deal, gave consent already Now the ball’s in his court.

Did he provide you the Email that I sent demanding 0.01 btc? was the email similar to mine?  Also how about trustpilot reviews link was it posted from my email? and You can see the bets is played on 33% chances right?

The 33% wining chances evidance you got was not this  https://imgur.com/a/Z852R43 that I provided earlier to disprove Kirito89 claim of me never played there. It was different and was provided by kirito89 showing thousand of bets were played on 33% causing eye pain to you?

The betting log were pulled from the server seed following the betID that you gave, thousands of of. So, it's safe to assume that even if that screenshot of betID is a bet that's stuck in between the log given to me, the bet still cover your betting history. Unless you played in tens of thousands of bets.

But, as I can see an attempt to grasp at straws when it happened in front of my very own face, let me make it way simpler for both of you, the player, and DuckDice, the casino:

Instead of going in circles and asking endless questions and pulling quotes, trying to give life to the case that's ended about few posts ago following the verdict, here's the fact, a simple one: the purpose of your thread [as you claimed it] was to prove that there was a manipulation in DuckDice's game, that there provable fairness is not... fair, as you lose 158 times in a row. Of which after a long and exhaustive process, both parties entered an agreement where the player will 100% trust me, holydarkness, to prove or disprove the root of the thread. Of which DuckDice through their representative, Kirito89, accepted and give their side of obligation in the deal by showing me the log.

The report of the findings was made, people can read them. Bottomline: the narratives are false.

So, unless you're interested to tell me one last mystery that I still wondered, about that "fair offer", you have two option: take this ruling and make peace with your past loses, or keep on throwing questions to steer the narrative into an endless cycle, and DuckDice or Kirito89 as the representative of DuckDice, who entered that written agreement with you, are allowed to raise a type-3 flag against you, for a breach of written contract.

[Horsbyname]

No Evidences

Well, your novel contains many line defending duckdice.io openly now.

I will cut it Short, You have ignored many questions upon which we were agreed, and I repost it because you forget things.


We agreed by

Kirirto89 you have to show your evidences of me Sending blackmailing emails for 0.01btc
2. Trustpilot link- that my review was posted from the same email you was blackmailed from for 0.01 btc.
3. That I didn’t played on 15.5% chances but 33% chances.
4. You have to provide evidences that the blackmailing email you have received is from the same email similar to mine but different with one later.[/b]


We are at the point where Kirito89 gotta back his accusations. I’ve accepted your deal, gave consent already Now the ball’s in his court.

You covered none of them but wrote a novel about things which is already posted in the thread you got nothing from duckdice.io at all-what you have is already in the thread posted by me. You wasn’t supposed to be the Private eye for the things reviled already in public.


What do you mean by

DuckDice or Kirito89 as the representative of DuckDice, who entered that written agreement with you, are allowed to raise a type-3 flag against you, for a breach of written contract.

Having said that its mean I can create 10 flags against kirito89 right? No?

Kirito89, I've got a written consent through PM from OP to validate the situation of similar email account. It came with several terms, but after mulling over it the entire day, I think the best approach is to actually leave both parties in the blind, so, simplified, kindly provide me [through PM, not here publicly] the evidence of those email similarities, and I'll take it from there, if you don't mind.

Thank you for the assist holydarkness,  I'm curently on vacation for 2 days.  So once I return I will come to your dms with the email evidence .





Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.

How about when he asked for my consent to share the evidence in public, I allowed him to do it, but he didn't, Should I raise a flag against him?

And 2.  Do I have permission to publicly show the email address you've been in contact with us? that way I can show the blackmailer's email address, and let bitcointalk give their oppinion on it .

Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

And when he says NO to that sharing, you didn’t ask me to create flag against him-Instead you post the story of red steel bars

Why double standard 9 years old reputable bridge? You were supposed to be the bridge to see if the accusation of Kirito89 is true or false but you completely drop it and sticked to a bunch of numbers showing no result but tied to me because I provided the proof showing 33% chances.

Yes, I still stand by Statement but since they didn’t provide proof of if my losing were fair and was not manipulated by Duckdice.io I want them to pay my loses back.

What do you think why I come to bitcointalk and create the thread? To get accused from someone’s who have history of accusing users who raise voice against them, who have history of manipulating bets results?

at all you didn’t obey your duty of being a bridge. I still stand my words only if you stand by yours, ask kirito89 to provide evidences of his accusations

1. show evidences of me Sending blackmailing emails for 0.01btc
2. Trustpilot link- that my review was posted from the same email you were blackmailed from for 0.01 btc.
3. That I didn’t played on 15.5% chances but 33% chances.
4. Provide evidences that the blackmailing email you have received is from the same email similar to mine but different with one later.

This is what we were agreed on

[Kirito89]

Kirirto89 you have to show your evidences of me Sending blackmailing emails for 0.01btc
2. Trustpilot link- that my review was posted from the same email you was blackmailed from for 0.01 btc.
3. That I didn’t played on 15.5% chances but 33% chances.
4. You have to provide evidences that the blackmailing email you have received is from the same email similar to mine but different with one later.[/b]


We are at the point where Kirito89 gotta back his accusations. I’ve accepted your deal, gave consent already Now the ball’s in his court.

You have agreed for holydarkness to be on the receving end of the evidence and act as a 3d party independent verifier.

Hello,  nr 1. on your list, not possible as the trustpilot review was deleted.
Nr 2.  I have submitted the evidence to holydarkness, which confirms you did not play on 15.5% chance, you did not encounter a losing streak as you claimed in your initial thread, thus providing evidence that you have lied, and while circumstancial, obviously by lying and creating 4 different threads here, falls in to place with our blackmail situation.
Nr 3. Again, not possible as I've stated before the email connection was due to the trustpilot review that got deleted in the meantime.


Regardless, the sole fact of proving you have lied about your gameplay, shows that your entire threads are not relevant, and simply serve you a different purpose.

On that note, I have created a flag against OP https://asktom.cf/index.php?action=trust;flag=3386   please support it based on this thread and holydarkness confirmation about the authenticity of the evidence I have provided him.



Have a nice day!


Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

[Horsbyname]

This only Statement of your is enough to show people how badly you are busted-

 3. Again, not possible as I've stated before the email connection was due to the trustpilot review that got deleted in the meantime.


Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

Here what you stated regarding the email, that you received for 0.01 btc from a email similar to mine.

4. OP didn't take into account, that the blackmailer's email, and his email are unique, only separated by 1 letter, so if someone was trying to take advantage of his bitcointalk thread, there would be no way of guessing his unique email, I've actually asked him in the other thread if he gives me permission (due to GDPR constraints) to disclose his email, which he conviniently ignored, so regardless of any reason provided by you, or me, or anyone else for that matter, he will simply ignore it and spam the thread so he can push his narrative.


Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

Your words right? No? Wait your master Holydarkness words will work- what was he asking me for? read it loud-yes loud- yes it was regarding the email you received for 0.01 btc the same email as mine but different with 1 later than mine as per you above statement.

And oh, perhaps give your consent for DuckDice to share your email? To prove or disprove their rebuttal about similar email address with the scammer? If you feel uncomfortable with your account being publicly disclosed, I'd like to offer an option where they send it to me, for-my-eyes-only basis, and I'll reproduce a screenshot of that proof they have me, with several characters of the email being censored. I'll give my best to find a balance where it's enough to maintain privacy yet also prove [or disprove] the similarities.

[LoyceV]

I have created a flag against OP https://asktom.cf/index.php?action=trust;flag=3386   please support it based on this thread

I saw your post in Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags. You're linking to a thread created by the accused. I'm not going to read 45 posts that have nothing to do with your accusation: please create one post that summarizes the written contract OP has violated.

[examplens]

I have created a flag against OP https://asktom.cf/index.php?action=trust;flag=3386   please support it based on this thread

I saw your post in Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags. You're linking to a thread created by the accused. I'm not going to read 45 posts that have nothing to do with your accusation: please create one post that summarizes the written contract OP has violated.

+1
Kirito89, it is also necessary to adhere to some basic conditions for creating a red flag. Some of the guidelines can be found on Trust flags
Disagreeing with something someone wrote is not sufficient grounds for flag support.

[Kirito89]

I have created a flag against OP https://asktom.cf/index.php?action=trust;flag=3386   please support it based on this thread

I saw your post in Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags. You're linking to a thread created by the accused. I'm not going to read 45 posts that have nothing to do with your accusation: please create one post that summarizes the written contract OP has violated.

Will do, thank you for the feedback.

I have created a flag against OP https://asktom.cf/index.php?action=trust;flag=3386   please support it based on this thread

I saw your post in Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags. You're linking to a thread created by the accused. I'm not going to read 45 posts that have nothing to do with your accusation: please create one post that summarizes the written contract OP has violated.

+1
Kirito89, it is also necessary to adhere to some basic conditions for creating a red flag. Some of the guidelines can be found on Trust flags
Disagreeing with something someone wrote is not sufficient grounds for flag support.

Thanks for the input, will take it into account.

[Horsbyname]

I am waiting for you to raise the flag.

[holydarkness]

I am waiting for you to raise the flag.

He will not. I encouraged him not to and he, as DuckDice representative, agreed. Not because you're right and they're wrong, but rather because you don't deserve anymore attention from DuckDice following all of their evidence and explanation given.

Thus, they leave you for good, as there's nothing more to add.

And now, with everything made abundantly clear in my other post, it's my time to take my leave.

[Rating Place]

Holydarkness spends a ton of unpaid time trying to help posters. I don’t think he’s always right, but his heart’s in the right place. If you have a problem with a casino, then attack the problem and casino. It’s a huge waste of time and unnecessary to attack posters.

[Horsbyname]

If you read the Thread I wrote there that Holydarkness Coaching casinos in private and ask them what to post and when to post, and now holydarkness by mistake spited

I feel like holydarkness coaches them, like what to post now, what to excuse, dodge the hard questions. And then holydarkness will appear in the post with a ton of questions making a way for the casinos to get a point and make it an excuse. Am I wrong? Check my case you will see how he ignore to ask from duckdice.io representative to prove his accusations, instead he asked me to prove that you are not a scammer and duckdice.io is falsely accusing you, Which I did and he dropped that after.

Here what he stated, so weird, Aren’t you a dark bridge between casinos and users?

He will not. I encouraged him not to and he, as DuckDice representative, agreed. Not because you're right and they're wrong, but rather because you don't deserve anymore attention from DuckDice following all of their evidence and explanation given.

Thus, they leave you for good, as there's nothing more to add.

And now, with everything made abundantly clear in my other post, it's my time to take my leave.

Having said that, you confessed now that you were coaching them this entire time, its mean I was right, you are coaching them, you are the darkest bridge between casinos and Users, once you get consent from users you let the casino to pass you (Dark Bridge) that’s why you were offering again and again to be the bridge between me and Duckdice.io.

And now, with everything made abundantly clear in my other post, it's my time to take my leave.

Instead of clearing things you created a mess, you dropped your statements- you let the casino to pass, without providing any proofs of what we were agreed on, your 9 years’ reputation is nothing in front of few bucks as I believe now.
You can leave ofc and I regret it to trust you, but thanks to the forum where everything is clearly posted and you are exposed, this thread will follow you forever. I will update it where you made statements and where you dropped it for the sake of casinos.

Holydarkness spends a ton of unpaid time trying to help posters. I don’t think he’s always right, but his heart’s in the right place. If you have a problem with a casino, then attack the problem and casino. It’s a huge waste of time and unnecessary to attack posters.

I wish a % of it was true, I never attacked him, All I posted is along proofs-Instead I am attacked by casino representative in this forum-right infront of all of yours and how holydarkness let him pass and when I asked him to prove it Holydarkness save him multiple times as he is coaching casinos representatives he know very well how to trick the users in the forum

[nutildah]

Bro, I'm still trying to understand what your endgame is here.

Its already well established that nobody outside of the casino can do anything for you. It does not matter at this point what holydarkness said or did -- that will not change the fact that you don't have access to your betting data. No matter what you say or do, nobody here will be able to help you get your money back. Basically you're wasting your time.

[BlackyJacky]

Holydarkness spends a ton of unpaid time trying to help posters.

How do you know that she isn't getting paid by online casinos?

I don’t think he’s always right, but his heart’s in the right place.

Psychologically abusing online casino victims is heart at the right place?

If you have a problem with a casino, then attack the problem and casino. It’s a huge waste of time and unnecessary to attack posters.

If you get paid to attack online casino victims, maybe it is not a huge waste of time?

[Rating Place]

Holydarkness spends a ton of unpaid time trying to help posters.

How do you know that she isn't getting paid by online casinos?

I don’t think he’s always right, but his heart’s in the right place.

Psychologically abusing online casino victims is heart at the right place?

If you have a problem with a casino, then attack the problem and casino. It’s a huge waste of time and unnecessary to attack posters.

If you get paid to attack online casino victims, maybe it is not a huge waste of time?

I'm not 100% sure if he's getting paid or not. It's my guess based on how he posts. I've seen him talk positively and negatively about the same casino. Holydarkness has to walk a fine line. No casino is going to talk to him if he's not respectful.

[albon]

Having said that, you confessed now that you were coaching them this entire time, its mean I was right, you are coaching them, you are the darkest bridge between casinos and Users, once you get consent from users you let the casino to pass you (Dark Bridge) that’s why you were offering again and again to be the bridge between me and Duckdice.io.

You sent me a PM on the forum before, asking me to contribute to the discussions regarding the cases against DuckDice. If I had  gotten involved in the discussion, acted as a mediator or served as a bridge between you and the casino, and if the evidence and explanations had proven that the mistake was on your side, you would have opened a thread against me just like you did with Holydarkness!



I'm surprised that you're the one asking members to intervene in resolving disputes, yet in the end, you blame them... No reputable member in the forum will stand with you if you are wrong and the casino is justified in its claims. There are people like you who attack casinos and attack posters to blackmail casinos and force them to pay, even when they have clearly violated the rules.

So, I advise that if you can resolve your disputes with casinos on your own, don’t involve others in your problems if this is how you react. And you should know that any future message from you will be considered unsolicited PM [that's against forum rules], and I will report it to the Mods.

[BlackyJacky]

Holydarkness spends a ton of unpaid time trying to help posters.

How do you know that she isn't getting paid by online casinos?

I don’t think he’s always right, but his heart’s in the right place.

Psychologically abusing online casino victims is heart at the right place?

If you have a problem with a casino, then attack the problem and casino. It’s a huge waste of time and unnecessary to attack posters.

If you get paid to attack online casino victims, maybe it is not a huge waste of time?

I'm not 100% sure if he's getting paid or not. It's my guess based on how he posts.

Someone who psychologically abuses online casino victims isn't a selfless justice fighter who does it for free!

I've seen him talk positively and negatively about the same casino. Holydarkness has to walk a fine line. No casino is going to talk to him if he's not respectful.

Have you also seen her (unjustifiably) talking negatively about online casino victims?

Hmm... must be fun to live in the world inside your head where you're always right and when someone pointed out that you're not, either ignore the fact [because you're always right, so you shouldn't address the matter where they show that you're not] like when you try to point out my "fun fact" that stake routinely scan this board, which I then show the full statement made by the rep herself, which prove that the "fun fact" is actually a, well, "fact", or, when an ADR refuse to mediate due to the lack of evidence, they're stupid.

Comparing CG to police is misleading... is it, though? Try to go to the police and accuse someone without concrete evidence, see if they'll take your case seriously. By "your concrete evidence", I believe we all [but you] understand that what you served them --if we compare to what you tried to serve to CG on your thread there, as well as here in those wall of text and numbers-- are not valid as a compelling prima facie because well, your understanding of how the system works is wrong, but then again, in the world you're living inside your head, you're the one who always right. Even three AI and other people are wrong.

"Fun fact": this phrase kept repeating in my head while I write this post, "off with his head!", I guess I know why, LOL.

[Rating Place]

You have to have thick skin and not hold grudges when posting on a forum. I’ve been in a few arguments with Holydarkness but then it’s over and you let it go.

[BlackyJacky]

You have to have thick skin and not hold grudges when posting on a forum. I’ve been in a few arguments with Holydarkness but then it’s over and you let it go.

I will call out this psychological abuser until she withdraws its hallucinated nonsense about my evidence about Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack.