USA and UK weapons sales need alot customers and users

[Fullbear2222]

Economic restart needs also the new usd and gbp currency loans to make uk usa banks flow money again and what more can make it then wars the banks swim in money again.
Now people talking about wars in middle east and europe to be honest....war needs a lot sea area where you can bomb a lot vessels a lot land and a lot people.
If even just UK and USA big military complex companies selling 1-2%of their military equipments to europe or middle east then most of the land will be destroyed and a lot people killed and still only small % of weapons and defence equipments will be sold so Europe definately not place for wars so too much envoiremental damage will be done too.
So Europe is not place for using weapons the population and area is too little just and they can only buy little %
But where all those weapons can used is asia indo-pafcific ocean region and australia there is a lot land a lot people and a lot sea so you can sell weapons to there a lot and since uk and usa military complex guys think about numbers they will urge to trump definately make peace with russia taking out weapons of europe giving ukraine to putin to decide and new focus will be indo pafcific area and australia the land and the sea you can give alot loans to there on commodities resources collateral to nations
( a lot natural resources in there for example GOLD in australia so uk and usa can give military aid or loans in return of GOLD )from uk and usa banks so they could buy military defence equipments missiles guns vessels and aircraft, i see bullish and prosperity of uk Barclays Lloyds tsb usa JP Morgan Goldman Sachs mellons and other banks because of indo pafcific area land and ocean there is a lot people and a lot land and sea where to make wars and even If top military complex companies put large % in there there will be still huge demand and still a lot land will be not damaged and still alot people will be alive.
For that sense i see huge demand for USD and GBP currency because of this area will be start buying guns arms and military equipment.
And to sell all those military equipments this area is only big enough with huge population too If we run numbers.

So most definately you will see UK and usa approach very welcoming towards war in there while they want to stop europe and middle east situation and focus on indo pafcific and australia asia region also the taiwan area good to you can sell like 100 vessels it's a big ocean bomb them and then sell more the point is not win or lose the point is that equipments need to be destroyed so they can order more and usa uk like northern gummer and lockead martin and other military sellers can empty their warehouses and sell it

[franky1]

governments dont need alot of repeated weapons deals with one country to milk the initial weapons sales and loans

using ukraine for instance
UK simply needs to offer ukraine a loan.. ukraine then use that loan money to buy UK stuff. (UK get repaid once)
then the ukraine need to pay back the loan later plus interest(UK get paid again+interest)

UK get 2.5x overall on a loan that they materially made out of nothing (money printing)
..
they dont then need to continue to then pursue further weapons orders. instead they can transfer the loan repayment into a new deal involving mineral rights or infrastructure rebuilding, which then yields even further profit ongoing.

.
but yes if they can repeat this effort with multiple countries, then they can multiply the gravy train of profits

[Kelward]

Every country needs weapons not necessarily to kill their neighbors but to scare external aggressors, nothing more. This is why countries will budget a lot of money for the procurement of weapons and the producing countries are getting richer for it, there's nothing we can do about it. Going into a war with another country should be a last resort, like I already emphasized they allocate alot if money to buy weapons because they have to protect their sovereign territories. So without planning for war every country makes preparations for it, if you're perceived to be weak your stronger neighbor might want to take a piece of your land or territory like in the animal kingdom.

[franky1]

Every country needs weapons not necessarily to kill their neighbors but to scare external aggressors, nothing more. This is why countries will budget a lot of money for the procurement of weapons and the producing countries are getting richer for it, there's nothing we can do about it. Going into a war with another country should be a last resort, like I already emphasized they allocate alot if money to buy weapons because they have to protect their sovereign territories. So without planning for war every country makes preparations for it, if you're perceived to be weak your stronger neighbor might want to take a piece of your land or territory like in the animal kingdom.

the main countries that produce weapons are not usually the countries that go to war.
when other countries are at war they supply them. but using deals that triple their funds and then take care of the rebuild after to increase returns even more

take UK&US they have not started the ukraine or isreal or red sea wars.. but they supply the loans and weapons
iran fund houthi and hamas and supply the weapons but iran does not run their own troops to the frontline themselves

[Dunamisx]

Why should there be more deals on making sales of weapons, when the entire ones available are not enough in making peace and safety to the entire world, maybe we should also consider if related routes are part of the means through which some of the insurgents got supplies from, because we cant continue with the importation and manufacturing of what has not been evident to improve safety for the people, instead its now a common thing to see fire arms and use one easily, which shouldn't.