3000+ homes are burnt by wild forest fires each year, solution

[betterthanSNnBTC]

Drones that detect heat sigs using thermals and AI and send another swarm of drones that spray the fires with fire extishers out.

Geo fence the BBQ pits and normal camp fire places off.

Some 1 do this idea and get a billion $ gov grant.

Sam Altman stole my Iris idea and made 21million + off this forum

You will make more.

[BADecker]

There is evidence that the BIG fires have been started and controlled by the military. Is this true that the military is doing this?

[betterthanSNnBTC]

I also believe the Gov started some of those fires, I have some pretty solid proof using google maps and the times that some of the fires started.

Almost like they were driving down the highway starting them one by one. Man made, and you can tell how they spread.

For the ones in west Canada and LA America.

100% just like 9/11 do it themselves on purpose, but there is still some wild ones that can be stopped.

All it takes is a piece of glass to start a wild one or a hiker throw a smoke or joint in the wrong spot.

[Stalker22]

If only it were that simple, huh?  Dont get me wrong - drones are totally being used nowadays to edtect wildfires with their thermal cameras and AI.  But were a long way off from having whole fleets of autonomous drones patrolling places like national forests.  Those areas are so huge and rough, good luck getting swarms of little drones with a very limited range to cover it all and communicate in real-time.  The logistics and supporting infrastructure would be absolutely colossal and astronomically expensive. We are not talking about a few dozen drones. To cover vast, often remote, wilderness areas across a country, you wouldd need thousands, if not tens of thousands of drones.  So, how do you even begin to power and maintain a network of thousands of drones scattered across inaccessible terrain?  What about the sheer cost of manufacturing, maintaining, and constantly replacing thousands upon thousands of sophisticated drones that are operating in extreme environments?

[betterthanSNnBTC]

If only it were that simple, huh?  Dont get me wrong - drones are totally being used nowadays to edtect wildfires with their thermal cameras and AI.  But were a long way off from having whole fleets of autonomous drones patrolling places like national forests.  Those areas are so huge and rough, good luck getting swarms of little drones with a very limited range to cover it all and communicate in real-time.  The logistics and supporting infrastructure would be absolutely colossal and astronomically expensive. We are not talking about a few dozen drones. To cover vast, often remote, wilderness areas across a country, you wouldd need thousands, if not tens of thousands of drones.  So, how do you even begin to power and maintain a network of thousands of drones scattered across inaccessible terrain?  What about the sheer cost of manufacturing, maintaining, and constantly replacing thousands upon thousands of sophisticated drones that are operating in extreme environments?

lets be real, fiat is the only thing holding us back.

also you don't need a fleet, you just need like 3-4 scanner ones with very good cameras high up to cover 100000's of acres, and then the fleet comes.

I bet the live sats we have could do it as well, you can see what they did to gaza on google maps, where did those 2.1 million people go? all i see is ruble.

[Vod]

lets be real, fiat is the only thing holding us back.

also you don't need a fleet, you just need like 3-4 scanner ones with very good cameras high up to cover 100000's of acres, and then the fleet comes.

I bet the live sats we have could do it as well, you can see what they did to gaza on google maps, where did those 2.1 million people go? all i see is ruble.

Reality is holding us back.   How large will these drones have to be?   If you want to carry water, it's heavy.  If you want to carry extinguisher, you need to get close.    Have you ever seen windshear above a wildfire?  

I asked AI about monitoring an area the size of White River National Forest 24/7 with drones, taking into account mountain terrain and curvature of the earth:

Area   9,308 km²
Flat-land baseline drone count   ~745 drones
With mountain/terrain complexity   ~2,235 drones
With 24/7 rotation & redundancy   ~6,700 drones

Drone Capabilities (realistic high-end surveillance drones):

Altitude: Up to 3,000–5,000 m AGL (Above Ground Level)

Camera FoV / Coverage: High-resolution gimbal camera covering ~1–2 km radius effectively at altitude

Flight Time: ~4 hours per drone (battery-powered)

Speed: ~50–80 km/h

Autonomous area scan ability with GPS waypointing

That's not the fleet - that's just the scanner ones with very good cameras as high as possible.  You'll also need
- Central coordination/control systems
- Redundant power and charging infrastructure.
- Fleet drones to douse the flames.

... for every national park or forest area.


How much would you like to bet?  

[betterthanSNnBTC]

lets be real, fiat is the only thing holding us back.

also you don't need a fleet, you just need like 3-4 scanner ones with very good cameras high up to cover 100000's of acres, and then the fleet comes.

I bet the live sats we have could do it as well, you can see what they did to gaza on google maps, where did those 2.1 million people go? all i see is ruble.

Reality is holding us back.   How large will these drones have to be?   If you want to carry water, it's heavy.  If you want to carry extinguisher, you need to get close.    Have you ever seen windshear above a wildfire?  

I asked AI about monitoring an area the size of White River National Forest 24/7 with drones, taking into account mountain terrain and curvature of the earth:

Area   9,308 km²
Flat-land baseline drone count   ~745 drones
With mountain/terrain complexity   ~2,235 drones
With 24/7 rotation & redundancy   ~6,700 drones

Drone Capabilities (realistic high-end surveillance drones):

Altitude: Up to 3,000–5,000 m AGL (Above Ground Level)

Camera FoV / Coverage: High-resolution gimbal camera covering ~1–2 km radius effectively at altitude

Flight Time: ~4 hours per drone (battery-powered)

Speed: ~50–80 km/h

Autonomous area scan ability with GPS waypointing

That's not the fleet - that's just the scanner ones with very good cameras as high as possible.  You'll also need
- Central coordination/control systems
- Redundant power and charging infrastructure.
- Fleet drones to douse the flames.

... for every national park or forest area.


How much would you like to bet?  

Ill bet all my btc because it is worthless to me and the future of our species.

Your grok chatgpt or whatever ass you are using is simply wrong.

They have live feeds already from space of ENTIRE HEMISPHERES.

Also a work around is just to set up cams on trees everywhere on a mesh network (solar power)

However the drones putting out the fires would be op. We can create missles that blow up everything I am sure we can make kamakazi drones that put out fires before they get to nutty. The winds would not matter to the sacrifice of dah drone.

50 km per hour? dood my drones go 400 mp h

This is from your God thougtbot/clever bot I mean chatgpt


 How Many Drones to watch  White River National Forest fully?
For Continuous Monitoring: Let’s assume you want to have continuous aerial coverage over the entire White River National Forest. You'd need several drones to ensure there’s always one in the air, while others are charging or in maintenance. For full 24/7 monitoring, you’d likely need:

At least 10–20 drones for rotation, depending on their endurance and coverage capacity.

24/7 coverage requires staggered flight times, so while some drones are charging, others are actively flying.

how many to fully cover it permanently?

100 Drones for direct coverage, assuming overlap and periodic recharging, could handle the entire forest.

wow 100 big number

so build a solar field next to them and its gg wildfires.

btw earth is headed for a ice age anyways, a really really bad ice age is coming soon, so i guess we wont have to worry about that anyways.

[Vod]

Your grok chatgpt or whatever ass you are using is simply wrong.
They have live feeds already from space of ENTIRE HEMISPHERES.

Can you show us a single live feed of anything from space?   

I'm sorry - I did not include the calculations above to compare against yours.   Let's try another one.  I asked AI "how much data would you need to have a satellite cover an entire hemisphere real time in resolution it can detect a fire starting in a forest?"  The result? Orders of magnitude beyond current or foreseeable satellite data transmission capability.

🔥 Fire Detection Resolution
To detect a fire starting in a forest, you typically need:

Spatial resolution: ~5–30 meters (ideally closer to 5m for small fires).
Temporal resolution: Real-time, or near real-time (<1 min latency).
Spectral resolution: Infrared (thermal) bands are essential, along with visible light.

🛰️ Coverage & Imaging Specs
1. Earth Hemisphere Stats
Surface area of one hemisphere: ~255 million km².
But only land area is relevant for forest fire detection (~71 million km²).
Still, for total coverage, we’ll consider the full 255 million km².


2. Pixel Size & Count
Assume 10m resolution (moderate choice):
Each pixel = 10m×10m=100m²
Total pixels = 255×10⁶km² / 100m² = 2.55×10¹⁴
 
📡 Data Rate Estimate
Let’s estimate data per frame, assuming:
16-bit multispectral imaging (e.g., 3 bands: RGB + thermal/IR).
Each pixel: 4 bands × 2 bytes = 8 bytes.
Data per full hemisphere frame:
2.55×10¹⁴ pixels × 8 bytes = 2.04 × 10¹⁵ bytes ≈ 2,040terabytes (TB)

⏱️ Real-Time Requirement
Let’s say “real-time” means one frame per second:
Bandwidth required = 2,040 TB/sec.
Even one frame per minute = ~34 TB/sec.

⚠️ Realistic Takeaways
This is orders of magnitude beyond current or foreseeable satellite data transmission capability.
The best Earth observation satellites (like NASA's MODIS or commercial ones like Planet or Maxar) downlink at hundreds of Mbps to single-digit Gbps, and they image swaths of the planet, not whole hemispheres.

✅ Practical Solutions
Constellations of small satellites (e.g. hundreds of LEO satellites).
Event-driven imaging: Fire detection is focused using AI onboard, and only relevant areas are downlinked.
Thermal sensors + edge AI: Satellites only transmit when anomalies are detected (e.g., heat spikes in forests).
Use geostationary satellites for lower-resolution monitoring (e.g., GOES), which can detect large fires quickly.

Realistic?   Not currently feasible

[betterthanSNnBTC]

Just know when you see this creation in the next 1-3 years.
I was the mind that created the concept.
and you will see them in the news.

I predicted the highrise building washing drones.
So people do not have to go up 100's of floors to die.
1 year later they came out.

I wrote at Sam Altmans worldcoin idea in 2014-2015 on this forums
In 2017 he said he came up with the concept.
However Iris change and not all have them and heartbeats everyone has, someone will create the concept I talk about in my other post, because they do see it as valid.

Your AI is not programmed off the real data, it is using a old data base of a false altered reality.

Just because YOU and your AI are unaware and are coded on a old database of lies does not mean that they do not have live feed sats. It is a camera in space you goober.

[Vod]

Just because YOU and your AI are unaware and are coded on a old database of lies does not mean that they do not have live feed sats. It is a camera in space you goober.

Yes, there are cameras in space, but you cannot find a live feed of anything that can detect movement, much less fire.  My calculations are not based off a false reality -  ten multiplied by ten is still one hundred, and should be in your AI as well.   Put up your live feed link and prove me wrong. 

There are satellites that detect ICBM launches, but they are aimed and those plume temperatures are magnitudes higher than a fire.   By the time a geosynchronous satellite could detect a wildfire (500 meters to 1 km per pixel) it would be out of control to drones. 

So we can't do your idea now unless the new gen LEO satellites add fire detection, but they tend to point to populated areas.   How many years until you predict this end to wildfires and how much $ will it cost?

[betterthanSNnBTC]

Just because YOU and your AI are unaware and are coded on a old database of lies does not mean that they do not have live feed sats. It is a camera in space you goober.

Yes, there are cameras in space, but you cannot find a live feed of anything that can detect movement, much less fire.  My calculations are not based off a false reality -  ten multiplied by ten is still one hundred, and should be in your AI as well.   Put up your live feed link and prove me wrong.  

There are satellites that detect ICBM launches, but they are aimed and those plume temperatures are magnitudes higher than a fire.   By the time a geosynchronous satellite could detect a wildfire (500 meters to 1 km per pixel) it would be out of control to drones.  

So we can't do your idea now unless the new gen LEO satellites add fire detection, but they tend to point to populated areas.   How many years until you predict this end to wildfires and how much $ will it cost?

Fiat cost are irrelevanto  1 nothing = 1 nothing, 1 trillion nothings = 1 nothing
Understand 1 bitcoin can be worth 123987128371 nothings it is still worth nothing.
Some smart gov will subsidize it.
As for the resource cost of metals and computer chips and solar panels, under 2 million in real resources to do the park you mention and under 50k upkeep cost per year.
What is the fiat cost of 1 human life saved, unlimited.

I predict 1-3 years. Someone smart has read this post and is already working on it. They understand it can be done easily. Also I spread the concept to about 500k youth online already. Every single one of them call it quite a brilliant idea. Some saying they will try to create it.

Within 1 year of my concept of high rise window washing drones, someone created it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0l6AAk7Ho4

Within 2 years, Sam Altman created my world coin concept.
However heartbeats are a better metric, everyone has a heartbeat not eyes and iris change.
I made a poll on this forum in 2015 would you be willing to give up your iris for a fairly distributed coin. Most people voted no, yet he had line ups of people WILLINGLY signing up for his coin and made 21 in VC money from it.

To be honest these are not my ideas, I do not think to think, the creator inputs me. It works through me. I given it full permission over my meat vehicle.
I did not learn to make my heartbeat nor breath, I just did it, I am the creators NPC.

I push humanity to a better future, do not believe in copyright or patents, they only hold us back, open source the world.

"I am the smartest man alive, for I know nothing" -Socrates