Microstrategy/Michael Saylor has NEVER bought a single Bitcoin/Satoshi, i have p

[lagillas]

hello, Im a retired bitcoin analyst, and let me tell you such an obvious fact we on the team already know, but were just so lazy to tell yall, we analyze when large amounts of bitcoins move, even when people use various addresses to do so, for example.
let says somebody buys/sells/moves 100 bitcoin with the chainanalysis tools, we can certainly know who or what that person moves and when, and what addresses does the bitcoin belongs to, since im retired from it, i was trying to get the Microstrategy bitcoin addresses out of fun, since michael saylor was never a target in my job, we never actually even tried to find his holdings, but because im now free, i was just trying to time up, all of his boughts and sells and what are the results?: NOTHING NOT A CLUE, not even the AMOUNTS he says the enterpise is buying EXIST, in the whole blockchain.
im 100% certain, microstrategy HAS NEVER BOUGHT any bitcoin, and not because i prove it myself, but because even if it wasnt me, somebody or someone in my team or anywhere that dedicates their lives to what i do, will have already leak, all the microstrategy bitcoin addresses if he actually bought the bitcoin he says he buys.
this is a sad reality.

[TryNinja]

Funny story, mate. But Strategy's addresses (Saylor's company) are very known and already tracked onchain.

https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/microstrategy

Maybe you should remain retired?

[slaman29]

Man I was just about to settle in and see what was gonna be the explanation.

I thought maybe the addresses could be proven to be just cycling BTC thru from an exchange.

Leaked agreement that they would just transfer but have no custody,

Then OP just comes out and forgets to google.

Booring

[BitGoba]

Strategy is a publicly traded company listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange. This means it must operate under extremely strict laws and regulations overseen by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). All financial transactions, including Bitcoin purchases, are publicly reported and regularly audited. Falsifying such information would be a serious violation of the law and would immediately trigger an investigation and penalties. Therefore, the claim that they “didn’t actually buy Bitcoin” makes no sense  Lying about that would be a serious crime. So no, it’s not fake this is one of the most transparent Bitcoin-holding companies in the world.You probably don’t understand how this works.

[henry_of_skalitz]

Man I was just about to settle in and see what was gonna be the explanation.

I thought maybe the addresses could be proven to be just cycling BTC thru from an exchange.

Leaked agreement that they would just transfer but have no custody,

Then OP just comes out and forgets to google.

Booring

The bane of any bait post - check the Google or any LLM on the matter

[Moreno233]

The OP have done a terrible background checks before coming online to post this misleading information. Who does not know that Microstrategy have been accumulating Bitcoin for a long time now? Maybe it is only the OP and his co-travelers, who might be too busy and could not use simple Google search to verify is Michael Saylor indeed bought Bitcoin or not. What you have as proof is baseless and if you want to be taken seriously, provide real data to counter all that have been supplied to show they they actually Bitcoin.

[Satofan44]

This thread was necro revived by this AI spam post.

The bane of any bait post - check the Google or any LLM on the matter

You fell for this though. Check the dates of the threads and recent posts. OP has not even been active since October 16. Nevertheless he deserves negative feedback for the lies that he was spreading.

The OP have done a terrible background checks before coming online to post this misleading information. Who does not know that Microstrategy have been accumulating Bitcoin for a long time now? Maybe it is only the OP and his co-travelers, who might be too busy and could not use simple Google search to verify is Michael Saylor indeed bought Bitcoin or not. What you have as proof is baseless and if you want to be taken seriously, provide real data to counter all that have been supplied to show they they actually Bitcoin.

You have done terrible background checks on the user, the thread and the posts. You also fell for the revival of this thread by a random AI bot.
OP you are stupid and you can fuck off with your lies, and anyone else who spreads similar stuff. When lies are extreme, one should not invest time and resources in order to write a proper explanation to debunk them. The bad actors and stupid people have much more free time to waste than anyone with a working brain. It is a net negative to spend time writing a proper response to them, especially after someone has already done it.

[Majestic-milf]

 After his dream didn't materialize, he had to go AWOL for awhile and then had to return with this banger! Surprised that these sorts of users would do anything to get attention to their posts. And correct me if I'm wrong but this so-called retired Bitcoin analyst who seems to know the goings-on in Microstrategy couldn't as much as provide us with at least something to believe his very funny claim because even he knows they are just that: funny claims.
 He hasn't even come to "open" our eyes more on what we are so blind about as regards Michael Saylor.

[hd49728]

im 100% certain, microstrategy HAS NEVER BOUGHT any bitcoin

There is a tracker based on on-chain data from Arkham Intelligence shared above, and there are other websites that track Strategy's Bitcoin portfolio with links to Strategy annoucements on X and also their report documents sent to SEC.

You can get it in the Purchase history box.
https://saylortracker.com/

For example, the 359-bitcoin purchase on 11/3/2025 has a link to this document.
https://assets.contentstack.io/v3/assets/bltf8d808d9b8cebd37/bltafec8168d365fffa/690838c1531ab0abd528156b/form-8-k_11-03-2025.pdf

Do you think SEC accept it if Strategy does not give them information about addresses stored those bitcoins for SEC verification?
It's not written in the report for privacy but surely SEC knows Strategy's Bitcoin addresses as it's their job to assess and verify reports from companies like Strategy.

[henry_of_skalitz]

This thread was necro revived by this AI spam post.

The bane of any bait post - check the Google or any LLM on the matter

You fell for this though. Check the dates of the threads and recent posts. OP has not even been active since October 16. Nevertheless he deserves negative feedback for the lies that he was spreading.

Yep, my mistake, truly. Sometimes, the dates mix up when you go around the threads and forums, or you just don't put so many attention to them, but to the discussion itself..

Thanks for pointing it out.

[odolvlobo]

hello, Im a retired bitcoin analyst, ...

Lost me already

[Josefjix]

I'm just getting confused by your statement but what is your proof of your claims, I wouldn't believe you if no exhibit can be provided, how can we believe you are a retired Bitcoin analyst.

hello, Im a retired bitcoin analyst, ...

Lost me already

It's funny, can't believe him

[coolcoinz]

hello, Im a retired bitcoin analyst,

I didn't know there were retired bitcoin analysts already. What happened? Weren't you successful enough in your work, or did you just grow old after a couple years on the job?
Is there a retirement fund for bitcoin analysts?

and let me tell you such an obvious fact we on the team already know,

Is that a team of retired analysts?

let says somebody buys/sells/moves 100 bitcoin with the chainanalysis tools, we can certainly know who or what that person moves and when, and what addresses does the bitcoin belongs to

Really? I'll show you my address and you tell me who I am.

[Nathrixxx]

im 100% certain, microstrategy HAS NEVER BOUGHT any bitcoin, and not because i prove it myself, but because even if it wasnt me, somebody or someone in my team or anywhere that dedicates their lives to what i do, will have already leak, all the microstrategy bitcoin addresses if he actually bought the bitcoin he says he buys.
this is a sad reality.

Is this a reality or misinformation? However, who even cares after all, but the certainty to how they ha e been investing has been proven, but you couldn't stand a chance to show a little evidence to your claim, not even you or your team were able to find any proof, so this as far as am concerned is invalid accusations, Saylor and Microstrategy have gone far the way you think of, maybe you need to upgrade on your research level by waking up from your dream into reality.

[SatoPrincess]

hello, Im a retired bitcoin analyst, ...

Lost me already

More likely sacked than retired lol. Who titles a topic that I have proof and then proceeds to show us nothing. Aren’t analysts obsessed with data and research? If OP was this bad at his job it’s no surprised that he is retired. 

[cr1776]

hello, Im a retired bitcoin analyst...

Who needs a "bitcoin analyst"?  And I am sure they can try and track everything but it seems unlikely to be accurate.

[slaman29]

<>
Then OP just comes out and forgets to google.

Booring

The bane of any bait post - check the Google or any LLM on the matter

Well yes, more Google, but even then have to check and verify. But LLM I'm not so sure. Even the very very very latest Chatgpt I used couldn't name Barcelona full squad even after I told it to check Transfermarkt first, I mean one or two players sure but it was still telling me Messi could score the most in this Champions League

[pooya87]

hello, Im a retired bitcoin analyst, ...

Lost me already

More likely sacked than retired lol. Who titles a topic that I have proof and then proceeds to show us nothing. Aren’t analysts obsessed with data and research? If OP was this bad at his job it’s no surprised that he is retired. 

It depends on what "analyst" actually means. I've seem so many newbies on social media who create some sort of channel and get some followers then start posting random guesses about the market movement and call that analysis. They always lose a lot of money and abandon aka retire after a while

[Taskford]

hello, Im a retired bitcoin analyst, ...

Lost me already

More likely sacked than retired lol. Who titles a topic that I have proof and then proceeds to show us nothing. Aren’t analysts obsessed with data and research? If OP was this bad at his job it’s no surprised that he is retired. 

It depends on what "analyst" actually means. I've seem so many newbies on social media who create some sort of channel and get some followers then start posting random guesses about the market movement and call that analysis. They always lose a lot of money and abandon aka retire after a while

Most of them are self proclaim. But the real thing is they don't have any credibility for posting those speculation and everything they have said are pure guess. The same as what OP posted while its clear fact that MicroStrategy's portfolio has been tracked but he keep saying that they didn't actually accumulate which is crazy assumption. Maybe at least he came back and explain his side on why he said such thing and maybe people would find something interesting on the information he shared.

Aside from those site shared OP should go to their site to track their purchases https://www.strategy.com/purchases

Well I guess its better for him to stay retired since looks like he fail on his assumptions on MicroStrategy.

[hd49728]

Most of them are self proclaim. But the real thing is they don't have any credibility for posting those speculation and everything they have said are pure guess. The same as what OP posted while its clear fact that MicroStrategy's portfolio has been tracked but he keep saying that they didn't actually accumulate which is crazy assumption. Maybe at least he came back and explain his side on why he said such thing and maybe people would find something interesting on the information he shared.

Aside from those site shared OP should go to their site to track their purchases https://www.strategy.com/purchases

Well I guess its better for him to stay retired since looks like he fail on his assumptions on MicroStrategy.

Even professional on-chain analytic companies like Arkham can make inaccuracy in their analysis and the tracker on Strategy's portfolio. They can be right mostly but there is chance that they miss something, even not too big, but it still contributes to inaccuracy.

Strategy did not announce their Bitcoin addresses but they announced and had reports on how many bitcoins they bought each time. It's important information for on-chain companies to do their works and find possible Bitcoin addresses that very likely belong to Strategy. I believe they made good analysis but as said, if they missed some tiny things, it's not strange at all.

It's about professional companies like Arkham, but with individual people who self-claim as professional, it's hard to believe their works are good in quality and have enough accuracy.