[Finding] The Same Wallet Was Used by Two Different Accounts

[lovesmayfamilis]

Now is the right time to tag his accounts

I disagree that a single address match warrants a negative tag. I think the situation was different from how many perceive it.

Look, coaltin applied to participate in a company's signature on May 12, 2025, and Cryptomultiplier followed suit three minutes later. After the manager confirmed who was accepted, Cryptomultiplier deleted his application.

I had to delete my older applications for several campaigns,

https://ninjastic.space/search?title=CCE%20CASH%20No%20Account%20Cross-chain%20Crypto%20Exchange%20Signature%20Campaign

But on the same day, May 12, four minutes later, coaltin applied to participate in a company with no open slots, likely due to his own carelessness; he simply copied the information from Cryptomultiplier's application.

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=5516469.msg65371965#msg65371965

He does the same thing in another company. Namely, submitting an application where there are no places.
https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=5534550.msg65372774#msg65372774

The error in entering the address is obvious.

Question:  Why would Cryptomultiplier apply where there are no available spots? For someone who hasn't been on the forum for a while, namely coaltin, this is understandable, but not for someone who regularly attends. I don't think Cryptomultiplier is unaware of this. Such an incident could happen to anyone.

Therefore, I don't think a negative tag is appropriate here.

If not, then it is almost definitely a slip up. It is very unlikely that someone got this address from them privately and then proceeded to troll or hurt them in this convoluted way. Occam's Razor.    

I think you'll be interested to learn how true your words might one day be. But I'm glad that happens rarely. You can read the thread to gain a better understanding.

After investigation, and with help from the rest of the mod team, I've determined that inbizin = bitkoinguru$$$. He created that blog post (registering the domain in June) and then made that post in Meta in order to frame you. The moderator who actually did the banning was not a Russian moderator, but was acting upon what seemed to be a clear case of plagiarism. The thought of this type of attack had occurred to me before, but this is the first time that it's actually been done successfully. I'll have to think about countermeasures.

You're unbanned. Sorry about that.

[albon]

I'd need more specific evidence than just the single address re-use to leave a tag. That's just me personally speaking.

So more like coaltin was using Cryptomultiplier's address and not vice versa. For what reason I have no idea.

Again I think this should only be supplementary evidence presented in conjuncture with something else, but that's the thing, there really isn't anything else that ties these two accounts together. At least not that's been found so far.

I disagree that a single address match warrants a negative tag. I think the situation was different from how many perceive it.

After reviewing your comments everyone, I think I will investigate the matter again.

For now, I will temporarily remove the negative feedback to make sure I haven’t wronged him, although I still have my doubts, but I cannot ignore your input, as I appreciate your remarks and objections.

This makes me reconsider the situation and look at it from different perspectives, and I hope that I am wrong in the end.

My tagging was based on the fact that the matter was repeated before, but with Lorence.xD,, as I mentioned in post #3. so I will review the details again before making a final decision.

[Cryptomultiplier]

I'd need more specific evidence than just the single address re-use to leave a tag. That's just me personally speaking.

So more like coaltin was using Cryptomultiplier's address and not vice versa. For what reason I have no idea.

Again I think this should only be supplementary evidence presented in conjuncture with something else, but that's the thing, there really isn't anything else that ties these two accounts together. At least not that's been found so far.

I disagree that a single address match warrants a negative tag. I think the situation was different from how many perceive it.

After reviewing your comments everyone, I think I will investigate the matter again.

For now, I will temporarily remove the negative feedback to make sure I haven’t wronged him, although I still have my doubts, but I cannot ignore your input, as I appreciate your remarks and objections.

This makes me reconsider the situation and look at it from different perspectives, and I hope that I am wrong in the end.

My tagging was based on the fact that the matter was repeated before, but with Lorence.xD,, as I mentioned in post #3. so I will review the details again before making a final decision.

Like I said on my previous comment about Lorence xD, I haven't heard nor know about the existence of such an account on this forum until someone mentioned it here and Coaltin falls into same category.

I neither have or operate double accounts nor have or use more than one address for my account. I have always maintained my stand from the onset and would consider it a great injustice to be accused and punished with even a neutral tag, for someone else's mistake in this forum.

I'd need more specific evidence than just the single address re-use to leave a tag. That's just me personally speaking.

So more like coaltin was using Cryptomultiplier's address and not vice versa. For what reason I have no idea.

Again I think this should only be supplementary evidence presented in conjuncture with something else, but that's the thing, there really isn't anything else that ties these two accounts together. At least not that's been found so far.

I disagree that a single address match warrants a negative tag. I think the situation was different from how many perceive it.

After reviewing your comments everyone, I think I will investigate the matter again.

For now, I will temporarily remove the negative feedback to make sure I haven’t wronged him, although I still have my doubts, but I cannot ignore your input, as I appreciate your remarks and objections.

This makes me reconsider the situation and look at it from different perspectives, and I hope that I am wrong in the end.

My tagging was based on the fact that the matter was repeated before, but with Lorence.xD,, as I mentioned in post #3. so I will review the details again before making a final decision.

Like I said on my previous comment about Lorence xD, I haven't heard nor know about the existence of such an account on this forum until someone mentioned it here and Coaltin falls into same category.

I neither have or operate double accounts nor have or use more than one address for my account. I have always maintained my stand from the onset and would consider it a great injustice to be accused and punished with even a neutral tag, for someone else's mistake in this forum.

It is rather fortunate I had to delete my older applications for several campaigns, otherwise I would have presented same screenshot evidence that show that maybe in a bid to copy and edit my application on that fateful day, Coaltin forgot to input his address after editing the name.

With due respect @AakZaki, I do not have any connection with coaltin and Lorence. xD, so I don't agree with your tag on my account because I'm innocent of that accusation. If I'm  guilty here, I will rather not reply rather than make false excuses but I'm not guilty here.

Like I said above in my first comment, it's unfortunate that I deleted my old applications which I believe coaltin copied just after I also applied on that campaign, I was looking for how to get the post I deleted but thanks to lovesmayfamilis &TryNinja who has helped me find my deleted post.

I'm innocent of your neutral tag and I ask you review the accusations again and remove the tag. Thank you.

Thank you TryNinja and lovesmayfamilis for your help, I really appreciate.

[AakZaki]

I’ve found something else again. It started with the account topman21. He had previously colluded with LDL in the thread topman21 scam my 40$ help me but the issue was eventually resolved after a lot of drama.
It’s undeniable that someone active in both local board A and local board B could come from the same country. . A scammer is a scammer, no matter what.
The first example: The account being sold, as in the link above, shows that even cross-country account deals are possible.
The second example: Because there are too many alt accounts, they may be hiding their tracks and operating in different locales. We won't know. They will stop if they are caught. Here's what I found:

Code:

bc1qu9tl7ng322hduq0uytjjvhnqmv2erccxx9r9uk, 
bc1q58dvavj470736793g8dwalm8ejt3uku0vs9ye3

In the two pictures above there is nothing strange, the problem is not there but below:

Try TXHash below in Traking on Blockchain: Bitcoin Transaction

Code:

4a6f5ebd24f580607889d512a14c264bc1ad1332a6c8ca7fee1de8282afc672e

Please help verify whether the same wallet can be used in a single transaction. If you're not satisfied, you can check the other TXHash in that wallet.
It seems that JollyGood should know about this issue, since he was the one who gave the neutral tag. Or even anyone who disagrees with this kind of cheating can re-verify it.

[Little Mouse]

LDL and armanda90 case is quite unsual.
LDL is from Bangladesh and he still can write post in Bangla. armanda90 is from Indonesia and he still writes post in their local language. How can they both be alt?

[Mahiyammahi]

LDL and armanda90 case is quite unsual.
LDL is from Bangladesh and he still can write post in Bangla. armanda90 is from Indonesia and he still writes post in their local language. How can they both be alt?

Yeah that's concering for sure, cause armanda90 is still actively posting in his local board Indonesia. Although he could have impersonate as an Indonesian user if he posts very few , by using ChatGPT. AI translation is way better than regular translation. Or maybe they have any internal connection traded each other's Bitcoin. But this would also eliminate the fact they had used same wallet address in the forum.

Confusing and unusual to be sure.

[AakZaki]

LDL and armanda90 case is quite unsual.
LDL is from Bangladesh and he still can write post in Bangla. armanda90 is from Indonesia and he still writes post in their local language. How can they both be alt?

Regarding the language, can’t it be done with ChatGPT, Sir.
And regarding the wallet: this can also happen when someone creates an Electrum wallet, then creates many wallets in Electrum and uses them to register for campaigns.
When all the wallets in that Electrum send BTC to another wallet, all the wallets in Electrum will be visible in the TXHash, just like in this case.

[LDL]

bc1qgzrva028eym96uax90j28qj3aqhh3dy8gk6qvp


Check the address you connected to above carefully and you will see that it is Binance's official address. Check the addresses of all participants in the Rainbet Signature Campaign to see if Bitcoin transactions have been made from all addresses to the above address.

And all the bitcoins of all the wallets that are still pending are deposited in the said wallet (bc1qgzrva028eym96uax90j28qj3aqhh3dy8gk6qvp).

If you don't believe me, you can search the wallets below.

More than 100+ wallet connected to  bc1qgzrva028eym96uax90j28qj3aqhh3dy8gk6qvp

bc1q8hp48qp3rsn50uxvlfnv6ypswyhqv77pqp43mv
bc1q9gajm3vgc7k4zs6kamtk6lp75c4hya2hmlrk9d
bc1qj9rzytymsmh5seec33v4mdzm3trepltw8ggdje
bc1qpf82censd6vwewnfsgpn8gq6uqmldxu80defwz
bc1qmfwqys0wn7uz0dj7dgyj7y4x74jr3ltpq30e8f
bc1q3hjzr5kvdhdhccfxg8x53jv3l8vpmvcnvl7m4j
bc1qhgc56hf4ynpp9rmdxcv84aq9ma2l9kwpydk0rl
bc1qdezddun8ydmspy3f6qq69jryuudg4ceczmksdt
bc1qcehqtlxp2fvmzsf5qxjnc6kzxv2263ne84mnsj
bc1qepdf47wxd80z3a274dudg0xzv3dxkka6lhf4he
bc1q7u2s70q86tzc5p3yj5ys5585nrpwzdvzelm9y8

The above addresses are given as samples. Please check and justify them carefully.
N.B: All of the above participants are participants in the Rainbet Signature Campaign.

[Satofan44]

Yeah this does not look accurate, always check the recipient address. If it has a lot of volume and thousands of transactions it is very unlikely that it is used by 3rd world shitposters.

bc1qgzrva028eym96uax90j28qj3aqhh3dy8gk6qvp

Check the address you connected to above carefully and you will see that it is Binance's official address. Check the addresses of all participants in the Rainbet Signature Campaign to see if Bitcoin transactions have been made from all addresses to the above address.

And all the bitcoins of all the wallets that are still pending are deposited in the said wallet (bc1qgzrva028eym96uax90j28qj3aqhh3dy8gk6qvp).

This seems correct (regardless of whether it is Binance or not, I have not looked at that part).

Confirmed tx count  289234
Confirmed received 309173 outputs (27542.26382065 BTC)
Confirmed spent      309164 outputs (27542.24594736 BTC)
Confirmed unspent  9 outputs (0.01787329 BTC)

[Z_MBFM]

LDL and armanda90 case is quite unsual.
LDL is from Bangladesh and he still can write post in Bangla. armanda90 is from Indonesia and he still writes post in their local language. How can they both be alt?

Regarding the language, can’t it be done with ChatGPT, Sir.
And regarding the wallet: this can also happen when someone creates an Electrum wallet, then creates many wallets in Electrum and uses them to register for campaigns.
When all the wallets in that Electrum send BTC to another wallet, all the wallets in Electrum will be visible in the TXHash, just like in this case.

Semangat aja terus gan buat ikutin bounty sosmed,lumayan ko hasilnya bisa ditabung untuk ikut ICO nantinya...
Sambil2 nunggu tittle dinaikin.CMIIWW

armanda90 has been posting on Indonesian local boards since 2017. And her local posting started from the 3rd post after register her account and still now he/she posting on Indonesia location board. And he posted on about 794 Indonesian local boards.

বাংলাদেশ থেকে কিভাবে একটি অফলাইন ওয়ালেট ব্যবহার করতে পারব?

অনেকদিন ধরে একটি বিষয় শেয়ার করার জন্য চেষ্টা করছি, আমি ইতিমধ্যে ইংলিশ বোর্ডে একটি পোস্ট করেছিলাম যে একটি বিটকয়েন নিষিদ্ধ দেশে কিভাবে একটি হার্ডওয়্যার ওয়ালেট ব্যবহার করতে পারবে, কিভাবে পাব। কিন্তু সবাই বিভিন্ন উপদেশ মূলক পোস্ট করেছিল কিন্তু আমার পক্ষে তাদের উপদেশ মোতাবেক কাজ করা ঝুঁকি পূর্ণ বলে মনে হচ্ছে। আমার দেশে বিশেষ করে বিটকয়েন নিয়ে কথা বললে আইনি জটিল ঝামেলায় পড়তে হয়, তাই আমি এগুলা নিয়ে জনসম্মুখে কথা বলতেও পারি না। দিন দিন সেন্টালাইজড এক্সচেঞ্জ এর প্রতি মানুষের বিশ্বাসও আস্থা কমে যাচ্ছে, তারা (ক্রিপ্টোহোল্ডার) তাদেরকে ক্রিপ্টোকারেন্সি সেন্ট্রালাইজড এক্সচেঞ্জে মজুদ করতে চাইছে না‌ । অন্যান্য দেশে বিশেষ করে যে সকল দেশে ক্রিপ্টোকারেন্সির বৈধতা আছে তারা ইচ্ছামতো তাদের কর্মকাণ্ড চালিয়ে যেতে পারে। কিন্তু আমার দেশে ক্রিপ্টোকারেন্সির সরকারের নিষেধাজ্ঞা থাকায় বাংলাদেশিরা যত্রতত্র বিটকয়েন নিয়ে আলোচনা করতে পারেনা। আমাদের দেশে হার্ডওয়ার ওয়ালেট বাণিজ্যিকভাবে পাওয়া যায় না। এমতাবস্থায় আমি খুবই দুশ্চিন্তায় রয়েছি কেননা আমার তিন হাজার ডলার সমপরিমাণ বিটকয়েন বাইন্যান্স এক্সচেঞ্জ ও কুকয়েন এক্সচেঞ্জের  মধ্যে রয়েছে । ফোরামের অভিজ্ঞ ব্যক্তিরা আমাকে পরামর্শ দিয়েছেন যে আপনি অতি দ্রুত আপনার সকলকে ক্রিপ্টোকারেন্সি হার্ডওয়ার ওয়ালেটে ট্রান্সফার করে ফেলুন। কিন্তু দুঃখের বিষয় হলো আমি কিভাবে একটি হার্ডওয়্যার ওয়ালেট ম্যানেজ করতে পারবো? এজন্য আমার আজকের এই পোস্টটি লেখা, এখানে অনেক সিনিয়র পারসন আছেন যারা ক্রিপ্টোকারেন্সি মজুদ করে রেখেছেন, দীর্ঘমেয়াদী মজুদের জন্য সিদ্ধান্ত গ্রহণ করেছেন।

আমার জানতে চাওয়া হল, আপনারা কোথায় আপনাদের ক্রিপ্টোকারেন্সী মজুদ করে রেখেছেন?

হার্ডওয়ার ওয়ালেট ছাড়াও কি অন্য কোন উপায় আছে যেখানে আমি আমার সকল কিপ্টোকারেন্সি মজুদ করে রাখতে পারব?

LDL is a Bangladeshi account and he has posted about 375 posts entirely in the Bangla regional language, so I don't think these two accounts can be Alt.

ChatGPT was officially launched by OpenAI on November 30, 2022.

chatgpt was launched in late 2022. No other translator can translate a local language into a pure regional language. If someone were to post using such a translator, then among all these posts, a local member would definitely catch that.

[AakZaki]

bc1qgzrva028eym96uax90j28qj3aqhh3dy8gk6qvp

(,,,,)

The problem is not with the Binance wallet, I already understand that.
The problem is why this wallet belonging to armanda90 (bc1qu9tl7ng322hduq0uytjjvhnqmv2erccxx9r9uk) and this one belonging to LDL (bc1q58dvavj470736793g8dwalm8ejt3uku0vs9ye3) are always in the group of senders to that Binance wallet. Is it just a coincidence? It seems impossible.

TXhash 1: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/4a6f5ebd24f580607889d512a14c264bc1ad1332a6c8ca7fee1de8282afc672e
TXhash 2: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/962db10afc9c992c7eee63e78f4852e4c2cfe7b056b65e8cc6440724041a0e1b
TXhash 3: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/9691a68bf8a16df4e260404471355ab1ade9a179e627460d745537bd9f6f6017
TXhash 4: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/e891114b07ac805bb48d21e8d9c3f2fdd4feb6d824d6393dc87f705e89f4eb36
TXhash 5: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/5c4949394601c1fa351c991b7c586e903f020e844d4309af724e66297eda480f
TXhash 6: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/e4f4c197df2d76e8b9cc432631df477ec78a0978fc8953caa37fb9f2689d078c

The data on the blockchain never lies. If your wallet and armanda90 wallet are not in the same Electrum application, then when you send BTC to the Binance wallet, It should be detected as a single sender.

[Satofan44]

The problem is not with the Binance wallet, I already understand that.
The problem is why this wallet belonging to armanda90 (bc1qu9tl7ng322hduq0uytjjvhnqmv2erccxx9r9uk) and this one belonging to LDL (bc1q58dvavj470736793g8dwalm8ejt3uku0vs9ye3) are always in the group of senders to that Binance wallet. Is it just a coincidence? It seems impossible.

The data on the blockchain never lies. If your wallet and armanda90 wallet are not in the same Electrum application, then when you send BTC to the Binance wallet, It should be detected as a single sender.

My idea is that these two addresses are Binance deposit addresses, and that bc1qgzrva028eym96uax90j28qj3aqhh3dy8gk6qvp is the address that Binance consolidates some of the deposits to (in which case it makes sense that they sometimes spend at the same time depending on the timing of receiving funds and how Binance consolidates UTXOs). I could be wrong, no certainty on this from me either way.

I don't think bc1qgzrva028eym96uax90j28qj3aqhh3dy8gk6qvp is anyone's deposit address based on the transaction count and volume (at least not from a campaign participant here). That was my point and you missed it entirely.

Confirmed tx count  289234
Confirmed received 309173 outputs (27542.26382065 BTC)
Confirmed spent      309164 outputs (27542.24594736 BTC)
Confirmed unspent  9 outputs (0.01787329 BTC)

[Shishir99]

bc1qgzrva028eym96uax90j28qj3aqhh3dy8gk6qvp


Check the address you connected to above carefully and you will see that it is Binance's official address. Check the addresses of all participants in the Rainbet Signature Campaign to see if Bitcoin transactions have been made from all addresses to the above address.

And all the bitcoins of all the wallets that are still pending are deposited in the said wallet (bc1qgzrva028eym96uax90j28qj3aqhh3dy8gk6qvp).

If you don't believe me, you can search the wallets below.

More than 100+ wallet connected to  bc1qgzrva028eym96uax90j28qj3aqhh3dy8gk6qvp

Yep. I also confirm the address belongs to Binance. That is not what AakZaki pointed out.
The address bc1qgzrva028eym96uax90j28qj3aqhh3dy8gk6qvp is a receiver address associated with Binance.

But we are talking about sender addresses, which are

Code:

bc1qu9tl7ng322hduq0uytjjvhnqmv2erccxx9r9uk,
bc1q58dvavj470736793g8dwalm8ejt3uku0vs9ye3

How can both addresses be in the same transaction as inputs if it does not belong to the same seed phrases? It is only possible when you send all funds from the wallet, consolidate all your address inputs, and then send the funds to a receiver's address.

In this case, we can see that the transaction has 7 inputs from 6 different addresses, and all those inputs belong to the same wallet owner.

My idea is that these two addresses are Binance deposit addresses

Binance is not a tiny exchange. What are the odds that they do not consolidate more than 10 inputs in the same transaction, and most of the time these two specific wallets appear in the same transaction?

[Satofan44]

How can both addresses be in the same transaction as inputs if it does not belong to the same seed phrases? It is only possible when you send all funds from the wallet, consolidate all your address inputs, and then send the funds to a receiver's address.

Read my post, unless you think that this signature participant is extremely rich this theory does not make sense.

The address bc1qgzrva028eym96uax90j28qj3aqhh3dy8gk6qvp is a receiver address associated with Binance.

This is not a deposit address, it has received over 27 thousand Bitcoin.

In this case, we can see that the transaction has 7 inputs from 6 different addresses, and all those inputs belong to the same wallet owner.

Which is Binance.
Stop spamming shit both of you and go back to the basics, learn how UTXO consolidation works. If it was much less Bitcoin I could consider other theories such as the involvement of someone who provides "exchange services" in private but not at this amount.

[Shishir99]

Read my post, unless you think that this signature participant is extremely rich this theory does not make sense.

This signature participant owns more than 10 accounts in this forum and probably earns a good amount of money. But I am not saying he owns that receiver wallet. That wallet surely belongs to Binance Exchange.

In this case, we can see that the transaction has 7 inputs from 6 different addresses, and all those inputs belong to the same wallet owner.

Which is Binance.
Stop spamming shit both of you and go back to the basics, learn how UTXO consolidation works.

What about going back to where you belong? Be a regular forum member instead of insulting people over trivial matters. I always notice that you are being jerky with each forum member. Just don't cross my path next time, or I will be a Jerk as well. I understand that you are not mentally stable and a frustrated kid who grew up in a slum fighting others, but that's not how the entire world works. Asshole.

[Satofan44]

Read my post, unless you think that this signature participant is extremely rich this theory does not make sense.

This signature participant owns more than 10 accounts in this forum and probably earns a good amount of money. But I am not saying he owns that receiver wallet. That wallet surely belongs to Binance Exchange.

Enough of this Dunning Kruger bullshit. If you want to become an experienced hunter as some here are, you need to listen to feedback and learn how Bitcoin works. I don't have any experience hunting, but I am well versed with the latter. Much more than 99.9% of the users of this forum. If I am telling you to reconsider and that you are likely wrong, then use your brain to ask questions instead of repeating the same shit over and over again.

Here is some GPT magic.

Code:

           +---------------------------+                                       +---------------------------+
           | Campaign / Source          |                                       | Campaign / Source          |
           +---------------------------+                                       +---------------------------+
                       |                                                                       |
           (External deposit from user 1)                                         (External deposit from user 2)
                       |                                                                       |
                       v                                                                       v
+----------------------+---------------+                                       +---------------+------------------+
| Binance Deposit Address (User 1)   |                                       | Binance Deposit Address (User 2)   |
| (User 1's UTXOs)                   |                                       | (User 2's UTXOs)                   |
|------------------------------------|                                       |------------------------------------|
| bc1qu9tl7ng322hduq0uytjjvhnqmv2erccxx9r9uk |                              | bc1q58dvavj470736793g8dwalm8ejt3uku0vs9ye3 |
+------------------------------------+                                       +------------------------------------+
        |                                                                                         |
        +--------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
                                                     |
                                    (BINANCE SPENDING — internal sweep)
                                                     v
                            +----------------------------------------------------+
                            |       Binance Consolidation Address                |
                            |  bc1qgzrva028eym96uax90j28qj3aqhh3dy8gk6qvp        |
                            +----------------------------------------------------+

What is not clear?

[noorman0]

-snip-
How can both addresses be in the same transaction as inputs if it does not belong to the same seed phrases?

@Satofan44 is correct about his theory. Binance and other centralized exchanges will regularly consolidate all or some user deposits into hot wallets, depending on how they configure their consolidation triggers. The primary function of an exchange's hot wallet is to "pull" users' coins directly from their respective deposit addresses. It's not always because they have the same key or seed, but rather, Binance has all the keys generated from users' deposit addresses, and their system somehow creates bulk transactions that can be collectively signed and broadcasted.

Because in a single payment schedule, those two addresses are highly likely to be consolidated at the same time.

[Xiaomie A1]

LDL and armanda90 case is quite unsual.
LDL is from Bangladesh and he still can write post in Bangla. armanda90 is from Indonesia and he still writes post in their local language. How can they both be alt?

A very good question, but I've long suspected that LDL is an Indonesian who may be deliberately pretending to be a citizen of another country. I saw this when he wrote a statement about the sad news that befell an Indonesian member, although he later deleted the statement to eliminate any trace of his Indonesian citizenship. And perhaps this could provide additional evidence to support AakZaki's statement.



Source: https://ninjastic.space/post/61150817

[JollyGood]

The LDL account deleted the post, it does not exist and the thread commemorating the member that sadly passed away is now locked.

I checked the image link in the updated post captured in Ninjastic. The image was never deleted, it is still there and if everything is correct it was posted by the LDL account. Why would he post in the Indonesia local board and then delete the post and image?

Source: https://ninjastic.space/post/61150817

[AakZaki]

The LDL account deleted the post, it does not exist and the thread commemorating the member that sadly passed away is now locked.

I checked the image link in the updated post captured in Ninjastic. The image was never deleted, it is still there and if everything is correct it was posted by the LDL account. Why would he post in the Indonesia local board and then delete the post and image?

I know Pandukelana2712, sir. he is a well known figure in the Indonesian local board.
As for LDL, I don’t know him personally, but after doing an in depth search, my suspicion turned out to be correct.
Based on data from the Indonesian Local Board in 2023. He truly is a liar, and he even convinced Little Mouse Campaign Manager that he was from Bangla.

He is ranked number 318.

Nama-nama pengguna yang aktif di Lokal Board Tahun 2022

Code:

1. Husna QA [949]
2. DroomieChikito [816]
3. abhiseshakana [544]
4. masulum [505]
5. Luzin [470]
6. mamesso [442]
7. blue Snow [396]
8. erep [303]
9. Antonas1 [245]
10. Razmirraz [244]
11. mu_enrico [238]
12. Davian144 [225]
13. skarais [218]
14. MAAManda [198]
15. Bobrox [194]
16. kawetsriyanto [179]
17. Oneandpure [168]
18. nurilham [162]
19. lalabotax [141]
20. Tumanggor [138]
21. bestcoins1 [137]
22. Uang_kartal [121]
23. taufik123 [118]
24. Republikcoin.com [112]
25. Ahli38 [102]
26. Sarah Azhari [97]
27. roycilik [91]
28. SEEEP ZEEBOLOGI [84]
29. ShowOff [81]
30. arimamib [78]
31. zaim7413 [75]
32. Falconer [74]
33. MonaLeeTracy [74]
34. TelolettOm [73]
35. joniboini [68]
36. Bitinity [60]
37. JeWay [60]
38. indah rezqi [56]
39. BITCOIN4X [55]
40. bitjoin [53]
41. vv181 [53]
42. dewo_sat [52]
43. ryzaadit [51]
44. Renampun [50]
45. dark1234 [50]
46. panjul07 [49]
47. AakZaki [47]
48. Anasberna [47]
49. Chikito [47]
50. len01 [47]
51. DU18 [46]
52. oHnK [46]
53. Groundbit [45]
54. abia [45]
55. ETFbitcoin [44]
56. aylabadia05 [43]
57. bhooscream [43]
58. reagansimms [40]
59. Silver80 [35]
60. Luqman [33]
61. retreat [32]
62. sugehprasetyo [31]
63. Mr.sprin [29]
64. Pink NordFX [29]
65. LodisMcguire [28]
66. elda34b [28]
67. 8rch7 [27]
68. rmhuntley [27]
69. Roman_Picisan [26]
70. Rengga Jati [25]
71. Yudha2015 [25]
72. jcojci [25]
73. Lubcub62 [24]
74. teslag [24]
75. ancafe [23]
76. mumang siat [23]
77. Sirait [22]
78. nigthcrowd [22]
79. redwine49 [21]
80. Luffygroove [20]
81. jidut [20]
82. kamvreto [20]
83. 99Percent [19]
84. Bagong91 [19]
85. Doell [19]
86. Gaza13 [18]
87. Ninsalsa0.org [18]
88. bayu7adi [18]
89. zbutterfly [18]
90. Aldikenerry1 [17]
91. CageMabok [17]
92. dansus021 [17]
93. Ludmilla_rose1995 [16]
94. Ryu_Ar1 [16]
95. lombok [16]
96. Coin BTC [15]
97. Mukmin [15]
98. bigjuk [15]
99. BitLoader [14]
100. Daniel347 [14]
101. amihada [14]
102. cvasy [14]
103. Fakhrulenclix [13]
104. Liberalisasi [13]
105. Yabes [13]
106. aabbawon [13]
107. ayi nora [13]
108. bahagia93 [13]
109. bubidan.id [13]
110. ninis45 [13]
111. youngcoolzeero [13]
112. Ra1zeN [12]
113. agan husaeni [12]
114. m_nief [12]
115. Fawwaz wildan [11]
116. LastKiss [11]
117. celot [11]
118. noorman0 [11]
119. Blowon [10]
120. Dewi89 [10]
121. Princeofpoetry [10]
122. beezee [10]
123. cintaku008 [10]
124. marissa23 [10]
125. panjay [10]
126. rina aulia [10]
127. Ezravdb [9]
128. LeafMandiri [9]
129. Yasien Sayidiman [9]
130. fathafraink [9]
131. Dread Pirate Roberts [8]
132. Joyawan13 [8]
133. alfanjhon [8]
134. bitcoinnews_id [8]
135. crussaders1411 [8]
136. d_fitrie [8]
137. -Khairani- [7]
138. reza7777 [7]
139. AccountsLegend [6]
140. BK8.Official [6]
141. Lenzafritzy94 [6]
142. Note3 [6]
143. PRESDIR [6]
144. Rasa nanas [6]
145. TechnoX_X [6]
146. asking2 [6]
147. fara_buduk [6]
148. nankers [6]
149. suryana [6]
150. tgl277 [6]
151. 1001Night [5]
152. Andam76 [5]
153. Dayx [5]
154. Dinda mayasi [5]
155. Gontxi [5]
156. Jhonpro99 [5]
157. Kweek [5]
158. Ngemmeng [5]
159. RajaDen [5]
160. abikobong [5]
161. elgayul [5]
162. elshalih [5]
163. hotimbineh [5]
164. khiholangkang [5]
165. kids_ [5]
166. klidex [5]
167. kriptokar [5]
168. oemar bakrie [5]
169. Dhaniii [4]
170. Elvenland [4]
171. Forthe18 [4]
172. Lancelot07 [4]
173. Zoro senpai [4]
174. bounceback [4]
175. inanilujimi [4]
176. marcous [4]
177. my dream2021 [4]
178. oraisoh [4]
179. semloheh [4]
180. tperkara [4]
181. AnakJendral [3]
182. Deancooel1 [3]
183. ForMeritt [3]
184. Iballtrigan [3]
185. Jody.Drummer [3]
186. MR.SIR [3]
187. Nova Allexa [3]
188. Panglima Perang [3]
189. Payrain [3]
190. Pesona1 [3]
191. Radja Rimba [3]
192. Raselrana788 [3]
193. TahananKPK [3]
194. Uruhara [3]
195. Warkop [3]
196. Xiaomie A1 [3]
197. adammuiz [3]
198. budakhidung [3]
199. budi691 [3]
200. cloudfir3e [3]
201. falafy [3]
202. inikucing [3]
203. kakekbertopi [3]
204. lumbanrang [3]
205. max6575 [3]
206. muliyadi227 [3]
207. mzuhry19 [3]
208. naira [3]
209. patrickl99 [3]
210. riso2015 [3]
211. stevwinata [3]
212. sukmo [3]
213. tusandii [3]
214. wahyuagung26 [3]
215. zaki12 [3]
216. Aabcde [2]
217. AhmadM [2]
218. AirdropLand98 [2]
219. Atikah92 [2]
220. Bagus23 [2]
221. Bakai20 [2]
222. Bayu kurniawan [2]
223. Bitconia BIA [2]
224. CoinMraktCap [2]
225. Dervish doff [2]
226. Dilatamania [2]
227. FameDogeCoin [2]
228. Getwin [2]
229. HeadSh00t [2]
230. Innerpumper [2]
231. Jualanakun [2]
232. Kokokl0 [2]
233. Krystal_kim21 [2]
234. LogOut1000x [2]
235. LoyceV [2]
236. Luthfi20 [2]
237. MidnightWolf [2]
238. OctoAlts [2]
239. Onika84 [2]
240. Pakoha1 [2]
241. PedroSuketteki [2]
242. Rollezgarcia [2]
243. Shoki12 [2]
244. Tigerw [2]
245. Water-Bottle [2]
246. _IRMAN [2]
247. abah arie [2]
248. affandi [2]
249. aku_sultan20 [2]
250. anggada18 [2]
251. anpura519 [2]
252. armanda90 [2]
253. buwaan [2]
254. castol [2]
255. chewinggum [2]
256. d4pz99 [2]
257. entar pasar [2]
258. febriyana [2]
259. gojek.crypto [2]
260. imamusma [2]
261. insufficient_funds [2]
262. johnsaributua [2]
263. lvsca [2]
264. ndanghermawan12 [2]
265. poloneix [2]
266. rat03gopoh [2]
267. riswantocuy [2]
268. velikamagarca [2]
269. Ady Idris [1]
270. Alisha FR [1]
271. Aotuverse_Mandy [1]
272. Aptekary [1]
273. Armed95 [1]
274. Arnas [1]
275. AuthorCRYPTO [1]
276. BITDV [1]
277. Baliee [1]
278. Bernakurnia [1]
279. BitSwapNow [1]
280. BlackBaron [1]
281. Bondex69 [1]
282. CROBO [1]
283. CTFThold [1]
284. Capluek [1]
285. Carlos Smart [1]
286. Carollzinha [1]
287. Chel_v [1]
288. CoinCovM [1]
289. CoinMrktCap [1]
290. DarkStar_ [1]
291. Dilladupak [1]
292. Din116 [1]
293. Farul [1]
294. Fedrey [1]
295. FriedeFritz [1]
296. Gagal Mancung [1]
297. Gamer6969 [1]
298. GelesFinance [1]
299. Gianluca95 [1]
300. Giebaymax [1]
301. Globalinvestacapital [1]
302. Gnarvius [1]
303. Hagz [1]
304. HunterBTC [1]
305. I p u l [1]
306. Indah Jovanka [1]
307. Indonesia Newbie [1]
308. JAAYYY [1]
309. JAKIYA [1]
310. JOO0825 [1]
311. Jack_Dan [1]
312. Javi_Anibarro [1]
313. Justin Beiiberr [1]
314. Kkhair [1]
315. Klein126 [1]
316. Koconk [1]
317. Konyer [1]
318. LDL [1]
319. Legioner519 [1]
320. LouVandetta [1]
321. LuckyAL777 [1]
322. MAFCripto [1]
323. Manuela_Stef [1]
324. MichaelWozniak [1]
325. MrPratowo [1]
326. NewbieAkut [1]
327. NoorulHuda [1]
328. PARACETAMOL [1]
329. PanduGeddonrozak [1]
330. Pelana vreo [1]
331. Piotrzimmer [1]
332. RB000 [1]
333. RYX573 [1]
334. Rafael-Rafael [1]
335. Ringo Harbinger [1]
336. SKIN999 [1]
337. SawiPait [1]
338. Sectorcleaar [1]
339. Sen5555 [1]
340. Shaha98 [1]
341. StopPutin-StopWar [1]
342. SubZero555 [1]
343. Syahrul rojab [1]
344. Tamaperdana [1]
345. Tazzy4050 [1]
346. Techkoy407 [1]
347. Teletalk.org [1]
348. The Last Choice [1]
349. Tikrotse [1]
350. Time is gold [1]
351. Trinhbcoin [1]
352. Vioslimo [1]
353. WeMakeMoney [1]
354. Wisanggeni [1]
355. XXXHABIBANA [1]
356. Xal0lex [1]
357. Xampeuu [1]
358. Yanni Prelude [1]
359. ZkSyncNFT [1]
360. Zoftcuan [1]
361. ZyroArt [1]
362. abi1988 [1]
363. akeko [1]
364. algi32 [1]
365. alhyudien [1]
366. alkatiri [1]
367. ananjaafar [1]
368. andyjvv [1]
369. andywei007 [1]
370. ardydyon [1]
371. asvec [1]
372. awik p [1]
373. black19 [1]
374. bubblegum08 [1]
375. chigo [1]
376. chrisEvan2 [1]
377. christopherkanz [1]
378. chum_yum [1]
379. coeghacked [1]
380. csdewabandar [1]
381. cutesatan [1]
382. dbshck [1]
383. dwinrs [1]
384. ertgrlucn [1]
385. ewakona [1]
386. ezza3e [1]
387. ficihch [1]
388. fotocopyaxis [1]
389. fulled [1]
390. ginsan [1]
391. govaOG [1]
392. greckcustle [1]
393. hardjo [1]
394. harryhvn [1]
395. hockeychiku [1]
396. hodldulu23 [1]
397. igorstam [1]
398. ilhamaditya7 [1]
399. imam45 [1]
400. indo1 [1]
401. indraww [1]
402. iovio [1]
403. ixoffehu [1]
404. jonggol [1]
405. l84316719 [1]
406. landheer [1]
407. light_warrior [1]
408. littlesiliconvalley [1]
409. lizfhe [1]
410. lizgop [1]
411. maks-ivanov89 [1]
412. man5399 [1]
413. mandala22 [1]
414. marcellinuswiray [1]
415. mgaaron [1]
416. mirgo1791 [1]
417. muncuss [1]
418. nabile zep [1]
419. pakpahan [1]
420. pangeran05 [1]
421. qomariah95 [1]
422. reggiebsc [1]
423. rejho [1]
424. rizaldi [1]
425. rlawodnjs [1]
426. rustysee [1]
427. ryjdheas [1]
428. salad daging [1]
429. saltomanx1x [1]
430. samuraijin [1]
431. sembakotoken [1]
432. sicoco71 [1]
433. stabilastb [1]
434. strawberry_official [1]
435. sultanibnu [1]
436. susancllibra [1]
437. sutantiko [1]
438. taniasaja [1]
439. tazmantasik [1]
440. telo1 [1]
441. teukufrazi10 [1]
442. topman21 [1]
443. trophyapp [1]
444. trx201001 [1]
445. tusdtCoin [1]
446. walletrecovery [1]
447. wikibit.id [1]
448. xranilec [1]
449. yanadefis [1]
450. zltmdnltm12 [1]
451. zltmdnltm123 [1]

And the possibility regarding the wallet that consistently appears together with armanda90 wallet is also likely true. In fact there are six TXHash that I have sent above.
A simple logic example: when someone wants to withdraw assets from different places, it is usually done at the same time.
Something like that can’t be a coincidence six times.