Vou colocar uma outra visão pro knotz.
Após ver esse post do gmaxwell (antigo desenvolvedor do core), comentando que isso tudo aconteceu depois do Lukrdashjr perder suas moedas em um hack e estar desesperado atras de dinheiro.
E também ao fato de que existem possibilidades de um grupo centralizado comecar a censurar o que vai pra rede, fiquei com um pe atras.
Ele ate comenta que as ideas tem similaridades com as do craig...
Well I think it's more than that... Luke-jr-- already long since burned out on Bitcoin-- lost his coins due to being hacked and his only recovery plan was to start a mining pool company, so he was thrust back in against his own desires. He created it at the height of the first ordinals and BRC20 floods, when that trash traffic was being a particularity nuisance. Spam became a big part of their message and reason for existence. But as most predicted, fees eventually depleted that traffic and while it still exists it's not a big deal now, not something most bitcoin users were particularly concerned about anymore.
Luke-jr's fixation on meddling with other peoples transactions isn't new, and as a new involuntary no-coiner he has less incentive than ever to not just burn the house down if it doesn't go his way, and his ability to see reason or reasonable tradeoffs is no doubt more compromised than ever by the absolutely delusional believed that some bitcoin core developer stole his coins... when no such contrived theories are required to explain the expected outcome from consistent poor security practices that continue to this day.
And so the diminished public concern about the NFT traffic to him looked like an awareness problem, rather than just not currently being a big deal (the later of which I think is the correct read). And so they sat out to manufacture an issue (or in their view inform the public) with floods of paid advocacy, etc. And other people with their own grievances real or imagined have signed on along with others who just want to see bitcoin burn.
I think much like the first blocksize war this is doing bitcoin a great service of flushing out people who are unprincipled, easily influenced, or just sloppy in their thinking.
Instead, he proposes the implementation of a multisig quorum on Bitcoin that grants a designated group of people the ability to retroactively alter data that is hosted on the blockchain.
By Dashjr’s description, the trusted multisig committee would review transactions and replace any data it identifies as CSAM with a zero-knowledge proof. Node operators could then remove said data from their nodes – altering their version of the blockchain – while continuing to be able to prove that the transaction that contained the affected data is valid.
https://www.therage.co/leaked-luke-dashjr-bitcoin-hardfork/Enfim, colocando esse outro lado aqui.
