Low Wager, Low Risk, Low Reward

[Wapfika]

As for the above mentioned strategy that involves low wager, low risk , low Reward, I see it as a good gambling practice that helps in risk reduction and high profit generation as its primary objective is to regulate the gamblers gambling activities and make winning more possible even as its clear know game is 100 percent possible.

This make sense since a gambler should place bets using sportsbook for the sake of entertainment which means using a strategy with a minimum risk involved is the most appropriate attempt to have fun and at the same time minimize risk.

I doubt this strategy can generate profit in the long run because of its long shot approach that obviously will not work on gambling  with odds in favor to the casino as always.

This strategy will just make you enjoy longer betting without inflicting much losses.

[Natalim]

High win rate, sure, but I’m curious what the actual profit looks like. For example, he already bet on 24 games at 5 dollars per bet with that win rate - how much did he actually grow his bankroll?

And you’re right, it needs extreme discipline. The moment you lose control, the whole game plan collapses. It takes a lot of discipline, especially since the odds he’s picking are very low. You’d need at least 6 straight wins just to make a decent profit. You know how hard that kind of grind is. And one loss basically wipes out those 6 wins. For me, that’s not worth it.

[DPHOR]

That is the best way to gamble using small amount to stake on small odd without overly accumulating much odds and to stake with very small amount at the end you entirely lose the whole game..
The higher the games the higher the volatility, and also the easiest to lose your bet. As a gambler it is best advisable not to be using money that you can't afford to lose, and of course using very huge amount to bet with a small can actually work fine because the potential winning could boost above higher than when using smaller amount to stake, again the probability winning still remain unchanged as it is 50/50 chances.

[stompix]

One of my has started a new strategy of betting on really low odds games. He has the outlook of aiming for anywhere in the region of a 3% return.
He started 4 days ago and has an overall 96% win rate and 24 wins from 24 wins yesterday,so overall its working - so far.
He bets low odds, low returns with low wagers - $5 max on odds of no greater than 1.18 . . .so it takes a lot of time overall

This is weird from the return rate perspective
Assuming 96% winning rates at 1.1 odds, for 100 $1 bets you have won $9.6 and lost $4, that would be around $5, that would be a 5% return on a full bankroll, but since he has a rate of 96% it means at no point, even if he had lsot 4 consecutive games at the start he would have needed mroet han 5$ in the bank!

So, to what do we calculate the return since the above scheme could have been done with for $1 bet with $5 , $10 , $100 or 5 million in the bank and the results would have been the same>

[BABY SHOES]

Honestly, it's a good strategy but it takes time to get a big profit so you have to hoard profits for a long time especially with low odds, low bet amounts.

I have done this kind of strategy, but never satisfied with low odds as there is no adrenaline challenge while the bets we like odds above 1.50 and above are much better even though the risk is worth it.

Actually, our strategy has never been consistent, it's just that we are often tempted by high odds and want high winnings too.

[Cityhunter34]

Yes, I bet on low odd games with hope that the rate of its success is high, I do win many times while the losses come unexpectedly and it could come when you already staked with a huge amount out of the confidence you have on that game but the result will turn bad clearing a whole lot of your bankroll. So, what I can advise someone using this strategy is to stick with a proper bankroll management, don't stake with more than 40% of your bankroll.

Many gamblers normally get carried away by this low odd games thinking they can easily beat the casino. Normally they are more higher chance of getting winning with this low odd, but doesn't mean you would bet huge amount that you can not afford to lose because is a game that luck plays a significant role in determining the final outcome. Honestly, I don't like betting on this low odd games because I have lost several times with it and even though it always require a huge amount before you can get what you want that's why we don't need to go extra mile.

[armanda90]

Personally, this strategy very suitable for sport betting low wager, low risk, low odds and low reward or winning return earn when betting for teams have bigger chance for winning the match. I adopt this strategy when placing bet at sport betting match the top teams face the mediocre team has 70% winning ratio the favorite team win the match, but too small reward from low odds some time make us boring and have place multiple bet although with low odds.
But this strategy not stable yet for my self some time getting risk by placing bet with high odd, high risk and actually high reward return later if my bet is correctly, its depend personal of gambler want get high risk but get high return or get low odd but already for  low return if get win of bet placed.

[capokmerah]

This strategy is generally used. And it's true that as long as the win rate is high, the results do seem "safe."
But the problem isn't the theory, but the long-term reality. In my opinion, this strategy provides a false sense of security.
Winning streaks can be long, but a single loss can instantly wipe out many small profits accumulated.
That's why this strategy looks good at first, but over time it becomes increasingly risky due to psychological factors.

I personally don't like this strategy. It doesn't feel challenging enough, and even if I win, the rewards are too small.

[Die_empty]

Yes, I bet on low odd games with hope that the rate of its success is high, I do win many times while the losses come unexpectedly and it could come when you already staked with a huge amount out of the confidence you have on that game but the result will turn bad clearing a whole lot of your bankroll. So, what I can advise someone using this strategy is to stick with a proper bankroll management, don't stake with more than 40% of your bankroll.

For some time now, I have been doing the opposite. My target was high odds and it was an interesting experience. You might lose many games betting on high odds, but a single win will cover all you have lost. Betting on high odds has its disadvantages, and one of them is that winning in most cases depends on luck.

For those who choose low odds, the chances of winning are high, but the returns are not encouraging.  Everyone would choose the best pattern that suits them. I don't like small wins that's why I take the risks based on my financial capacity.

[viljy]

I once followed the same strategy as described by OP. I even won some money last year (well, how did I win - if you count the total for more than a month). In general, the main problem with this strategy is that it's all starting to get annoying. It's too tedious. I don't do that anymore. By the way, the risks are not less in principle. I lost several times in the process, and this greatly reduced the entire previous profit (I even hated Juventus haha). Although to be honest, by the end I was already betting more. In general, this strategy is neither good nor bad, but you need to have a special character and a lot of patience.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

I once followed the same strategy as described by OP. I even won some money last year (well, how did I win - if you count the total for more than a month). In general, the main problem with this strategy is that it's all starting to get annoying. It's too tedious. I don't do that anymore. By the way, the risks are not less in principle. I lost several times in the process, and this greatly reduced the entire previous profit (I even hated Juventus haha). Although to be honest, by the end I was already betting more. In general, this strategy is neither good nor bad, but you need to have a special character and a lot of patience.

I would say that the essential difference lies in volume. With low-risk bets and low returns, you need higher volume to make significant profits. The other side of the coin is variance. With this type of betting, variance tends to be lower, but if you hit a long streak of variance, not only will you get bored quickly, but you will also likely abandon the strategy soon because you cannot understand how you can be losing with such 'easy' bets.

[Charles-Tim]

I would say that the essential difference lies in volume. With low-risk bets and low returns, you need higher volume to make significant profits. The other side of the coin is variance. With this type of betting, variance tends to be lower, but if you hit a long streak of variance, not only will you get bored quickly, but you will also likely abandon the strategy soon because you cannot understand how you can be losing with such 'easy' bets.

I have tried this before, it was like a wolf in disguise. You can bet like 10 times and continue to win but just 1 or 2 losses will make the gambler completely lose.

It encourages the use of all the money won and the money the person begin gambling with to bet again and again, so the losses of all the money the person have on his account on the gambling site at ones is very high.

I will advise the OP to be very careful because this coult be a sign of addiction.

[mrust_mobile]

Low odds don’t really make much sense if you are gambling. You lose your initial wager no matter what the odds were so i think it makes more sense to take some risks instead of being a boring gambler.

I mean if you want safe returns, why even gamble?

Go buy an index fund or something. Their annual returns are averaging at 10% or something. I’d rather do that instead of betting on any game with a return below 5%.

I have even seen people making bets on 1% return games where their chances of winning is 95%+ . What the hell? Why even play this?

[Fortify]

One of my has started a new strategy of betting on really low odds games. He has the
outlook of aiming for anywhere in the region of a 3% return.


Is anyone else betting on low odd's games?

It would be interesting to hear if anyone has been doing this and are successful.

Maybe this strategy is safer, but the reality is that a book maker will always build in a margin of safety for any bet that they offer. For example if they have priced out a bet at 1.25x risk, they they will offer it to gamblers at 1.20x so can skim a little extra and account for all the times they've mispriced a bet. However they also have to work within a rough range that other bookmakers are offering, otherwise they would not attract enough business. I find low odds a bit boring really.

[Su-asa]

Negatives:
Low return
Balancing a loss takes time because of the low return
Maintaining discipline

I don't like talking about the positive dudes only, I mainly focus on the negative side of everything because if one mainly focus on the positive side of gamble or anything that is very risky and unluckily to the person he didn't get what he expected, the only thing he or she will get is regrets, of which is will be so sad because the person will be very emotional about his losses.
Winning is not guaranteed, at any moment the result of his bet might not be what he expects because there's no guarantee to win a bet. And you are very right on what you said earlier that his greatest enemy is greed, because if he eventually have the minded of winning very quick, the end result might not be friendly to him. So it's better for him to maintain his lower odd of 1.18.

Is anyone else betting on low odd's games?

It would be interesting to hear if anyone has been doing this and are successful.

Actually I bet on low odds most time but not everyday is Christmas because some day I lose while I win some days but my winning days while betting on a smaller odds are higher than the losses I have got.
Like we already know that greed is or greatest enemy when gambling, and that's the one of the advantage the house had over gamblers as they believes gamblers will be greedy to chase big wins and big odds so the constantly provides it. Only the lucky gamblers bet big odds and will. A strategic gamble focus on small odds with huge amount of money which they can afford bro risk.

[irhact]

One of my has started a new strategy of betting on really low odds games. He has the
outlook of aiming for anywhere in the region of a 3% return.

He started 4 days ago and has an overall 96% win rate and 24 wins from 24 wins yesterday,
so overall its working - so far.

He bets low odds, low returns with low wagers - $5 max on odds of no greater than 1.18 . . .
so it takes a lot of time overall.

a gambling strategy built entirely on low odds can look attractive in short term because the win rate is naturally high but the real test is how long can you maintain it or rather sustain it. A 96% success rate over a few days is not enough to prove sustainability, eventually, that on loss that slips through will wipe out several days' worth of slow gains. Discipline alone is not the challenge, the mathematical structure of the strategy is working against him actually.

[Odogwu-Blockchain]

He started 4 days ago and has an overall 96% win rate and 24 wins from 24 wins yesterday,
so overall its working - so far.

How many rounds your ally planned to reach before restating the journey again, he has gotten 24 wins since yesterday, how many rounds would be his target to start all over again, and also is he compounding the win with little odd?

I am asking this because, there is always a target for this challenge, and it's not proper to be keeping on moving till a bad day happen.

Is he ready to stop anytime soon, and start again? Or not target at all?

[Wiwo]

That is not a new strategy,  most newbies that have the warnings of high risk with high odds and know whaz it takes have chosen to selext those low odds, this comes with it advantages and disadvantages.

You pointed out the advantages, which is low risk ratios which make the winning rate higher than the loses.

Also you pointed out the rewards that is low income profits since the percentage ratios of the idds is relatively low means liw outcomes rewards, This make bettors to increase there betting amount so significantly that to make up with the outcome rewards,  let say the bet upto $10k to $100k sometimes running into millions in bet all with aim to get that massive outcomes through the low risks odds and when the loses hit, it becomes almost a dead trapped.

[rdluffy]

I have tried this before, it was like a wolf in disguise. You can bet like 10 times and continue to win but just 1 or 2 losses will make the gambler completely lose.

It encourages the use of all the money won and the money the person begin gambling with to bet again and again, so the losses of all the money the person have on his account on the gambling site at ones is very high.

I will advise the OP to be very careful because this coult be a sign of addiction.

Exactly
The “fun” and interesting part of betting is looking for odds that offer a good risk/return ratio
I usually look for odds starting at 1.80, and sometimes I make parlays with three games.

I've lost a lot of bets with odds of 1.15 or 1.20, and I've found that they're not that difficult to lose

[crwth]

Positives:
Low odds can mean low risk

I'm quite confused with how this is worded. Low odds mean a low chance of winning, which means low chances of actually making it. Isn't it talked about like that? And you're probably talking about the multiplier, right? A low multiplier means higher odds of winning. There would still be a factor in how the game would play out, but I agree that lower multipliers would increase the chances of winning.