trust rating issue

[Mrsats1987]

Ive done over 20 deal recently and the people say they gave me good trust ratings but when I check it shows only 1 was done and shows my trust rating is disabled is that something I can fix remotely or ??

[PX-Z]

Ive done over 20 deal recently and the people say they gave me good trust ratings but when I check it shows only 1 was done and shows my trust rating is disabled is that something I can fix remotely or ??

Because only 1 DT user has given you positive feedback and well, a one negative feedback as well. There are three more positive feedback you have which shows under "Untrusted feedback" which can be seen by clicking "Show rating" on your trust page. You can tell those people you deal with to feel free to give you a feedback anyway.

[Mrsats1987]

thank you.

[Doan9269]

Ive done over 20 deal recently and the people say they gave me good trust ratings but when I check it shows only 1 was done and shows my trust rating is disabled is that something I can fix remotely or ??

Once you observe the trust rating that is showing, it means such is coming from a DT member and others that are giving you trust aren't DT, if you check further, you will also see their own, but not being seen as you could find with a DT member trust, if others too are DT or in the nearest future turned a DT, they will also be made more visible as the first one you saw, trust from DT are more trusted in their judgement.

[Zoomic]

Ive done over 20 deal recently and the people say they gave me good trust ratings but when I check it shows only 1 was done and shows my trust rating is disabled is that something I can fix remotely or ??

Why you guys keep sending and recieving feedbacks without reference link?

[examplens]

Ive done over 20 deal recently and the people say they gave me good trust ratings but when I check it shows only 1 was done and shows my trust rating is disabled is that something I can fix remotely or ??

Why you guys keep sending and recieving feedbacks without reference link?

The OP does not understand the trust rating on this forum. The way his deals look like, it seems like an attempt to raise trust with the help of fake feedback. On November 11, he reset the password, so that after two days, he had some successful trades, of course, without references, but just to take his word for it.
I do not claim that it is so, but I would rather set off a red alarm than believe that real trades are behind those feedbacks.

[KWH]

Ive done over 20 deal recently and the people say they gave me good trust ratings but when I check it shows only 1 was done and shows my trust rating is disabled is that something I can fix remotely or ??

Why you guys keep sending and recieving feedbacks without reference link?

Exactly.

[Amphenomenon]

Ive done over 20 deal recently and the people say they gave me good trust ratings but when I check it shows only 1 was done and shows my trust rating is disabled is that something I can fix remotely or ??

Why you guys keep sending and recieving feedbacks without reference link?

The OP does not understand the trust rating on this forum. The way his deals look like, it seems like an attempt to raise trust with the help of fake feedback. On November 11, he reset the password, so that after two days, he had some successful trades, of course, without references, but just to take his word for it.
I do not claim that it is so, but I would rather set off a red alarm than believe that real trades are behind those feedbacks.

The fact that Op specializes in collectibles, looking at his post history, this makes his trust more questionable with none with a references.

It is better to be cautious when doing business with Op especially currently.

[Plaguedeath]

The OP does not understand the trust rating on this forum. The way his deals look like, it seems like an attempt to raise trust with the help of fake feedback. On November 11, he reset the password, so that after two days, he had some successful trades, of course, without references, but just to take his word for it.
I do not claim that it is so, but I would rather set off a red alarm than believe that real trades are behind those feedbacks.

I think it's a real trade, the one who left him positive feedback is an old user.

But, the way @OP take the positive feedback seriously seems like he has a hidden purpose why he did these trades. If the reason is the buyer can't trust @OP because @OP has no successful trading, it's make sense. However, I didn't find someone complain for @OP didn't have any positive feedback/trade history.

[JollyGood]

If those trades took place and you did not receive any positive feedback, you should not complain because I cannot see you leaving feedback for over 20 members.

Keeping that aside, you can start by mentioning the names of the members you have traded with. After that, you can list the links to each of those trades. The community can check your trades and make their own mind regardless of your feedback status.

Ive done over 20 deal recently and the people say they gave me good trust ratings but when I check it shows only 1 was done and shows my trust rating is disabled is that something I can fix remotely or ??

[Dropsera]

feedback doesn't need to be asked for someone will give it sincerely

[The Cryptovator]

Ive done over 20 deal recently and the people say they gave me good trust ratings but when I check it shows only 1 was done and shows my trust rating is disabled is that something I can fix remotely or ??

Why really are you concerned about ratings and trust when you haven't even established your account here? Before establishing your account, it seems you are focusing on building trust so hard. Is there any goal behind it? Don't take it negatively, but often exit scammers focus more on building trust. We have seen such users on the forum and saw how they do exit scams. Hope you aren't going to do something like this. Rather raising concern, it was better to ask questions about how the trust system works and mention the part you are really not getting. There are a lot of threads where you can learn a lot just by using the forum search button.

However, feedback from DT members will be visible by default. So what you are seeing, most probably, is that they are on the DT list; if you don't see their feedback, then they are non-DT members, and these would be found on untrusted feedback. Also whatever feedback you left won't be visible to their profile unless you have been added to the DT list.

[Amphenomenon]

feedback doesn't need to be asked for someone will give it sincerely

Yes but unfortunately this is not often the case. Individuals might still request for this after a successful trade or service but I think over all it's the intentions/purpose that gives a better description on why it was done, with who the feedback is coming from with it reference.

This helps to gauge the trust system users behaviors and identify those to be cautious of or not even trade with at all.

[YOSHIE]

Ive done over 20 deal recently and the people say they gave me good trust ratings but when I check it shows only 1 was done and shows my trust rating is disabled is that something I can fix remotely or ??

1. If you get a trust summary from a beginner who is not a DT member on this forum, the trust summary will not be visible publicly.
2. Why does the trust summary never have references, proof of your trading with other members? References are necessary, so that other members do not suspect you.
3. Check this thread: Topic: Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings, If you never use transactions or trade with them, summary evidence of trust is not visible.

[howardsentell]

I don't know this member and have not had any transactions with him. I have asked to stop harassing. He is a CYBERBULLY and I believe it would be best to remove him from the forum.

[Rikafip]

He is a CYBERBULLY and I believe it would be best to remove him from the forum.

That's not how things work around here.

People get banned here only for a very few things here, and insults and "cyberbullying" (unless is death threat/threats to phisically harm you). Anything else is not moderated.

[howardsentell]

Trust cannot be established due to your previous online behavior. The accusation you made against me is inaccurate, as the actions you described were actually your own. If there is a rebuttal, I provide evidence from our previous correspondence.