Will you still hold?

[free-bit.co.in]

I agree that Satoshi must remain secret to the rest of forever since their silence helped Bitcoin to become Digital Gold and is owned by entire world and not just one person with their pride.

While we all want to make huge profits and become rich through bitcoin, but we want the creator of Bitcoin to never use or sell their Bitcoin.  We want them to disappear forever simply because that makes Bitcoin more valuable. Does that sound too selfish?

Also, can you tell me what would happen to Bitcoin if Satoshi appeared? Would that cause Bitcoin to lose its decentralized nature and become centralized? No, the appearance of Satoshi will not change anything. Therefore, if he decides to reveal his identity or wants to sell his bitcoin, that wouldn't be such a bad thing.
In fact, that is a good thing, because he has the right to enjoy what he creates.

[Graph001]

Well blockchain started with Bitcoin. Even if Bitcoin ded, I could still hold other cryptocurrencies that adopt blockchain technology. From the start, I’ve been amazed by blockchain technology, which is why I continue to hold it. Right now, many institutions are using Bitcoin and many people already use it either as a form of payment or as an investment. So holding Bitcoin along with them is definitely an honor

It all takes for one to get the right information,  which one can still be able to hold other coins if only they get the right information.
That is why people should make research in everything they want to invest into, it will make them or give them the chance to make a right decision, which they can be able to achieve their success through it and they can be able to nativigate any challenges when they encounter any challenges or problems.

I agree with you that having information is important but if you want to be successful in investing, just knowing the information will not ensure your success. Because the market is unpredictable. Just knowing the information does not mean that you can deal with the real risks of the market. Seeing the volatility of the market, you can panic or make emotional decisions that can cause you losses. If you do not have control over yourself, no matter how much information you know or how many strategies you adopt, you will not be able to succeed. You also need to have proper financial management because if you do not understand when, where and how to use your money, then you will be the one who will be hindered later. Investment does not depend only on information, you also need real experience. Because just as you can never learn to swim out of water, you will not understand anything in investment if you do not enter the market.

[Achalugo BTC]

I agree with you that having information is important but if you want to be successful in investing, just knowing the information will not ensure your success. Because the market is unpredictable. Just knowing the information does not mean that you can deal with the real risks of the market. Seeing the volatility of the market, you can panic or make emotional decisions that can cause you losses. If you do not have control over yourself, no matter how much information you know or how many strategies you adopt, you will not be able to succeed. You also need to have proper financial management because if you do not understand when, where and how to use your money, then you will be the one who will be hindered later. Investment does not depend only on information, you also need real experience. Because just as you can never learn to swim out of water, you will not understand anything in investment if you do not enter the market.

Which is why I said that information is good for one to acquire because investing in the market because with that information, you can be able to know the important things which you need to know about crypto, either by trading or by investing and you can be able to acquire .ore knowledge and understanding of crypto despite its volatility, but with that information you can know be able to know how to manage risks and know the pros and cons to enable know the right tool to use and how to apply them when necessary and also know how to control your emotions. Although you are right but its essential for people to get the right information and be able to verify them because with it one can find it a bit easy to navigate any ups and downs, in order to achieve their success.

[As-Soon-As]

Leave your reality behind for a while and dive into this world of mine, spare me a minute and think for a moment that this is true what will you do if this is the case?

Epstein is Satoshi Nakamoto

How will you feel if this is the reality for a minute? Will you have the gut to keep holding or not?
Will this start the beginning of the end for Bitcoin or it doesn't even matter no more.

Many people like you have claimed to be Satoshi, but if you want to be Satoshi, then you can prove it only by transferring Bitcoin from Satoshi old wall. But besides, those who are making unnecessary claims only want to create traps to cheat. So I don't want to believe you at all, Bitcoin is currently moving at its own pace and will continue to do so in the future.

[mvdheuvel1983]

You're right, if a coin is been moved from Satoshi's wallet to a wallet where the owner is popular known does not prove that the person is Satoshi. If that's the case what about those folks whose coin were moved to a different wallet, I know surely the owner might be the one to move it sometimes but I'm talking about the ones that happened without the consent of the owner, who did you think is responsible for that, the scammers right? So if such thing happened, we might assume that the scammers are the one responsible for that or it could be Satoshi as we can't tell for sure.

If coins are moved from Satoshi's wallet to the wallet of a popular person it could prove  a lot of things especially if the person is a lover of Bitcoin, if the person is not known to be a scammer then all fingers will point that he could be associated to Satoshi since the identity behind the founder of Bitcoin is still unknown but his wallet still has some Bitcoin in it. If the coins that left his wallet could be done without his consent the person who made the transaction should remain unknown that's how scammers operate but if the identity of the person who moved the coins is known it could mean two things which a sensible person can figure out correctly.

[Byebyebtc]

This will not be much of an issue to investors, Bitcoin is now rather independent, and can not change its nature of gathering liquidity because of the owner,
Yes if such news is released it will shake the market but minimal.
Bitcoin will still move the way it moves, investor will not take their money from something that will give them good amount of profit in future because of the discovery of the owner, your making money not your not doing it for nobody.

[Nwada001]

no one's going to think satoshi is fishing for fame if he was, he should have done long time ago and people respect and idolize satoshi too much to 'troll' him he might even have a warm welcome if he does come back

How can someone who is already famous without his identity being revealed be fishing for fame? If Satoshi is to come out today, he won't even need to come out publicly to come and announce that he's Satoshi, but a few things that he will do will drag attention directly to him, which many will now have to investigate there and uncover whatever mystery that will make them believe he's the one, but all this we are saying are just mere assumptions; it's never going to happen, at least not now.

[WatChe]

Many people like you have claimed to be Satoshi, but if you want to be Satoshi, then you can prove it only by transferring Bitcoin from Satoshi old wall. But besides, those who are making unnecessary claims only want to create traps to cheat. So I don't want to believe you at all, Bitcoin is currently moving at its own pace and will continue to do so in the future.

Many people like Craig Wright claimed that they are Satoshi Nakamoto but they were not able to prove it. If someone is really Satoshi then he just need to move Bitcoin residing in famous Satoshi wallet and that will be enough to prove his claim.

As far as OP question is concerned, I don't think Epstein is Satoshi and even if real Satoshi came out one day then it won't matter because he himself won't be able to do anything with Bitcoin blockchain. The whole network is designed in a way that even it's creators has no right to modify it.
 

[gunhell16]

Up until now, many community investors still believe that holding Bitcoin and other top-listed altcoins will yield huge profits in the future.

However, that will only happen if they consistently practice DCA (Dollar-Cost Averaging) on their crypto assets gradually buying into potential coins alongside Bitcoin, which is already a given for the long term.

[Hardyrobust]

Up until now, many community investors still believe that holding Bitcoin and other top-listed altcoins will yield huge profits in the future.

However, that will only happen if they consistently practice DCA (Dollar-Cost Averaging) on their crypto assets gradually buying into potential coins alongside Bitcoin, which is already a given for the long term.

Holding bitcoin for a long term is less risk than short term holding. However, talking about being profitable at the end is one mistake so many investors make , holding bitcoin for a long term doesn't guarantee success at the end . Talking about altcoin being profitable by holding for long term is something I won't quite agree with. Holding altcoin for a long term is very risky as the tendency of it turning into dust is very high. Holding bitcoin for a long term is good but it is not a guarantee that it is going to be successful.

[Lida93]

no one's going to think satoshi is fishing for fame if he was, he should have done long time ago and people respect and idolize satoshi too much to 'troll' him he might even have a warm welcome if he does come back

How can someone who is already famous without his identity being revealed be fishing for fame? If Satoshi is to come out today, he won't even need to come out publicly to come and announce that he's Satoshi, but a few things that he will do will drag attention directly to him, which many will now have to investigate there and uncover whatever mystery that will make them believe he's the one, but all this we are saying are just mere assumptions; it's never going to happen, at least not now.

For a figure such as Satoshi fame is the least thing that is in his plans which I believe that the game which bitcoin alone has gotten is just enough for him to continue staying mysterious. All other persons claiming to be Satoshi as persons that are out to catch attention because if really they were Satoshi Nakamoto it wouldn't have taken them anything to move the coins in the wallet of Satoshi which is enough action to make the world believe their claims.

[MinoRaiola]

The FIAT system was/is also controlled or created by people or the state. Moste of the people do not only have good intentions. So should we take FIAT and burn it? No, we use it for our plans. Thats what people do with Bitcoin too, only with Bitcoin everyone has more freedom. And there is no third party, in many cases it remains a p2p. Whether Satoshi shows up or not, Bitcoin will stay. And when people understand BTC, more will come and want to own bitcoin themselves.

[Nwada001]

How can someone who is already famous without his identity being revealed be fishing for fame? If Satoshi is to come out today, he won't even need to come out publicly to come and announce that he's Satoshi, but a few things that he will do will drag attention directly to him, which many will now have to investigate there and uncover whatever mystery that will make them believe he's the one, but all this we are saying are just mere assumptions; it's never going to happen, at least not now.

For a figure such as Satoshi fame is the least thing that is in his plans which I believe that the game which bitcoin alone has gotten is just enough for him to continue staying mysterious. All other persons claiming to be Satoshi as persons that are out to catch attention because if really they were Satoshi Nakamoto it wouldn't have taken them anything to move the coins in the wallet of Satoshi which is enough action to make the world believe their claims.

Moving the coin, which is in Satoshi's wallet, is one thing, but aside from that, those who claim to be Satoshi are just busy chasing social media clout and using that to gain influence; they don't even hold or possess any personalities that could show they can create something like that and stay hidden until they decide to start creating noise called 'claims,' just like the fake Satoshi Craig Wright, who is on the run from facing a UK court.

[Lida93]

Snip

For a figure such as Satoshi fame is the least thing that is in his plans which I believe that the game which bitcoin alone has gotten is just enough for him to continue staying mysterious. All other persons claiming to be Satoshi as persons that are out to catch attention because if really they were Satoshi Nakamoto it wouldn't have taken them anything to move the coins in the wallet of Satoshi which is enough action to make the world believe their claims.

Moving the coin, which is in Satoshi's wallet, is one thing, but aside from that, those who claim to be Satoshi are just busy chasing social media clout and using that to gain influence; they don't even hold or possess any personalities that could show they can create something like that and stay hidden until they decide to start creating noise called 'claims,' just like the fake Satoshi Craig Wright, who is on the run from facing a UK court.

It's a well established technique that these guys have being using and obviously it's become a normal thing for all cryptocurrency community not to take them serious whenever anyone come out to make headline about being Satoshi. Craig Wright is a controversial businessman which is very disappointing to me that he leaves putting energy into his business progress and rather diverting it to becoming who he has no fact of becoming, which is laughable.