This notorious scammer clearly bribe many DT to give him POSITIVE feedback. I have PROOF from FIVE big popular proof website who offer free service to check scam.
Normally cheaters here stay quiet and in their lane so that they don't attract attention. As you can see, most local board abusers are staying within their own groups and barely venture out to where they shouldn't.
This is true for the most part. A few of the most successful cheaters ranked up through cycling merits earned from the Wall Observer thread, however. This encouraged a hundred others to follow suit over the years, of which 2 became successful, 88 found out they were too retarded for the ploy to work, and the remaining 10 haven't found out yet and keep posting there.
You are right, I overgeneralized while writing this post but the intended meaning is something else. Generally the cheaters are in 3 categories now from what I can observed (in no particular order):
1. WO and Speculation section farmers, mostly writing generic stuff that has been rephrased countless times already.
2. Local-board contests and other activities (LN, Bitcoin node) farmers.
3. Local board or other farmers, sometimes related to merit sources. Often obvious by unbalanced merit behavior, ignoring best posters such as d5000 while meriting other shitposters (which I have said repeatedly in many places).
What I mean with "staying in their lane" is that they focus on farming and try to ignore drama. They are unlikely going to stir up shit or participate in fights because this brings attention on them. Whenever I see an unusual account in this section come to the defense of somebody, that is a red flag that is worth investigating. This does not mean that the user is going to be shady, recently some users have appeared that I have not seen much or at all before such as suchmoon or DireWolfM14. However, pattern recognition is extremely important -- as long as it is paired with at least a superficial investigation it usually hints you towards the correct conclusion.
Now as to the OP and some accusations thrown at him,
it is unlikely that AakZaki is an abuser of any kind (the possibility remains, but it exists for everyone here). I don't know his history, but generally people who are diligently and consistently investigating accounts do not have time to run their own farm. It is simply too time consuming.
There is an argument to be made that they are trying to eliminate competition or cover up their own farming by building a personality that is against farming,
but this argument can not be used for people who do this consistently. It does not factor in the time requirement, so unless they have an organized 3rd world shithole scam center operation going on - people like OP, JollyGood, lovesmayfamilis, and others who do this frequently would be near the bottom of my list for suspects for account farming.
This is not just a theoretical argument that can be dismissed on some vague reasoning grounds, I checked this experimentally. The other day,
I merely formatted a long list of users and did some basic review of the reported findings and users in question. While I did not do any investigating myself which requires even more time, this still took me more time than it would take me to write 10-20 of
my posts at the very least. For generic 3-4 line shitposts, we are probably talking about more time than it takes to write 50 posts at the least. The numbers simply don't add up.
Lastly, as you can see there are some users that are slowly working towards manipulating others to require a higher standard of evidence for random shitposters. Obviously their motives are malicious and should the key DT members fall for that manipulation, I expect to see a future with even more spam and cheating than we have now.
Nice.
We need more memes here and fewer lawyers for the mentally diseased shady individuals.
Scam Likelihood 85% (Very High Risk)
https://www.f-secure.com/en/text-message-checkerThis message seems dangerous. We detected multiple suspicious behavior.
https://scamspotter.net/Medium Risk
Our AI has identified the following potential red flags:
The message discusses cheating and farming in the context of an online forum, which could be related to scams or fraudulent activities.
The message mentions 'red flags' and 'investigating' which suggests potential deceptive behavior.
The message includes a link to a asktom.cf post, which, while not inherently malicious, warrants caution as external links can sometimes lead to phishing or scam sites.
https://scamadvisor.ai/Scam risk: Medium
The communication discusses patterns of behavior among users and raises concerns about account farming, which implies a level of suspicion. While the analysis has a logical structure, it is based on observations and inferences that could be influenced by personal biases or limited context. The mention of specific users and accusations, even if unsubstantiated, introduces a potential for drama and misunderstandings, warranting caution.
https://www.wikihow.com/Generator/Scam-DetectorScam Probability: 65%
Assessment: The text discusses different categories of users involved in “farming” and manipulative behavior, which highlights potential scam-like activity. It displays a level of complexity and suspicion about users' intentions that could indicate a warning. Phrases such as "red flag that is worth investigating" and discussions about patterns of behavior suggest an awareness of scams; however, it lacks direct requests for personal information or urgent offers, indicating that it's more analytical rather than outright fraudulent. Nonetheless, the focus on manipulation and suspicious activity raises enough concern to consider it a probable scam.
It's time to wake up and act.
