Bitcoin Forum
December 31, 2025, 03:42:46 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 [384] 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 ... 486 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014  (Read 1210843 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Monerobuyer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 06, 2017, 01:23:46 AM
 #7661

No actual development for two years and this coin goes screaming.  Pure pump and dump. 
If anyone can provide an explanation please do.  Otherwise it's just an obvious pump and dump from a group of scammers.


People on Reddit confirm this shit a scam
Monerobuyer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 06, 2017, 01:26:28 AM
 #7662

The amount of shilling going on in this thread is un-fucking believable. Legacy holders who haven't done shit for this project besides baghold for the last few years come in here bragging about dumping their holdings then proceed to throw around scam accusations. Followed up by two of the most mindless FUD campaigners.. Seems legit. No doubt this is an effort to drive the price back down to buy back in. A fucking scam in itself. God forbid this rise in volume was actually due to those interested in the prospect of a renewed Boolberry.

So let me get this straight: Boolberry sparks the interest of a few whales, as a result, accumulation drives up the price, a fake crypto_zoidberg shows up in slack and the price continues to go up completely ignoring the Bitcoin rally. You dump on the news of a fake crypto_zoidberg and brag about it, but then the real crypto_zoidberg shows up here promising code commits within the next few days and you expect a decline in marketcap?

If anything, the marketcap is going to continue growing now that crypto_zoidberg decided to show up and the project has caught the attention of new investors that have never heard of Boolberry.

The recent rise in marketcap should be an eye opener to crypto_zoidberg and those watching this project - that any future development that happens here has potential to be a huge disruptive factor in the anonymous currency vertical. As I have told crypto_zoidberg in the past.. he will not make anymore money anywhere else than contributing the Boolberry codebase. What is his reasoning for being recluse and neglecting the project over the last years? WTF knows what is going on in his head. One thing is certain, this spike was a wake up call for him to return to the project.

You dumped your holdings? Good. They were passed on to those who will hopefully be better assets to this project than a bunch of useless early adopters circle jerking each other. It's also no coincidence that Fluffyfag shows up in the Poloniex trollbox talking shit about Boolberry in an effort to drive the price down. A Boolberry with active development is a threat to Monero, a project propped up by a real scam (see Oasis Exit scam).

This quote made me invest:


https://github.com/fluffypony/bitmonero/commit/014708fe71c1379af281ca9ac17e82c159e98e6d

lol Smiley

Monero devs (particular fluffypony) have no idea what they do Smiley




Actually fluffy is god. You don't know shit
Monerobuyer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 06, 2017, 01:32:42 AM
 #7663

So the important question

Is CZ back on boolberry or not. I mean the real CZ. Only he can answer this.

Why are we all still guessing and accusing. If he is coming back to work on bbr then that is great if not I guess this all a fuss over nothing.

Boolberry is done. Entire market cap less than 1 satoshi. Check the Reddit. Knife catchers not aware yet
b4h4mu7
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 337
Merit: 315


View Profile
February 06, 2017, 01:54:11 AM
 #7664

The amount of shilling going on in this thread is un-fucking believable. Legacy holders who haven't done shit for this project besides baghold for the last few years come in here bragging about dumping their holdings then proceed to throw around scam accusations. Followed up by two of the most mindless FUD campaigners.. Seems legit. No doubt this is an effort to drive the price back down to buy back in. A fucking scam in itself. God forbid this rise in volume was actually due to those interested in the prospect of a renewed Boolberry.

So let me get this straight: Boolberry sparks the interest of a few whales, as a result, accumulation drives up the price, a fake crypto_zoidberg shows up in slack and the price continues to go up completely ignoring the Bitcoin rally. You dump on the news of a fake crypto_zoidberg and brag about it, but then the real crypto_zoidberg shows up here promising code commits within the next few days and you expect a decline in marketcap?

If anything, the marketcap is going to continue growing now that crypto_zoidberg decided to show up and the project has caught the attention of new investors that have never heard of Boolberry.

The recent rise in marketcap should be an eye opener to crypto_zoidberg and those watching this project - that any future development that happens here has potential to be a huge disruptive factor in the anonymous currency vertical. As I have told crypto_zoidberg in the past.. he will not make anymore money anywhere else than contributing the Boolberry codebase. What is his reasoning for being recluse and neglecting the project over the last years? WTF knows what is going on in his head. One thing is certain, this spike was a wake up call for him to return to the project.

You dumped your holdings? Good. They were passed on to those who will hopefully be better assets to this project than a bunch of useless early adopters circle jerking each other. It's also no coincidence that Fluffyfag shows up in the Poloniex trollbox talking shit about Boolberry in an effort to drive the price down. A Boolberry with active development is a threat to Monero, a project propped up by a real scam (see Oasis Exit scam).

This quote made me invest:


https://github.com/fluffypony/bitmonero/commit/014708fe71c1379af281ca9ac17e82c159e98e6d

lol Smiley

Monero devs (particular fluffypony) have no idea what they do Smiley




Actually fluffy is god. You don't know shit

Here's your false god. You don't know shit.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/52sw9r/9830_xmr_stolen_from_my_mymonerocom_wallet_be/?st=iytfzg9s&sh=7701d553
donnatello
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 338
Merit: 101


View Profile
February 06, 2017, 01:57:51 AM
 #7665

So the important question

Is CZ back on boolberry or not. I mean the real CZ. Only he can answer this.

Why are we all still guessing and accusing. If he is coming back to work on bbr then that is great if not I guess this all a fuss over nothing.

Boolberry is done. Entire market cap less than 1 satoshi. Check the Reddit. Knife catchers not aware yet

Why so much FUD from Monero supporters?
@bb
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 137
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 06, 2017, 03:04:03 AM
 #7666

So the important question

Is CZ back on boolberry or not. I mean the real CZ. Only he can answer this.

Why are we all still guessing and accusing. If he is coming back to work on bbr then that is great if not I guess this all a fuss over nothing.

Boolberry is done. Entire market cap less than 1 satoshi. Check the Reddit. Knife catchers not aware yet

Why so much FUD from Monero supporters?

Borrowing Monero names doesn't mean always Monero supporters or related to Monero, just person making riot to seize gain for what they do. E.g. they want to trade xmr for bbr at lowest price.

dvz29
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91
Merit: 10



View Profile
February 06, 2017, 03:39:08 AM
 #7667

Bce, scam!!! )))
donnatello
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 338
Merit: 101


View Profile
February 06, 2017, 03:54:25 AM
 #7668

Bce, scam!!! )))

If this is a scam, why do you want people to join your mining pool?
clintar2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 202
Merit: 104


View Profile
February 06, 2017, 04:45:01 AM
 #7669

FYI, anyone having problems with syncing, you can use my repos. They have some patches to get them mining. I haven't hard coded any new seed nodes, though, so try:
Code:
--add-priority-node 45.79.180.42:10101 --add-priority-node 52.15.111.162:10101 --add-priority-node 78.47.186.74:10101 --add-priority-node 5.9.44.154:10101 --add-priority-node 213.186.170.110:10101 --add-priority-node 218.58.75.24:10101

https://github.com/clintar/boolberry for classic crypto_zoidberg's version. Just needed same checkpoints as Blockchain Development company version.
https://github.com/clintar/BDC_Boolberry for segfault fixes in that version.
Fallenzz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 101


View Profile
February 06, 2017, 10:56:12 AM
 #7670

and the scam continuous Wink Zoidberg is NOT working with 1blockologist. 1blockologist added nothing in 4 months to bbr and will also not add anything they only created a group to pump up the price.

there is no real wallet. boolberry is outdated for years watch out all! Older bitcointalk members already exposed the scam on page 384/385. They also faked zoidberg on the slack to get people hyped.

Too bad they now completely ruined a good project with a scam
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
February 06, 2017, 11:03:42 AM
 #7671

and the scam continuous Wink Zoidberg is NOT working with 1blockologist. 1blockologist added nothing in 4 months to bbr and will also not add anything they only created a group to pump up the price.

there is no real wallet. boolberry is outdated for years watch out all! Older bitcointalk members already exposed the scam on page 384/385. They also faked zoidberg on the slack to get people hyped.

Too bad they now completely ruined a good project with a scam


The faked zoidberg was very bad. Looks terrible in that respect.

However since now we see the real CZ and some other people who have contributed are now also posting it may not be all bad.


Fallenzz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 101


View Profile
February 06, 2017, 11:30:43 AM
 #7672

and the scam continuous Wink Zoidberg is NOT working with 1blockologist. 1blockologist added nothing in 4 months to bbr and will also not add anything they only created a group to pump up the price.

there is no real wallet. boolberry is outdated for years watch out all! Older bitcointalk members already exposed the scam on page 384/385. They also faked zoidberg on the slack to get people hyped.

Too bad they now completely ruined a good project with a scam


The faked zoidberg was very bad. Looks terrible in that respect.

However since now we see the real CZ and some other people who have contributed are now also posting it may not be all bad.



real CZ is not working on it Wink clintar added some seed nodes so nothing new. And clintar is directly connected to the block development company
zhalox
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 106


XMR = BTC in 2010. Rise chikun.


View Profile
February 06, 2017, 05:19:34 PM
Last edit: February 06, 2017, 05:35:28 PM by zhalox
 #7673

Well if the real crypto_zoidberg returns to active development & implements multi-sig before Monero does, then Boolberry may start actually competing with Monero, which means it could still rise by several orders of magnitude IMO

DeCryptIcon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 06, 2017, 06:48:22 PM
 #7674

Well if the real crypto_zoidberg returns to active development & implements multi-sig before Monero does, then Boolberry may start actually competing with Monero, which means it could still rise by several orders of magnitude IMO

What would it take to get crypto_zoidberg back into development of BBR?
crypjunkie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 06, 2017, 08:01:03 PM
 #7675

Well if the real crypto_zoidberg returns to active development & implements multi-sig before Monero does, then Boolberry may start actually competing with Monero, which means it could still rise by several orders of magnitude IMO

So very true
crypjunkie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 06, 2017, 08:05:29 PM
 #7676

No actual development for two years and this coin goes screaming.  Pure pump and dump. 
If anyone can provide an explanation please do.  Otherwise it's just an obvious pump and dump from a group of scammers.


People on Reddit confirm this shit a scam

Lets just correct this, FUD was spread on the reddit by a few who have absolutley no clue what there talking about. They where called out on it and since decided to dissapear. Lot's of FUD about that's for sure, lot's are eager to drive the price back down as they have just realised it's potential. Pretty basic stuff and will only deter those who can't or won't spend the time to research for themselves.
clintar2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 202
Merit: 104


View Profile
February 06, 2017, 09:11:08 PM
 #7677

and the scam continuous Wink Zoidberg is NOT working with 1blockologist. 1blockologist added nothing in 4 months to bbr and will also not add anything they only created a group to pump up the price.

there is no real wallet. boolberry is outdated for years watch out all! Older bitcointalk members already exposed the scam on page 384/385. They also faked zoidberg on the slack to get people hyped.

Too bad they now completely ruined a good project with a scam


The faked zoidberg was very bad. Looks terrible in that respect.

However since now we see the real CZ and some other people who have contributed are now also posting it may not be all bad.



real CZ is not working on it Wink clintar added some seed nodes so nothing new. And clintar is directly connected to the block development company
I don't consider myself connected. I'm willing to help with things, though. Really, I want to wait until crypto_zoidberg can come back when he's got his other stuff taken care of. He'd be the best at getting things moving.
b4h4mu7
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 337
Merit: 315


View Profile
February 06, 2017, 09:58:00 PM
 #7678

I live in my parent's basement. When I'm not trolling Boolberry I'm jacking off to anime porn.

I suck dick for coins. PM me for a trade

Lets just correct this, FUD was spread on the reddit by a few who have absolutley no clue what there talking about. They where called out on it and since decided to dissapear. Lot's of FUD about that's for sure, lot's are eager to drive the price back down as they have just realised it's potential. Pretty basic stuff and will only deter those who can't or won't spend the time to research for themselves.

It's better to ignore these low lifes of the crypto community. It's apparent not many others are defending the project so they can buy back cheaper as a result of these Fudfags. When they've accumulated their targets they'll come back here with their real usernames to promote the project. Unfortunately, they're apart of the growth process. We're in a moderated thread and their posts aren't being deleted here for a reason. The only people getting scammed here are the people selling into their bullshit.
crypto_zoidberg (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 976
Merit: 646



View Profile WWW
February 07, 2017, 04:49:41 AM
 #7679


I started to get personal messages from people who call themselfs "investors".
They writing that they invested hundreds of-thousands $ in project and really care about it, giving me strong advice to stop other projects and dedicate myself to BBR and so on.

For all those people i'll answer here: you invest not in the project, you invest in coins, which do not affect project funding much.
Just fyi: average salary for experienced developer is about 8-10k$/month, if you would dedicate just a tiny part of your "investment" into project funding you would get really strong improvements of BBR from development side.

But since you prefer to wait passively and write convincing message  - then have patience and wait, i have things to be done in BBR in near future.


Zoidbeg

Big Naturals
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 268


View Profile
February 07, 2017, 04:57:07 AM
 #7680


I started to get personal messages from people who call themselfs "investors".
They writing that they invested hundreds of-thousands $ in project and really care about it, giving me strong advice to stop other projects and dedicate myself to BBR and so on.

For all those people i'll answer here: you invest not in the project, you invest in coins, which do not affect project funding much.
Just fyi: average salary for experienced developer is about 8-10k$/month, if you would dedicate just a tiny part of your "investment" into project funding you would get really strong improvements of BBR from development side.

But since you prefer to wait passively and write convincing message  - then have patience and wait, i have things to be done in BBR in near future.


Zoidbeg



Very reasonable suggestion. As a crypto noobie I find it hard to understand why people invest big money in the hobbies of high paid developers. Pay peanuts, get monkeys
Pages: « 1 ... 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 [384] 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 ... 486 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!