[BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014

[b4h4mu7]

We seen different ticker everywhere.
Some using BBR and some XBB.
Can anyone tell me which one is correct?

thanks.

BBR is the original ticker although it's listed on coinmarketcap as XBB. I have no opinion either way which ticker is used but it does create some confusion since this is the main thread and its using BBR for identification. I messaged coinmarketcap to ask them to change the ticker back to BBR and update the coin supply since they are still using the offline mingergate explorer but they never did.

If anyone in the community wants to take up this task here's the information:

Coinmarketcap Contact:
https://coinmarketcap.com/request/

Current coin supply API:
http://explorer.mining.blue/q/supply/
10648593.638334142044

[s1lverbox]

We seen different ticker everywhere.
Some using BBR and some XBB.
Can anyone tell me which one is correct?

thanks.

BBR is the original ticker although it's listed on coinmarketcap as XBB. I have no opinion either way which ticker is used but it does create some confusion since this is the main thread and its using BBR for identification. I messaged coinmarketcap to ask them to change the ticker back to BBR and update the coin supply since they are still using the offline mingergate explorer but they never did.

If anyone in the community wants to take up this task here's the information:

Coinmarketcap Contact:
https://coinmarketcap.com/request/

Current coin supply API:
http://explorer.mining.blue/q/supply/
10648593.638334142044

Asking because we have debate if we should call it XBB or BBR. Maybe ask clint to specify what should we use for market creations.

[b4h4mu7]

We seen different ticker everywhere.
Some using BBR and some XBB.
Can anyone tell me which one is correct?

thanks.

BBR is the original ticker although it's listed on coinmarketcap as XBB. I have no opinion either way which ticker is used but it does create some confusion since this is the main thread and its using BBR for identification. I messaged coinmarketcap to ask them to change the ticker back to BBR and update the coin supply since they are still using the offline mingergate explorer but they never did.

If anyone in the community wants to take up this task here's the information:

Coinmarketcap Contact:
https://coinmarketcap.com/request/

Current coin supply API:
http://explorer.mining.blue/q/supply/
10648593.638334142044

Asking because we have debate if we should call it XBB or BBR. Maybe ask clint to specify what should we use for market creations.

For Bitcoin some exchanges use BTC some use XBT. At the end of the day its up to you which you want to use. I'd say it would lessen confusion if we go with BBR and have coinmarketcap change the ticker. On the flipside, if zoidberg can change the ticker here to XBB then that would resolve the identity confusion.

Clintar's explorer shows "XBB" but that's an easy change back to BBR. We're planning on rebranding with the fork anyways to separate this codebase from the new one so ultimately BBR or XBB won't matter.

[1blockologist]

We seen different ticker everywhere.
Some using BBR and some XBB.
Can anyone tell me which one is correct?

thanks.

BBR is the original ticker although it's listed on coinmarketcap as XBB. I have no opinion either way which ticker is used but it does create some confusion since this is the main thread and its using BBR for identification. I messaged coinmarketcap to ask them to change the ticker back to BBR and update the coin supply since they are still using the offline mingergate explorer but they never did.

If anyone in the community wants to take up this task here's the information:

Coinmarketcap Contact:
https://coinmarketcap.com/request/

Current coin supply API:
http://explorer.mining.blue/q/supply/
10648593.638334142044

Asking because we have debate if we should call it XBB or BBR. Maybe ask clint to specify what should we use for market creations.

For Bitcoin some exchanges use BTC some use XBT. At the end of the day its up to you which you want to use. I'd say it would lessen confusion if we go with BBR and have coinmarketcap change the ticker. On the flipside, if zoidberg can change the ticker here to XBB then that would resolve the identity confusion.

Clintar's explorer shows "XBB" but that's an easy change back to BBR. We're planning on rebranding with the fork anyways to separate this codebase from the new one so ultimately BBR or XBB won't matter.

stocks.exchange listed it as XBB , and these guys are just looking for an executive decision

what ticker/name do you have in mind for the new codebase? still curious how a new chain is going to get all of our boolberry balances in it easily

[1blockologist]

I requested Coinmarketcap, Coincap.io and Worldcoinindex to update Boolberry information, so that we can get accruate price information via API for all the tertiary services people use for accounting and monitoring.

[b4h4mu7]

I requested Coinmarketcap, Coincap.io and Worldcoinindex to update Boolberry information, so that we can get accruate price information via API for all the tertiary services people use for accounting and monitoring.

Thanks. stocks.exchange has updated their listing to BBR. Moving forward I hope this will lessen the identity confusion for everyone.

https://stocks.exchange/trade/BBR/BTC

If anyone else wants to help out, a request to coingecko.com to re-add Boolberry would be much appreciated.

[Newton90]

If anyone else wants to help out, a request to coingecko.com to re-add Boolberry would be much appreciated.

i request.

[ninjacoins]

How is the development front looking for Boolberry? Great that we now have a exchange.

[Kliv73]

I can not remove from the purse v.0.3 clintar from the beginning no more than 500bbr, then no more than 400bbr, then no more 300bbr , now not more than 100bbr

Failed to send transactio is too big

[hashappliance]

I can not remove from the purse v.0.3 clintar from the beginning no more than 500bbr, then no more than 400bbr, then no more 300i, now not more than 100bbr

Failed to send transactio is too big

Wait a couple of minutes, and you will be able to send the rest. 

[Kliv73]

I can not remove from the purse v.0.3 clintar from the beginning no more than 500bbr, then no more than 400bbr, then no more 300i, now not more than 100bbr

Failed to send transactio is too big

Wait a couple of minutes, and you will be able to send the rest. 

It's not right
This every day less and less

[ph4nt0m]

I can not remove from the purse v.0.3 clintar from the beginning no more than 500bbr, then no more than 400bbr, then no more 300i, now not more than 100bbr

Failed to send transactio is too big

Wait a couple of minutes, and you will be able to send the rest. 

It's not right
This every day less and less

The wallet picks largest chunks of coins first. In the end, there's only dust left. A tx should be within 25kb in size AFAIR.

[ninjacoins]

Will there be a development update as to progress so far?

[b4h4mu7]

Will there be a development update as to progress so far?

Yes. We're planning to reveal project highlights with R&D progress once we get all the exchanges and supporting services updated. This was planned for Nov 5th but the delay with Kucoin and other exchanges along with supporting services like coinmarketcap, coincap etc has derailed the scheduled update. In the spirit of transparency and without going into too much of the technical details which will be reserved for whitepaper here's the main features we're working on:

- Improved Ring Signatures

- Improved Stealth Addresses

- Native i2pd Routing

- Improved Hashing Algorithm

- Improved GUI wallet

The cryptographers on the research team are still working to further improve the designs through peer review. It should be noted these designs are unique to the new codebase and represent a massive leap forward for the technology. In a future update we'll be providing a more detailed overview of the new features and comparative analysis over other Cryponote projects.

If you want to help out, put pressure on supportive services to update all relative Boolberry listing information i.e. coin supply, block explorer, ticker, exchange listing.  

[ninjacoins]

Thanks for the update, much appreciated.

Will there be a development update as to progress so far?

Yes. We're planning to reveal project highlights with R&D progress once we get all the exchanges and supporting services updated. This was planned for Nov 5th but the delay with Kucoin and other exchanges along with supporting services like coinmarketcap, coincap etc has derailed the scheduled update. In the spirit of transparency and without going into too much of the technical details which will be reserved for whitepaper here's the main features we're working on:

- Improved Ring Signatures

- Improved Stealth Addresses

- Native i2pd Routing

- Improved Hashing Algorithm

- Improved GUI wallet

The cryptographers on the research team are still working to further improve the designs through peer review. It should be noted these designs are unique to the new codebase and represent a massive leap forward for the technology. In a future update we'll be providing a more detailed overview of the new features and comparative analysis over other Cryponote projects.



If you want to help out, put pressure on supportive services to update all relative Boolberry listing information i.e. coin supply, block explorer, ticker, exchange listing.  

[1blockologist]

Will there be a development update as to progress so far?

Yes. We're planning to reveal project highlights with R&D progress once we get all the exchanges and supporting services updated. This was planned for Nov 5th but the delay with Kucoin and other exchanges along with supporting services like coinmarketcap, coincap etc has derailed the scheduled update. In the spirit of transparency and without going into too much of the technical details which will be reserved for whitepaper here's the main features we're working on:

- Improved Ring Signatures

- Improved Stealth Addresses

- Native i2pd Routing

- Improved Hashing Algorithm

- Improved GUI wallet

The cryptographers on the research team are still working to further improve the designs through peer review. It should be noted these designs are unique to the new codebase and represent a massive leap forward for the technology. In a future update we'll be providing a more detailed overview of the new features and comparative analysis over other Cryponote projects.

If you want to help out, put pressure on supportive services to update all relative Boolberry listing information i.e. coin supply, block explorer, ticker, exchange listing.  

stocks exchange switching the ticker and breaking the old URL may have delayed things with some of those market cap sites. I'll try to update them

what will the upgrade path be? and I'd like to see the new codebase

[ninjacoins]

Coinmarketcap has listed boolberry and seems to to be updated. Ticker BBR. https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/boolberry/#charts

[1blockologist]

Coinmarketcap has listed boolberry and seems to to be updated. Ticker BBR. https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/boolberry/#charts

Yes, and I've been bugging them to get the market cap and supply stuff right and updated.


Worldcoinindex has it up too:

https://www.worldcoinindex.com/coin/boolberry

[1blockologist]

So we are waiting for https://cryptochangex.com/ and Kucoin

nice nice

[b4h4mu7]

what will the upgrade path be? and I'd like to see the new codebase

The primary focus in choosing an upgrade path and a major concern for the project moving forward is funding. It is one of the reasons why development has been stagnant over the years and why this project isn't a top marketcap currency yet. To date, we've received roughly 300BBR from the community within a seven month plus time span.. While that donation is appreciated, it doesn't scratch the financial burden associated with hiring top experts in their respective fields to contribute to the project.

Moving forward it would be in the best interest of everyone in the community to remember how we got here and to make sure that this situation never happens again. That's why we're looking for ways to establish a development fund during the transition so that we can have sustainability. At present we're still on target for a hardfork. The plan is a portion of coins that transition to the new codebase will be sent to an output controlled by dev team. This way everyone chips in towards the project instead of relying on a minority to contribute the bulk of their own funds.

At present the repository is private and reserved for contributors only. As we get closer to public testing and eventual launch we'll be opening the source to the general public. In meantime, Clintar can verify any claims made in any current and future posts with regards to progress.