[ANN] [NAUT] Nautiluscoin - First Coin w/Stabilization Fund - Digishield

[BTCrawl]

It's like having a discussion with someone who's deeply religious and just keeps screaming "Infidel!" over and over.

Good description, you just can't debate with her.

You're right, neither of you can debate me because you write me off as a troll before trying to counter my arguments using facts and logic.

No, you completely ignore numerous arguments that prove the opposite of your points; you often claim BK is specifically FOR the regulation of crypto, when in fact he has repeatedly stated that he is NOT for the regulation, HOWEVER, he understands it is an inevitability and feels it be necessary that people in crypto (such as you, and me), be the ones to write that regulation, and NOT the governing bodies.

Accepting something as an inevitability is NOT the same thing as supporting it, it never has been, and never will be.

This is either a shakedown or she's not all there.

Do you know if multipool development will be paid for by the nsf or do we have to arrange a bounty?

I have not been told though from past experiences from bk he may be paying someone to make that happen as well. I can't answer for certain though

I got that impression too. Hope we can get an update this week on what he and Blocktech are working on

[FlyingMongoose]

It's like having a discussion with someone who's deeply religious and just keeps screaming "Infidel!" over and over.

Good description, you just can't debate with her.

You're right, neither of you can debate me because you write me off as a troll before trying to counter my arguments using facts and logic.

No, you completely ignore numerous arguments that prove the opposite of your points; you often claim BK is specifically FOR the regulation of crypto, when in fact he has repeatedly stated that he is NOT for the regulation, HOWEVER, he understands it is an inevitability and feels it be necessary that people in crypto (such as you, and me), be the ones to write that regulation, and NOT the governing bodies.

Accepting something as an inevitability is NOT the same thing as supporting it, it never has been, and never will be.

This is either a shakedown or she's not all there.

Do you know if multipool development will be paid for by the nsf or do we have to arrange a bounty?

I have not been told though from past experiences from bk he may be paying someone to make that happen as well. I can't answer for certain though

I got that impression too. Hope we can get an update this week on what he and Blocktech are working on

I do know of at least one person who operates in the IRC channel who's been working on a multipool (for multiple coins, nautiluscoin being one of them).

[whatdidshedo]

every time i check the thread here i'm looking for that BK post "good news guys"

[nutildah]

No, you completely ignore numerous arguments that prove the opposite of your points; you often claim BK is specifically FOR the regulation of crypto, when in fact he has repeatedly stated that he is NOT for the regulation,

Here's what Brian Kelly says about regulation:

"The New York State Department of Financial Services took the first step toward developing these rules this week, with the announcement of a BitLicense. Superintendent Benjamin Lawsky has taken the lead in regulating digital currency businesses with the goal of protecting consumers while fostering innovation. This was the right move at the right time."

Now Erik Vorhees' take on the same legislation, a well-respected member of the bitcoin community:

"The concern is essentially that any user of any Bitcoin service would have to be entered into all sorts of databases with their name and personal information, like where they live, what they look like, what nationality they are — probably scans of their passport or driver’s license. And so this is all just a bunch of personal information that other people have no business knowing. And if the government wants to have private information about people, they need to make a case that that person is at least a suspect of a crime, I would think. They shouldn’t be able to just require everyone’s information just because they write it on paper. So that was my main concern — there are other concerns, but that was kind of the thrust of my piece."

http://moneyandstate.com/reflections-right-privacy-response-nydfs-bitcoin-proposal/

HOWEVER, he understands it is an inevitability and feels it be necessary that people in crypto (such as you, and me), be the ones to write that regulation, and NOT the governing bodies.

Accepting something as an inevitability is NOT the same thing as supporting it, it never has been, and never will be.

That's exactly what it means, because in this case it doesn't have to be inevitable. He is just brainwashing people into accepting a new form of slavery by the financial system so Wall Street can continue its dominant position as Earth's Overlords.

Some more from Brian Kelly's original article:

"The open-source nature of digital currencies provides a built-in self-regulatory mechanism, but that mechanism does not protect against human greed."

And Wall Street DOES???!!! WHAT A FUCKING JOKE.

[whatdidshedo]

No, you completely ignore numerous arguments that prove the opposite of your points; you often claim BK is specifically FOR the regulation of crypto, when in fact he has repeatedly stated that he is NOT for the regulation,

Here's what Brian Kelly says about regulation:

"The New York State Department of Financial Services took the first step toward developing these rules this week, with the announcement of a BitLicense. Superintendent Benjamin Lawsky has taken the lead in regulating digital currency businesses with the goal of protecting consumers while fostering innovation. This was the right move at the right time."

Now Erik Vorhees' take on the same legislation, a well-respected member of the bitcoin community:

"The concern is essentially that any user of any Bitcoin service would have to be entered into all sorts of databases with their name and personal information, like where they live, what they look like, what nationality they are — probably scans of their passport or driver’s license. And so this is all just a bunch of personal information that other people have no business knowing. And if the government wants to have private information about people, they need to make a case that that person is at least a suspect of a crime, I would think. They shouldn’t be able to just require everyone’s information just because they write it on paper. So that was my main concern — there are other concerns, but that was kind of the thrust of my piece."

http://moneyandstate.com/reflections-right-privacy-response-nydfs-bitcoin-proposal/

HOWEVER, he understands it is an inevitability and feels it be necessary that people in crypto (such as you, and me), be the ones to write that regulation, and NOT the governing bodies.

Accepting something as an inevitability is NOT the same thing as supporting it, it never has been, and never will be.

That's exactly what it means, because in this case it doesn't have to be inevitable. He is just brainwashing people into accepting a new form of slavery by the financial system so Wall Street can continue its dominant position as Earth's Overlords.

Some more from Brian Kelly's original article:

"The open-source nature of digital currencies provides a built-in self-regulatory mechanism, but that mechanism does not protect against human greed."

And Wall Street DOES???!!! WHAT A FUCKING JOKE.

i thought you said you will leave and spread awareness, you can't convert people that have their minds set, look up definition of the word insanity(i just can't be nice anymore)

[IncreaseMyT]

No, you completely ignore numerous arguments that prove the opposite of your points; you often claim BK is specifically FOR the regulation of crypto, when in fact he has repeatedly stated that he is NOT for the regulation,

Here's what Brian Kelly says about regulation:

"The New York State Department of Financial Services took the first step toward developing these rules this week, with the announcement of a BitLicense. Superintendent Benjamin Lawsky has taken the lead in regulating digital currency businesses with the goal of protecting consumers while fostering innovation. This was the right move at the right time."

Now Erik Vorhees' take on the same legislation, a well-respected member of the bitcoin community:

"The concern is essentially that any user of any Bitcoin service would have to be entered into all sorts of databases with their name and personal information, like where they live, what they look like, what nationality they are — probably scans of their passport or driver’s license. And so this is all just a bunch of personal information that other people have no business knowing. And if the government wants to have private information about people, they need to make a case that that person is at least a suspect of a crime, I would think. They shouldn’t be able to just require everyone’s information just because they write it on paper. So that was my main concern — there are other concerns, but that was kind of the thrust of my piece."

http://moneyandstate.com/reflections-right-privacy-response-nydfs-bitcoin-proposal/

HOWEVER, he understands it is an inevitability and feels it be necessary that people in crypto (such as you, and me), be the ones to write that regulation, and NOT the governing bodies.

Accepting something as an inevitability is NOT the same thing as supporting it, it never has been, and never will be.

That's exactly what it means, because in this case it doesn't have to be inevitable. He is just brainwashing people into accepting a new form of slavery by the financial system so Wall Street can continue its dominant position as Earth's Overlords.

Some more from Brian Kelly's original article:

"The open-source nature of digital currencies provides a built-in self-regulatory mechanism, but that mechanism does not protect against human greed."

And Wall Street DOES???!!! WHAT A FUCKING JOKE.

Some regulation is good, too many scams in crypto.  Of course because of the nature of crypto, there will always be an unregulated exchange or coin.  As I have said numerous times.  So your argument is pretty much pathetic.

go away

[nutildah]

Some regulation is good, too many scams in crypto.  Of course because of the nature of crypto, there will always be an unregulated exchange or coin.  As I have said numerous times.  So your argument is pretty much pathetic.

go away

Really? This is what you come back with?

You people aren't even very intelligent.

You were just born into wealthy families and told you were intelligent.

You are living proof there no longer exists any correlation between wealth and intelligence.

[BTCrawl]

Please don't quote her posts. I'm trying to limit my input of crazy to a minimum

[nutildah]

Please don't quote her posts. I'm trying to limit my input of crazy to a minimum

Whatever you say Junior.

[Doging]

Please don't quote her posts. I'm trying to limit my input of crazy to a minimum

I'm so tempted to call out her bullshit but it's just bait and that should be obvious after her last outburst.

[IncreaseMyT]

anyone who thinks BTC doesn't need some regulation is most likely a crook themselves.

PS I grew up poor

[BTCrawl]

Please don't quote her posts. I'm trying to limit my input of crazy to a minimum

I'm so tempted to call out her bullshit but it's just bait and that should be obvious after her last outburst.

I eyed through some of here earlier posts before blocking her. Here's a telling one:

"I am a quality troll too, not just an average "oops spilt some haterade on you" troll.

I believe in ripping down imperfection without offering an alternative solution, all in an irritating passive-aggressive manner. "

That says pretty much everything you need to know  When people are even admitting that they're trolling it's obviously pointless to even read their posts. Use the ignore button, my friend

[cypz]

200 page milestone woooot =)


i beg you all please to not reply to the crazy, dont quote the crazy just totally ignore anything to do with the crazy being said please.

its tainting a otherwise great thread.


some kind of update by BK would be quite welcoming even if its just a post to say hi =)

[BTCrawl]

200 page milestone woooot =)

Sweet!!

[Doging]

Please don't quote her posts. I'm trying to limit my input of crazy to a minimum

I'm so tempted to call out her bullshit but it's just bait and that should be obvious after her last outburst.

I eyed through some of here earlier posts before blocking her. Here's a telling one:

"I am a quality troll too, not just an average "oops spilt some haterade on you" troll.

I believe in ripping down imperfection without offering an alternative solution, all in an irritating passive-aggressive manner. "

That says pretty much everything you need to know  When people are even admitting that they're trolling it's obviously pointless to even read their posts. Use the ignore button, my friend

She actually bumps the thread so it's not all bad.

[nutildah]

anyone who thinks BTC doesn't need some regulation is most likely a crook themselves.

... or else they understand that regulation is completely controlled by corporate interests when it comes to finance in America.

[nutildah]

"I am a quality troll too, not just an average "oops spilt some haterade on you" troll.

I believe in ripping down imperfection without offering an alternative solution, all in an irritating passive-aggressive manner. "

That says pretty much everything you need to know  When people are even admitting that they're trolling it's obviously pointless to even read their posts. Use the ignore button, my friend

For your education, I was being sarcastic.

But I really am flattered that you bother looking into my post history.

I haven't looked into yours. You want to know why? You're boring as fuck!

[BTCrawl]

Please don't quote her posts. I'm trying to limit my input of crazy to a minimum

I'm so tempted to call out her bullshit but it's just bait and that should be obvious after her last outburst.

I eyed through some of here earlier posts before blocking her. Here's a telling one:

"I am a quality troll too, not just an average "oops spilt some haterade on you" troll.

I believe in ripping down imperfection without offering an alternative solution, all in an irritating passive-aggressive manner. "

That says pretty much everything you need to know  When people are even admitting that they're trolling it's obviously pointless to even read their posts. Use the ignore button, my friend

She actually bumps the thread so it's not all bad.

Very good point 

[drakoin]

I bought my NAUT on 6/7/2014, that's when this BTCT thread about a coin with a "stabilization fund" was on page 146. Since then, I have lost 59.57% of my investment, to be specific: I still have the same amount of coins, unfortunately - but their value has somehow decreased. In relation to BTC. I don't even want to think about the value loss in relation to Fiat. Anyways, now we are on page 200.

So 59.57% / (200-146+1) = 1.083 % per page.

--> Each of these 20-messages-pages in bitcointalk ... cost me about 1 percent of my NAUT value.


Is there anything that we can do to help this coin?

 

[Doging]

I bought my NAUT on 6/7/2014, that's when this BTCT thread about a coin with a "stabilization fund" was on page 146. Since then, I have lost 59.57% of my investment, to be specific: I still have the same amount of coins, unfortunately - but their value has somehow decreased. In relation to BTC. I don't even want to think about the value loss in relation to Fiat. Anyways, now we are on page 200.

So 59.57% / (200-146+1) = 1.083 % per page.

--> Each of these 20-messages-pages in bitcointalk ... cost me about 1 percent of my NAUT value.


Is there anything that we can do to help this coin?

 

Apart from the to do list below have you got any ideas? We could always do with more promotion, especially on twitter.

Release Proof of Stake Wallet - Being Worked on by Blocktech
Mobile Wallet App - (Doesn't NEED to stake, but would be nice).
Multipool
Official block explorer - The NautInsight one is nice, but it's not marked as official (it wouldn't hurt to have that block explorer moved to the nautiluscoin domain)
Video(s) - Make Nautiluscoin promo videos!
Website update - Front page update
Come up with more plans to get naut into the hands of more people and more in the public eye