|
laredo7mm
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 10:57:04 PM |
|
ok thanks could ask hashcows too.
BTW
Safe to move coins around? i see some people saying their wallets going in and out of sync since going pos?
I wouldn't move anything. The last block (21003) was more than 30 minutes ago. On edit. Now a bunch just dropped on the block explorer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BitQuark
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 10:58:32 PM |
|
just went from block 21003 to 21012
|
|
|
|
Starkz
Member

Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 11:01:07 PM |
|
 { "blocks" : 21012, "currentblocksize" : 1263, "currentblocktx" : 1, "difficulty" : 5205.79639598, "errors" : "", "generate" : false, "genproclimit" : -1, "hashespersec" : 0, "networkhashps" : 273584891653, "pooledtx" : 1, "testnet" : false }
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1003
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 11:01:21 PM |
|
how long before they are confermed
i have 1.5 coins left in pool unconfirmed how long before confermation plz Same here i think about 1 to 2 hrs
|
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1003
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 11:02:34 PM |
|
how long before they are confermed
i have 1.5 coins left in pool unconfirmed how long before confermation plz Same here They will be comfirmed once there will be enough pos blocks minted to get them confirmed. Just like with pow ok thank you
|
|
|
|
|
|
BitQuark
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 11:05:30 PM |
|
should we run the "setgenerate true" command?
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1003
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 11:06:01 PM |
|
cryptoalts only 88% effective
|
|
|
|
|
jaayruu
Member

Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 11:07:03 PM |
|
is there a more detailed post on the Xnodes?
|
|
|
|
|
nanoprobe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
Traveling in subspace
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 11:09:20 PM |
|
cryptoalts only 88% effective
Same here. 12-13% DOA is not acceptable.
|
You'll never know what you're living for until you know what you're willing to die for. Never look back, something might be gaining on you.
|
|
|
|
battbot
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 11:10:22 PM |
|
Here are the key points I have collated from the developer over numerous posts so far: The mixer technology will be multi-path across a cluster of xnodes which runs over the encrypted protocol, so it won't be a central server, it would be similar to a distributed cluster, and the data is encapsulated inside that encrypted tunnel to prevent off-the wire sniffing (or off-the-air* for the mobile platform)... DRK didn't "invent" supernodes or the concept, and while some of concepts are similar and/or overlap, we are on a different path than DRK and as we refine the platform, it will be clear why our design, implementation and infrastructure is superior as we will have autonomous supernodes using PKI that can scale up and out to become a distributed anonymous application platform This is why the multi-path paradigm network I built back in 2005 still functions to do this day and scaled up to meet the demands of 2014... think back to 2005, granted we had the internet, but not the mobile technology - and that is a key part of my background is mobility that will be leveraged in the android anonymous POS wallet( http://eprint.iacr.org/2009/385.pdfhttp://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1208/1208.3022.pdf) (The principles for this concept come from a design that I originally leveraged back in 2005,[multi-path paradigm] the system still runs to do this day handling 50k to 100k users per day ) If your waiting for NSA proof anonymity - well that is the goal of our REV 2 release..No, mixing is only part of it, XC now contains a completely new transaction protocol layer that is encrypted and will be leveraged as a platform for all sorts of concepts.... and it will leverage multi-path paradigm topology (which again is a custom developed concept based on dual-path paradigm)So mixing is just the first application to run on top of this new protocol........ Don't want this key point to get lost --- mixing is just the first application, the list is long and the potential is huge, and since the foundation has been built and deployed, it is now time to build on that foundation.... with some revolutionary concepts and idea's..... Also the infrastructure for this will support numerous other applications, such as encrypted messaging, P2P exchange..etc granted we can only develop new features so fast, but we are putting the foundation for a multi-use, multi-purpose platform ^ xnodes
|
|
|
|
|
|
laredo7mm
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 11:10:39 PM |
|
cryptoalts only 88% effective
Same here. 12-13% DOA is not acceptable. Read their FAQ on their website. I'm pretty sure it said to expect 10% doa since it is p2pool based I am only seeing 1% rejects, but I am running -g 2 and -Q 0 on all my GPU's.
|
|
|
|
|
r0ach
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 11:11:06 PM |
|
My vote for coin name: Xnode Currency
After reading all the ridiculous coin name ideas, Xnode coin and Xcurrency seemed like the only two decent ones for using the XC abbreviation. Xcurrency takes a lot of effort to pronounce is the only thing I don't like. You could always combine the two names to Xnode Currency, then only refer to it as XC and never go through the long pronunciation.
The name "Xnode Currency" makes it sound very upscale and high tech as well to the average Joe.
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 11:13:17 PM |
|
cryptoalts only 88% effective
ask hashcows to hook xc up
|
|
|
|
|
Polycoin
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 11:13:28 PM |
|
How about Xenographic Corosisative. (XC)
That name is easy to remember and catchy.
|
Polycoin Troopers, Assemble!
|
|
|
|
BitQuark
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 11:16:05 PM |
|
I am sure something must be wrong, bacause when i unlock wallet my green minting icon is lighting , net weight: 0 and then pup out with old wallet was all ok...
by the way, i think we need more nodes... or ?
addnode=76.182.189.115
|
|
|
|
|
atcsecure (OP)
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 11:17:10 PM |
|
I am sure something must be wrong, bacause when i unlock wallet my green minting icon is lighting , net weight: 0 and then pup out with old wallet was all ok...
by the way, i think we need more nodes... or ?
162.243.109.24 188.226.174.16 use these two nodes looks miners are still submiting pow blocks, use -connect as well to only connect to these 2 nodes
|
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
laredo7mm
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 11:18:08 PM |
|
I am sure something must be wrong, bacause when i unlock wallet my green minting icon is lighting , net weight: 0 and then pup out with old wallet was all ok...
by the way, i think we need more nodes... or ?
Yeah, someone mentioned earlier and they may be correct. It is like pos is still competing with pow. A few posts back some posted their get info from the debug console and the difficulty was still saying 5000+. Not sure what is going on but I am confident that the DEV is looking into it. Hold tight. Be patient.
|
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1003
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 11:19:44 PM |
|
CryptoAlts now supports and ready for XC post-POW mining
nope
|
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 11:21:24 PM |
|
if a lot of people have not uploaded to the new wallet and still try to mine? is that a problem?
|
|
|
|
|
Alisho
|
 |
May 27, 2014, 11:24:41 PM |
|
I am sure something must be wrong, bacause when i unlock wallet my green minting icon is lighting , net weight: 0 and then pup out with old wallet was all ok...
by the way, i think we need more nodes... or ?
162.243.109.24 188.226.174.16 use these two nodes looks miners are still submiting pow blocks, use -connect as well to only connect to these 2 nodes where do we have to put the -connect?
|
|
|
|
|
|