Unmoderated XC thread

[chaeplin]

^^

^^

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=631052.msg7315641#msg7315641

Not interested

[landcrab]

^^

^^

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=631052.msg7315641#msg7315641

...

씹새끼 

[From Above]

This thread is too much drama unfortunatly.

[chaeplin]

Code:

06/15/14 15:37:59 AcceptPendingSyncCheckpoint : sync-checkpoint at dfc0bcfc2ea6ed0b0570f6b97484f697ba9ebcfe24f650cee40fd4ef7211055b

06/15/14 15:39:37 LoadBlockIndex(): hashBestChain=85c4d3901624a80cf963  height=31156  trust=136309179263  date=06/15/14 15:38:08
06/15/14 15:39:37 LoadBlockIndex(): synchronized checkpoint 1d50c6a509e442f496bf8e59bdb226c31d9edae756dcae2619fb42d18dd13443

Oho..  sync-checkpoint

[EmilioMann]

^^

^^

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=631052.msg7315641#msg7315641

Not interested

it's obvious that you are trying and not succeeding

[NewWorldCoiner]

Code:

06/15/14 15:37:59 AcceptPendingSyncCheckpoint : sync-checkpoint at dfc0bcfc2ea6ed0b0570f6b97484f697ba9ebcfe24f650cee40fd4ef7211055b

06/15/14 15:39:37 LoadBlockIndex(): hashBestChain=85c4d3901624a80cf963  height=31156  trust=136309179263  date=06/15/14 15:38:08
06/15/14 15:39:37 LoadBlockIndex(): synchronized checkpoint 1d50c6a509e442f496bf8e59bdb226c31d9edae756dcae2619fb42d18dd13443

Oho..  sync-checkpoint

1 BTC Bounty.

Find the senders address.         https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=630547.msg7296161#msg7296161

[phosphorush]

all that chaeplin does is failing to address the real point and pointing out irrelevant facts... Pretty much like fallacies in logic/argumentation.

[From Above]

Is XC the same like Litecoin?

[policymaker]

Is XC the same like Litecoin?

what do u mean litecoin? algo? XC is x11 that is now full PoS, the first real anon wallet which is currently addressing bugs and such, you can visit the topic https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=630547.8120  , this unmoderated topic was made so people can fud freely.

[From Above]

Is XC the same like Litecoin?

what do u mean litecoin? algo? XC is x11 that is now full PoS, the first real anon wallet which is currently addressing bugs and such, you can visit the topic https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=630547.8120  , this unmoderated topic was made so people can fud freely.

I mean innovation-wise. Cleary not, right? I mean its not as plain as Litecoin right?

[policymaker]

Is XC the same like Litecoin?

what do u mean litecoin? algo? XC is x11 that is now full PoS, the first real anon wallet which is currently addressing bugs and such, you can visit the topic https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=630547.8120  , this unmoderated topic was made so people can fud freely.

I mean innovation-wise. Cleary not, right? I mean its not as plain as Litecoin right?

lol no dude.

anon wallet rdy(not even final release), PoS coin(works like interest), low supply, and multipool rdy(because PoW phase done). Its nothing like litecoin... litecoin's only value comes for the fact that its old and stable really.

visit main topic and see for urself

[NewWorldCoiner]

wat a load of shit. do ur self a favour and buy nxt . We are superior in every way n i'm tired of everyone saying we are shit

Then a change of attitude and learning to use the English language correctly might see a change in your fortunes.

[chaeplin]

Ref:

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=630547.msg7335721#msg7335721

I don't see the whole "multipath" idea yet, but at least mixer outputs come from the 550XC masternode input rather than the senders inputs.


Can some further details or source code be provided for how the signatures for multipath/mixed transactions work for this release? It still doesn't look like there is any multisignature going on between the wallet and mixer wallet so in theory mixers can still steal coins in rev2?.

Not in rev2..  You cant steal coins

Can you address this with technical details or some proof.  I keep seeing people say that these coins will get stolen.  They are even talking about it in CINNI thread.  


https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=573232.msg7335393#msg7335393

XC is in the near DUMP or a Pump-n-Dump right now. They released their new wallet. Anyone know if it is better than ours??My feeling it's a scam coin. Thoughts, comments? thnx.

~darylluke.

its a scam and not worth of mention in Cinni thread

would you want a hold a coin that can stolen/lost because of xnode?  its completely experimental, people should able to expect that when they send coins somewhere it ends up at their intended destination, not someplace else because of malfunction or a bad xnode stealing coins.

Its unacceptable for your coins to be at risk because of experimental features.  Imagine you sent anon 100k XC somewhere and a bad xnode hijacks and sends it to their own address.  

Lets set the record straight

#1.  XC is not a scam coin.

#2.  XC's XNode technology is still under development

#3.  You can't send more than 10 XC's through the XNODE system, plus you have to use the debug console, so clearly it is Beta feature that is being tested to demonstrate the progress[and provide PROOF] and provide testing for the code.

#4.  REV2 Will use multisig to prevent stolen coins

Wow multisig !!

I will return when REV2 is released.



By the way, Does XC user know that every splitted tx has been charged tx fee(0.00001000).



See you all later.

[CryptoGretzky]

Ref:

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=630547.msg7335721#msg7335721

I don't see the whole "multipath" idea yet, but at least mixer outputs come from the 550XC masternode input rather than the senders inputs.


Can some further details or source code be provided for how the signatures for multipath/mixed transactions work for this release? It still doesn't look like there is any multisignature going on between the wallet and mixer wallet so in theory mixers can still steal coins in rev2?.

Not in rev2..  You cant steal coins

Can you address this with technical details or some proof.  I keep seeing people say that these coins will get stolen.  They are even talking about it in CINNI thread.  


https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=573232.msg7335393#msg7335393

XC is in the near DUMP or a Pump-n-Dump right now. They released their new wallet. Anyone know if it is better than ours??My feeling it's a scam coin. Thoughts, comments? thnx.

~darylluke.

its a scam and not worth of mention in Cinni thread

would you want a hold a coin that can stolen/lost because of xnode?  its completely experimental, people should able to expect that when they send coins somewhere it ends up at their intended destination, not someplace else because of malfunction or a bad xnode stealing coins.

Its unacceptable for your coins to be at risk because of experimental features.  Imagine you sent anon 100k XC somewhere and a bad xnode hijacks and sends it to their own address.  

Lets set the record straight

#1.  XC is not a scam coin.

#2.  XC's XNode technology is still under development

#3.  You can't send more than 10 XC's through the XNODE system, plus you have to use the debug console, so clearly it is Beta feature that is being tested to demonstrate the progress[and provide PROOF] and provide testing for the code.

#4.  REV2 Will use multisig to prevent stolen coins

Wow multisig !!

I will return when REV2 is released.



By the way, Does XC user know that every splitted tx has been charged tx fee(0.00001000).



See you all later.

You can't even solve 1.5 multi-path regular coin mixing... you think you can solve 2.0?!?!? LOL

[chaeplin]

You can't even solve 1.5 multi-path regular coin mixing... you think you can solve 2.0?!?!? LOL

You have to learn more.

You don't know the meaning of multisig.

Code:

#4.  REV2 Will use multisig to prevent stolen coins

For you.


http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/3718/what-are-multi-signature-transactions


What did he say before ?

ATCsecure can u plz explain how it is prevented from a mixer stealing coins during this beta wallet? 

a mixer on its own can't steal coins, but with out the REV2 trust system and multi-path there is a potential risk of loosing coins through a bad node.  I have setup "hardened" servers for testing, PM for details

"REV2 will have a solution to the bad actor problem.  Using a dynamic learning trust system"

Create Xnode - steal coins.

Shutdown Xnode - Move Coins to new Xnode

steal coins.

Shutdown Xnode - Move Coins to new Xnode

Rinse, repeat.


Cant wait to get started.

Lol, good luck with your uber hax skillz /facepalm

Can someone explain if that is a potential risk?

I know it's probably FUD, but it seems somewhat "logic", anyone to explain?

He wants people to sell XC and buy DRK, read his previous posts. XC and DRK are the two strongest anon Alts. XC appears to be developing tech very quickly however. Oh, someone already stole 1000 DRK, so people should not be throwing stones.

There is no risk, the trust system is designed to prevent this and other potential attack vectors

Is atcsecure still planning on giving an update tonight for future plans as well as more detailed report on xnodes?

Anyone know?

yes, dev posted this earlier.

Sorry but this is going to be fairly brief as I'm exhausted

- Future Plans
     - Finalize Business Plan
     - Identify key market potential opportunities
     - Market analysis for high growth opportunities
     - XC Foundation
     - Structured Corporate Entity
     - Android Wallet

     - Release REV2
  
     - REV2 is a major upgrade to the system, using the existing REV1 code.  It will support a decentralized learning trust system and be not only anonymous but have protection against various attack vectors

     - Post REV2 is Wallet improvements and Working today's the Retail Market Space and Point of Sales and ATM's.  A cost separate analysis will be done on this
         - Wallet Updates to include encrypted IM, encrypted IRC type communications
         - Wallet Updates to support new applications (will update)
          
     - Completing the Android wallet with the Mobile solution mentioned above -

That is the current high level plan, I will create a more formal way to present this and to keep it updated so that is available 24/7

- XNODE

  XNODE is in the wallet, the batch files run it either on mainnet or testnet.  Unfortunately I was not able to complete the testing tonight.  This will happen tomorrow with a basic user guide on how to set it up


ATCSECURE

Flawed !!

[evtrmm]

Sad sad individuals

[chaeplin]

Sad sad individuals

Yes, it's sad.

I have told you people.

I have told Dev.

Now he has changed his mind.


Really sad.

[chaeplin]

+ no more comments on this thread.
+ If anyone asks, I will reply.
+ If anyone annoys me, I will reply.

[evtrmm]

+ no more comments on this thread.
+ If anyone asks, I will reply.
+ If anyone annoys me, I will reply.

Close it? Stop the nonsense from both sides maybe?

[counter]

+ no more comments on this thread.
+ If anyone asks, I will reply.
+ If anyone annoys me, I will reply.

Close it? Stop the nonsense from both sides maybe?

Might not be a bad idea because it doesn't seem to be getting anywhere even remotely close to settled.  Can't imagine much good coming of the back and forth bickering instead I'd suggest letting the facts speak for themselves.  The hostility just makes the thread unreadable.