NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs

[WayToGo]

now its a good time to buy i think

I would wait a bit more,until BTC halving at lest.

[XbladeX]

now its a good time to buy i think

This is really tricky question when to buy.
I think that halving price up with BTC we had already
if i remind some halvings hypes like with eg. Doge price was going up
before after that was falling i don't know hot it will go with BTC but i don't expect magic buy preassure.
Even before when price was low mines were keeping BTC in wallets so they did not push price down in down trend.
Many people is waiting to sell at halving...

[bitwarrior]

now its a good time to buy i think

This is really tricky question when to buy.
I think that halving price up with BTC we had already
if i remind some halvings hypes like with eg. Doge price was going up
before after that was falling i don't know hot it will go with BTC but i don't expect magic buy preassure.
Even before when price was low mines were keeping BTC in wallets so they did not push price down in down trend.
Many people is waiting to sell at halving...

And some traders are already expecting this to happen, so they are the one now initiating the ongoing BTC Dump.If BTC is going down then why XEM is still heavily bleeding?

[dranster]

Looks like XEM heading back to 500's
Where have the hypers gone?
They should try harder to pump the price

[jelin1984]

what happen and price is down?

[rindo]

what happen and price is down?

i think just a good time for bought more,becouse up down is ordinary thing in the trade

[nzminer]

now its a good time to buy i think

I would wait a bit more,until BTC halving at lest.

Well, perhaps its better to buy your BTZC now, hold the BTC until halving happens, there is a good chance that BTC could almost double, but no one knows, but i expect it should reach near its all time high so expect $1000 per BTC at least after halving. Then your BTC would get a good amount of XEM

[Thingamajig]

made about 23,000 nem from this bear market it's now in. Quite happy.

[gentlemand]

Looks like XEM heading back to 500's
Where have the hypers gone?
They should try harder to pump the price

Nope. Far better to let nature take its course otherwise you just end up with more bagholders. If it truly deserves a high valuation then it'll get there.

[jor77]

Is anywhere any discussion or plans to change amount needed to be supernode? Does it make for me to buy 3 mils to run supernode, if in near future should required amount drop?

aim for the 3 million
if at all the network need high performance nodes able support mobike wallets
so requirement checks can go harder not easyer

i guess mostly on the tech part

if the network gets 300 high performance nodes on top of the normal nodes thats enought

and we have nearly 300 supernodes already why access should made more easy

when gather 3 million is in fact a healthy generation of buy pressure

Rather than changing SN minimum Amount, I´d prefer to lower the transaction fees. I paid 1,5 $ Yesterday for a NEM transaction. Thats much much more I would have paid for a similar Bank transfer here in Germany.

Yes. Fees are not humane now. If we want XEM $0.1 or higher, then fees have to be lowered.
Imagine:
XEM = $1 and you want to pay 1 XEM for something. Fee in this transaction suddenly 9!!! XEM 
If you pay 8 XEM - fee = 2 XEM. It's 25% of payment.
As we can see - XEM is NOT available for micropayments!
It's a pity! And developers must do something with it, if we and they want XEM to the moon!

[pabloangello]

Is anywhere any discussion or plans to change amount needed to be supernode? Does it make for me to buy 3 mils to run supernode, if in near future should required amount drop?

aim for the 3 million
if at all the network need high performance nodes able support mobike wallets
so requirement checks can go harder not easyer

i guess mostly on the tech part

if the network gets 300 high performance nodes on top of the normal nodes thats enought

and we have nearly 300 supernodes already why access should made more easy

when gather 3 million is in fact a healthy generation of buy pressure

Rather than changing SN minimum Amount, I´d prefer to lower the transaction fees. I paid 1,5 $ Yesterday for a NEM transaction. Thats much much more I would have paid for a similar Bank transfer here in Germany.

Yes. Fees are not humane now. If we want XEM $0.1 or higher, then fees have to be lowered.
Imagine:
XEM = $1 and you want to pay 1 XEM for something. Fee in this transaction suddenly 9!!! XEM 
If you pay 8 XEM - fee = 2 XEM. It's 25% of payment.
As we can see - XEM is NOT available for micropayments!
It's a pity! And developers must do something with it, if we and they want XEM to the moon!

Which usernames are NEMs devs here?

[jor77]

Is anywhere any discussion or plans to change amount needed to be supernode? Does it make for me to buy 3 mils to run supernode, if in near future should required amount drop?

aim for the 3 million
if at all the network need high performance nodes able support mobike wallets
so requirement checks can go harder not easyer

i guess mostly on the tech part

if the network gets 300 high performance nodes on top of the normal nodes thats enought

and we have nearly 300 supernodes already why access should made more easy

when gather 3 million is in fact a healthy generation of buy pressure

Rather than changing SN minimum Amount, I´d prefer to lower the transaction fees. I paid 1,5 $ Yesterday for a NEM transaction. Thats much much more I would have paid for a similar Bank transfer here in Germany.

Yes. Fees are not humane now. If we want XEM $0.1 or higher, then fees have to be lowered.
Imagine:
XEM = $1 and you want to pay 1 XEM for something. Fee in this transaction suddenly 9!!! XEM 
If you pay 8 XEM - fee = 2 XEM. It's 25% of payment.
As we can see - XEM is NOT available for micropayments!
It's a pity! And developers must do something with it, if we and they want XEM to the moon!

Which usernames are NEMs devs here?

In the first message of this thread:
NEM Core Developers
- Jaguar0625
- BloodyRookie
- Gimre
- Makoto
- Thies

NEM Core Marketers
- Makoto
- Rockethead
- Kodtycoon
- Jabo38
- Mixmaster
- Ronel

[nzminer]

Is anywhere any discussion or plans to change amount needed to be supernode? Does it make for me to buy 3 mils to run supernode, if in near future should required amount drop?

aim for the 3 million
if at all the network need high performance nodes able support mobike wallets
so requirement checks can go harder not easyer

i guess mostly on the tech part

if the network gets 300 high performance nodes on top of the normal nodes thats enought

and we have nearly 300 supernodes already why access should made more easy

when gather 3 million is in fact a healthy generation of buy pressure

Rather than changing SN minimum Amount, I´d prefer to lower the transaction fees. I paid 1,5 $ Yesterday for a NEM transaction. Thats much much more I would have paid for a similar Bank transfer here in Germany.

Yes. Fees are not humane now. If we want XEM $0.1 or higher, then fees have to be lowered.
Imagine:
XEM = $1 and you want to pay 1 XEM for something. Fee in this transaction suddenly 9!!! XEM 
If you pay 8 XEM - fee = 2 XEM. It's 25% of payment.
As we can see - XEM is NOT available for micropayments!
It's a pity! And developers must do something with it, if we and they want XEM to the moon!

In all fairness, the price jump has been so high that the fees are still that when we launched, im sure they will adjust them very soon

[jor77]

Yes. Fees are not humane now. If we want XEM $0.1 or higher, then fees have to be lowered.
Imagine:
XEM = $1 and you want to pay 1 XEM for something. Fee in this transaction suddenly 9!!! XEM 
If you pay 8 XEM - fee = 2 XEM. It's 25% of payment.
As we can see - XEM is NOT available for micropayments!
It's a pity! And developers must do something with it, if we and they want XEM to the moon!

In all fairness, the price jump has been so high that the fees are still that when we launched, im sure they will adjust them very soon

Did they think about it? What developers could say about this?

[LiskQH]

Explain to me how XEM cost can reach $ 1 , if the developers - a formula laid morons Commission :


This means that in case of transfer to pay just such a commission:

Translate XEM 1 - 9 Commission XEM or 900% of the amount transferred
Translate XEM 2 - Commission 8 XEM or 400% of the amount transferred
Translate 3 XEM - Commission 7 XEM or 233% of the amount transferred
Translate 4 XEM - Commission 6 XEM or 150% of the amount transferred
Translate 5 XEM - Commission 5 XEM or 100% of the amount transferred
Translate 6 XEM - Commission 4 XEM or 67% of the transfer amount
Translate 7 XEM - Commission XEM 3 or 43% of the transfer amount
Translate XEM 8 - Commission XEM 2 or 25% of the transfer amount
.......
and only when the amount of the transfer fee is 200 XEM tolerable 1%

So all sorts of boxes, small businesses and the general online trading becomes impossible due to inadequate fees for transfer of coins. To enable accounting XEM $ 0.01 coin in principle can not be more than 1 / $ 100 or the current exchange rate of 1 / (100 * BTC) or ~ 0.00001545 MTC.
This is a logical ceiling price of one coin of the inadequacy of the formula determining the commission! But then XEM capitalization will total $ 90 million, but this is not enough to conquer the world.
So that everything would be fine, if not a large!!!!

[LiskQH]

Probably one of the holders feared or purposefully removed cream. Now, without any important news is unlikely that trading volumes have increased. In many bins of lemons Boys oh boys, it makes no sense to drive the price. In addition, during these plums stopped working access to RichList. "coincidence? I do not think ..."
Unharmonized job holders who would kill themselves and NEM. Aims at them different. If someone has supported the idea, while others have deep @ host, their goal quickly cut the dough and roam to a new object.

P.S. It is not clear why it is not foreseen creators NEM?
We can analyze the situation.
Suppose there are about 300 primary holders of coins that financed development. But we clearly see that the active node in a network of 107 + -10. It is foolish to believe that the enthusiast finance the development is not able to establish and maintain a node, which also affects the reliability of the network. Considering that the holders of the GCD can be NEderzhateli starting coins is obtained that only <30% of the so-called HOLDERS really support this coin. The rest of> 70% likely to merge them in any suitable time. Calculate how much it billions of coins? Still there is another explanation - the original holders of coins somewhere 100 people max! What can testify to the initial deception and will also alienate the audience.
Why did it happen so? This is a big miscalculation NEM creators. There is no incentive to fund the establishment in coins continued support network. What is the point, if easier to cut down its profit X10-X1000 in the short term on the pampas and after financing with the same purpose has other projects.
I, as a user coins do not care who cuts the transfer fee, I need the stability of the network and a stable exchange rate is desirable in relation to fiat money. This is partly solved by the direct exchange pairs at Fiat, but did not provide incentives NEM coin holders do not pour your coins heaping thus pushing the market and investors and users.

[nzminer]

I wouldnt worry about the fees, its quite obvious they will have to decrease them, they often adjust the fees with BTC also for this very reason.

There may be some way to dynamically change the fees automatically if the value increases, but we still have to somehow calculate the fees based on the USD or some other fiat value, otherwise we would have nothing as a reference.

The idea is when the maximum marketcap is reached, you would not have to worry about this, or at least they would not need frequent adjusting.

[gimre]

(first paragraph)

I have not a slightest idea what you're trying to say.

But we clearly see that the active node in a network of 107 + -10.

Not sure where you're taking your data from, but there are already over 160 supernodes (and supernodes are not ALL the nodes in the network, as there are some nodes that are not public).

(another longparagraph with some illuminati stuff)

I, as a user coins do not care who cuts the transfer fee, I need the stability of the network and a stable exchange rate is desirable in relation to fiat money. This is partly solved by the direct exchange pairs at Fiat

we have two fiat pairs: xem/CNY and xem/JPY

[jelin1984]

Why Japan f.. So much

[kattokassinen]

Wow, NEM really is aiming higher than any other crypto.

http://blog.nem.io/a-major-announcement/