NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs

[BigSirko]

http://www.gtreview.com/news/global/r3-goes-public-with-blockchain-platform-code/

There was a recent article on R3.   Almost sounds like they had thrown in the towel -  by giving the code away to Hyperledger and emphasizing their network effect.   Network effect is Déjà vu for me, as Bitcoin maximalists have been using that arguments against alternates for years.    

Also I'm not sure if I can buy the idea of 70 companies "working together" on something.  Every company has its' own interests and visions and no way could that many companies ever agree on something.   Also that many companies working together is guaranteed social loafing.
If I run one of these companies, why would I spend any money or assign staff when another company will do it?  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_loafing

Seems a lot of people are buying into the quantity over quality argument.

[rockethead]

http://www.gtreview.com/news/global/r3-goes-public-with-blockchain-platform-code/

There was a recent article on R3.   Almost sounds like they had thrown in the towel -  by giving the code away to Hyperledger and emphasizing their network effect.   Network effect is Déjà vu for me, as Bitcoin maximalists have been using that arguments against alternates for years.    

Also I'm not sure if I can buy the idea of 70 companies "working together" on something.  Every company has its' own interests and visions and no way could that many companies ever agree on something.   Also that many companies working together is guaranteed social loafing.
If I run one of these companies, why would I spend any money or assign staff when another company will do it?  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_loafing

Seems a lot of people are buying into the quantity over quality argument.

I read an article recently. If precedence is any measure, this is a sure failure, as has been the cases previously. The only people to gain from this are the consultants, i.e., R3 staffs.

This is a "me too" nice feeling. None of them are really serious. Each bank will embark on their own initiatives and wrestle that into the consortium to gain an upper hand, leaving those suckers who are not, the real losers.

[Fatih87SK]

Hi Rockethead,

Is it possible to import a wallet into the Mobile App just by its Address?
So you can just see the transactions/harvesting rewards/supernode rewards?

And when you actually want to send XEM or do another kind of transaction; only then the App asks for the Private Key?

[rockethead]

Hi Rockethead,

Is it possible to import a wallet into the Mobile App just by its Address?
So you can just see the transactions/harvesting rewards/supernode rewards?

And when you actually want to send XEM or do another kind of transaction; only then the App asks for the Private Key?

>Is it possible to import a wallet into the Mobile App just by its Address? Not in our release version, but it can be programmed to watch though

> only then the App asks for the Private Key? Too hard to implement because the Private key is too long.

[garp]

are nanowallet and mobile wallets use same way of backup import keys?
means can i use same addresses on both?

You can use the same private key in Nano, Android, Lighwallet, and NCC and you will have the same account on each wallet. 

Also, NCC has an option to export wallet to Lightwallet format.  That wallet will work in both Nano and Lightwallet.  And now that the Android app is out, the next update to Nano in a week or so will also have an "export wallet to Android" option where the app just scans a QR in Nano and now you have the same account on your phone and your desktop.

Can we add a second account to an existing nano or mobile wallet using the private key? Or do we need to import a second account into a second wallet?

yes you can. But the feature was taken out. Reason is the NCC import function gets screwed up a little, so says @Jabo38

The feature was taken out, so I understand this as "No, you can't". Correct?

[garp]

A whitepaper will be released soon to expound the real value of NEM as a project. It is something that will address what most of the world is talking about. Yes, talking about, not in production.

Take your time. We want the waiting to be worth it 
Keep up the good work.

[jabo38]

a little more about Apostille
http://www.econotimes.com/Tech-Bureau-and-NEM-launch-notary-and-timestamping-solution-Apostille-386394
https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=1672157.msg16790318#msg16790318

[DIMKAZDS]

A whitepaper will be released soon to expound the real value of NEM as a project. It is something that will address what most of the world is talking about. Yes, talking about, not in production.

Take your time. We want the waiting to be worth it 
Keep up the good work.

+1 )) So True. Thank you NEM Team!

Also one interesting article:

https://cointelegraph.com/news/time-based-cryptocurrency-utopia-or-uber-like-labour-market-game-changer

[nzminer]

Markets are reacting well to the news!

[rockethead]

are nanowallet and mobile wallets use same way of backup import keys?
means can i use same addresses on both?

You can use the same private key in Nano, Android, Lighwallet, and NCC and you will have the same account on each wallet.  

Also, NCC has an option to export wallet to Lightwallet format.  That wallet will work in both Nano and Lightwallet.  And now that the Android app is out, the next update to Nano in a week or so will also have an "export wallet to Android" option where the app just scans a QR in Nano and now you have the same account on your phone and your desktop.

Can we add a second account to an existing nano or mobile wallet using the private key? Or do we need to import a second account into a second wallet?

yes you can. But the feature was taken out. Reason is the NCC import function gets screwed up a little, so says @Jabo38

The feature was taken out, so I understand this as "No, you can't". Correct?

It is a feature that was taken out. So, you "can actually put that back in". But you are not having it now because it has been taken out. But anyone reasonably skilled can put that feature back in.

[pow2poiConvert]

Added https

https://nemnodes.org/

[shapeshiftscam]

a little more about Apostille
http://www.econotimes.com/Tech-Bureau-and-NEM-launch-notary-and-timestamping-solution-Apostille-386394
https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=1672157.msg16790318#msg16790318

Thanks for sharing, very good news indeed.

[nzminer]

NEM - MAKE CRYPTO GREAT AGAIN! 

[BigSirko]

NEM - MAKE CRYPTO GREAT AGAIN! 

NEM did surge from Brexit.  I notice on Coinmarketcap, compared to other alternates, it seems to be doing good at the moment. 

[Fatih87SK]

Hi Rockethead,

Is it possible to import a wallet into the Mobile App just by its Address?
So you can just see the transactions/harvesting rewards/supernode rewards?

And when you actually want to send XEM or do another kind of transaction; only then the App asks for the Private Key?

>Is it possible to import a wallet into the Mobile App just by its Address? Not in our release version, but it can be programmed to watch though

> only then the App asks for the Private Key? Too hard to implement because the Private key is too long.

Ok, maybe the first step is to make it possible to import 'read-only' wallets so you can only watch what's happening on your account.

If this gets implemented, I will use the app for sure; so I don't have to go to the Blockchain explorer all the time.
Why am I not using it now? Because I'm a little paranoid and afraid that my Smartphone could be hacked and my XEMs are stolen.

When I have time; I will also point out some minor Design improvements. Which of course will be my own opinion. So you guys are free to ignore that =)

[jabo38]

Ok, maybe the first step is to make it possible to import 'read-only' wallets so you can only watch what's happening on your account.

If this gets implemented, I will use the app for sure; so I don't have to go to the Blockchain explorer all the time.
Why am I not using it now? Because I'm a little paranoid and afraid that my Smartphone could be hacked and my XEMs are stolen.

When I have time; I will also point out some minor Design improvements. Which of course will be my own opinion. So you guys are free to ignore that =)

What I hear you saying is you want a "watch only" option where you add an account's address to the app, and then it just watches you and notifies you if there is some activity.  That is of course possible but nobody has added that yet. 

[cryptonit]

Ok, maybe the first step is to make it possible to import 'read-only' wallets so you can only watch what's happening on your account.

If this gets implemented, I will use the app for sure; so I don't have to go to the Blockchain explorer all the time.
Why am I not using it now? Because I'm a little paranoid and afraid that my Smartphone could be hacked and my XEMs are stolen.

When I have time; I will also point out some minor Design improvements. Which of course will be my own opinion. So you guys are free to ignore that =)

What I hear you saying is you want a "watch only" option where you add an account's address to the app, and then it just watches you and notifies you if there is some activity.  That is of course possible but nobody has added that yet.  

its basical just a filter for stuff that happens on blockchain based on address and not if u have the private key that fit
i think its not hard to modify that

example each blockexplorer act that way

all the light wallets run no own copy of chain anyway
and just ask the node they are connected too if he have relevant data of their addresses to show them

i dont even think he check if u can prove the ownership for that addresses by sign something

so in fact the change should be a little one to request data even regarding addresses u dont own private key

that would be your desired "watch mode"

such watching addresses ability can be important if u wana code stuff that automatic manage multisig stuff based on if some transactions happened

some kind of automated escrow or call it offchain smart contracts that only need multisig able blockchain

and tell me who have the most advanced multisig implementation?

yes

NEM!

[stereotype]

NEM - MAKE CRYPTO GREAT AGAIN! 

Check out the cap  .... 
https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=1667736.msg16803717#msg16803717

[Fatih87SK]

Ok, maybe the first step is to make it possible to import 'read-only' wallets so you can only watch what's happening on your account.

If this gets implemented, I will use the app for sure; so I don't have to go to the Blockchain explorer all the time.
Why am I not using it now? Because I'm a little paranoid and afraid that my Smartphone could be hacked and my XEMs are stolen.

When I have time; I will also point out some minor Design improvements. Which of course will be my own opinion. So you guys are free to ignore that =)

What I hear you saying is you want a "watch only" option where you add an account's address to the app, and then it just watches you and notifies you if there is some activity.  That is of course possible but nobody has added that yet. 

That's exactly what I mean.

[willowfoot]

Great infographic shared in the Apostille thread comparing to Factom!

BTW, what is an HD Colored Account?

Some people asked how Apostille is different from Factom.