NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs

[gentlemand]

but if someone didn't buy all 3 million way back, then the requirement will price most people out at today's prices.

It's a staggering amount of money indeed, but you could argue that exclusivity serves a purpose. Someone with 3 million is either old school or a true believer if they've bought in.

For the super nodes the last thing you want is people flitting in and out. They're designed to be the backbone of the whole thing run by people with a deep commitment.

[wosch76]

I wonder how many of the big exchanges (Kraken, bitfinex, gdax, ...) currently struggle to implement NEM

[samysamy1]

According to bittrex graph. NEM is going to rise. I predict rise to be for next 6 coming hours and then some corrections. We will see!

We have been saying this for a couple of days now

[wiser]

but if someone didn't buy all 3 million way back, then the requirement will price most people out at today's prices.

It's a staggering amount of money indeed, but you could argue that exclusivity serves a purpose. Someone with 3 million is either old school or a true believer if they've bought in.

For the super nodes the last thing you want is people flitting in and out. They're designed to be the backbone of the whole thing run by people with a deep commitment.

Good points, especially if there are enough. If there aren't enough, then maybe incrementally reducing the entry barrier until desired number is obtained might be a good plan.

[501026666]

According to bittrex graph. NEM is going to rise. I predict rise to be for next 6 coming hours and then some corrections. We will see!

We have been saying this for a couple of days now

Will the NEM replace XRP to be No 2?

[wiser]

Another question: Is reducing the 3,000,000 XEM minimum holding requirement to run a supernode a possibility? I saw a post here about reducing that requirement to 100,000. If the requirement could get reduced to anything below one million I would jump on it, as I know someone who would help me set it up.

EDIT: I should also ask what is the payment for supernodes these days?

I dont see super node holding requirement changing anytime in the near future if at all.

Also, I am not sure about your error but I know you cant start harvesting until you have a vested balance of at least 10k XEM. So if you just downloaded the wallet I do not think you can start harvesting yet. 1% of your unvested balance will become vested every 1440 blocks which is about 24 hours.

I checked and I have a vested balance that is greater than 10,000 XEM, so that's not the issue. Any other ideas?

[DIMKAZDS]

but if someone didn't buy all 3 million way back, then the requirement will price most people out at today's prices.

It's a staggering amount of money indeed, but you could argue that exclusivity serves a purpose. Someone with 3 million is either old school or a true believer if they've bought in.

For the super nodes the last thing you want is people flitting in and out. They're designed to be the backbone of the whole thing run by people with a deep commitment.

Good points, especially if there are enough. If there aren't enough, then maybe incrementally reducing the entry barrier until desired number is obtained might be a good plan.

yep, according to BloodyRookie ( Developer) there was enough of them about 1 year ago (it was about twice lower amount of them, then now)

[wiser]

but if someone didn't buy all 3 million way back, then the requirement will price most people out at today's prices.

It's a staggering amount of money indeed, but you could argue that exclusivity serves a purpose. Someone with 3 million is either old school or a true believer if they've bought in.

For the super nodes the last thing you want is people flitting in and out. They're designed to be the backbone of the whole thing run by people with a deep commitment.

Good points, especially if there are enough. If there aren't enough, then maybe incrementally reducing the entry barrier until desired number is obtained might be a good plan.

yep, according to BloodyRookie ( Developer) there was enough of them about 1 year ago (it was about twice lower amount of them, then now)

Well, try finding an available slot on any of those nodes to do delegated harvesting! I've gone through the first hundred or so on the list and they are all full.

What would be the configuration to custom add if I just want to use my own computer to harvest?

It looks like my earlier error message came because I was trying to activate delegated harvesting when it's already active. Now I just need to actually start delegated harvesting, but can't find an available slot.

EDIT: Is there a way to set up a regular node that would just allow me to delegate harvest, but isn't a supernode?

[BloodyRookie]

I'm sure this is a simple problem, so wondering if anyone knows the answer. I just downloaded and installed the new nanowallet. I'd like to activate delegated harvesting. When I try, I get the error message that says

FAILURE_IMPORTANCE_TRANSFER_NEEDS_TO_BE_DEACTIVATED

How do I resolve it?

Thanks!

If you had activated delegated harvesting in NCC, it is still activated when you switch to Nano. You could just start delegated harvesting in Nano.

[BloodyRookie]

I'm sure this is a simple problem, so wondering if anyone knows the answer. I just downloaded and installed the new nanowallet. I'd like to activate delegated harvesting. When I try, I get the error message that says

FAILURE_IMPORTANCE_TRANSFER_NEEDS_TO_BE_DEACTIVATED

How do I resolve it?

Thanks!

I also have a question: If I import the old wallet to nano, will delegated harvesting be active or do I need to restart it again and pay a fee?

It will still be active, no need to activate it again.

[kocodile]

According to bittrex graph. NEM is going to rise. I predict rise to be for next 6 coming hours and then some corrections. We will see!

We have been saying this for a couple of days now

Will the NEM replace XRP to be No 2?

100%

[wiser]

I'm sure this is a simple problem, so wondering if anyone knows the answer. I just downloaded and installed the new nanowallet. I'd like to activate delegated harvesting. When I try, I get the error message that says

FAILURE_IMPORTANCE_TRANSFER_NEEDS_TO_BE_DEACTIVATED

How do I resolve it?

Thanks!

If you had activated delegated harvesting in NCC, it is still activated when you switch to Nano. You could just start delegated harvesting in Nano.

I figured that out. But now I am having the hardest time finding a node with available slots for delegated harvesting. Is there an easier way to search for an open slot than manually going through each node on the list?

If all else fails, is there a way to create a node (not a supernode) just to allow for delegated harvesting?

If I wanted to just harvest on my computer, can I do that with nanowallet? If so, how?

My preference would be to just connect to someone else's node for harvesting, but that is proving difficult and has been for a long time, which is why I have not harvested in almost a year.

[qwertyqwerty]

Sigh. Wish I wouldn't have dumped at 30 statoshis. I could have been a millionaire!

[liemly]

Sigh. Wish I wouldn't have dumped at 30 statoshis. I could have been a millionaire!

still under 1usd,  buy back now and u maybe a hundrednaires 

[ciappa]

i want to participate in the ico of xarcade
any link?

what is the ico of xarcade? In NEM thread.. I have missed something? 

[Jamthirteen]

Hello good day,

I am JAMTHIRTEEN and this letter is in reference to a claim I made on NEM forum sometime ago. I reported a situation to this platform about how we were being cheated out of our rights but no steps were taken to remedy the situation.

We are three friends that work together in the same place, and because we believed in this idea, we all decided to create accounts on the platform, we did the registrations at our office, the same location. We were aware of the house rule that states that a member cannot own more than one stake, and can only get another for a loved one. None of us flouted that rule because we understood why the rule was put up. So we all took care and ensured that we abided by this rule, two of us opened an account each, and also opened one each for our partners, the third only created an account for himself. We followed the rule to the letter. The BTT accounts in question are:

JAMTHIRTEEN: NBXVHA-S2TOYM-H4GFFO-V3SGIN-SP6DLT-HERCMK-RBN3
MAMEN (JAMTHIRTEEN’s partner): NBKEYS-BJB74B-5M7Q4Z-Y6N5AZ-JPDUY7-5T7UHZ-VINH

JERJU80: NC7IWM-24KC6K-BT7SH2-2VOESS-QNGCTA-CSDKZT-CK72
SANDRAMABE (JERJU80’s partner): NC2V53-WKYFCC-MKETYL-M3IXHJ-VF3HJZ-B4IHTC-LQDZ

OSCARVENEGAS: NC7545-ULAZAR-5CEWIU-R3H5R6-6Z6SGH-XP64NX-JNUY

It therefore came as a surprise to us when the administrators decided to only give SANDRAMABE her stake and deny the rest of us ours; they claimed that only one person opened all five accounts; and that was after coming up with a new rule that made separate accounts registered on the same IP address invalid. This was surprising to us as each of us are different persons and if it was made clear that registering with the same IP address was wrong, we would have done our registrations in different places. We contacted the administrators and clarified the situation, as far as we were concerned, the rule was to ensure that one person doesn’t get more than one stake, so we offered to provide any proof they requested to prove that all five accounts were valid. All the accounts were registered with work email address, which are unique to every employee and cannot be falsified. We even offered to send pictorial evidence even as far as sending our passports as seen in these two posts

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=654845.msg11975858#msg11975858

and

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=654845.msg11962374#msg11962374

 None of our offers were accepted. I posted a few times on the forum to bring the admins’ attention to the situation, all I got was cold shoulder. Eventually I made it clear that I would not let it go, and that at a certain time, if we were not given what we were promised, we would take legal action. That time has come now and I am now using this opportunity to give the administrators one last opportunity to ensure that we settle this out of court, I am giving the administrators a one month notice to give us our stakes or we will have to meet in court to resolve this. Thank you!


PS: I will be sending this to all members involved in this project. I will be sending it to the NEM Core developers, Jaguar0625, BloodyRookie, Gimre; and the NEM Core marketers Rockethead, Kodtycoon, Jabo38, Mixmaster, and Ronel. I will be doing this to ensure that everyone involved understands the situation.

[kauppalahti]

Hello good day,

I am JAMTHIRTEEN and this letter is in reference to a claim I made on NEM forum sometime ago. I reported a situation to this platform about how we were being cheated out of our rights but no steps were taken to remedy the situation.

We are three friends that work together in the same place, and because we believed in this idea, we all decided to create accounts on the platform, we did the registrations at our office, the same location. We were aware of the house rule that states that a member cannot own more than one stake, and can only get another for a loved one. None of us flouted that rule because we understood why the rule was put up. So we all took care and ensured that we abided by this rule, two of us opened an account each, and also opened one each for our partners, the third only created an account for himself. We followed the rule to the letter. The BTT accounts in question are:

JAMTHIRTEEN: NBXVHA-S2TOYM-H4GFFO-V3SGIN-SP6DLT-HERCMK-RBN3
MAMEN (JAMTHIRTEEN’s partner): NBKEYS-BJB74B-5M7Q4Z-Y6N5AZ-JPDUY7-5T7UHZ-VINH

JERJU80: NC7IWM-24KC6K-BT7SH2-2VOESS-QNGCTA-CSDKZT-CK72
SANDRAMABE (JERJU80’s partner): NC2V53-WKYFCC-MKETYL-M3IXHJ-VF3HJZ-B4IHTC-LQDZ

OSCARVENEGAS: NC7545-ULAZAR-5CEWIU-R3H5R6-6Z6SGH-XP64NX-JNUY

It therefore came as a surprise to us when the administrators decided to only give SANDRAMABE her stake and deny the rest of us ours; they claimed that only one person opened all five accounts; and that was after coming up with a new rule that made separate accounts registered on the same IP address invalid. This was surprising to us as each of us are different persons and if it was made clear that registering with the same IP address was wrong, we would have done our registrations in different places. We contacted the administrators and clarified the situation, as far as we were concerned, the rule was to ensure that one person doesn’t get more than one stake, so we offered to provide any proof they requested to prove that all five accounts were valid. All the accounts were registered with work email address, which are unique to every employee and cannot be falsified. We even offered to send pictorial evidence even as far as sending our passports as seen in these two posts

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=654845.msg11975858#msg11975858

and

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=654845.msg11962374#msg11962374

 None of our offers were accepted. I posted a few times on the forum to bring the admins’ attention to the situation, all I got was cold shoulder. Eventually I made it clear that I would not let it go, and that at a certain time, if we were not given what we were promised, we would take legal action. That time has come now and I am now using this opportunity to give the administrators one last opportunity to ensure that we settle this out of court, I am giving the administrators a one month notice to give us our stakes or we will have to meet in court to resolve this. Thank you!


PS: I will be sending this to all members involved in this project. I will be sending it to the NEM Core developers, Jaguar0625, BloodyRookie, Gimre; and the NEM Core marketers Rockethead, Kodtycoon, Jabo38, Mixmaster, and Ronel. I will be doing this to ensure that everyone involved understands the situation.

Unfortunatly the time have resolved your issues.

[BloodyRookie]

I figured that out. But now I am having the hardest time finding a node with available slots for delegated harvesting. Is there an easier way to search for an open slot than manually going through each node on the list?

HugeAlice.nem.ninja has enough slots.

[tyz]

In the long term yes. Ripple polarized very much. This is because it has been premined and is proof-of-trust. It must be noted that 100 billion ripples have been created, but only one third has been circulated so far. The rest belongs the Ripple company. NEM, on the other hand, is completely distributed and completely decentralized. And distribution is very well compared to many other similar projects. I am convinced, NEM will overtake Ripple in market cap anyway in the long run.

According to bittrex graph. NEM is going to rise. I predict rise to be for next 6 coming hours and then some corrections. We will see!

We have been saying this for a couple of days now

Will the NEM replace XRP to be No 2?

[Tehfiend]

Hello good day,

I am JAMTHIRTEEN and this letter is in reference to a claim I made on NEM forum sometime ago. I reported a situation to this platform about how we were being cheated out of our rights but no steps were taken to remedy the situation.

We are three friends that work together in the same place, and because we believed in this idea, we all decided to create accounts on the platform, we did the registrations at our office, the same location. We were aware of the house rule that states that a member cannot own more than one stake, and can only get another for a loved one. None of us flouted that rule because we understood why the rule was put up. So we all took care and ensured that we abided by this rule, two of us opened an account each, and also opened one each for our partners, the third only created an account for himself. We followed the rule to the letter. The BTT accounts in question are:

JAMTHIRTEEN: NBXVHA-S2TOYM-H4GFFO-V3SGIN-SP6DLT-HERCMK-RBN3
MAMEN (JAMTHIRTEEN’s partner): NBKEYS-BJB74B-5M7Q4Z-Y6N5AZ-JPDUY7-5T7UHZ-VINH

JERJU80: NC7IWM-24KC6K-BT7SH2-2VOESS-QNGCTA-CSDKZT-CK72
SANDRAMABE (JERJU80’s partner): NC2V53-WKYFCC-MKETYL-M3IXHJ-VF3HJZ-B4IHTC-LQDZ

OSCARVENEGAS: NC7545-ULAZAR-5CEWIU-R3H5R6-6Z6SGH-XP64NX-JNUY

It therefore came as a surprise to us when the administrators decided to only give SANDRAMABE her stake and deny the rest of us ours; they claimed that only one person opened all five accounts; and that was after coming up with a new rule that made separate accounts registered on the same IP address invalid. This was surprising to us as each of us are different persons and if it was made clear that registering with the same IP address was wrong, we would have done our registrations in different places. We contacted the administrators and clarified the situation, as far as we were concerned, the rule was to ensure that one person doesn’t get more than one stake, so we offered to provide any proof they requested to prove that all five accounts were valid. All the accounts were registered with work email address, which are unique to every employee and cannot be falsified. We even offered to send pictorial evidence even as far as sending our passports as seen in these two posts

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=654845.msg11975858#msg11975858

and

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=654845.msg11962374#msg11962374

 None of our offers were accepted. I posted a few times on the forum to bring the admins’ attention to the situation, all I got was cold shoulder. Eventually I made it clear that I would not let it go, and that at a certain time, if we were not given what we were promised, we would take legal action. That time has come now and I am now using this opportunity to give the administrators one last opportunity to ensure that we settle this out of court, I am giving the administrators a one month notice to give us our stakes or we will have to meet in court to resolve this. Thank you!


PS: I will be sending this to all members involved in this project. I will be sending it to the NEM Core developers, Jaguar0625, BloodyRookie, Gimre; and the NEM Core marketers Rockethead, Kodtycoon, Jabo38, Mixmaster, and Ronel. I will be doing this to ensure that everyone involved understands the situation.

If your story is true then my heart goes out to you but only for the loss of around 1000 USD. If you truly believed in NEM then you could have easily purchased a stake for $200-$300 in late 2015 and if you did receive your stake then there's a good chance you would have also sold it long ago.