[ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000

[BurstIncomeAsset]

Dividend received, thx

Sure, no problem!

Done all INCOME dividends paid out. The NXT part:

NXT dividend: 60.13 NXT - 4 fee = 56.13 NXT
Nr shareholders: 4 (excluding main address)
Dividend /share: 0.0011226 NXT.
https://nxtforum.org/asset-exchange-general/%28ann%29-income-asset-id-327508399992504862/msg195375/#msg195375
The total of 0.01BTC paid out. Now I`m asking the community, and I`ll ask the NXT community too: When should we pay the next INCOME dividend, shall we leave the 0.01 BTC trigger or shall we raise it to 0.02BTC to save on fees? What do you think shareholders?

Raise the trigger point

Indeed, i`ve already explained it in the burst forum, that we will do trading too from now on:

https://burstforum.com/index.php?threads/ann-income-asset-decentralized-referral-empire-based-income.839/page-6#post-6223

I initially wanted a passive profit system where we will just lean back and get the casino profits, but this is not that profitable, and certainly not with our current capital size. For that we will need 20-30 bitcoins.

So we will do trading too ,in fact i`ve already bought some HIFUN altcoin, for 1 satoshi so we have 0 risk in that trade, it can only go higher, or worst care, if the coin loses momentum, we sell it back at 1 satoshi.

However usually these altcoins can get 10-20 satoshi, so we have a potential to x10 our capital with 0 risk. What do you think?

[luxe]

There may be other good assets, but I have no knowledge/information about the other assets, so excuse me if I left out a good asset

all assets with at least one trade ...

ACTIVE (with trades in last 4 weeks)
name 'ByteEnt', id '1800253871016293364', bidOrders '14', askOrders '8', trades '311', accounts '86'
name 'BdePool', id '3101115594843807035', bidOrders '7', askOrders '7', trades '185', accounts '35'
name 'ByteEMini', id '639537212154320', bidOrders '3', askOrders '3', trades '102', accounts '11'
name 'HardInvest', id '15295227971848272658', bidOrders '1', askOrders '11', trades '234', accounts '47'
name 'ByteBank', id '15398588224704032134', bidOrders '6', askOrders '3', trades '109', accounts '17'
name 'solarfarm', id '11330004142522539040', bidOrders '5', askOrders '5', trades '477', accounts '71'
name 'pos', id '17647398155953557298', bidOrders '2', askOrders '10', trades '44', accounts '41'
name 'hash', id '18119229184320918134', bidOrders '17', askOrders '10', trades '844', accounts '77'
name 'PetaByte', id '14668748687827404894', bidOrders '7', askOrders '6', trades '143', accounts '32'
name 'Debenture', id '17164677442585110887', bidOrders '2', askOrders '7', trades '74', accounts '21'
name 'ByteGear', id '18266087415257944078', bidOrders '2', askOrders '6', trades '103', accounts '29'
name 'Income', id '11188744773544606055', bidOrders '10', askOrders '49', trades '155', accounts '120'
name 'BdeBank', id '4053085726300717216', bidOrders '3', askOrders '10', trades '261', accounts '38'
name 'Drives', id '13332903480994488665', bidOrders '0', askOrders '1', trades '8', accounts '2'

INACTIVE (without trades in last 4 weeks)
name 'BCPT', id '12791182347560578640', bidOrders '3', askOrders '15', trades '502', accounts '78'
name 'HardCloud', id '12747217131514889961', bidOrders '1', askOrders '0', trades '4', accounts '3'
name 'BLotto14', id '3027301435742414364', bidOrders '2', askOrders '7', trades '97', accounts '35'
name 'StupidPts', id '4271892478945522528', bidOrders '0', askOrders '5', trades '50', accounts '4'
name 'SyGear', id '11269823358919764726', bidOrders '0', askOrders '0', trades '2', accounts '1'
name 'BMPOOL', id '11375670541237055652', bidOrders '0', askOrders '3', trades '95', accounts '11'
name 'TestAsset', id '13121531462532881593', bidOrders '0', askOrders '0', trades '2', accounts '2'
name 'BLTPS', id '12588513172055458075', bidOrders '0', askOrders '1', trades '1', accounts '16'
name 'Asset', id '7680550370207558962', bidOrders '0', askOrders '0', trades '3', accounts '1'
name 'BurstFund', id '673530795527425458', bidOrders '0', askOrders '0', trades '2', accounts '26'

[notabeliever]

Blago error ? "Debug Assertion Failed"  

Why when running blago I get Error message as follow

"Debug Assertion Failed" Program: E:\blago.1.150509 MSVCP120D.dll File:C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 12.0\VC\include\vector line: 1201

Expression:vector subscript out of range

I'm running WIN7 /64 ultimate no service packs. 8GB Memory. Turned a lot of the previous false features on which are great to use.

"ShowMsg" : false,
"ShowUpdates" : false,
"UseSorting" : false,
"Debug": false,
"SendBestOnly": false,
"UseFastRcv" : false,
"SendInterval": 100,
"UpdateInterval": 2000,
"UseLog" : false,
"UseCleanMem" : true,
"ShowWinner" : true,
"SkipBadPlots" : false,
 "UseBoost" : true

( would of posted this in the forum under mining support however I think I needed privileges or something.
Thankyou Haitch,Wmikrat and Bobafatt for providing the windows running bat I just started to use so I can by pass the error message for unattended mining)

[haitch]

Blago error ? "Debug Assertion Failed"  

Why when running blago I get Error message as follow

"Debug Assertion Failed" Program: E:\blago.1.150509 MSVCP120D.dll File:C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 12.0\VC\include\vector line: 1201

Expression:vector subscript out of range

I'm running WIN7 /64 ultimate no service packs. 8GB Memory. Turned a lot of the previous false features on which are great to use.

"ShowMsg" : false,
"ShowUpdates" : false,
"UseSorting" : false,
"Debug": false,
"SendBestOnly": false,
"UseFastRcv" : false,
"SendInterval": 100,
"UpdateInterval": 2000,
"UseLog" : false,
"UseCleanMem" : true,
"ShowWinner" : true,
"SkipBadPlots" : false,
 "UseBoost" : true

( would of posted this in the forum under mining support however I think I needed privileges or something.
Thankyou Haitch,Wmikrat and Bobafatt for providing the windows running bat I just started to use so I can by pass the error message for unattended mining)

Do you get the message every time you try to mine, or randomly? I used to get it randomly, but I've now switched to the GPU assisted jminer - never had an issue with it.

https://burstforum.com/index.php?threads/ann-burstcoin-jminer-gpu-assisted-poc-miner.842/

[notabeliever]

Yes everyday this week and since after I increased the amount of plot files using wplotgenerator. I used Jminer  for a whole month then in September switched to Blago. Java memory wise doesn't run well with windows 7 for very long.

Blago ran for 48 hours straight so maybe its windows 7 memory issue like jminer. Both do work well and have yielded good amounts of burst. Okay well if I have time I'll setup a virtualbox and run win10 or linux

[haitch]

Yes everyday this week and since after I increased the amount of plot files using wplotgenerator. I used Jminer  for a whole month then in September switched to Blago. Java memory wise doesn't run well with windows 7 for very long.

Blago ran for 48 hours straight so maybe its windows 7 memory issue like jminer. Both do work well and have yielded good amounts of burst. Okay well if I have time I'll setup a virtualbox and run win10 or linux

Blago would have an issue once a week or so, jminer - no issues. Even on a virtualized guest VM with hardware pass through. The guest however would not plot - mining ok, plotting, not happening.

[jwinterm]

What's up with IRC channel being invite only now? It's not like anyone ever said anything in there anyway...

[haitch]

What's up with IRC channel being invite only now? It's not like anyone ever said anything in there anyway...

It was an accidental, unnoticed, typo by me, fixed now.

H.

[Elmit]

FYI:

burstforum.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed. The certificate is only valid for Parallels Panel (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)

[haitch]

FYI:

FYI:

burstforum.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed. The certificate is only valid for Parallels Panel (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)

And mininghere.com doesn't use any certificates at all - totally insecure.

Did you have a point ?

[Elmit]

FYI:

FYI:

burstforum.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed. The certificate is only valid for Parallels Panel (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)

And mininghere.com doesn't use any certificates at all - totally insecure.

Did you have a point ?

Mininghere.com does not need one!
Therefore it does not show an error.
If burstforum.com doesn't need one, then don't show this error!

[haitch]

FYI:

FYI:

burstforum.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed. The certificate is only valid for Parallels Panel (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)

And mininghere.com doesn't use any certificates at all - totally insecure.

Did you have a point ?

Mininghere.com does not need one!
Therefore it does not show an error.
If burstforum.com doesn't need one, then don't show this error!

It's not an error, it's a warning that while your communications are secure, they're not as secure as desirable.

Whereas, on your site, usernames and passwords are passed in cleartext ... so anyone going to http://mininghere.com/wp-login.php?redirect_to=http%3A%2F%2Fmininghere.com%2F is totally insecure, and subject to having their credentials stolen!

Whats better Elmit, no security at all, or a warning about not being as secure as desirable?

[Elmit]

FYI:

FYI:

burstforum.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed. The certificate is only valid for Parallels Panel (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)

And mininghere.com doesn't use any certificates at all - totally insecure.

Did you have a point ?

Mininghere.com does not need one!
Therefore it does not show an error.
If burstforum.com doesn't need one, then don't show this error!

It's not an error, it's a warning that while your communications are secure, they're not as secure as desirable.

What's your problem?

Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer

Get a good certificate or just remove it. Simple, clear, ....

For further information use GOOGLE!!!!

[Elmit]

The currently 10 best miners:

[ 23.10% ] BURST-KQ2P-FWCW-AAYU-D9G24 (582) /bin/laden
[ 5.83% ] BURST-3N7E-CX8T-K6AM-D6Q4N (147)
[ 3.77% ] BURST-5M3F-REHB-PWRE-6E4HP (95) M1
[ 3.65% ] BURST-A7NY-ESG8-9VAT-DQJVF (92) M2
[ 2.02% ] BURST-XNS5-62HN-J3UY-79THE (51)
[ 1.98% ] BURST-SDAC-FFUD-SMCB-D3Q74 (50)
[ 1.63% ] BURST-42JY-E6TZ-885E-AZ9HK (41) <-= Pythagorean Switch =->
[ 1.39% ] BURST-ACGB-YGHQ-G9ZL-5XD7U (35) Haitch ACGB [ pool: 12468105956737329840 ]
[ 1.19% ] BURST-B2XN-WGYA-ND3F-2LHHS (30)
[ 1.19% ] BURST-FDUK-NG2J-5LFN-6EP8H (30) UD3

/bin/laden added 2%, but that might be a result of the low Est. Networksize (PB): 6.0335018746995

[haitch]

FYI:

FYI:

burstforum.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed. The certificate is only valid for Parallels Panel (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)

And mininghere.com doesn't use any certificates at all - totally insecure.

Did you have a point ?

Mininghere.com does not need one!
Therefore it does not show an error.
If burstforum.com doesn't need one, then don't show this error!

It's not an error, it's a warning that while your communications are secure, they're not as secure as desirable.

What's your problem?

Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer

Get a good certificate or just remove it. Simple, clear, ....

For further information use GOOGLE!!!!

So remove the secure communications and be as insecure as your site? Why would the burstforum owner want to do do that? If you'd done some Googling yourself, you'd know that even with a self signed certificate the communications between your browser and the site are encrypted. With no certificate at all, like the login to your site, user credentials are sent in plain text and can be STOLEN!

Everyone involved in Burst should lower their security to the same non-existent level as you?

Somehow I don't see that happening.

[Elmit]

FYI:

FYI:

burstforum.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed. The certificate is only valid for Parallels Panel (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)

And mininghere.com doesn't use any certificates at all - totally insecure.

Did you have a point ?

Mininghere.com does not need one!
Therefore it does not show an error.
If burstforum.com doesn't need one, then don't show this error!

It's not an error, it's a warning that while your communications are secure, they're not as secure as desirable.

What's your problem?

Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer

Get a good certificate or just remove it. Simple, clear, ....

For further information use GOOGLE!!!!

So remove the secure communications and be as insecure as your site? Why would the burstforum owner want to do do that? If you'd done some Googling yourself, you'd know that even with a self signed certificate the communications between your browser and the site are encrypted. With no certificate at all, like the login to your site, user credentials are sent in plain text and can be STOLEN!

Everyone involved in Burst should lower their security to the same non-existent level as you?

Somehow I don't see that happening.

Why would the burstforum owner want to do do that?

To remove the error message!

Mixing up subjects is a speciality of you. I am talking about burstforum.com

[haitch]

FYI:

FYI:

burstforum.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed. The certificate is only valid for Parallels Panel (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)

And mininghere.com doesn't use any certificates at all - totally insecure.

Did you have a point ?

Mininghere.com does not need one!
Therefore it does not show an error.
If burstforum.com doesn't need one, then don't show this error!

It's not an error, it's a warning that while your communications are secure, they're not as secure as desirable.

What's your problem?

Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer

Get a good certificate or just remove it. Simple, clear, ....

For further information use GOOGLE!!!!

So remove the secure communications and be as insecure as your site? Why would the burstforum owner want to do do that? If you'd done some Googling yourself, you'd know that even with a self signed certificate the communications between your browser and the site are encrypted. With no certificate at all, like the login to your site, user credentials are sent in plain text and can be STOLEN!

Everyone involved in Burst should lower their security to the same non-existent level as you?

Somehow I don't see that happening.

Why would the burstforum owner want to do do that?

To remove the error message!

Mixing up subjects is a speciality of you. I am talking about burstforum.com

You really are less intelligent than a rock aren't you Elmit. It's NOT an Error, and even with the self signed certificate, Burstforum is more secure than your site.

[Elmit]

Headache, you do not understand YOUR and MINE, ....

I am talking about burstforum.com and nothing else. Get your mind focused on that subject, please.

The certificate was fine a month ago, but now it is not anymore. Now it requires to add an exception. There is a warning NOT to do that. Is it the purpose of burstforum.com now to AVOID visitors?

[haitch]

Headache, you do not understand YOUR and MINE, ....

I am talking about burstforum.com and nothing else. Get your mind focused on that subject, please.

The certificate was fine a month ago, but now it is not anymore. Now it requires to add an exception. There is a warning NOT to do that. Is it the purpose of burstforum.com now to AVOID visitors?

Elmit, so to avoid the warning about the site not being as secure as desirable, he should turn off security altogether, and be as insecure as your site?

Your logic is .... astoundingly stupid.

My mind is completely focused - I'm not talking about my sites; I'm talking about your assertion that the owner of burstforum.com turn off encryption so that you don't get the warning about the site not being totally secure, so make the site as insecure as yours. This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. It's like suggesting because a home owner doesn't have the best of breed door locks, they should remove all the door locks they have.

Elmit, I've always assumed you were just a thief - but now, with this suggestion, you've confirmed that you're a dumber than a box of rocks thief.

[jwinterm]

Any list of existing assets or easy way to see them?