The Frisian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1020
Merit: 1003
Senior Developer and founder of ViMeAv ICT
|
 |
July 29, 2017, 10:31:22 AM Last edit: July 29, 2017, 11:01:39 AM by The Frisian |
|
Thanks for posting those links HR. Looks like lots of people are waiting what will happen after the first of august. Good time to purchase some cheap XMG before price will raise again.
I made many crazy deals last week on Bittrex. It's the best time to buy back again. Wanna elaborate on the trades?  Were they successful or not? Crazy days in crypto world, you can really change your portfolio bigtime these days (up or down).  Sold until 5250, buy back until 4025, at almost the same time, made me 1/5 btc to buy even more XMG
|
|
|
|
|
111magic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1005
|
 |
July 29, 2017, 02:01:01 PM |
|
Thanks for posting those links HR. Looks like lots of people are waiting what will happen after the first of august. Good time to purchase some cheap XMG before price will raise again.
I made many crazy deals last week on Bittrex. It's the best time to buy back again. Wanna elaborate on the trades?  Were they successful or not? Crazy days in crypto world, you can really change your portfolio bigtime these days (up or down).  Sold until 5250, buy back until 4025, at almost the same time, made me 1/5 btc to buy even more XMG Well done! Iam not a good trading but keep my coins in the wallet! 😉
|
bitcoin: bc1qyadvvyv29z08ln2ta7g3uqwzkscr7wq4p09wuz
|
|
|
The Frisian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1020
Merit: 1003
Senior Developer and founder of ViMeAv ICT
|
 |
July 29, 2017, 02:28:30 PM |
|
Well done! Iam not a good trading but keep my coins in the wallet! 😉
I also keeps most of my coins in the wallet, for the best times to come ....
|
|
|
|
|
111magic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1005
|
 |
July 29, 2017, 02:33:40 PM |
|
Well done! Iam not a good trading but keep my coins in the wallet! 😉
Yes very good. I'am sure Magi will get better times. Hard to say when but maybe it will happen after the new developments and improvements. I also keeps most of my coins in the wallet, for the best times to come ....
|
bitcoin: bc1qyadvvyv29z08ln2ta7g3uqwzkscr7wq4p09wuz
|
|
|
z0n0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1006
|
 |
July 29, 2017, 04:23:50 PM |
|
Is there still any active Magi faucet? I remember there was back in time, don't know if its still active.
If any1 knows...share pls. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
111magic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1005
|
 |
July 29, 2017, 04:26:01 PM |
|
Is there still any active Magi faucet? I remember there was back in time, don't know if its still active.
If any1 knows...share pls. Thanks.
I will check for it. Will be back Find it: http://cryptoguru.tk/Faucet/index.php?Currency=XMG
|
bitcoin: bc1qyadvvyv29z08ln2ta7g3uqwzkscr7wq4p09wuz
|
|
|
z0n0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1006
|
 |
July 29, 2017, 04:29:56 PM |
|
Wow, that was quick amigo, thanks 
|
|
|
|
|
starmman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1029
|
 |
July 29, 2017, 06:53:42 PM |
|
Wow, that was quick amigo, thanks  Haha, I'd forgotten about faucets - they are great for people getting started with BTC =)
|
|
|
|
|
|
edward0181
|
 |
July 30, 2017, 04:32:54 PM |
|
Good day.
I'm trying to build a pool for our lovely coinmagi but stratum seems to fail. Hashrate is showing wrong in mpos. Now trying p2pool buy I'm missing coin info. Can you help me as magi-stratum on github.com isn't much help.
Many thanks for help
Edward0181
|
|
|
|
z0n0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1006
|
 |
July 31, 2017, 08:28:33 AM |
|
@suprnova miners, @ocminer do you guys also having problems with idle worker email notifications? I checked monitor ON and idle worker notification but still not getting emails when my worker goes idle.
|
|
|
|
|
starmman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1029
|
 |
July 31, 2017, 10:56:35 AM |
|
@suprnova miners, @ocminer do you guys also having problems with idle worker email notifications? I checked monitor ON and idle worker notification but still not getting emails when my worker goes idle.
I didn't even know there was the option for that - I'll configure it and check - but might take a long time before my miner goes idle LOL
|
|
|
|
|
111magic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1005
|
 |
August 01, 2017, 07:10:54 AM |
|
Magi might hit the bottom this week. In $ the value did not drop much because of the high btc value. But when it goes higher this is not a bad period to purchase some XMG.  Reminder Magi XMG has awesome roadmap with great improvements & developments in progress. https://roadmap.coinmagi.org
|
bitcoin: bc1qyadvvyv29z08ln2ta7g3uqwzkscr7wq4p09wuz
|
|
|
the_drugs
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
 |
August 01, 2017, 09:45:14 AM |
|
So, a quick search and looking through more recent forum posts shows there is not much data regarding the newer AMD Ryzen CPU for mining with XMG. So I thought I would run some tests for those interested in the community, and in the process I found some interesting results. Testing was done with a r5 1600 on an Asrock Taichi x370 board, not sure on the BIOS revision, I'm more than happy to check if anyone is interested. I used m-minerd for the testing. I felt that some users may be interested in the performance differences with different -e settings, so I've included a number of different settings. I was interested to see if RAM speed played as large of a role in XMG as in other tasks, as well as the impact of an overclock, so tests have been run at 3.4/2133, 3.4/3200, 3.9/2133, 3.9/3200. This was run on my horribly messy installation of windows, simply because I didnt have a good working linux boot when I had time for the tests. The numbers are my perceived "average" of the reported hashrate inside of the miner. Not the most scientific of methods, but again this was a quick test. here's the results: 3.9/3200CAS15 6t 25% - 4.5/26.8 6t 50% - 9.9/59.5 6t 75% - 19.3/116.5 6t 90% - 19.3/112.5 6t 95% - 19.5/117.1 6t 100% - 19.5/117.1 --- 12t 25% - 3.0/36.5 12t 50% - 4.8/57.3 12t 75% - 9.8/117.3 12t 90% - 9.9/118.3 12t 95% - 9.9/118.3 12t 100% - 12.5/151.4 ---------------------- 3.4/2133CAS15 6t 25% - 3.0/18.0 6t 50% - 8.5/52.5 6t 75% - 9.0/54.3 6t 90% - 17.0/101.8 6t 95% - 8.5/52.4 6t 100% - 16.8/99.1 --- 12t 25% - 2.3/27.7 12t 50% - 4.8/57.9 12t 75% - 9.6/114.1 12t 90% - 9.6/116.2 12t 95% - 11.0/132.23 12t 100% - 11.0/131.6 --------------------- 3.4/3200CAS15 12t 25% - 3.0/36.4 12t 50% - 4.9/58.3 12t 75% - 9.7/116.9 12t 90% - 9.8/117.8 12t 95% - 11.3/136.0 12t 100% - 11.1/132.6 ---------------------- 3.9/2133CAS15 12t 25% - 3.0/36.7 12t 50% - 4.7/56.8 12t 75% - 9.7/117.3 12t 90% - 9.9/119.1 12t 95% - 12.5/151.0 12t 100% - 12.6/151.6 What do I make of it? Well, for starters, there seems to be a large drop off in performance gains after 75% in all situations, which to me seems to suggest a lack of optimizations for the new architecture or newer CPU in general. Also, it appears to me that clock speed is king, at least for now on Ryzen CPU. This could be due to the lack of optimization again, but that's all over my head! Something else I noticed that may explain some of the strange performance numbers is for m-minerd, my reported CPU usage often exceeded or under performed the -e setting, ie. -e 75, usage at 20%. This could be a reporting issue, this could be a m-minerd issue, this could be a user error or installation issue. There are a lot of variables, which I am working to resolve. I'd like to retest on a clean installation of linux/windows, as well as try the other miners (spexx and wolf are the only other two I am familiar with). I would also like to do more testing with SMT disabled and compare these results to the 6 core tests with SMT enabled, if for no other reason to see how zen is utilized by the miner as well as under the current windows scheduler, etc. Overall, however, I feel these results are more or less valid, and should work as a good representation of the Ryzen series chips, from this we can estimate performance of other models given the scaling of the zen architecture (assuming e-100, perfect scaling, similar performance to current testing method): 4c/4t - 77.8 4c/8t - 100.9 8c/16t - 201.8 12c/24t - 302.8 16c/32t - 403.7!!! Overall very interesting!! Really nice performance, although I feel some optimizations can almost certainly be made, but again I am unsure as much of that goes right over my head! If anyone would like me to run specific tests or gather other information please let me know! I'd be more than happy to!
|
|
|
|
|
111magic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1005
|
 |
August 01, 2017, 09:53:23 AM |
|
Wow thanks for the nice test. I need some time to read it. Also welcome in our friendly Magi community
|
bitcoin: bc1qyadvvyv29z08ln2ta7g3uqwzkscr7wq4p09wuz
|
|
|
the_drugs
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
 |
August 01, 2017, 10:02:10 AM |
|
Wow thanks for the nice test. I need some time to read it. Also welcome in our friendly Magi community
Not a problem! Also, I'm fairly certain I've posted in the thread before... I may not have, either way, I've been around magi for some time now, but thank you! As friendly as ever.
|
|
|
|
|
starmman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1029
|
 |
August 01, 2017, 12:27:00 PM |
|
Wow thanks for the nice test. I need some time to read it. Also welcome in our friendly Magi community
Not a problem! Also, I'm fairly certain I've posted in the thread before... I may not have, either way, I've been around magi for some time now, but thank you! As friendly as ever. Wow, even the basic version of the CPU kicks my pretty old i7 out of the park one thing I noticed with HT enabled i7's was that I could mine same number of XMR and XMG threads as my physical cores without seeing any peformance drop (where with same number of virtual threads had a massive perf impact). Not sure if that hack also works on the new AMD's
|
|
|
|
|
The Frisian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1020
Merit: 1003
Senior Developer and founder of ViMeAv ICT
|
 |
August 01, 2017, 12:42:08 PM |
|
Magi might hit the bottom this week. In $ the value did not drop much because of the high btc value. But when it goes higher this is not a bad period to purchase some XMG.  Reminder Magi XMG has awesome roadmap with great improvements & developments in progress. https://roadmap.coinmagi.orgI changed my last BTC cent into XMG, this morning. Let the price go up again!
|
|
|
|
|
joelao95 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1009
Coin of the Magi!
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 03:32:51 AM |
|
Good day.
I'm trying to build a pool for our lovely coinmagi but stratum seems to fail. Hashrate is showing wrong in mpos. Now trying p2pool buy I'm missing coin info. Can you help me as magi-stratum on github.com isn't much help.
Many thanks for help
Edward0181
magi-stratum is basically working as m-hash is relying on that. p2pool is much helpful, but it's probably not an easy go. MPOS should be the one straightforward; the guide on MPOS itself is actually good and enough for having the pool up. It might also be helpful to google MPOS.
|
|
|
|
|
edward0181
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 07:09:50 AM |
|
Good day.
I'm trying to build a pool for our lovely coinmagi but stratum seems to fail. Hashrate is showing wrong in mpos. Now trying p2pool buy I'm missing coin info. Can you help me as magi-stratum on github.com isn't much help.
Many thanks for help
Edward0181
magi-stratum is basically working as m-hash is relying on that. p2pool is much helpful, but it's probably not an easy go. MPOS should be the one straightforward; the guide on MPOS itself is actually good and enough for having the pool up. It might also be helpful to google MPOS. Cheers. Indeed MPOS isn't that hard to do and was running okay except that gash rates where not right. Got it working now with some work yet to be done. Thanks
|
|
|
|
the_drugs
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 09:18:20 AM |
|
Wow, even the basic version of the CPU kicks my pretty old i7 out of the park
one thing I noticed with HT enabled i7's was that I could mine same number of XMR and XMG threads as my physical cores without seeing any peformance drop (where with same number of virtual threads had a massive perf impact). Not sure if that hack also works on the new AMD's
That's very interesting! I'd never considered that the algorithms might not interfere with each other, that could almost definitely be tweaked with the efficiency setting for XMG as well. I'll definitely have to look into this! Thanks for the heads up. Was that the rate as viewed in the miner console? or on the pool, if you remember.
|
|
|
|
|
|