VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position

[Vod]

Sorry scammer, I can't make it any clearer for you.   

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

I also answered the same question at the top of page 2 of this thread:
https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=915823.msg10065704#msg10065704

How many times are you guys going to demand the same thing?  

You mean this?

but rather point out that you are allowed by the staff to freely abuse the trust system without repercussion

There ya go.  There's your lie (again), because it's simply not true no matter what you think.  

That's not a lie, ROFL. The truth is not a lie.

When a similar situation happened to me, I was quickly removed from DefaultTrust and received the following PM:

IMO your ratings of gweedo are inappropriate. His thread title is inaccurate and overly harsh, but this doesn't imply that he's untrustworthy. I feel that allowing your ratings to exist in the default trust network would be counter to the forum's mission of free speech, so I've removed you from the default trust network.

You did far worse than what I did, however you faced no repercussion. This is a fact.

Telling the truth cannot possibly be lying.

[Blazr]

>inb4 ad hominem attacks against TF

[Vod]

You did far worse than what I did, however you faced no repercussion. This is a fact.

I believe you got removed when you stole over a million dollars in bitcoin.

Me standing up to some shills is worse than that?

[Blazr]

You did far worse than what I did, however you faced no repercussion. This is a fact.

I believe you got removed when you stole over a million dollars in bitcoin.

Me standing up to some shills is worse than that?

I was right!

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

=
I believe you got removed when you stole over a million dollars in bitcoin.

You should read the PM, because I've been removed from DefaultTrust two times.

The first time I got removed was for leaving gweedo negative feedback, when he made a number of topics with material fabrications. Basically, I left him negative feedback for lying.

theymos agreed that what gweedo posted was inaccurate, however removed me from defaulttrust regardless because of 'the forum's mission of free speech'.

You have done the same, yet you were not removed from DefaultTrust. Hence, TECSHARE's statement is accurate.

[Vod]

=
I believe you got removed when you stole over a million dollars in bitcoin.

You should read the PM, because I've been removed from DefaultTrust two times.

The first time I got removed was for leaving gweedo negative feedback, when he made a number of topics with material fabrications. Basically, I left him negative feedback for lying.

theymos agreed that what gweedo posted was inaccurate, however removed me from defaulttrust regardless because of 'the forum's mission of free speech'.

You have done the same, yet you were not removed from DefaultTrust. Hence, TECSHARE's statement is accurate.

A fake PM?  We take your word for it?  Your word is worth nothing dude.  You're a thief.

[iCEBREAKER]

Vod's account is acting strange. Quick! everyone neg him with "possibly hacked".  

Be careful!  Vod may respond with baseless retaliatory negative feedback, amplified by abuse of his default trust privilege.

And even worse, the Staff will indulge this tit-for-tat Trust Warring misbehavior to ensure he is free from any consequences.

As long as he doesn't lie about "BTC risked" it's all good.  Anything else is fine.

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

A fake PM?  We take your word for it?  Your word is worth nothing dude.  You're a thief.

Haha, another ad hominen. You do realize that this does not help your case at all, right?

I've just PM'd theymos asking him to confirm that PM in this thread

[Vod]

Be careful!  Vod may respond with baseless retaliatory negative feedback, amplified by abuse of his default trust privilege.

Ah, is that what this?  Everyone jumping on me and abusing the trust system hoping I'll "lose my cool" and leave negative feedback?

lol - sorry guys.  I've dealt with trolls my entire life.  I can handle myself.  

[Vod]

A fake PM?  We take your word for it?  Your word is worth nothing dude.  You're a thief.

Haha, another ad hominen. You do realize that this does not help your case at all, right?

I've just PM'd theymos asking him to confirm that PM in this thread

Why would a forum administrator give even two seconds to someone who stole thousands of bitcoins from hundreds of it's members?

Your word means nothing.

[Shallow]

OK, Vod, this is pointless. When are you going to admit that you've made up the trust feedback, and that TECSHARE never lied about you?

[Vod]

OK, Vod, this is pointless. When are you going to admit that you've made up the trust feedback, and that TECSHARE never lied about you?

You're dense.  I've pointed out as clearly as I can how he lied. 

[Shallow]

You're dense.  I've pointed out as clearly as I can how he lied.  

You didn't.

What repercussions have you faced for abusing the trust system?

I don't think you have faced any. So how is that a lie then?

Even assuming that's a lie (which I fail to see how it is), I don't think that's something you should leave negative feedback for. You have already amended it to neutral, but you have caused damage to his reputation.

[Vod]

You're dense.  I've pointed out as clearly as I can how he lied.  

You didn't.

What repercussions have you faced for abusing the trust system?

I don't think you have faced any. So how is that a lie then?

I did.  You can't understand it.  That's your issue, not mine.

I'm sure most of the people reading can understand what I meant, save for the shills.

[Vod]

Even assuming that's a lie (which I fail to see how it is), I don't think that's something you should leave negative feedback for. You have already amended it to neutral, but you have caused damage to his reputation.

You've caused damage to my reputation by abusing the trust system.  But since you're not on the default trust list, you feel you can do whatever you want, since I have higher responsibilities. 

[Shallow]

I did.  You can't understand it.  That's your issue, not mine.

It is not my issue that you are unable to adequately explain your position.

It is up to you to identify what repercussions you have faced. You are the one making the claim. He who claims he proves.

[Shallow]

You've caused damage to my reputation by abusing the trust system.  But since you're not on the default trust list, you feel you can do whatever you want, since I have higher responsibilities. 

Please detail how I am abusing the trust system by leaving you with the following feedbacks I have left you:

This user abuses the trust system and his position in DefaultTrust by using negative feedback to punish people who criticize his hot-headed bursts of poor judgement.

See the reference link for more information.

This user has made a number of disparaging remarks about users, such as claiming that a user has lied, without backing it up or pointing to any instance of the 'lies'.

Consider his left trust feedback carefully.

Are any of them inaccurate? How are they inaccurate? Even if inaccurate, how is it abuse of the trust system?

[Vod]

I did.  You can't understand it.  That's your issue, not mine.

It is not my issue that you are unable to adequately explain your position.

It is up to you to identify what repercussions you have faced. You are the one making the claim.

It is your issue.  Everyone else can understand me.

Please detail how I am abusing the trust system by leaving you with the following feedbacks I have left you:

Why bother trying?  You can't understand.   

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

It is your issue.  Everyone else can understand me.

Please put your hand up if you can "understand" what identifiable repercussions Vod has faced over his trust system abuse.

Anyone?