|
Demarsac
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 11:44:14 AM |
|
I'm curious about something here. I've been mining on flypool and I saw this: (there is a bar missing between 4 and 6 AM) http://imgur.com/a/PRvPxThere was mining activity between 4 and 6 AM. why does it not show the amount of valid and invalid shares? Is there something wrong on my end, or is it a bug at flypool? this kidos Keep your comment to yourself if you can't say anything that makes sence...Got nothing else better to do, kiddo? But what's not understandable, you just do not pay extra, if you mined on other pools must beat note that it is common practice.... The percentage is somewhere more, somewhere less, flipped back, this topic is as old as the world These 2 sentences would make more sense if you just encrypted them and post them (without the decryption key) Or to rephrase...there is no translator that can turn this post into English... GTCG: It's not your end and its not a bug. It just means that during 5 AM no blocks were found in that pool There are better pools than flypool though....
|
|
|
|
|
chown.multi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 11:51:29 AM |
|
New year discount!
I would delete it even if You send it for free. If You don't believe what I'm talking about: --no-fee is free and I'm not using it.  oh you, such a liar 
|
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 12:01:38 PM |
|
v9.3:
- improved stability and compatibility with various drivers. - slightly improved mining speed for some cards (1-2%). About 340H/s on stock 390X. - fixed issue in Linux version with GPU SEGFAULT and high CPU load. - added support for round robin DNS. - some bug fixes and minor improvements.
|
|
|
|
GTCG
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 12:25:10 PM |
|
I'm curious about something here. I've been mining on flypool and I saw this: (there is a bar missing between 4 and 6 AM) http://imgur.com/a/PRvPxThere was mining activity between 4 and 6 AM. why does it not show the amount of valid and invalid shares? Is there something wrong on my end, or is it a bug at flypool? this kidos Keep your comment to yourself if you can't say anything that makes sence...Got nothing else better to do, kiddo? But what's not understandable, you just do not pay extra, if you mined on other pools must beat note that it is common practice.... The percentage is somewhere more, somewhere less, flipped back, this topic is as old as the world These 2 sentences would make more sense if you just encrypted them and post them (without the decryption key) Or to rephrase...there is no translator that can turn this post into English... GTCG: It's not your end and its not a bug. It just means that during 5 AM no blocks were found in that pool There are better pools than flypool though.... Thank you for a comprehensive comment. Will switch over to dwarfpool and see what it gives. I think Zoryk is on funny stuff 
|
|
|
|
|
|
espressodelisi
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 12:27:11 PM |
|
v9.3:
- improved stability and compatibility with various drivers. - slightly improved mining speed for some cards (1-2%). About 340H/s on stock 390X. - fixed issue in Linux version with GPU SEGFAULT and high CPU load. - added support for round robin DNS. - some bug fixes and minor improvements.
Thanks for the new version. What is the normal hashrate for r9 280x GPU on linux? I get 207H/s from my 280x GPU's. is that normal or should I tweak more?
|
|
|
|
|
|
tiamatt
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 12:32:48 PM |
|
Only 235 - Rx 480 nitro on v9.3 On v9.2 -257 
|
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 12:45:07 PM |
|
Only 235 - Rx 480 nitro on v9.3 On v9.2 -257  I see same hashrate 235H/s on stock RX480 on both v9.2 and v9.3, drivers 16.11.3.
|
|
|
|
Gambler8899
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 12:47:03 PM |
|
Thanks claymore... 320 sols on 290x stock and 290 sols on 290 stock 
|
|
|
|
|
GTCG
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 12:47:46 PM Last edit: December 30, 2016, 01:02:54 PM by GTCG |
|
v9.3:
- improved stability and compatibility with various drivers. - slightly improved mining speed for some cards (1-2%). About 340H/s on stock 390X. - fixed issue in Linux version with GPU SEGFAULT and high CPU load. - added support for round robin DNS. - some bug fixes and minor improvements.
First results indicate a very small improvement of a few more hashes on both gpu's. Each around 203h/s. Slightly overclocked. Can someone post current hashrate of HD7950 in Linux with version 9.3?
|
|
|
|
|
jelin1984
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 01:00:01 PM |
|
when you will make new miner for monero???
|
|
|
|
|
peteycamey
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1185
Merit: 1026
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 01:03:47 PM |
|
improved? what is improved? definitely not the hash rate.
hash rate actually decreased in almost all cards
9.3 another garbage.
oh well.
back to 9.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
rpg
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 01:10:30 PM |
|
Only 235 - Rx 480 nitro on v9.3 On v9.2 -257  I see same hashrate 235H/s on stock RX480 on both v9.2 and v9.3, drivers 16.11.3. 5 more hashes on the 7950 - up to 230 sols now - and a couple more on the rx480 - up t 248 sols ty man
|
|
|
|
|
DrX
Member

Offline
Activity: 233
Merit: 20
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 01:21:07 PM |
|
Thanks claymore... 320 sols on 290x stock and 290 sols on 290 stock  Driver version? I'm using 15.12 and 1030/1250 clocks, Only getting 270 & 285
|
|
|
|
|
Etolay
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 01:27:32 PM |
|
My 290s increased in hash rate. 470 is a bit slower.
I have a total of 20-25 sols more from 9.3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ffthomas
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 01:31:12 PM |
|
thank you!
@claymore:
"- added support for round robin DNS"
I'm not a network specialist, so I ask what that means and why is that feature good for us?
I red about round robin but I didn't find the answer. Sorry if it's a dummy question.
|
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 01:40:50 PM |
|
thank you!
@claymore:
"- added support for round robin DNS"
I'm not a network specialist, so I ask what that means and why is that feature good for us?
I red about round robin but I didn't find the answer. Sorry if it's a dummy question.
Round robin is a method of load-balancing that will allow 1 FQDN (ie : something.pool.org) to reply multiples with IP addresses, it can help when one IP isn't replying fast enough, you can have several others host IP to contact as a backup https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Round-robin_DNSFor the claymore miner, it would probably mean better timeout/resolve handling in case of the first IP adress of the pool DNS record is unavailable or slow it'll try to contact the others, must not have been the case before. Will probably help for stale shares (share calculated by you but with a result already being submitted by someone on the same pool as you). It would probably help too big farm that could be throttled by some pools limiting the amount of request per remote IPs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
micairvas
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 01:54:23 PM |
|
Claymore, Is there any room for further hash improvement for RX cards or that's it?
|
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 01:59:35 PM |
|
NOTE: v9.3 is not performance release, in this version I improved compatibility/stability in GPU code and fixed Linux-related issues. You can use older versions if they are good and stable for you. thank you! @claymore: "- added support for round robin DNS" I'm not a network specialist, so I ask what that means and why is that feature good for us? I red about round robin but I didn't find the answer. Sorry if it's a dummy question.
In theory, pools can balance servers load with this feature. Nicehash pool asked me about this feature so I added it. If a pool has several IPs and first IP fails, miner will try to connect to the second IP, etc. Claymore, Is there any room for further hash improvement for RX cards or that's it?
I think it's possible to get better speed, but not too much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Juhagic
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 02:09:05 PM |
|
when you will make new miner for monero???
The old miner is already very efficient.
|
|
|
|
|
|