Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)

[DebitMe]

What does "GPU1 hangs in OpenCL call" mean?

Possibly faulty PCI riser, Try replacing GPU1's riser and it might go away.

Check your overclocking. Does it happen on stock rom?

Everything is stock, I will try with a different riser.  What is actually going wrong though?  Not enough power or signals getting crossed or what?

[Golku]

What does "GPU1 hangs in OpenCL call" mean?

Possibly faulty PCI riser, Try replacing GPU1's riser and it might go away.

Check your overclocking. Does it happen on stock rom?

Everything is stock, I will try with a different riser.  What is actually going wrong though?  Not enough power or signals getting crossed or what?

Try to swap your card on a other slot

[neogeo]

What does "GPU1 hangs in OpenCL call" mean?

Possibly faulty PCI riser, Try replacing GPU1's riser and it might go away.

Check your overclocking. Does it happen on stock rom?

Everything is stock, I will try with a different riser.  What is actually going wrong though?  Not enough power or signals getting crossed or what?

Same problems i have but only with one, exactly one, card. Miner named it GPU#3. Changed a couple risers and whatever but always the same card.
So, card needs more vGPU power. Try to rise vGPU and PowerLimit only for that card. That is the settings helped me.
Don't know the resons but that card have good ASIC around 85%...
I have 10x msi rx 470 8GB cards (~2270sol/s) and plane to change them for gtx 1060 3GB versions (for ZCash). Cooler and less power hungry with good statistics for ZCash mining...
Enjoy

[DebitMe]

What does "GPU1 hangs in OpenCL call" mean?

Possibly faulty PCI riser, Try replacing GPU1's riser and it might go away.

Check your overclocking. Does it happen on stock rom?

Everything is stock, I will try with a different riser.  What is actually going wrong though?  Not enough power or signals getting crossed or what?

Try to swap your card on a other slot

I picked the riser up and put it in another slot and it has been running for about 15 minutes now at full speed without any issues.  Why on earth would the the specific slot make a difference?

EDIT: as soon as I said that I got, "GPU #0 returned incorrect data! d07f5ff9" and it is now running at 0 hashes per second and is getting the same GPU hangs message. Blah
At least when it restarted itself this time the GPU actually came back on as mining.

[timbereagle]

THANKS Claymore!

9.3 is about %1 slower on RX 480 and RX 470

BUT it is much more stable!

No hangouts

It works almost 14-15 hours without problem.

9.2 and 9.1 was not stable for me.

[naeme18720]

HI GUYS

This pool best profit in a day

this link for sign up

Go --- go --- best profit in mining Zcash

https://minergate.com/a/e172e848728edd0d2b97b9b5

[Claymore]

Hmm, it seems 390X can reach 400H/s though it requires some additional efforts, Polaris cards can get some speedup too.

[omshree]

Hmm, it seems 390X can reach 400H/s though it requires some additional efforts, Polaris cards can get some speedup too.

 Is it possible to improve Fiji hasrate as well? They do an avarage 360 now. Thank you very much

[golden0707]

Honestly im thinking we have got all what we need for rx series. Just bkz of 256 bit band. Any empruvement is only cards with 386 bit ram band.

[QuintLeo]

Hi can anyone help me i have a psu on 700w and 2x rx 470 xfx 4gig & 1x rx 480 nitro 8gig and i dosen't get it to work when i start the miner my computer hangs and i have to restart it a fast easy guide to undervolt cards or something pls!

 Check the PS +12VDC rails - if it's not a single-rail design you might be overloading one of the rails.
 If it IS a single-rail design it still might be marginal for the +12VDC draw.

 Not all "700w" power supplies are built equally.

[xuanmichael]

performance of 390x=rx480. But rx480:240H/s, 390x:400H/s. why? people understand?

[Haryford]

performance of 390x=rx480. But rx480:240H/s, 390x:400H/s. why? people understand?

The R9 390 has more memory bandwidth and more computing cores.

[Realetim]

Honestly im thinking we have got all what we need for rx series. Just bkz of 256 bit band. Any empruvement is only cards with 386 bit ram band.

I agree with that. The R9 390 has 512 memory bit, so it is faster.

[Demarsac]

This is to confirm the slight decrease in speed for the RX 480's in Claymore 9.3
The decrease is about 1%
Ceteris paribus

[osnwt]

About miner monitor, is it possible to implement encrypted traffic between miner and monitoring software, also I think it is a good to shown the local clock and date on a web page UI.

In addition, if the utility will provide key/certificate option and the miner will check it, it may replace a missing password protection or other authentication options for monitoring/management.
And THAT is where I highly appreciate SSL/TLS.

[QuintLeo]

performance of 390x=rx480. But rx480:240H/s, 390x:400H/s. why? people understand?

 Bad theory.

 I have yet to see ANYTHING where the performance of the RX 480 matches the RX 390X - even ETH which is very hard on memory (and is probably the point the RX 480 comes the closest to matching the RX 390X).

 ZEC has proven to be a lot less memory-hardened than it's developers appear to have intended it to be - at which point the far superior number of computer cores (abet as somewhat lower clock) of the R9 390x start pulling away from the RX 480.


 Keep in mind - the RX 480 is NOT a high end of "Enthusiast" range card like the R9 390x was for IT'S generation.
 It is targeted at the high end of "Mainstream" or the BOTTOM end of "Enthusiast" cards for the current generation.
 We still haven't seen the high-end *OR* the bottom-end of the "still in the works" CURRENT generation of AMD cards, much less the next-generation Vega to come.

[xuanmichael]

performance of 390x=rx480. But rx480:240H/s, 390x:400H/s. why? people understand?

 Bad theory.

 I have yet to see ANYTHING where the performance of the RX 480 matches the RX 390X - even ETH which is very hard on memory (and is probably the point the RX 480 comes the closest to matching the RX 390X).

 ZEC has proven to be a lot less memory-hardened than it's developers appear to have intended it to be - at which point the far superior number of computer cores (abet as somewhat lower clock) of the R9 390x start pulling away from the RX 480.


 Keep in mind - the RX 480 is NOT a high end of "Enthusiast" range card like the R9 390x was for IT'S generation.
 It is targeted at the high end of "Mainstream" or the BOTTOM end of "Enthusiast" cards for the current generation.
 We still haven't seen the high-end *OR* the bottom-end of the "still in the works" CURRENT generation of AMD cards, much less the next-generation Vega to come.

you see:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-14VJ6zgsFE
http://hwbench.com/vgas/radeon-rx-480-vs-radeon-r9-390x

[oldisoft]

Hmm, it seems 390X can reach 400H/s though it requires some additional efforts, Polaris cards can get some speedup too.

Lovely news! Thank You!

When will be possible to have this update?


Cheers

[nevermind41]

@Claymore
Thank you for this release. It is stable. I lived gpu0 hangs with 9.2 but 9.3 great.

[Xising]

Hmm, it seems 390X can reach 400H/s though it requires some additional efforts, Polaris cards can get some speedup too.

Lovely news! Thank You!

When will be possible to have this update?


Cheers

I hope it will be in the next few days. Amph might be disappointed.