Bitcoin Forum
January 29, 2026, 12:55:17 PM *
News: Community awards 2025
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 [490] 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 ... 758 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 3839409 times)
Raja_MBZ
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1520



View Profile
December 31, 2016, 03:38:50 PM
 #9781

Claymore, the miner is not working correctly with ZCL. Whenever I try to mine ZClassic, it mines for a few minutes but as soon as the DevFee round comes, it tries to connect with the dev pool but at last, the mining almost stops.

Is there any solution for this?

You did not explain what happens exactly. Does it fail to connect? Why? PM me your command line (or config.txt if you use it) and also you can send me log file.

Just wanted to confirm here that the issue has been resolved with the newer version. Smiley
golden0707
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 189
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 31, 2016, 04:28:15 PM
 #9782

So, any reason to move from working 9.2 on rx 470s and 280xs?
023dgagi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 31, 2016, 04:41:49 PM
 #9783

So, any reason to move from working 9.2 on rx 470s and 280xs?

No reason
AriesIV10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006


Mine for a Bit


View Profile WWW
December 31, 2016, 04:42:31 PM
 #9784

So, any reason to move from working 9.2 on rx 470s and 280xs?

No reason

No reason to upgrade!

BTC Address (Donations):  3LepZAju88ZRuNVD4cS6Xv5hKyKrjvirkB     Website:  www.MintMining.com
Email: Mining@MintMining.com      Power Supplies: https://bit.ly/2TtvdOR
citronick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080


---- winter*juvia -----


View Profile
December 31, 2016, 04:48:32 PM
 #9785

So, any reason to move from working 9.2 on rx 470s and 280xs?

if it aint broke - dont fix it  Grin

If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
Tiky-turbo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 31, 2016, 08:39:16 PM
 #9786

Hmm, it seems 390X can reach 400H/s though it requires some additional efforts, Polaris cards can get some speedup too.

Thank you Claymore for your effort...
and Happy New Year to you all Smiley
Lucky - Luciano
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 711
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 31, 2016, 09:02:25 PM
 #9787

Honestly im thinking we have got all what we need for rx series. Just bkz of 256 bit band. Any empruvement is only cards with 386 bit ram band.

I agree with that. The R9 390 has 512 memory bit, so it is faster.
May be. Nvidia 1070 has much less cores (1920) and Memory Bandwidth (GB / sec) 256 but fast hashed than R9 390X,R9 390 and RX480. My EVGA nVIDIA GTX 1070 hashed 430 sol/s .
golden0707
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 189
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 01, 2017, 12:14:34 AM
 #9788

So, any reason to move from working 9.2 on rx 470s and 280xs?

if it aint broke - dont fix it  Grin

Fkng wright Smiley its working, dont tuch

Been 3 day nonreboot state, thanks :8
sorry2xs
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node


View Profile
January 01, 2017, 01:52:53 AM
Last edit: January 01, 2017, 02:08:40 AM by sorry2xs
 #9789

wtf with the diff.1451489.83 Grin
edit: 1556247.57 Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Huh Huh Huh Huh Huh Huh Huh Huh

Please tip the Node 1MPWKB23NsZsXHANnFwVAWT86mL24fqAjF; KO4UX
THAT NO GOOD DO GOODER BAT!!!
sorry2xs
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node


View Profile
January 01, 2017, 04:22:46 AM
 #9790

is this the expected performance with stock settings and v.9.3GPU #0: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #1: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #2: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #3: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #4: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #5: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 1400.007 H/s, Total Shares: 126, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:04
ZEC: GPU0 235.090 H/s, GPU1 233.052 H/s, GPU2 233.269 H/s, GPU3 232.907 H/s, GPU4 231.216 H/s, GPU5 234.473 H/s

Please tip the Node 1MPWKB23NsZsXHANnFwVAWT86mL24fqAjF; KO4UX
THAT NO GOOD DO GOODER BAT!!!
Hamtard
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 01, 2017, 11:46:01 AM
 #9791

So, any reason to move from working 9.2 on rx 470s and 280xs?

if it aint broke - dont fix it  Grin

Fkng wright Smiley its working, dont tuch

Been 3 day nonreboot state, thanks :8

For the 280X, the 9.3 is about 1% higher speed. So not much difference.
BenCodie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1167


View Profile
January 01, 2017, 01:02:33 PM
 #9792

is this the expected performance with stock settings and v.9.3GPU #0: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #1: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #2: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #3: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #4: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #5: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 1400.007 H/s, Total Shares: 126, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:04
ZEC: GPU0 235.090 H/s, GPU1 233.052 H/s, GPU2 233.269 H/s, GPU3 232.907 H/s, GPU4 231.216 H/s, GPU5 234.473 H/s

Yes its good with stock setting for Rx 480
ciombat
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 01, 2017, 01:47:11 PM
 #9793

Hello guys, can anyone tell me current hashrates with rx 470 and r9 390?  Grin thx
kaese2002
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 01, 2017, 02:18:58 PM
 #9794

Hello guys, can anyone tell me current hashrates with rx 470 and r9 390?  Grin thx

RX470/RX480 the same
my 7 290X went from 1970 to 2000Hs
cryptonitro
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 348
Merit: 119



View Profile
January 01, 2017, 02:29:17 PM
 #9795

only crashing with stock rx480 8go nitro stock , seem better with mod bios

The only project make me believe ... Holochain
GTCG
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 01, 2017, 02:41:14 PM
 #9796

Can anyone explain me what "Compute units" are? They seem to be different on my 2 cards? I believe it depends on the GPU manufacturer?
http://imgur.com/a/ptDWr
Prelektro
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 283
Merit: 250



View Profile
January 01, 2017, 03:34:02 PM
 #9797

After updating to v.9.x versions, my graphics card started acting weird. First, I got black screen after some mining and my fans went to 100%. Restarted, my comp opened normally but now i get random black screens during gaming, surfing etc. Anybody had this too ? I have r9 290 sapphire tri-x oc card.

vapourminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4928
Merit: 5650


what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?


View Profile
January 01, 2017, 04:12:04 PM
 #9798

Hello guys, can anyone tell me current hashrates with rx 470 and r9 390?  Grin thx

470 4gb (1300/1800)  208sol
390 (1100/1500) 313sol

9.3
imunisasi
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 86
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 01, 2017, 04:43:27 PM
 #9799

is this the expected performance with stock settings and v.9.3GPU #0: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #1: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #2: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #3: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #4: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #5: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 1400.007 H/s, Total Shares: 126, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:04
ZEC: GPU0 235.090 H/s, GPU1 233.052 H/s, GPU2 233.269 H/s, GPU3 232.907 H/s, GPU4 231.216 H/s, GPU5 234.473 H/s
me crash with -i 1 - 6
idk what happen, after sleep try to reinstall ati for that cpu

only crashing with stock rx480 8go nitro stock , seem better with mod bios
any link for that mod bios sir ?
CryptoHobo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000



View Profile
January 01, 2017, 05:11:11 PM
 #9800

is this the expected performance with stock settings and v.9.3GPU #0: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #1: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #2: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #3: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #4: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #5: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 1400.007 H/s, Total Shares: 126, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:04
ZEC: GPU0 235.090 H/s, GPU1 233.052 H/s, GPU2 233.269 H/s, GPU3 232.907 H/s, GPU4 231.216 H/s, GPU5 234.473 H/s
me crash with -i 1 - 6
idk what happen, after sleep try to reinstall ati for that cpu

only crashing with stock rx480 8go nitro stock , seem better with mod bios
any link for that mod bios sir ?

ethman shows my nitro rx480 with stock bios as running for 45:31(0) conf file just has these lines :
Code:
-tt 72
-i 6
-allpools 1
Pages: « 1 ... 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 [490] 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 ... 758 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!