Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com

[sickpig]

The Eligius way of showing the hashrate on the page is not realy what the devices hashed.

I Have exactly 52.xxxx GHz, a constant hasrate that doesn't go up or down much.
Eligius gives me stats from 43 to 70Ghash

ok thanks for sharing this info, since I never minted @Eligius.

[Xialla]

Please acknowledge that your customers are taking actions based on this information, e.g. booking flights, taking days off etc.

I believe, that all 1st day orders will be shipping today. according to clouhashing, they should start within 13 hours. and yes, this waiting is little bit tricky for all except guys on maternity leave.)

[frelex]

Almost 600 GH/s average!

[Xialla]

Almost 600 GH/s average!

not sure, if this is only from mining jupiter..

[el_rlee]

I think KNC's achievement is great. The extra hashrate is more than welcome given the recent spike in difficulty.

BUT....

Why not keep up the good communication? They clearly didn't ship yesterday so we are past the date they promised. The least one would expect is an update on the new expected delivery date. At this point the uncertainties should be much smaller so they should be able to give the dates for the different orders (day 1, day 2 etc).

Please acknowledge that your customers are taking actions based on this information, e.g. booking flights, taking days off etc.


Then again we could just chill. It's only btcs  

Good sir, I advice you buy some BFL hardware as cure for your problem!

[hope4me]

I think KNC's achievement is great. The extra hashrate is more than welcome given the recent spike in difficulty.

¨


Yes, this will compensate my bet lost on their delivery date, not worst case scenario...

[Xialla]

Good sir, I advice you buy some BFL hardware as cure for your problem!

please, stop comparing KNC and BFL. at least in this thread.

[Dexter770221]

500GH but 20% of hardware errors. It's better to lower to original 400GH and have more efficiency at 1% HW errors.

[sickpig]

500GH but 20% of hardware errors. It's better to lower to original 400GH and have more efficiency at 1% HW errors.

Actually according to the video they are running at diff=127 so about 18mil accepted shares and less than 1% errors.

[vervolioman]

500GH but 20% of hardware errors. It's better to lower to original 400GH and have more efficiency at 1% HW errors.

Actually according to the video they are running at diff=127 so about 18mil accepted shares and less than 1% errors.

But does the HW errors increases a lot when you overclock, that would be bad

[genykm]

Is there any news when pick-up will be available for 300X orders in queue?  

[sickpig]

Is there any news when pick-up will be available for 300X orders in queue? 

there's no public news at all about pick-up nor for delivery, hopefully they will tell us something during the day

[erk]

Is there any news when pick-up will be available for 300X orders in queue?  

No there is not.

[Dexter770221]

500GH but 20% of hardware errors. It's better to lower to original 400GH and have more efficiency at 1% HW errors.

Actually according to the video they are running at diff=127 so about 18mil accepted shares and less than 1% errors.

Those hardware error share are also diff=127. So accepted 18mil shares and 3.6mil shares are hardware error. Let's be honest...

[crocko]

The real story here isn't "ROI or no ROI?  Ship 9/30 or 10/3?"  The celebration and the sour grapes, the sore losers and the ecstatic supporters, the assholes and the gentlemen, that's all fun to read.  But IMO opinion that's not the story.

The real story is the presentation of a functioning IC entailing leading edge technology in a period of time far less than they'll teach you in school is even feasible.  

Every time some information came out, it was met with armchair experts who pontificated on the folly of it all.  It's all in the 600+ pages of this thread:  "The package is ridiculously large; OrSoC must be idiots."  "The power consumption will be way off the scale."  "They can't come to market without the test sequence. It's going to be a disaster of BFL proportions."  "They're too small to produce in size."  Best of all:  they're Swedish, how can they possibly do high tech?

Spending a significant part of my life in venture capital analysis, I have to say:  while there were no red flags for me from a business or technical standpoint, I didn't think it would happen this close to schedule; too many moving parts and supply chain issues to be certain.  

There are still red flags, I'd say, in both CoinTerra and HashFast, but I'm not going to discuss them.  They will be what they will be.  Instead, I'm just sayin' to KnC's professionals:

Spectacular performance!

+1
Congratulations KNC !

[-Redacted-]

500GH but 20% of hardware errors. It's better to lower to original 400GH and have more efficiency at 1% HW errors.

Actually according to the video they are running at diff=127 so about 18mil accepted shares and less than 1% errors.

Those hardware error share are also diff=127. So accepted 18mil shares and 3.6mil shares are hardware error. Let's be honest...

Ummm - no.  Hardware errors are not diff 127...

[Dexter770221]

500GH but 20% of hardware errors. It's better to lower to original 400GH and have more efficiency at 1% HW errors.

Actually according to the video they are running at diff=127 so about 18mil accepted shares and less than 1% errors.

Those hardware error share are also diff=127. So accepted 18mil shares and 3.6mil shares are hardware error. Let's be honest...

Ummm - no.  Hardware errors are not diff 127...

Yes they are. HW errors are those share that's not validate on CPU but are reported by hardware. And in this case all shares reported are diff=>127.

[ElGabo]

And what about the 5V connector.

Should I buy a 230V to 5V DC converter?

[Its About Sharing]

500GH but 20% of hardware errors. It's better to lower to original 400GH and have more efficiency at 1% HW errors.

Guys, the units were just turned on and not tuned yet. 20% errors is unacceptable and they know that. But the units have to be tuned first.
They are not shipping units with 20% errors.

[arlekyn13]

I do hope the hashing speed showing now on that test account is a result of further tweaking/oc . It's showing 650GH/s pretty constant now, with spikes @ 700+

Edit: showing 900+ now, so more than Jupiter hashing there :-)