xyzzy099
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1068
Merit: 1109
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 05:29:06 PM |
|
Brack Friday Bunduru?
A timely South Park reference, nice 
|
Libertarians: Diligently plotting to take over the world and leave you alone.
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 05:33:04 PM |
|
why the hell choose any brand for a psu, any good psu will do i personally buy anything with good stats corsair, ocz, antec you just need to check how the psu is build and how much they actually can deliver on the lanes they have I have my small antec quattro here which delivers 6 rails with each capable of feeding 30 amp max and 170 max on the 3.3=5 volts rail. This psu has one major drawback however because it has no power on/off switch. But in general this monster has no had no problem feeding my 4 gpu system at all.
It got a robot psu switch and i am very happy with that solution
My question is what is going to happen with the upgrade modules are they now also on hold And what does this it mean for the delivery of the upgrade modules effectively As i read that it seems the building of the november orders miners seem to go first and as i understood it the upgrade modules are being send when the orders are finished on the miners. Would that mean another month of waiting or ?
I have posted alot of questions towards knc but the time it takes to get an answer is insane long, i think the communication towards the community has to pick up some pace. Its easy for them to prevent many emails and phone calls if they communicate onto the forums. but as of yet on non of the actual communcations i see any of the knc people actually post at all besides the initial posts from sam cole.
Its so simple to add some information when you are going to sell a product, so people do not NEED to ask whats included I do not wanna see a post from some forum member and to be honest alot of them are on my ignore list.
I want to see relevant information which make us clear what is going on. Everytime they post something instant many questions pop up which should not be needed if the info was more clear towards us customers.
Again this is not a rant but a real concern, knc would have less a problem with people calling and sending emails if the info was not all the time in crypto language.
I took almost 3 weeks to get an answer from knc and what was said as a answer was not even an answer at all on my questions
Mark my words....... a six rail psu will not work! Use single rail only!
|
|
|
|
|
fubly
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 05:34:36 PM |
|
|
each time you send a transaction don't forget to use a new address, each time you receive one also!
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 05:38:26 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
rolling
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 05:43:50 PM |
|
https://www.kncminer.com/news/news-67All, We have a new firmware for you today this is the 0.99 version of our firmware The firmware has the following New features: - Update cgminer revision to 3.8.1. This should solve most of the issues with eligius pool. - Cgminer API always enabled (removed that setting from web interface) - Pool quota support in the web interface Bugfixes - Fixed some memory leaks in cgminer - Fixed a number of bugs in the web interface - Turned off excessive logging in the lighttpd web server to prevent excessive memory consumption the firmware can be downloaded here www.kncminer.com/userfiles/file/kncminer-0.99.bin Thanks KnCMiner Team
|
|
|
|
|
ASIC-K
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Hell?
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 05:58:33 PM |
|
this firmware blows. back to 98.1 beta....
|
|
|
|
|
xyzzy099
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1068
Merit: 1109
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 05:59:03 PM |
|
I just noticed that my module order has gone from 'paid' to 'in progess'  That's gotta be a good sign...
|
Libertarians: Diligently plotting to take over the world and leave you alone.
|
|
|
|
rolling
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 06:00:14 PM |
|
this firmware blows. back to 98.1 beta....
Agreed. Killed die 0 again. Back to 98.1 Beta...
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 06:00:56 PM |
|
this firmware blows. back to 98.1 beta....
It hasn't ran 5 minutes...how can you make that assumption? although I like the beta best so far as well... but need to give this a chance...lol
|
|
|
|
|
FCTaiChi
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 06:01:17 PM |
|
After looking all over their page and through several pages of threads I still am not finding their the delivery date for next batch. Does anyone know? I was just told I had it wrong with no clarification.
|
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 06:04:29 PM |
|
After looking all over their page and through several pages of threads I still am not finding their the delivery date for next batch. Does anyone know? I was just told I had it wrong with no clarification.
 Try reading sometime... (Just kidding)...I know there is a lot to sort thru!
|
|
|
|
ASIC-K
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Hell?
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 06:09:13 PM |
|
this firmware blows. back to 98.1 beta....
It hasn't ran 5 minutes...how can you make that assumption? although I like the beta best so far as well... but need to give this a chance...lol trust me, 5 minutes is all i need. hw errors way higher, lots of rejected etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FCTaiChi
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 06:09:33 PM |
|
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 06:17:09 PM |
|
this firmware blows. back to 98.1 beta....
It hasn't ran 5 minutes...how can you make that assumption? although I like the beta best so far as well... but need to give this a chance...lol trust me, 5 minutes is all i need. hw errors way higher, lots of rejected etc. ok... Your machines..... But I must say that if you'd been reading & keeping up with this thread (which I think you have), You should know that some dies need the chip to warm up before they activate... I too noticed the new FW started out a bit slower, but is now ramping up to speed that they are back up to temp.... 5 or 10 mins isn't nearly enough to make such a judgement imho.. But if it doesn't pan out... I'll be the first third to say so....lol and go back to 0.98.1 beta as well....  I'm at least going to give it a few hours.... before going back... but not before trying enablecores, and trying again.... also... remember to clear browser cache
|
|
|
|
ASIC-K
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Hell?
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 06:24:23 PM |
|
this firmware blows. back to 98.1 beta....
It hasn't ran 5 minutes...how can you make that assumption? although I like the beta best so far as well... but need to give this a chance...lol trust me, 5 minutes is all i need. hw errors way higher, lots of rejected etc. ok... Your machines..... But I must say that if you'd been reading & keeping up with this thread (which I think you have), You should know that some dies need the chip to warm up before they activate... I too noticed the new FW started out a bit slower, but is now ramping up to speed that they are back up to temp.... 5 or 10 mins isn't nearly enough to make such a judgement imho.. But if it doesn't pan out... I'll be the first third to say so....lol and go back to 0.98.1 beta as well....  I'm at least going to give it a few hours.... before going back... but not before trying enablecores, and trying again.... also... remember to clear browser cache yeah the die warm up stuff doesn't make a difference to my machine. mine is very firmware dependent. every other firmware other than beta, i was getting 7 percent hw error and 3 percent rejected. beta i get 1.5 and .3 percent. my machine is running at optimum so yeah not much improving what is already perfect.
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 06:27:08 PM |
|
this firmware blows. back to 98.1 beta....
It hasn't ran 5 minutes...how can you make that assumption? although I like the beta best so far as well... but need to give this a chance...lol trust me, 5 minutes is all i need. hw errors way higher, lots of rejected etc. ok... Your machines..... But I must say that if you'd been reading & keeping up with this thread (which I think you have), You should know that some dies need the chip to warm up before they activate... I too noticed the new FW started out a bit slower, but is now ramping up to speed that they are back up to temp.... 5 or 10 mins isn't nearly enough to make such a judgement imho.. But if it doesn't pan out... I'll be the first third to say so....lol and go back to 0.98.1 beta as well....  I'm at least going to give it a few hours.... before going back... but not before trying enablecores, and trying again.... also... remember to clear browser cache yeah the die warm up stuff doesn't make a difference to my machine. mine is very firmware dependent. every other firmware other than beta, i was getting 7 percent hw error and 3 percent rejected. beta i get 1.5 and .3 percent. my machine is running at optimum so yeah not much improving what is already perfect. I think whenever the "Tuning Suite" comes out, you will be a happy camper then... 
|
|
|
|
soy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 06:31:03 PM Last edit: November 15, 2013, 08:55:27 PM by soy |
|
Cheers bro, but so you know they're on top of shiz i will post a pic of what i.m currently surrounded by in two secs.   WELL DONE SIR!!! We can still complain, but as a former BFL customer, you guys are still at the top of my list! I wish you a restful weekend!!!  My hair 45 years ago. Correction, 40 years ago. I suspect he would test in the top percentile for sonar skills, hearing acuity.
|
|
|
|
|
ASIC-K
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Hell?
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 06:32:30 PM |
|
this firmware blows. back to 98.1 beta....
It hasn't ran 5 minutes...how can you make that assumption? although I like the beta best so far as well... but need to give this a chance...lol trust me, 5 minutes is all i need. hw errors way higher, lots of rejected etc. ok... Your machines..... But I must say that if you'd been reading & keeping up with this thread (which I think you have), You should know that some dies need the chip to warm up before they activate... I too noticed the new FW started out a bit slower, but is now ramping up to speed that they are back up to temp.... 5 or 10 mins isn't nearly enough to make such a judgement imho.. But if it doesn't pan out... I'll be the first third to say so....lol and go back to 0.98.1 beta as well....  I'm at least going to give it a few hours.... before going back... but not before trying enablecores, and trying again.... also... remember to clear browser cache yeah the die warm up stuff doesn't make a difference to my machine. mine is very firmware dependent. every other firmware other than beta, i was getting 7 percent hw error and 3 percent rejected. beta i get 1.5 and .3 percent. my machine is running at optimum so yeah not much improving what is already perfect. I think whenever the "Tuning Suite" comes out, you will be a happy camper then...  i don't know....i feel like i shouldn't mess with it... this tuning software seems like it will push already sketchy hardware beyond the limit. pop some capacitors, burn some stuff. lol i also wish november hardware was compatible with october stuff.....that would make too much sense though. lol
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 06:33:34 PM |
|
this fw seems to enable/disable cores with greater frequency... cool
|
|
|
|
|
joeventura
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 06:34:23 PM |
|
I just noticed that my module order has gone from 'paid' to 'in progess'  That's gotta be a good sign... ME TOO YAY!
|
|
|
|
|
|