|
gsrcrxsi
|
 |
January 27, 2014, 01:27:12 PM |
|
Why is useast and EU so unstable over the past 24 hours? Really cutting into the profits  Then set the default uswest server as a backup/failover. If you're pool mining without multiple failover pools, you're doing it wrong. |
|
|
|
|
the_unholy_grail
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
January 27, 2014, 01:37:23 PM |
|
Why is useast and EU so unstable over the past 24 hours? Really cutting into the profits Then set the default uswest server as a backup/failover. If you're pool mining without multiple failover pools, you're doing it wrong. I do have multiple failover pools  but the ping for uswest is too damn high. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ioqua
|
|
January 27, 2014, 01:38:23 PM |
|
Teach me for not having three failover pools |
|
|
|
|
|
artiface
|
|
January 27, 2014, 01:38:38 PM |
|
Let's say we have lots of rigs and typed our payout address incorrectly for one of them and it now has a balance of 0.2BTC. How would I go about getting this sent to the correct address? 2 of the characters were switched.
You probably don't. If payments were sent to an address you don't control, they will be lost. Bitcoin payments are not reversible. |
|
|
|
|
MrBobC
Member
Offline
Activity: 110
Merit: 10
|
|
January 27, 2014, 01:44:26 PM |
|
Let's say we have lots of rigs and typed our payout address incorrectly for one of them and it now has a balance of 0.2BTC. How would I go about getting this sent to the correct address? 2 of the characters were switched.
You probably don't. If payments were sent to an address you don't control, they will be lost. Bitcoin payments are not reversible. Yes, but I don't see where a payout actually happened. 1MmBUf6 KDTQsNGBEyrsxrTFNCbCT1vtTEK should have been 1MmBUf6 DKTQsNGBEyrsxrTFNCbCT1vtTEK. I don't see any payouts for the first one though, just a balance of 0.2. |
|
|
|
|
|
Catswold
|
|
January 27, 2014, 01:47:16 PM |
|
Send a PM to h2o with all the info. IF it can be corrected, he will do so. It appears that you were lucky and the address to which you directed it is no currently a legitimate BTC address, so the coin remained in your balance.
Oh, and now you know why you should always use copy and paste for your wallet addresses rather than manually typing them in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
JCviggen
|
|
January 27, 2014, 01:48:23 PM |
|
Let's say we have lots of rigs and typed our payout address incorrectly for one of them and it now has a balance of 0.2BTC. How would I go about getting this sent to the correct address? 2 of the characters were switched.
You probably don't. If payments were sent to an address you don't control, they will be lost. Bitcoin payments are not reversible. It's very very very (VERY) unlikely to create a valid address with typos. That said, typing addresses is a bad idea, always copy/paste. |
Age Of Mars | GameFI Virtual colonization of Mars
|
|
|
|
gsrcrxsi
|
|
January 27, 2014, 01:53:13 PM |
|
Teach me for not having three failover pools My pool/failovers are: 1. Middlecoin useast 2. Middlecoin uswest 3. Hashcows 4. Poolerino EAC pool As a result, no cut in to profits. I never even get to pool 3/4. They are there just in case. Also ping is really inconsequential. Blocks aren't found fast enough for an extra 100ms lag to really make much difference. Furthermore, afaik useast is BETA. Expect 50% uptime and be grateful for more. Along those same lines, uswest is non-beta, so expect 98% uptime and grateful for more. You have no one to blame but yourself for your high expectations and poor mining practices. If you think you can make more elsewhere (lol), there's the door. Good luck. |
|
|
|
|
fyff
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
January 27, 2014, 02:09:33 PM |
|
So eu and useast as a failover didn't work out going to be adding a third pool for failover
|
|
|
|
|
csf3lih
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
January 27, 2014, 02:11:45 PM |
|
massive rejections
asia seems also down
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ioqua
|
|
January 27, 2014, 02:12:05 PM |
|
Teach me for not having three failover pools My pool/failovers are: 1. Middlecoin useast 2. Middlecoin uswest 3. Hashcows 4. Poolerino EAC pool As a result, no cut in to profits. I never even get to pool 3/4. They are there just in case. Also ping is really inconsequential. Blocks aren't found fast enough for an extra 100ms lag to really make much difference. Furthermore, afaik useast is BETA. Expect 50% uptime and be grateful for more. Along those same lines, uswest is non-beta, so expect 98% uptime and grateful for more. You have no one to blame but yourself for your high expectations and poor mining practices. If you think you can make more elsewhere (lol), there's the door. Good luck. Wow jump down someone's throat much? I was just surprised that neither West or EU were up, At what point did I claim high expectations or thinking I could make more elsewhere? I'm happy here thanks and good payouts. Middle is always returning way more than the likes of Multipool etc should do. |
|
|
|
|
|
Damnsammit
|
|
January 27, 2014, 02:15:35 PM |
|
Wow jump down someone's throat much? I was just surprised that neither West or EU were up, At what point did I claim high expectations or thinking I could make more elsewhere? I'm happy here thanks and good payouts.
Middle is always returning way more than the likes of Multipool etc should do.
Gonna go out on a limb and say he meant to quote the_unholy_grail Either that or it was just a general statement from someone who has been here a while. I've never seen people complain so much about a pool as they do about Middlecoin. Between ignorance of difficulty and balances, there is never a shortage of pissed off people in this thread  |
|
|
|
|
Stanr010
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
January 27, 2014, 02:19:34 PM |
|
Teach me for not having three failover pools My pool/failovers are: 1. Middlecoin useast 2. Middlecoin uswest 3. Hashcows 4. Poolerino EAC pool As a result, no cut in to profits. I never even get to pool 3/4. They are there just in case. Also ping is really inconsequential. Blocks aren't found fast enough for an extra 100ms lag to really make much difference. Furthermore, afaik useast is BETA. Expect 50% uptime and be grateful for more. Along those same lines, uswest is non-beta, so expect 98% uptime and grateful for more. You have no one to blame but yourself for your high expectations and poor mining practices. If you think you can make more elsewhere (lol), there's the door. Good luck. Sadly, I'm running cudaminer on one of my rigs and there is no failover option. It's normally pointed to useast but when that cuts out my mining output is cut in half since it's not able to switch to uswest. uswest on the other hand gives me 5-8% rejects when useast is around 1% to 2% What makes the beta servers "beta"? Why do the servers fail or go down? Aren't these just Amazon servers? Wouldn't you just run the same backend on all of the servers and be done with it? There isn't really any reason why there would be a huge difference between them right? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stanr010
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
January 27, 2014, 02:28:24 PM |
|
To expand on that previous idea, isn't it just using the Amazon servers? What makes the difference between them being beta and non beta? US West (Oregon) Region EC2 Availability Zones: 3 Launched 2011 US East (Northern Virginia) Region EC2 Availability Zones: 5* Launched 2006 Asia Pacific (Singapore) Region EC2 Availability Zones: 2 Launched 2010 EU (Ireland) Region EC2 Availability Zones: 3 Launched 2007 http://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/globalinfrastructure/#reglink-na |
|
|
|
|
The Fat Miner
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Please give me Bitcoins so I can buy more food
|
|
January 27, 2014, 02:32:58 PM |
|
massive rejections
asia seems also down
I've been getting bundles of lost shares due to stratum disconnects, And average hash rate is well below what it should be, Even though I reconfigured my setup today for better results, For the life of me I don't know how it can go down even though it's at least ten percent higher on my end than yesterday. |
|
|
|
|
The Fat Miner
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Please give me Bitcoins so I can buy more food
|
|
January 27, 2014, 02:34:01 PM |
|
To expand on that previous idea, isn't it just using the Amazon servers? What makes the difference between them being beta and non beta? US West (Oregon) Region EC2 Availability Zones: 3 Launched 2011 US East (Northern Virginia) Region EC2 Availability Zones: 5* Launched 2006 Asia Pacific (Singapore) Region EC2 Availability Zones: 2 Launched 2010 EU (Ireland) Region EC2 Availability Zones: 3 Launched 2007 http://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/globalinfrastructure/#reglink-naThat's what I'd like to know. |
|
|
|
|
Stanr010
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
January 27, 2014, 02:38:02 PM |
|
To expand on that previous idea, isn't it just using the Amazon servers? What makes the difference between them being beta and non beta? US West (Oregon) Region EC2 Availability Zones: 3 Launched 2011 US East (Northern Virginia) Region EC2 Availability Zones: 5* Launched 2006 Asia Pacific (Singapore) Region EC2 Availability Zones: 2 Launched 2010 EU (Ireland) Region EC2 Availability Zones: 3 Launched 2007 http://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/globalinfrastructure/#reglink-naThat's what I'd like to know. I really hope he can take useast out of "beta" and implement auto load / latency balancing by just pointing to middlecoin soon. That would solve my issue with not being able to set up a failover server. I would prefer taking high reject rates and connecting to asia over being completely disconnected. |
|
|
|
|
|
mpdas108
|
|
January 27, 2014, 02:42:22 PM |
|
On a semi-related note of my cards and their variable / instable hashrates, since i have been using uswest for the past couple of hours because of useast's instability, I have noticed that my hashrate no longer fluctuates when Im hashing on uswest, and is stable once again.. very interesting I wonder why that would be.
Oh and btw the instability of my hashrates only started a few days ago, and Ive been on middlecoin since Dec 17.
|
|
|
|
|
Catswold
|
|
January 27, 2014, 02:42:46 PM |
|
massive rejections
asia seems also down
I've been getting bundles of lost shares due to stratum disconnects, And average hash rate is well below what it should be, Even though I reconfigured my setup today for better results, For the life of me I don't know how it can go down even though it's at least ten percent higher on my end than yesterday. Yep. I'm barely hitting 500mh/s on my R9 280X on the uswest. I was running 710mh/s on useast. Gonna be a lousy pay day today if it isn't fixed soon. |
|
|
|
|
|
