[ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com

[Cryptos2go]

All accounted for. As far as sudden increases in balance are concerned...

[linked67]

I just don't understand why people with the same hash pawer don't have the same stats. For example, i'm running since december my rigs 24/24 and i should have same stats like the one on the main page with a different ratio.

This night people had a lot of unexchanged but not for my 5 rigs that have around 8mhs. I'm on amsterdam server, rejected are around 2 or 3% in cgminer, same for stale. Good ping to amsterdam and eu server around 50ms.
My unexchanged were very flat and my payout is around 0.01btc/mhs/day. Compared to the main graph that has around 0.02, there is something wrong.

I suspect the server location to have different earnings. I hope i'm wrong.

[BombaUcigasa]

I just don't understand why people with the same hash pawer don't have the same stats. For example, i'm running since december my rigs 24/24 and i should have same stats like the one on the main page with a different ratio.

Links?

Some coins are exchanged after 5-7 days, so you need to compare 24/7 miners for the last week. Each server might mine different coins, or your miners might submit shares randomly through small coin mining windows or not, varying payouts.

[mechx]

Unfortunately you're right, different server mine different pools, asia server for example despite the highest payday for the week, averaged approx 0.01btc/mh today.

I suspect the server location to have different earnings. I hope i'm wrong.

[MagicOnline]

Unfortunately you're right, different server mine different pools, asia server for example despite the highest payday for the week, averaged approx 0.01btc/mh today.

I suspect the server location to have different earnings. I hope i'm wrong.

We use one profit pool and that is middlecoin, now it's spit up like different pools.

As said before it should be: BTC's earned on all servers >> divided by all shares submitted on all servers>> multiplied by user shares >> is payout

[The Fat Miner]

can someone explain this?



http://www.middlecoin.com/reports/1Pb8rwjy542Gd1wn1cy3QSZHcpouGSWE3j.html

Yeh that's where all the missing payments went lol

[The Fat Miner]

Unfortunately you're right, different server mine different pools, asia server for example despite the highest payday for the week, averaged approx 0.01btc/mh today.

I suspect the server location to have different earnings. I hope i'm wrong.

We use one profit pool and that is middlecoin, now it's spit up like different pools.

As said before it should be: BTC's earned on all servers >> divided by all shares submitted on all servers>> multiplied by user shares >> is payout

It doesn't work like that because I've been hashing exactly the same as somebody else on this forum and he's got 0.02 for every Mh/s I've had half that amount

[sgsdebruijn]

Unfortunately you're right, different server mine different pools, asia server for example despite the highest payday for the week, averaged approx 0.01btc/mh today.

I suspect the server location to have different earnings. I hope i'm wrong.

We use one profit pool and that is middlecoin, now it's spit up like different pools.

As said before it should be: BTC's earned on all servers >> divided by all shares submitted on all servers>> multiplied by user shares >> is payout

I don't think it goes like that  

[The Fat Miner]

Well i didnt have such a nice payment today, im on the asia server, received less then 0.01 BTC/mh today, actually alot less.

Hopefully onwards and upwards tomorrow.

Ditto

[Acrobat]

I (mining at Amsterdam) noticed the same issue and yesterday H2O confirmed (on IRC) that currently not all servers give the same profits, but he is working on a fix. Excerpts from a chatlog (with other news as well):


Jan 31 22:23:03 <Acrobat>   Do we know why the difference in unexchanged between different MC users is so enormous? Are you screwed when mining EU/Amsterdam instead of US?
Jan 31 22:31:35 <h2odysee>   Acrobat: I know that's an issue. In the future, it won't matter what server you're on.
Jan 31 22:31:47 <h2odysee>   I'll make all shares equal
Jan 31 22:33:15 <h2odysee>   The difference in profit between the various servers should be smaller now, than it was before.
Jan 31 22:34:48 <h2odysee>   well, they should be. I made a change a couple of days ago that should make them more equal
---
Jan 31 22:39:43 <h2odysee>   current plans, for those interested, are to fix the amsterdam server (I think I know why it disconnects a lot), then set up a new system for rolling out new servers.
Jan 31 22:40:11 <h2odysee>   So I will be able to easily provision new servers
Jan 31 22:40:38 <h2odysee>   Once that happens, we'll get a Dallas, LA, and Hong Kong server
Jan 31 22:41:03 <h2odysee>   both Ireland and Amsterdam suffer from the same problem. I don't know if either is best
Jan 31 22:42:28 <h2odysee>   I could do a Frankfurt server maybe.
Jan 31 22:44:48 <h2odysee>   Scandinavia will be low priority, because none of my hosting providers have datacenters there. I'd have to use a new one.
---
Jan 31 22:46:27 <h2odysee>   Yeah, the current load issues are the main thing
Jan 31 22:46:33 <h2odysee>   Which I can solve
---
Jan 31 22:47:27 <h2odysee>   I need to lower the diff again. But I can't yet.

[sgsdebruijn]

See de graphs on the mainpage a lot of miners are (still) down

[fyff]

bummer

I (mining at Amsterdam) noticed the same issue and yesterday H2O confirmed (on IRC) that currently not all servers give the same profits, but he is working on a fix. Excerpts from a chatlog (with other news as well):


Jan 31 22:23:03 <Acrobat>   Do we know why the difference in unexchanged between different MC users is so enormous? Are you screwed when mining EU/Amsterdam instead of US?
Jan 31 22:31:35 <h2odysee>   Acrobat: I know that's an issue. In the future, it won't matter what server you're on.
Jan 31 22:31:47 <h2odysee>   I'll make all shares equal
Jan 31 22:33:15 <h2odysee>   The difference in profit between the various servers should be smaller now, than it was before.
Jan 31 22:34:48 <h2odysee>   well, they should be. I made a change a couple of days ago that should make them more equal
Jan 31 22:41:03 <h2odysee>   both Ireland and Amsterdam suffer from the same problem. I don't know if either is best
---
Jan 31 22:39:43 <h2odysee>   current plans, for those interested, are to fix the amsterdam server (I think I know why it disconnects a lot), then set up a new system for rolling out new servers.
Jan 31 22:40:11 <h2odysee>   So I will be able to easily provision new servers
Jan 31 22:40:38 <h2odysee>   Once that happens, we'll get a Dallas, LA, and Hong Kong server
Jan 31 22:42:28 <h2odysee>   I could do a Frankfurt server maybe.
Jan 31 22:44:48 <h2odysee>   Scandinavia will be low priority, because none of my hosting providers have datacenters there. I'd have to use a new one.
---
Jan 31 22:46:27 <h2odysee>   Yeah, the current load issues are the main thing
Jan 31 22:46:33 <h2odysee>   Which I can solve
---
Jan 31 22:47:27 <h2odysee>   I need to lower the diff again. But I can't yet.

[deesx1]

My account reached hardly half of usual BTC amount (counting unexchanged). Good to know where is a problem.

[barean]

Unfortunately you're right, different server mine different pools, asia server for example despite the highest payday for the week, averaged approx 0.01btc/mh today.

I suspect the server location to have different earnings. I hope i'm wrong.

We use one profit pool and that is middlecoin, now it's spit up like different pools.

As said before it should be: BTC's earned on all servers >> divided by all shares submitted on all servers>> multiplied by user shares >> is payout

It doesn't work like that because I've been hashing exactly the same as somebody else on this forum and he's got 0.02 for every Mh/s I've had half that amount

Is there a way to see global stats by server?
, its obvious that payout, (at least last), depends on the server youre mining.

I understand that H2O wants to follow a different strategies on each server but "profits" should be shared among everybody. I´m first fan of middlecoin and have recomended it to many people but I´m dissapointed because my payout was almost half from previous day and some others had best ever.

Is we could see payout/hashpower for each server would be clarifying.

[ckoeber]

I understand that H2O wants to follow a different strategies on each server but "profits" should be shared among everybody. I´m first fan of middlecoin and have recomended it to many people but I´m dissapointed because my payout was almost half from previous day and some others had best ever.

Is we could see payout/hashpower for each server would be clarifying.

I could get behind this; if the stats differ people should see where it differs and why.

[The Fat Miner]

I (mining at Amsterdam) noticed the same issue and yesterday H2O confirmed (on IRC) that currently not all servers give the same profits, but he is working on a fix. Excerpts from a chatlog (with other news as well):


Jan 31 22:23:03 <Acrobat>   Do we know why the difference in unexchanged between different MC users is so enormous? Are you screwed when mining EU/Amsterdam instead of US?
Jan 31 22:31:35 <h2odysee>   Acrobat: I know that's an issue. In the future, it won't matter what server you're on.
Jan 31 22:31:47 <h2odysee>   I'll make all shares equal
Jan 31 22:33:15 <h2odysee>   The difference in profit between the various servers should be smaller now, than it was before.
Jan 31 22:34:48 <h2odysee>   well, they should be. I made a change a couple of days ago that should make them more equal
---
Jan 31 22:39:43 <h2odysee>   current plans, for those interested, are to fix the amsterdam server (I think I know why it disconnects a lot), then set up a new system for rolling out new servers.
Jan 31 22:40:11 <h2odysee>   So I will be able to easily provision new servers
Jan 31 22:40:38 <h2odysee>   Once that happens, we'll get a Dallas, LA, and Hong Kong server
Jan 31 22:41:03 <h2odysee>   both Ireland and Amsterdam suffer from the same problem. I don't know if either is best
Jan 31 22:42:28 <h2odysee>   I could do a Frankfurt server maybe.
Jan 31 22:44:48 <h2odysee>   Scandinavia will be low priority, because none of my hosting providers have datacenters there. I'd have to use a new one.
---
Jan 31 22:46:27 <h2odysee>   Yeah, the current load issues are the main thing
Jan 31 22:46:33 <h2odysee>   Which I can solve
---
Jan 31 22:47:27 <h2odysee>   I need to lower the diff again. But I can't yet.

Thanks for that info

[boy2k]

we are switching coins every 3 seconds on the eu server it seems...

[Bigeyeone]

for those not too happy with middlecoin,
have a look at http://hashbros.co.in
here's their official thread : https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=431140.0
i switched about a week ago , and must say
i'm very pleased with it
very good , informative website , transparency & good profits

kind regards

although it is allowed, you have no style spamming a competing pool in the middlecoin thread.

[ckoeber]

for those not too happy with middlecoin,
have a look at http://hashbros.co.in
here's their official thread : https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=431140.0
i switched about a week ago , and must say
i'm very pleased with it
very good , informative website , transparency & good profits

kind regards

When Hashbros starts getting more than 0.013 BTC per Mh/s on their payouts post back.

Until then I'll take the shitty web interface.

[webbson]

Is it just the useast server that has better profit than eu/amsterdam or uswest as well?

Todays payout was about 0.014 BTC per Mh/s for us running eu and amsterdam as failover, we didn't get the large unexchanged boom in BTC as the others.