[ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com

[Kheg]

Yes, another crappy payout - but look at the graph.  I bet you're all sitting on a MOUNTAIN of unexchanged balance, for a second straight day.

My guess is we're sitting on coins that can't be exchanged through an automated api waiting for H2O to do it manually, but he's been tied up trying to fix the regional server issues.  (That's me trying to be optimistic and nice)

I'd still much prefer to have whatever is causing the work restart requests fixed, since that's causing a huge drop in efficiency.

[Ioqua]

can anyone explain me this graph?

why negative bitcoins on <sat Feb 01 ?

This is when H20 processes all the payments for people under 0.01BTC i believe

[corsaro]

can anyone explain me this graph?

why negative bitcoins on <sat Feb 01 ?

This is when H20 processes all the payments for people under 0.01BTC i believe

I think negative is an artefact

[Stanr010]

Yes, another crappy payout - but look at the graph.  I bet you're all sitting on a MOUNTAIN of unexchanged balance, for a second straight day.

My guess is we're sitting on coins that can't be exchanged through an automated api waiting for H2O to do it manually, but he's been tied up trying to fix the regional server issues.  (That's me trying to be optimistic and nice)

I'd still much prefer to have whatever is causing the work restart requests fixed, since that's causing a huge drop in efficiency.

I think it has to do with the entire altcoin market being down and the algorithms not automatically selling it because it thinks it can get a better price. Then H20 needs to go in manually and sell a bunch of coins to balance out the unexchanged.

[metafr]

Yes, another crappy payout - but look at the graph.  I bet you're all sitting on a MOUNTAIN of unexchanged balance, for a second straight day.

My guess is we're sitting on coins that can't be exchanged through an automated api waiting for H2O to do it manually, but he's been tied up trying to fix the regional server issues.  (That's me trying to be optimistic and nice)

I'd still much prefer to have whatever is causing the work restart requests fixed, since that's causing a huge drop in efficiency.

I think it has to do with the entire altcoin market being down and the algorithms not automatically selling it because it thinks it can get a better price. Then H20 needs to go in manually and sell a bunch of coins to balance out the unexchanged.

Yesterday was one of the worst days so far for payouts 

will split rigs between middlecoin and wafflepool to see whats what.

Hi,

It is very frustrating.

I wonder why there is so much income difference between clients with almost same H/s rate :

Eg.:

http://s29.postimg.org/png5rlwf7/screenshot_501.jpg

VS

http://s13.postimg.org/oqv41m8w3/screenshot_502.jpg

Why so much difference (see unexchanged)?

[corsaro]

Yes, another crappy payout - but look at the graph.  I bet you're all sitting on a MOUNTAIN of unexchanged balance, for a second straight day.

My guess is we're sitting on coins that can't be exchanged through an automated api waiting for H2O to do it manually, but he's been tied up trying to fix the regional server issues.  (That's me trying to be optimistic and nice)

I'd still much prefer to have whatever is causing the work restart requests fixed, since that's causing a huge drop in efficiency.

I think it has to do with the entire altcoin market being down and the algorithms not automatically selling it because it thinks it can get a better price. Then H20 needs to go in manually and sell a bunch of coins to balance out the unexchanged.

Yesterday was one of the worst days so far for payouts  

will split rigs between middlecoin and wafflepool to see whats what.

Hi,

It is very frustrating.

I wonder why there is so much income difference between clients with almost same H/s rate :

Eg.:



VS



Why so much difference (see unexchanged)?

probably considering that the hash power is too high, not all servers are mining same coin?

[Acrobat]

So USEast is either disconnecting or not accepting shares, USWest is overloaded and giving 12% rejects. EU/Amsterdam/Asia are disconnecting and giving lower profits than US. We're fucked, this pool is/has been growing too fast... Back to renting out again, just like yesterday and the past days before, too bad renting prices on betarigs.com are dropping also.

[corsaro]

So USEast is either disconnecting or not accepting shares, USWest is overloaded and giving 12% rejects. EU/Amsterdam/Asia are disconnecting and giving lower profits than US. We're fucked, this pool is/has been growing to fast... Back to renting out again, just like yesterday and the past days before, too bad renting prices on betarigs.com are dropping also.

I am sure h2o will fix everything very soon

[Acrobat]

So USEast is either disconnecting or not accepting shares, USWest is overloaded and giving 12% rejects. EU/Amsterdam/Asia are disconnecting and giving lower profits than US. We're fucked, this pool is/has been growing to fast... Back to renting out again, just like yesterday and the past days before, too bad renting prices on betarigs.com are dropping also.

I am sure h2o will fix everything very soon

Yeah, I've been hoping the same for the last 5 weeks. 

[Gasai Yuno]

yes really bad payouts. is there any recommend to switch pool? i love middlecoin (but i love my money more than mdcoin) but i earn low and low day by day. its time to switch  

[corsaro]

yes really bad payouts. is there any recommend to switch pool? i love middlecoin (but i love my money more than mdcoin) but i earn low and low day by day. its time to switch  

h2o is surely reading this thread and he well knows our problems. He is actually trying to fix eu servers instability.

[MarcoPon]

I'm just trying SMOS 1.3 with 2 x 7950 @ 1000 MHz, and was getting about 600KHs each.

Then I run the script to get & compile Kalroth modified version of cgminer 3.7.2.
I modified a couple of parameters ("xintensity" : "4" instead of intensity, and "gpu-thread" : "2"), but I'm getting just about 450Khs.
I think there are obviously other parameters to tweak.

Can someone with a similar, well working, configuration post his cgminer.conf?
Thanx!

---

D'HO! Missed the 's'" on "gpu-threads"! Now it's at 610Khs each.
Still, it would be nice to see another complete cgminer.conf for comparision.

[jimlite]

Why all the "I'm going to wafflepool" comments.
I did a side by side run and Hashcows beats wafflepool.
If you are going to split miners, you should go there.

[jedimstr]

I'm just trying SMOS 1.3 with 2 x 7950 @ 1000 MHz, and was getting about 600KHs each.

Then I run the script to get & compile Kalroth modified version of cgminer 3.7.2.
I modified a couple of parameters ("xintensity" : "4" instead of intensity, and "gpu-thread" : "2"), but I'm getting just about 450Khs.
I think there are obviously other parameters to tweak.

Can someone with a similar, well working, configuration post his cgminer.conf?
Thanx!

---

D'HO! Missed the 's'" on "gpu-threads"! Now it's at 610Khs each.
Still, it would be nice to see another complete cgminer.conf for comparision.

SMOS 1.3 is not very good for the older 7950's. You're better off with SMOS 1.0 with the older CGMiner 3.2.1.  SMOS 1.3 works better for the newer R9 series cards.  In fact a lot of the newer updates like Kalroth's CGMiner fork and SGMiner tend to like the newer R9 280 and 290 cards.  I'd stick with the ancient but working CGMiner versions for the 7950's.

I've got 4 MSI 7950's running between 680 and 710 on SMOS 1.0 with CGminer 3.2.1 using the undervolted .962 bios and Lantis' scrypt bin files:

[wen9x88]

payout missing,what should i do ?

[ndevices]

my total balance was raised for 1 hour on 0.001 BTC with 8.7mhs  WTF!

[The Fat Miner]

Payout is getting worse and worse , And no the I unexchanged isn't getting higher like lot of users magically do. Middlecoin has been good to me so I will give it another week and I'm off, Cheers H2o

[MarcoPon]

SMOS 1.3 is not very good for the older 7950's. You're better off with SMOS 1.0 with the older CGMiner 3.2.1.  SMOS 1.3 works better for the newer R9 series cards.  In fact a lot of the newer updates like Kalroth's CGMiner fork and SGMiner tend to like the newer R9 280 and 290 cards.  I'd stick with the ancient but working CGMiner versions for the 7950's.

I've got 4 MSI 7950's running between 680 and 710 on SMOS 1.0 with CGminer 3.2.1 using the undervolted .962 bios and Lantis' scrypt bin files:

Thanks jedimstr! Interesting, and nice to see that the GPU clock could be pushed even with V < 1000.
Lantis bin file is this one?
https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=6058.0

Can you share the cgminer.conf file? Or can I ask what you use for intensity & thread-concurrency?
Thanks!

[dsgx1]

yes really bad payouts. is there any recommend to switch pool? i love middlecoin (but i love my money more than mdcoin) but i earn low and low day by day. its time to switch 

I split my hashing power 50/50 between Middlecoin and Hashcows.

[zSprawl]

I'm just trying SMOS 1.3 with 2 x 7950 @ 1000 MHz, and was getting about 600KHs each.

Then I run the script to get & compile Kalroth modified version of cgminer 3.7.2.
I modified a couple of parameters ("xintensity" : "4" instead of intensity, and "gpu-thread" : "2"), but I'm getting just about 450Khs.
I think there are obviously other parameters to tweak.

Can someone with a similar, well working, configuration post his cgminer.conf?
Thanx!

---

D'HO! Missed the 's'" on "gpu-threads"! Now it's at 610Khs each.
Still, it would be nice to see another complete cgminer.conf for comparision.

http://zsprawl.com/iOS/2014/02/scrypt-coin-mining-with-two-threads-on-an-amd-7950/