Bitcoin Forum
January 13, 2026, 08:07:06 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.2 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 [446] 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 ... 537 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com  (Read 829960 times)
ckoeber
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 06:14:41 PM
 #8901



"wafflepool" lol...

This is great; glad these stats are being published.
ckoeber
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 06:16:27 PM
 #8902

Balance has flat lined for an hour now. WTF is going on?  Cry

man relax, its just that the stats are frozen.

''middlecoin.com published data: 1 hour ago''

Cool, where do you see ''middlecoin.com published data: 1 hour ago'' ?

just use this site: http://middlecoin.info

add your adress and than check on the top news feed

No, even there the stats are frozen.

The stats are frozen there as it is dependent on Middlecoin. But middlecoin.info (the stats site) will tell you the last time middlecoin (the main pool) updated their stats at the top of the page.
gsrcrxsi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 06:24:41 PM
 #8903



"wafflepool" lol...

Where are you getting these stats from? Are you load balancing each server on one of your rigs or something? Are you taking into account that the payout people ACTUALLY receive is ~3.4% less than total pool earnings?

I ask because these numbers are quite different than my numbers. Based on my personal payouts. I'll share my numbers in a bit.

You're showing ~.014/MH for yesterday.
My numbers say about .009.
Gasai Yuno
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100

Yukki Yukki Yukki!


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 06:28:06 PM
 #8904



"wafflepool" lol...

Where are you getting these stats from? Are you load balancing each server on one of your rigs or something? Are you taking into account that the payout people ACTUALLY receive is ~3.4% less than total pool earnings?

I ask because these numbers are quite different than my numbers. Based on my personal payouts. I'll share my numbers in a bit.

You're showing ~.014/MH for yesterday.
My numbers say about .009.

and mine is 0,07

also efficiency is always bad. about %30 and %60

coz servers are being down too much and getting rejected too much so this kills efficiency. coz its not stable. i will try that wafflepool thing.
caution
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 65
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 06:46:54 PM
 #8905

Payouts are getting worse day by day. Since there is autoredirection to the nearest server my profits barely move. I guess its time to leave middlecoin too. For now.

I switched to http://wafflepool.com and i have not looked back.

much better?


more than better !

So you are saying yesterday's wafflepool payment (0.00910775 BTC / 1MH ) was better than middlecoin's? Or the average? Or....  Grin


about what I got yesterday with 3 Mh/s
fyff
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 06:48:00 PM
 #8906

I think the numbers are a bit high aswell. I think I got like 12.x BTC/Mhash on USeast
sgsdebruijn
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 06:58:11 PM
 #8907

Middlecoin  @middlecoinpool  
The Amsterdam server is down. It might be a while until it's up again.

Yep stable, djiesus how come a lotof servers crashes all the time?

I think H20 took the system down for maintenance; part of making the pool more stable.

yeah right
eMiz0r
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 60
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 06:59:03 PM
 #8908

No, I want the pool to be 100% stable. It's plenty big enough to work now, adding tons of little miners who don't have 50MH each just causes a lot of server traffic.
As the owner of a brick-and-mortar company that does work for businesses, as opposed to individuals, and mostly decent-sized corporations, there is something to this big miner vs small miner thing.

If I were to start a pool, honestly, I'd probably design it to attract larger miners (10MH+) and discourage smaller ones.  Providing support to a small number of large customers is SO much easier and more lucrative than a ton of small ones.

Easier? Hell yeah, definately. More risky? Also.

As the owner of an hostingcompany with tens of thousands individual customers (and also SOME large corps), we've had little or no problem with the recession/crisis/economic meltdown. Instead, we've grown almost twice the size in the last few years.

My point being: when you dedicate yourself to a small pool of large hashrates and get a lot of issues as middlecoin has right now, you wouldn't lose 1 or 2 GH/s as it did in the last few days, but you'd lose a lot more then that. Just as it wouldn't heart our profits too much when we get a big interruption of our services due to lets say... a DDoS attack. Better for the long term in my opinion, but I would understand when you disagree.

I switched to wafflepool yesterday and get 0,02% rejects. Don't know yet if it is the same or more profitable, but I'm gonna try it out for a couple of days.
zneww
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 07, 2014, 07:06:00 PM
 #8909

Still kinda mindblowing middlecoin still has these problems.
falsealarm_bf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 189
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 07:30:47 PM
 #8910



"wafflepool" lol...

Where are you getting these stats from? Are you load balancing each server on one of your rigs or something? Are you taking into account that the payout people ACTUALLY receive is ~3.4% less than total pool earnings?

I ask because these numbers are quite different than my numbers. Based on my personal payouts. I'll share my numbers in a bit.

You're showing ~.014/MH for yesterday.
My numbers say about .009.

and mine is 0,07

also efficiency is always bad. about %30 and %60

coz servers are being down too much and getting rejected too much so this kills efficiency. coz its not stable. i will try that wafflepool thing.

That's also my experience on the useast server too. I am not sure where these guys are getting the 0.014 averages. It's insane.
Gasai Yuno
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100

Yukki Yukki Yukki!


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 07:42:29 PM
 #8911



"wafflepool" lol...

Where are you getting these stats from? Are you load balancing each server on one of your rigs or something? Are you taking into account that the payout people ACTUALLY receive is ~3.4% less than total pool earnings?

I ask because these numbers are quite different than my numbers. Based on my personal payouts. I'll share my numbers in a bit.

You're showing ~.014/MH for yesterday.
My numbers say about .009.

and mine is 0,07

also efficiency is always bad. about %30 and %60

coz servers are being down too much and getting rejected too much so this kills efficiency. coz its not stable. i will try that wafflepool thing.

That's also my experience on the useast server too. I am not sure where these guys are getting the 0.014 averages. It's insane.

yesterday's payout was 0.033BTC and i have 4,4mh/s rig.

that means 0,075BTC/mhs

and i see on stats page all the same with me. i see people's hasrate and daily earnings.
gsrcrxsi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 07:48:54 PM
Last edit: February 07, 2014, 07:59:37 PM by gsrcrxsi
 #8912



"wafflepool" lol...

Where are you getting these stats from? Are you load balancing each server on one of your rigs or something? Are you taking into account that the payout people ACTUALLY receive is ~3.4% less than total pool earnings?

I ask because these numbers are quite different than my numbers. Based on my personal payouts. I'll share my numbers in a bit.

You're showing ~.014/MH for yesterday.
My numbers say about .009.
this is what my payments look like, as well as the associated BTC/day and BTC/day/MH. includes 5 days averages and all time averages (from mid January)

ok here we go:

pitobread
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 08:09:40 PM
 #8913

It used to be I would have a nice consistent connection and moderately high rejects and my pay was good.  .035 a day good.

Other than the last big dump of unexchanged I have been .02 a day or less and my connection, stats and middlecoin monitor says it is down even though my miner is working.

I was fine with the problems when I was still getting paid but now I can actually see my profits and stats drop.  I will be checking out my other pool options.
ckoeber
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 08:14:39 PM
 #8914

That's also my experience on the useast server too. I am not sure where these guys are getting the 0.014 averages. It's insane.

It really does depend on your reject rates. They were low for me (no more than 5%).

Otherwise I 100% agree with all of the complaints and findings. If your miners are either cutting off (from the servers going down) or you have extremely high reject rates (more than 10%) then you can't possibly average more than 0.007 ~ 0.008 Bitcoin per 1 MH/s.

If your reject rate is low then middlecoin WILL beat out those other pools.
cuesta
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 08:16:13 PM
 #8915

hi i have a query I can't find the answer to. One of my miners (on the eu server) keeps telling me

"accepted untracked stratum share from pool 0"

I'm using cgminer 3.7.2, and not using --no-submit-stale

The other miners (also pointing to the eu server) don't, which confuses me since this link (below) suggests it is to do with the server.

http://mining-tips.weebly.com/1/post/2014/01/-accepted-untracked-stratum-share-from-pool-0.html

but that doesn't make any sense, because only one of my miners is doing this and all my miners are pointing to the same server..

Is there something obvious I'm missing ??
elpsycongro
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 307
Merit: 102



View Profile
February 07, 2014, 08:16:39 PM
 #8916

h2o is a bad pool operator, very amateur and is stealing. When will you people wakeup? Sounds like you're starting to

Oh i am new here but i heard this guy is a famous troll  Grin

Eastwind
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 07, 2014, 08:17:52 PM
 #8917

h2o is a bad pool operator, very amateur and is stealing. When will you people wakeup? Sounds like you're starting to

Oh i am new here buy i heard this guy is a famous troll  Grin

I put him on ignore. Life is much easier after that.
ckoeber
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 08:21:28 PM
 #8918



"wafflepool" lol...

Where are you getting these stats from? Are you load balancing each server on one of your rigs or something? Are you taking into account that the payout people ACTUALLY receive is ~3.4% less than total pool earnings?

I ask because these numbers are quite different than my numbers. Based on my personal payouts. I'll share my numbers in a bit.

You're showing ~.014/MH for yesterday.
My numbers say about .009.
this is what my payments look like, as well as the associated BTC/day and BTC/day/MH. includes 5 days averages and all time averages (from mid January)

ok here we go:



Very detailed!

That average is pretty good. On the days that middlecoin is up and running fine your payouts seem to be awesome.
ckoeber
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 08:24:21 PM
 #8919

hi i have a query I can't find the answer to. One of my miners (on the eu server) keeps telling me

"accepted untracked stratum share from pool 0"

I'm using cgminer 3.7.2, and not using --no-submit-stale

The other miners (also pointing to the eu server) don't, which confuses me since this link (below) suggests it is to do with the server.

http://mining-tips.weebly.com/1/post/2014/01/-accepted-untracked-stratum-share-from-pool-0.html

but that doesn't make any sense, because only one of my miners is doing this and all my miners are pointing to the same server..

Is there something obvious I'm missing ??

Take out the --no-submit-stale.

Middlecoin counts those.

From the FAQ:

Code:
Any tips for cgminer configuration?

Don't use --no-submit-stale. Stale shares caused by coin switches are actually paid.
ckoeber
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 08:26:32 PM
 #8920

It used to be I would have a nice consistent connection and moderately high rejects and my pay was good.  .035 a day good.

Other than the last big dump of unexchanged I have been .02 a day or less and my connection, stats and middlecoin monitor says it is down even though my miner is working.

I was fine with the problems when I was still getting paid but now I can actually see my profits and stats drop.  I will be checking out my other pool options.

How has it been today?
Pages: « 1 ... 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 [446] 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 ... 537 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!