|
Jean-Luc
|
 |
January 08, 2014, 07:59:26 PM |
|
Can CfB/JLP comment on VPS requirements for the new 0.5.3 code? If a hallmarked VPS with say, 30M on the account was running, how much mem would it need? (not my hallmark, BTW, Im hosting someones hallmark for them)
NCC-1701-D is running on 8 GB VPS, with -Xmx6144M, and java is currently using 3065M. On another server I have java is currently using 2124M. I am going to run some memory profiling again soon to see what is taking how much space and if there is any room for improvement before switching to storing blocks and transactions in a database, which would be a significant change. |
|
|
|
|
ZeroTheGreat
|
|
January 08, 2014, 08:01:08 PM |
|
Most importantly, there is no evidence in the above case of a random, memory corruption type of bug, as some have feared. Adding checksums as a way to prevent user errors is a different issue, but there has been no memory corruption at play here.
Agree. Good to hear, thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
mcjavar
|
|
January 08, 2014, 08:02:45 PM |
|
THANK YOU MIKAL
I lold more than I should have.  |
|
|
|
|
|
opticalcarrier
|
|
January 08, 2014, 08:02:51 PM |
|
Can CfB/JLP comment on VPS requirements for the new 0.5.3 code? If a hallmarked VPS with say, 30M on the account was running, how much mem would it need? (not my hallmark, BTW, Im hosting someones hallmark for them)
NCC-1701-D is running on 8 GB VPS, with -Xmx6144M, and java is currently using 3065M. On another server I have java is currently using 2124M. I am going to run some memory profiling again soon to see what is taking how much space and if there is any room for improvement before switching to storing blocks and transactions in a database, which would be a significant change. thanks, will convert all my VPSs to 4GB, please keep us informed. |
|
|
|
|
|
NxtChg
|
|
January 08, 2014, 08:06:39 PM |
|
NCC-1701-D is running on 8 GB VPS, with -Xmx6144M, and java is currently using 3065M. On another server I have java is currently using 2124M.
 Why so much? Am I missing something? Why on my PC it only takes 200 M? |
|
|
|
laowai80
Member
 Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
January 08, 2014, 08:14:27 PM |
|
NCC-1701-D is running on 8 GB VPS, with -Xmx6144M, and java is currently using 3065M. On another server I have java is currently using 2124M.
Why so much? Am I missing something? Why on my PC it only takes 200 M? Starship has to be big |
|
|
|
|
|
opticalcarrier
|
|
January 08, 2014, 08:14:32 PM
Last edit: January 08, 2014, 08:25:24 PM by opticalcarrier |
|
NCC-1701-D is running on 8 GB VPS, with -Xmx6144M, and java is currently using 3065M. On another server I have java is currently using 2124M.
Why so much? Am I missing something? Why on my PC it only takes 200 M? lol someone isnt paying attention to how much dilithium is on the balance on NCC-1701-D's hallmark.... |
|
|
|
|
ferment
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
IDEX - LIVE Real-time DEX
|
|
January 08, 2014, 08:14:54 PM |
|
Can CfB/JLP comment on VPS requirements for the new 0.5.3 code? If a hallmarked VPS with say, 30M on the account was running, how much mem would it need? (not my hallmark, BTW, Im hosting someones hallmark for them)
NCC-1701-D is running on 8 GB VPS, with -Xmx6144M, and java is currently using 3065M. On another server I have java is currently using 2124M. I am going to run some memory profiling again soon to see what is taking how much space and if there is any room for improvement before switching to storing blocks and transactions in a database, which would be a significant change. thanks, will convert all my VPSs to 4GB, please keep us informed. All of mine (except node1) are running on 1GB. With this release, for the first time, after I removed *.nxt and disabled my hourly restart, all 100 are in sync or very close (knock on wood!). I have no idea how long it will last, but it feels good. |
|
|
|
|
ZeroTheGreat
|
|
January 08, 2014, 08:15:18 PM |
|
Brainstorming
I'd like to introduce a concept of a new feature called Account Control. This feature will allow to do different things with ur accounts. For example, u will be able to set a lock on an account to prohibit any outgoing transactions until a special condition met (e.g. an incoming transaction from a predefined account). Another example is Pooled Forging, when an account leases its forging power to another account.
Please, post here what u would like to see in Account Control.
Not only fully restriction, but limit too. Restriction must have, limitation can wait though~ What about recipient of forging power? It'll automatically divide reward between pool's forgers? I suppose even if it'll be fully automatical recipient'd have possibility to setup some fee to cover 24/7-running, wide bandwith and optimal managing of JVM. |
|
|
|
|
landomata
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 08, 2014, 08:15:30 PM |
|
Guys, will the decentralized exchange be able to support sports betting? How would this work? Is a third party needed? Could he be in stealth mode?  Arbitrary Messages can be used for sports betting. Both, the bettor and the service provider, can be in stealth mode (via Tor, for example). How does one become a service provider? |
|
|
|
|
btc24
|
|
January 08, 2014, 08:16:49 PM |
|
Firefox will not warn users about forums.nxtcrypto.org SSL certificate validity anymore. Sorry for the delay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NxtChg
|
|
January 08, 2014, 08:18:15 PM |
|
lol someone isnt paying attention to the balance on NCC-1701-D's hallmark....
Sorry, what? Memory requirement depends on the amount of money in the account? |
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
January 08, 2014, 08:19:20 PM |
|
Guys, will the decentralized exchange be able to support sports betting? How would this work? Is a third party needed? Could he be in stealth mode? Arbitrary Messages can be used for sports betting. Both, the bettor and the service provider, can be in stealth mode (via Tor, for example). How does one become a service provider? U develop an application that uses AM to publish bets info. Others use other app to see this info and place bets. U pay winnings when the time comes. |
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
January 08, 2014, 08:19:53 PM |
|
lol someone isnt paying attention to the balance on NCC-1701-D's hallmark....
Sorry, what? Memory requirement depends on the amount of money in the account? Kinda. More money = more traffic. |
|
|
|
|
|
gbeirn
|
|
January 08, 2014, 08:23:20 PM |
|
Firefox will not warn users about forums.nxtcrypto.org SSL certificate validity anymore. Sorry for the delay.
Yay! Are there any other sites that need SSL certificates? I can donate some NXT to help getting them if people need. |
NXT VPS Server Donations can be sent here: 6044921191674841550At the end of each month I will donate some of them back to the community. This is separate from my main wallet so you can keep track of them. I will keep them in there and only use them for hosting. |
|
|
landomata
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 08, 2014, 08:24:14 PM |
|
U develop an application that uses AM to publish bets info. Others use other app to see this info and place bets. U pay winnings when the time comes.
I;m not really in the betting business...but just wanted to know the process. |
|
|
|
|
NxtChg
|
|
January 08, 2014, 08:24:51 PM |
|
Kinda. More money = more traffic.
But 3 GB??? That is. Just. Wrong. |
|
|
|
|
ZeroTheGreat
|
|
January 08, 2014, 08:26:04 PM |
|
Google is centralized.
Well, there has to be a solution. Would voting system help? Several users will vote an alias down... Actually, maybe a full-blown alias rating? For scammers, who don't trade honestly and stuff like that? Something like a democratic Google Page Rank It's still a center. Just another form. With construction of representative hirarchy (lazy coins and active ones) we can get exactly in "Google" scenario. I suposse it's not an option. Winners of any voting just get bigger than losers (winners'll decide and losers'll shut up). In decantralized network IMO there could not be winners or losers. Each peer, each coin are equivalent in real power (there's no more powerful peer than others, there's no more powerful coins than others) with some restrictions by opensourced protocol that real people agreed too: like locked coins or penalty for non-forging. |
|
|
|
|
|
opticalcarrier
|
|
January 08, 2014, 08:27:16 PM |
|
Firefox will not warn users about forums.nxtcrypto.org SSL certificate validity anymore. Sorry for the delay.
Yay! Are there any other sites that need SSL certificates? I can donate some NXT to help getting them if people need. thanks, but we got a wildcard for all sites we'd ever want to run in the nxtcrypto.org domain. Hopefully by this time next year I wont need to ask for any donations to renew it! |
|
|
|
|
|
Noitev
|
|
January 08, 2014, 08:28:06 PM |
|
2 things
1: from my home computer, I don't see a box to enter a passphrase when sending nxt, so I always get wrong passphrase error when sending...
2. If I want to make an account on an offline computer, what stops someone from colliding the account? if an account is the last 15 digits of a long public key ( as i currently understand it...) and I make an account on an offline computer that ends with key 12345 and send it to that account, what stops someone from making an account that ends with 12345 that has a different passphrase, and stealing my nxt?
|
|
|
|
|
|
