Buy Buy Buy or Sell Sell Sell?

[Mayor of ogba]

Some people have this misconception that if they are to aggressive on their investment they might fall short or get in trouble with those decision they made. But actually if they try to figure out the whole activity they do there's nothing wrong about it especially if they are doing DCA. The more aggressive they are for accumulating to more volume they could get which is somehow beneficial for them in future. What I think wrong with being aggressive is if they are into trading since from that for sure that they are engaging with more bigger risk especially if they don't think on what they are doing and just buy those damn shitcoins in the market.

There's no perfect investor but what's important there is we know how to correct those mistakes we made and learn to correct so that next time we could do better moves that can potential give us good benefits in future.

If you know too well that if you invest in bitcoin aggressively, it will not stop you from sorting out your daily expenses, go ahead and invest aggressively because it will help you to accumulate a lot of bitcoin over time, and it will also speed up your bitcoin accumulation journey. The only time investing in bitcoin aggressively is wrong is when you invest way beyond your discretionary income, which could cause you not to sort out your daily expenses, which might get you off the game partially or permanently. Another perfect way of investing in bitcoin aggressively without getting off the game is when you get a bonus payment from the place of your work, and you use the bonus payment to invest in bitcoin aggressively since the money is not allocated in solving your daily expenses.

[JayJuanGee]

[edited out]

This is what must be emphasized, While I wouldn't say that waiting is a mistake because there are still many people who are trying to buy on the dip

Waiting is a mistake if you have no coins or if you are a low coiner.  If you bought a decent amount of coins, then you are prepared for up, if you have not bought much or any coins, then you are ONLY prepared for down if you are waiting, which down may or may not happen.  So you are gambling and that seems like a mistake to me.

but in the end when we focus on DCA in the end everything becomes different where our focus can lead to buying regardless of the price because our goal is long-term not short-term so while we can afford to buy then why not because it's not wrong to start by buying now even if there is a decline again rather than we are the ones left behind because bitcoin is more unreachable for their size because they think it is too expensive so it will be more worth it to start early while waiting and convincing them to buy it.

We cannot turn back the clock, so we have to decide from now.. are we buying or not?

Yeah, sure it would have been better to have had bought yesterday, but we have to decide from today whether we are buying or not and whether we are sufficiently prepared for up with the amount that we already bought.

It is also wrong to start by buying now even though there is a decline back than we are the ones left behind because bitcoin is more unreachable for their size because they consider bitcoin too expensive so it will be more worth it to start early while waiting and convincing that we are ready for a long investment relly maybe even up to 10 years ahead so that we get an optimal result from what we are doing now.

As long as we are still able to do it and as long as we understand what we are doing I think buying now will not be a problem because what we are waiting for is not a few months but years or even much longer.

At first you said to wait, and then now you said it is o.k. to buy now.  I am not quite clear what you are emphasizing, even though it seems that now you are saying to buy..  I think that we need to know whether newbie or not.. .if brand new then buy, if you already have coins then you still might be a newbie and you should buy.  I would also tend to suggest that if you have been buying less than a whole cycle, then continue to buy unless for some reason you had front loaded your investment along the way.

Another thing is that if we are buying every week, then why should we care if the price is high, low or somewhere in the middle?  If we are a newbie, then how are we going to know if the price is high, low or not?  Sure, we can see ATHs currently present, but does that tell us not to buy?

Maybe you know since you have presumptively been in bitcoin for two whole cycles (since mid-2016), and for you maybe you have already bought a lot or more than enough BTC over the years?  Most folks have not had two full cycles to accumulate BTC, so if you are addressing your comment to any newbie then the question would more likely be whether they have any coins and if they have enough and if they don't then for them to keep buying.., yet they are still responsible for their own choices whether they end up buying or not buying.

[laijsica]

Some people have this misconception that if they are to aggressive on their investment they might fall short or get in trouble with those decision they made. But actually if they try to figure out the whole activity they do there's nothing wrong about it especially if they are doing DCA. The more aggressive they are for accumulating to more volume they could get which is somehow beneficial for them in future. What I think wrong with being aggressive is if they are into trading since from that for sure that they are engaging with more bigger risk especially if they don't think on what they are doing and just buy those damn shitcoins in the market.

There's no perfect investor but what's important there is we know how to correct those mistakes we made and learn to correct so that next time we could do better moves that can potential give us good benefits in future.

If you know too well that if you invest in bitcoin aggressively, it will not stop you from sorting out your daily expenses, go ahead and invest aggressively because it will help you to accumulate a lot of bitcoin over time, and it will also speed up your bitcoin accumulation journey. The only time investing in bitcoin aggressively is wrong is when you invest way beyond your discretionary income, which could cause you not to sort out your daily expenses, which might get you off the game partially or permanently. Another perfect way of investing in bitcoin aggressively without getting off the game is when you get a bonus payment from the place of your work, and you use the bonus payment to invest in bitcoin aggressively since the money is not allocated in solving your daily expenses.

Aggressive buying is recommended for investors who have the means and have a higher level of floating cash. Aggressive buying of Bitcoin through emotion may not be a positive decision for an investor but if the amount of cash fund is decent it is definitely going to be positive if it is aggressive. The aim is to try to get Bitcoin holdings and keep depositing for a long time. DCA strategy is the best in the journey of collecting Bitcoin and it is effective for any people to continue. Running Bitcoin along with daily household expenses and being aggressive with bonus income is a good decision and if people can implement it they should get bonuses after three months. In my opinion if investors can deposit additional Bitcoin in their portfolio every three months there will be a tendency to increase the holdings over time and there is a possibility of getting more holdings than the target before reaching the cycle. However, at the same time a backup fund or floating cash fund should be kept in mind so that they can focus more on investing in emergencies and aggressive investing.

[Mayor of ogba]

Some people have this misconception that if they are to aggressive on their investment they might fall short or get in trouble with those decision they made. But actually if they try to figure out the whole activity they do there's nothing wrong about it especially if they are doing DCA. The more aggressive they are for accumulating to more volume they could get which is somehow beneficial for them in future. What I think wrong with being aggressive is if they are into trading since from that for sure that they are engaging with more bigger risk especially if they don't think on what they are doing and just buy those damn shitcoins in the market.

There's no perfect investor but what's important there is we know how to correct those mistakes we made and learn to correct so that next time we could do better moves that can potential give us good benefits in future.

If you know too well that if you invest in bitcoin aggressively, it will not stop you from sorting out your daily expenses, go ahead and invest aggressively because it will help you to accumulate a lot of bitcoin over time, and it will also speed up your bitcoin accumulation journey. The only time investing in bitcoin aggressively is wrong is when you invest way beyond your discretionary income, which could cause you not to sort out your daily expenses, which might get you off the game partially or permanently. Another perfect way of investing in bitcoin aggressively without getting off the game is when you get a bonus payment from the place of your work, and you use the bonus payment to invest in bitcoin aggressively since the money is not allocated in solving your daily expenses.

Aggressive buying is recommended for investors who have the means and have a higher level of floating cash. Aggressive buying of Bitcoin through emotion may not be a positive decision for an investor but if the amount of cash fund is decent it is definitely going to be positive if it is aggressive. The aim is to try to get Bitcoin holdings and keep depositing for a long time. DCA strategy is the best in the journey of collecting Bitcoin and it is effective for any people to continue. Running Bitcoin along with daily household expenses and being aggressive with bonus income is a good decision and if people can implement it they should get bonuses after three months. In my opinion if investors can deposit additional Bitcoin in their portfolio every three months there will be a tendency to increase the holdings over time and there is a possibility of getting more holdings than the target before reaching the cycle. However, at the same time a backup fund or floating cash fund should be kept in mind so that they can focus more on investing in emergencies and aggressive investing.

If you read my post very well, you will see I made it very clear that if someone can invest in bitcoin aggressively and knows that his or her action of investing in bitcoin aggressively will not stop him or her from sorting out his or her daily expenses, it is okay for him or her to go ahead and invest in bitcoin aggressively since him or her can comfortably solve his or her daily expenses even while investing in bitcoin aggressively. Even though you are investing in bitcoin with the DCA strategy and you are using $50 to invest in bitcoin on a weekly or monthly basis, and you know it will not stop you from sorting out your daily expenses, that is your own aggressive buy.

[Jewan420]

Aggressive buying is recommended for investors who have the means and have a higher level of floating cash. Aggressive buying of Bitcoin through emotion may not be a positive decision for an investor but if the amount of cash fund is decent it is definitely going to be positive if it is aggressive. The aim is to try to get Bitcoin holdings and keep depositing for a long time. DCA strategy is the best in the journey of collecting Bitcoin and it is effective for any people to continue. Running Bitcoin along with daily household expenses and being aggressive with bonus income is a good decision and if people can implement it they should get bonuses after three months. In my opinion if investors can deposit additional Bitcoin in their portfolio every three months there will be a tendency to increase the holdings over time and there is a possibility of getting more holdings than the target before reaching the cycle. However, at the same time a backup fund or floating cash fund should be kept in mind so that they can focus more on investing in emergencies and aggressive investing.

I do not see aggressive investing as a negative at all if one can be disciplined. If a person has the necessary capabilities to be aggressive, then I support him being aggressive. However, I would like to give an investor a chance to decide this matter independently. If he feels from his position that he can be aggressive in his investment, then he has every right to be aggressive in his investment. If someone decides to be aggressive in his investment beyond his capabilities, then the move will prove to be wrong for him. Because to be aggressive in investment, it is important that you have sufficient cash flow or you can be aggressive in investment with bonus money. In this case, you have to ensure that there is no shortage in emergency fund, reserve fund and cash flow. We can be aggressive in investment by being disciplined. Aggressiveness plays an important role in growing your portfolio.

[FortuneFollower]

Aggressive buying is recommended for investors who have the means and have a higher level of floating cash. Aggressive buying of Bitcoin through emotion may not be a positive decision for an investor but if the amount of cash fund is decent it is definitely going to be positive if it is aggressive. The aim is to try to get Bitcoin holdings and keep depositing for a long time. DCA strategy is the best in the journey of collecting Bitcoin and it is effective for any people to continue. Running Bitcoin along with daily household expenses and being aggressive with bonus income is a good decision and if people can implement it they should get bonuses after three months. In my opinion if investors can deposit additional Bitcoin in their portfolio every three months there will be a tendency to increase the holdings over time and there is a possibility of getting more holdings than the target before reaching the cycle. However, at the same time a backup fund or floating cash fund should be kept in mind so that they can focus more on investing in emergencies and aggressive investing.

I do not see aggressive investing as a negative at all if one can be disciplined. If a person has the necessary capabilities to be aggressive, then I support him being aggressive. However, I would like to give an investor a chance to decide this matter independently. If he feels from his position that he can be aggressive in his investment, then he has every right to be aggressive in his investment. If someone decides to be aggressive in his investment beyond his capabilities, then the move will prove to be wrong for him. Because to be aggressive in investment, it is important that you have sufficient cash flow or you can be aggressive in investment with bonus money. In this case, you have to ensure that there is no shortage in emergency fund, reserve fund and cash flow. We can be aggressive in investment by being disciplined. Aggressiveness plays an important role in growing your portfolio.

Investing, aggressive or not, should still be done responsibly too.
Just as you said - reserves should be prepared in place. Because you can't invest all of your fortune and pray that it will go smoothly till the end.

[Barikui1]

Aggressive buying is recommended for investors who have the means and have a higher level of floating cash. Aggressive buying of Bitcoin through emotion may not be a positive decision for an investor but if the amount of cash fund is decent it is definitely going to be positive if it is aggressive. The aim is to try to get Bitcoin holdings and keep depositing for a long time. DCA strategy is the best in the journey of collecting Bitcoin and it is effective for any people to continue. Running Bitcoin along with daily household expenses and being aggressive with bonus income is a good decision and if people can implement it they should get bonuses after three months. In my opinion if investors can deposit additional Bitcoin in their portfolio every three months there will be a tendency to increase the holdings over time and there is a possibility of getting more holdings than the target before reaching the cycle. However, at the same time a backup fund or floating cash fund should be kept in mind so that they can focus more on investing in emergencies and aggressive investing.

I do not see aggressive investing as a negative at all if one can be disciplined. If a person has the necessary capabilities to be aggressive, then I support him being aggressive. However, I would like to give an investor a chance to decide this matter independently. If he feels from his position that he can be aggressive in his investment, then he has every right to be aggressive in his investment. If someone decides to be aggressive in his investment beyond his capabilities, then the move will prove to be wrong for him. Because to be aggressive in investment, it is important that you have sufficient cash flow or you can be aggressive in investment with bonus money. In this case, you have to ensure that there is no shortage in emergency fund, reserve fund and cash flow. We can be aggressive in investment by being disciplined. Aggressiveness plays an important role in growing your portfolio.

The truth of the matter is that being over aggressive is like doing the right thing, the wrong way, because am very much aware that excess of everything is bad.
As an individual that wants to grow his or her stash of Bitcoin fast, the ideal thing to do is to be aggressive, but not when you  are weak financially, because if you do it more than your capabilities, then that's where you are wrong, because you will definitely struggle to hold onto it on a longer run, when your emergency funds aren't capable of covering up for the shortfalls.
So in essence of what am trying to say is that if it's done the right way, it's good, but if it's done the wrong way, that's where the problem is, because you can't be investing money that is for your upkeeps and be expecting not to fall back to your investment at some point in the future.

[fikrett]

The truth of the matter is that being over aggressive is like doing the right thing, the wrong way, because am very much aware that excess of everything is bad.
As an individual that wants to grow his or her stash of Bitcoin fast, the ideal thing to do is to be aggressive, but not when you  are weak financially, because if you do it more than your capabilities, then that's where you are wrong, because you will definitely struggle to hold onto it on a longer run, when your emergency funds aren't capable of covering up for the shortfalls.
So in essence of what am trying to say is that if it's done the right way, it's good, but if it's done the wrong way, that's where the problem is, because you can't be investing money that is for your upkeeps and be expecting not to fall back to your investment at some point in the future.

To have a good portfolio, one needs to stand well on his two financially - it's essential due to the fact that your investment is like a garden of sorts - you can't reap what you sow if you don't look after it well, or if not enough time passed through.
And it all boils down to having a plan, a realistic one - combining it with patience and determination to make it through and right.

[Salahmu]

To have a good portfolio, one needs to stand well on his two financially - it's essential due to the fact that your investment is like a garden of sorts - you can't reap what you sow if you don't look after it well,

You are wrong no matter any garden you have planted there is nothing will make you not to reap it even if you don't take good care of it but however the only problem you will have is that lack of good maintenance of the garden will make those fruits or plant not to be too fruitful to produce what is being intended for it, so saying that the person will not reap what they sow is wrong because is as if they would be deprive of there ownership to the garden, so arriving to Bitcoin investment is also the same because if you put little on Bitcoin is also the little you can get so nobody will take it away from you because you did not invest more by taking care of.

[Gallar]

I do not see aggressive investing as a negative at all if one can be disciplined. If a person has the necessary capabilities to be aggressive, then I support him being aggressive. However, I would like to give an investor a chance to decide this matter independently. If he feels from his position that he can be aggressive in his investment, then he has every right to be aggressive in his investment. If someone decides to be aggressive in his investment beyond his capabilities, then the move will prove to be wrong for him. Because to be aggressive in investment, it is important that you have sufficient cash flow or you can be aggressive in investment with bonus money. In this case, you have to ensure that there is no shortage in emergency fund, reserve fund and cash flow. We can be aggressive in investment by being disciplined. Aggressiveness plays an important role in growing your portfolio.

Yes, you are right, aggressive investing is not a negative way to go when investing in bitcoin. However, the most important thing is that if we want to make an aggressive investment in Bitcoin, we must also be prepared to bear all the consequences that might occur. Although it is true that Bitcoin is a very safe investment asset and also promises better profits than other investment assets. However, the consequences I mean here are the impacts that might occur if we make aggressive investments on our economic cycle. Because as far as I know, what is meant by aggressive investment has quite a big risk, because when using the funds you don't really think about whether it is cold money or not. Because the most important thing is that the portfolio target we want can be achieved quickly.

So in my personal opinion, if we want to make an aggressive investment in Bitcoin, so that our lives feel more comfortable, then we have to have better discretionary income. Because that way, when we HODL bitcoin for a long period of time there won't be too many obstacles. Because in essence we have to invest in Bitcoin as comfortably as possible and as safely as possible. Because investment is of course intended for our future. So in essence, even though we are going to make aggressive investments, we should choose a path that remains safe. Because basically if someone can consistently do DCA on bitcoin, for example every week, even though the nominal value is not large. But over time, the person's portfolio can become large in bitcoin. Therefore, I personally prefer to invest in Bitcoin relaxed but consistently.

[SuperBitMan]

The truth of the matter is that being over aggressive is like doing the right thing, the wrong way, because am very much aware that excess of everything is bad.
As an individual that wants to grow his or her stash of Bitcoin fast, the ideal thing to do is to be aggressive, but not when you  are weak financially, because if you do it more than your capabilities, then that's where you are wrong, because you will definitely struggle to hold onto it on a longer run, when your emergency funds aren't capable of covering up for the shortfalls.
So in essence of what am trying to say is that if it's done the right way, it's good, but if it's done the wrong way, that's where the problem is, because you can't be investing money that is for your upkeeps and be expecting not to fall back to your investment at some point in the future.

To have a good portfolio, one needs to stand well on his two financially - it's essential due to the fact that your investment is like a garden of sorts - you can't reap what you sow if you don't look after it well, or if not enough time passed through.
And it all boils down to having a plan, a realistic one - combining it with patience and determination to make it through and right.

You are very correct, however if your fellow newbies read this you have written he or she will feel there's a lot of things to be done before he or she can start Bitcoin investment, starting a Bitcoin investment is very simple learn how to buy Bitcoin and hodl for a long term that's all, what ever plan or strategy he or she uses is fine, it is important we allow newbies to fine and figure out things for themselves that will help them develop well.

[Cityhunter34]

To have a good portfolio, one needs to stand well on his two financially - it's essential due to the fact that your investment is like a garden of sorts - you can't reap what you sow if you don't look after it well,

You are wrong no matter any garden you have planted there is nothing will make you not to reap it even if you don't take good care of it but however the only problem you will have is that lack of good maintenance of the garden will make those fruits or plant not to be too fruitful to produce what is being intended for it, so saying that the person will not reap what they sow is wrong because is as if they would be deprive of there ownership to the garden, so arriving to Bitcoin investment is also the same because if you put little on Bitcoin is also the little you can get so nobody will take it away from you because you did not invest more by taking care of.

Well said mate that's the real truth about it. As far as I know saying that one wouldn't reap what he or she sow is actually a wrong idea. However, just like as you have said even in this Bitcoin investment it is what you invest that you would reap if you invest small amount in Bitcoin that's how your profit we be, and also if invest a huge amount in Bitcoin that's how the profits we be too. However, I think everybody is entitled to reap what he or she sow no matter how small or large it may be.

[Marvelockg]

To have a good portfolio, one needs to stand well on his two financially - it's essential due to the fact that your investment is like a garden of sorts - you can't reap what you sow if you don't look after it well,

You are wrong no matter any garden you have planted there is nothing will make you not to reap it even if you don't take good care of it but however the only problem you will have is that lack of good maintenance of the garden will make those fruits or plant not to be too fruitful to produce what is being intended for it, so saying that the person will not reap what they sow is wrong because is as if they would be deprive of there ownership to the garden, so arriving to Bitcoin investment is also the same because if you put little on Bitcoin is also the little you can get so nobody will take it away from you because you did not invest more by taking care of.

have you considered that it is possible to buy $10k worth of bitcoin at the time bitcoin was at $110k and if we assume a worst-case scenario that bitcoin ever DIPs below $100k that the person can hastily sell it in loss? do you know what mostly lead people to sell their bitcoin most especially at the time they never planned to sell it? it is because they failed to make proper financial plan and when an emergency happens, they are left with no option than selling their bitcoin holding to sort their needs. even though the instance @fikrett gave about garden is not related to the topic in consideration, his analysis is totally correct because having the best of garden and refusing to take care of it allows insect and intruders to step in and destroy your beautiful garden. in this context, intruders can come in the form of some personal wants and some emergency situation that sitting out an emergency fund would have helped protect you against. failure to set those necessary investment aids in place will be like you are being negligent on your bitcoin garden.

human wants are insatiable and that is the reason why some people keep using their investment to sort out these needs which only contribute to diminishing the amount of bitcoin stack they have built. for you to effectively invest and get the benefit from your investment, you have to ensure that as much as you want to be gathering more bitcoin, that the ones you already have doesn't get eaten up by your carelessness or your exposure of them to things that might eat it up.

[CageMabok]

>>>

To have a good portfolio, one needs to stand well on his two financially - it's essential due to the fact that your investment is like a garden of sorts - you can't reap what you sow if you don't look after it well, or if not enough time passed through.
And it all boils down to having a plan, a realistic one - combining it with patience and determination to make it through and right.

Simply put, every investor must be able to increase their capital first so that they can invest more comfortably in assets such as Bitcoin because when their capital is quite stable, either obtained through a monthly income that continues to occur routinely, of course it will be easier to accumulate it into Bitcoin investment by buying it even if only once a month. But if the amount is quite good, it will also be very good because it can also increase the amount of investment to be bigger and this has been done repeatedly by the Microstrategy company this year and also in previous years when the market was not in a bull condition.

So regular income should also be the main target for all investors who have liked Bitcoin because with this every investor can flow their money into Bitcoin which can also be used as an important target in their life. Because Bitcoin will continue to dominate all areas when its enthusiasts are increasing and continue to grow from day to day so that people will not hesitate to spend their money if their goal is to buy Bitcoin.

[Tmoonz]

I do not see aggressive investing as a negative at all if one can be disciplined. If a person has the necessary capabilities to be aggressive, then I support him being aggressive. However, I would like to give an investor a chance to decide this matter independently. If he feels from his position that he can be aggressive in his investment, then he has every right to be aggressive in his investment. If someone decides to be aggressive in his investment beyond his capabilities, then the move will prove to be wrong for him. Because to be aggressive in investment, it is important that you have sufficient cash flow or you can be aggressive in investment with bonus money. In this case, you have to ensure that there is no shortage in emergency fund, reserve fund and cash flow. We can be aggressive in investment by being disciplined. Aggressiveness plays an important role in growing your portfolio.

Yes, you are right, aggressive investing is not a negative way to go when investing in bitcoin. However, the most important thing is that if we want to make an aggressive investment in Bitcoin, we must also be prepared to bear all the consequences that might occur. Although it is true that Bitcoin is a very safe investment asset and also promises better profits than other investment assets. However, the consequences I mean here are the impacts that might occur if we make aggressive investments on our economic cycle. Because as far as I know, what is meant by aggressive investment has quite a big risk, because when using the funds you don't really think about whether it is cold money or not. Because the most important thing is that the portfolio target we want can be achieved quickly.

So in my personal opinion, if we want to make an aggressive investment in Bitcoin, so that our lives feel more comfortable, then we have to have better discretionary income. Because that way, when we HODL bitcoin for a long period of time there won't be too many obstacles. Because in essence we have to invest in Bitcoin as comfortably as possible and as safely as possible. Because investment is of course intended for our future. So in essence, even though we are going to make aggressive investments, we should choose a path that remains safe. Because basically if someone can consistently do DCA on bitcoin, for example every week, even though the nominal value is not large. But over time, the person's portfolio can become large in bitcoin. Therefore, I personally prefer to invest in Bitcoin relaxed but consistently.

I have been trying to really understand your narrative or definition of aggressive investment in Bitcoin and it seems that you are overly emphasising on what shouldn't be obtainable as to this regards. Generally, the level of wimpiness or aggressiveness is set to be solely depend or within your level of discretional income which completely has no consequences because it is assumed you have have taken care of your basic needs and the left over cash is what you are using to buy Bitcoin comfortably which differs from one another, it can only become problematic which of course will have consequences when you are being overly aggressive with your investment which includes investing alongside with money the money that should be meant for your other living expenses.

[Zackz5000]

Aggressive buying is recommended for investors who have the means and have a higher level of floating cash. Aggressive buying of Bitcoin through emotion may not be a positive decision for an investor but if the amount of cash fund is decent it is definitely going to be positive if it is aggressive. The aim is to try to get Bitcoin holdings and keep depositing for a long time. DCA strategy is the best in the journey of collecting Bitcoin and it is effective for any people to continue. Running Bitcoin along with daily household expenses and being aggressive with bonus income is a good decision and if people can implement it they should get bonuses after three months. In my opinion if investors can deposit additional Bitcoin in their portfolio every three months there will be a tendency to increase the holdings over time and there is a possibility of getting more holdings than the target before reaching the cycle. However, at the same time a backup fund or floating cash fund should be kept in mind so that they can focus more on investing in emergencies and aggressive investing.

I do not see aggressive investing as a negative at all if one can be disciplined. If a person has the necessary capabilities to be aggressive, then I support him being aggressive. However, I would like to give an investor a chance to decide this matter independently. If he feels from his position that he can be aggressive in his investment, then he has every right to be aggressive in his investment. If someone decides to be aggressive in his investment beyond his capabilities, then the move will prove to be wrong for him. Because to be aggressive in investment, it is important that you have sufficient cash flow or you can be aggressive in investment with bonus money. In this case, you have to ensure that there is no shortage in emergency fund, reserve fund and cash flow. We can be aggressive in investment by being disciplined. Aggressiveness plays an important role in growing your portfolio.

Been overly aggressive depends on level of an investor discretionary income if your discretionary income is capable then there is nothing wrong investing aggressively but let it not be done in a way that it is going to affect your personal needs along the line and also try to make sure that your emergency fund and reserve fund is available and also try to create a DCA strategy where you can accumulate weekly, but when you invest above your discretionary income you will definitely have difficulty in your bitcoin investment because then you will be investing with the money meant for your personal living or need  which will be a bit problematic.

[Scarlett_23]

The poor can only use one third of their daily income for investment.

Using one third of your income to invest in bitcoin as a poor man means that you might be investing over aggressively because you will not have much extra funds on you after taking care of your monthly expenses and needs. However, I think 10% of your income is cool to invest in bitcoin and not 33.33%.

It still all depends on how much is the poor person daily needs and discretionary income. It's his discretionary income that he can only  use to invest in bitcoin so that you don't use the funds for your basic needs to buy bitcoin, because it's gambling and you will sell your bitcoin in the short run when you needs arise.

You are right; if a poor man uses 33.33% of his income and invests in bitcoin, that means he or she is already investing in bitcoin aggressively because the remaining 66.66% of his or her income will not be enough to take care of his or her monthly expenses, which might make him or her sell off his or her bitcoin to get his or her monthly expenses sorted out. Bitcoin is a long-term investment, so there's no need to be aggressive in investing in bitcoin if you know too well it stops you from sorting out your daily expenses. As a poor man, using 10% of your monthly income is the best thing to do at the moment so that you will not find it hard to solve your daily expenses, but you can increase the percentage when you have work on your monthly income to a good one, which will give you good discretionary income to invest in bitcoin and also solve your daily expenses easily.

DCA method is actually for this type of investment, where someone from a poor or middle-class family will regularly invest a percentage (no matter how small) of their income in Bitcoin. The percentage of investment will depend on the amount of their income. However, I think that a small part of the income, such as 10%, allocated for investment will be a satisfactory percentage of investment.
In the current era, the average income of every poor family is at least $150 to $200. And the average income of every middle-class family is at least $350 to $400, in this case, if a poor family invests 10% of Bitcoin on a monthly basis in DCA, its monthly Bitcoin investment will be $15 to $20, and a middle-class family's monthly investment will be $35 to $40 as 10%. But, if a middle-class person wants to invest 20% to 30% of their money, they can easily invest $100 in DCA on a monthly basis.
Therefore, it is enough to start investing this amount as their income, they can increase the percentage of investment as their income increases in the future. And thus they will continue to slowly grow their Bitcoin investment stash, and if it continues to do so in the long term (at least 10 years), they may get something better than they expected in the future, from which they will be able to improve their financial situation a lot in the future.

That is how some people use to enriched themselves in this community, because they take the advantage of dollar cost average method to continue purchasing Bitcoin from both bullish season and bearish season, because they know that before they will trade the Bitcoin the price will double up for them to achieve passive income from their holding. You don't need to have huge amount of capital before you can start using dollar cost average method to accumulate Bitcoin, because you can use any amount of funds to purchase Bitcoin but let it be in the bearish season, because that is what will make your wish to come to reality when you are about to release them for sale in the market and you will like using that method to accumulate Bitcoin. I have try it and it favour me in the past which am still using dollar cost average method to accumulate Bitcoin whenever the bearish season appear, because I have other sources of income that is making me not to sell Bitcoin in a short term.

The advantages of depositing using the Dollar Cost Averaging (DCA) method are many. This is a strategy where anyone can consistently buy Bitcoin with a certain amount of money. You can buy Bitcoin worth $50 or $100 with the money you have in your hand once a month. In that case, there is no reason for the person to worry about the price of Bitcoin decreasing or increasing. The right time to buy Bitcoin is the bearish season, that is, when the price is low, there is a golden opportunity to buy Bitcoin. You do not have to sell any land to buy Bitcoin, that is, there is no need for a large amount of money. What is needed is your ability to hold it. Because those who hold BTC for a long time benefit from the increase in the price of BTC over time.

[Stablexcoin]

To have a good portfolio, one needs to stand well on his two financially - it's essential due to the fact that your investment is like a garden of sorts - you can't reap what you sow if you don't look after it well,

You are wrong no matter any garden you have planted there is nothing will make you not to reap it even if you don't take good care of it but however the only problem you will have is that lack of good maintenance of the garden will make those fruits or plant not to be too fruitful to produce what is being intended for it, so saying that the person will not reap what they sow is wrong because is as if they would be deprive of there ownership to the garden, so arriving to Bitcoin investment is also the same because if you put little on Bitcoin is also the little you can get so nobody will take it away from you because you did not invest more by taking care of.

It is you who is wrong here. You are missing a very critical point here and that is the fruit gotten from the garden. When you plant a garden it belongs to which is ownership but it is not all about ownership in this case. The point is if you don't take good care of that garden, sure the plant will grow but weeds will overrun it, the soil may lose effectiveness or the harvest will not yield good potential. The quantity and quality you will get is directly tied to the level of care and support you give to it.

Let's bring it back to Bitcoin investment. When you invest and fail to nurture your investment, by that I mean consistent accumulation, early bird planning (goals), or proper financial stability to avoid jeopardizing your investment. You will still have your Bitcoin fractions in your portfolio but not with the full potential you will get. Some investor risk making poor decisions like inconsistency in accumulation, prematurely selling and other risk they take. Plase dont be that type of investor that twill abandon their investment because they have bought at first hand.

[Ricardo11]

Aggressive buying is recommended for investors who have the means and have a higher level of floating cash. Aggressive buying of Bitcoin through emotion may not be a positive decision for an investor but if the amount of cash fund is decent it is definitely going to be positive if it is aggressive. The aim is to try to get Bitcoin holdings and keep depositing for a long time. DCA strategy is the best in the journey of collecting Bitcoin and it is effective for any people to continue. Running Bitcoin along with daily household expenses and being aggressive with bonus income is a good decision and if people can implement it they should get bonuses after three months. In my opinion if investors can deposit additional Bitcoin in their portfolio every three months there will be a tendency to increase the holdings over time and there is a possibility of getting more holdings than the target before reaching the cycle. However, at the same time a backup fund or floating cash fund should be kept in mind so that they can focus more on investing in emergencies and aggressive investing.

I do not see aggressive investing as a negative at all if one can be disciplined. If a person has the necessary capabilities to be aggressive, then I support him being aggressive. However, I would like to give an investor a chance to decide this matter independently. If he feels from his position that he can be aggressive in his investment, then he has every right to be aggressive in his investment. If someone decides to be aggressive in his investment beyond his capabilities, then the move will prove to be wrong for him. Because to be aggressive in investment, it is important that you have sufficient cash flow or you can be aggressive in investment with bonus money. In this case, you have to ensure that there is no shortage in emergency fund, reserve fund and cash flow. We can be aggressive in investment by being disciplined. Aggressiveness plays an important role in growing your portfolio.

Been overly aggressive depends on level of an investor discretionary income if your discretionary income is capable then there is nothing wrong investing aggressively but let it not be done in a way that it is going to affect your personal needs along the line and also try to make sure that your emergency fund and reserve fund is available and also try to create a DCA strategy where you can accumulate weekly, but when you invest above your discretionary income you will definitely have difficulty in your bitcoin investment because then you will be investing with the money meant for your personal living or need  which will be a bit problematic.

I agree with you, in fact, it is very important to maintain balance in Bitcoin investment, if an investor's financial situation is not very good, and he does not have any kind of emergency fund for his family, then he should never invest aggressively.
Being aggressive is only logical when you have a good source of discretionary income, as well as an emergency fund always ready, and the ability to take any unexpected risks. However, if you invest aggressively, the possibility of loss that money will be much higher.
Therefore, the best investment method is the DCA method, which is the best way to build a long-term portfolio without stress. However, even in the case of investing in the DCA method, you must have an emergency fund ready. And in the case of DCA investment, you should calculate your income and expenses, and use the amount of money left after meeting family expenses and personal needs to buy DCA.

[Zackz5000]

The poor can only use one third of their daily income for investment.

Using one third of your income to invest in bitcoin as a poor man means that you might be investing over aggressively because you will not have much extra funds on you after taking care of your monthly expenses and needs. However, I think 10% of your income is cool to invest in bitcoin and not 33.33%.

It still all depends on how much is the poor person daily needs and discretionary income. It's his discretionary income that he can only  use to invest in bitcoin so that you don't use the funds for your basic needs to buy bitcoin, because it's gambling and you will sell your bitcoin in the short run when you needs arise.

You are right; if a poor man uses 33.33% of his income and invests in bitcoin, that means he or she is already investing in bitcoin aggressively because the remaining 66.66% of his or her income will not be enough to take care of his or her monthly expenses, which might make him or her sell off his or her bitcoin to get his or her monthly expenses sorted out. Bitcoin is a long-term investment, so there's no need to be aggressive in investing in bitcoin if you know too well it stops you from sorting out your daily expenses. As a poor man, using 10% of your monthly income is the best thing to do at the moment so that you will not find it hard to solve your daily expenses, but you can increase the percentage when you have work on your monthly income to a good one, which will give you good discretionary income to invest in bitcoin and also solve your daily expenses easily.

DCA method is actually for this type of investment, where someone from a poor or middle-class family will regularly invest a percentage (no matter how small) of their income in Bitcoin. The percentage of investment will depend on the amount of their income. However, I think that a small part of the income, such as 10%, allocated for investment will be a satisfactory percentage of investment.
In the current era, the average income of every poor family is at least $150 to $200. And the average income of every middle-class family is at least $350 to $400, in this case, if a poor family invests 10% of Bitcoin on a monthly basis in DCA, its monthly Bitcoin investment will be $15 to $20, and a middle-class family's monthly investment will be $35 to $40 as 10%. But, if a middle-class person wants to invest 20% to 30% of their money, they can easily invest $100 in DCA on a monthly basis.
Therefore, it is enough to start investing this amount as their income, they can increase the percentage of investment as their income increases in the future. And thus they will continue to slowly grow their Bitcoin investment stash, and if it continues to do so in the long term (at least 10 years), they may get something better than they expected in the future, from which they will be able to improve their financial situation a lot in the future.

That is how some people use to enriched themselves in this community, because they take the advantage of dollar cost average method to continue purchasing Bitcoin from both bullish season and bearish season, because they know that before they will trade the Bitcoin the price will double up for them to achieve passive income from their holding. You don't need to have huge amount of capital before you can start using dollar cost average method to accumulate Bitcoin, because you can use any amount of funds to purchase Bitcoin but let it be in the bearish season, because that is what will make your wish to come to reality when you are about to release them for sale in the market and you will like using that method to accumulate Bitcoin. I have try it and it favour me in the past which am still using dollar cost average method to accumulate Bitcoin whenever the bearish season appear, because I have other sources of income that is making me not to sell Bitcoin in a short term.

The advantages of depositing using the Dollar Cost Averaging (DCA) method are many. This is a strategy where anyone can consistently buy Bitcoin with a certain amount of money. You can buy Bitcoin worth $50 or $100 with the money you have in your hand once a month. In that case, there is no reason for the person to worry about the price of Bitcoin decreasing or increasing. The right time to buy Bitcoin is the bearish season, that is, when the price is low, there is a golden opportunity to buy Bitcoin. You do not have to sell any land to buy Bitcoin, that is, there is no need for a large amount of money. What is needed is your ability to hold it. Because those who hold BTC for a long time benefit from the increase in the price of BTC over time.

Buying during the dip only gives us more opportunity to accumulate enough Bitcoin I believe that's why you said it's the right time to accumulate Bitcoin but it will only delay your Bitcoin investment journey if properly an investor keep on waiting for the dip before accumulating expecially those who just started bitcoin investment moreover with the DCA strategy one can start increasing his bitcoin stack either by buying weekly or monthly irrespective of bitcoin price and continue to hodl you can also choose to lump sum when there is an extra money that comes your way or probably you won lottery then you can choose to lump sum that is also a way of increasing your Bitcoin stack.