|
kiffner
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 07:17:55 AM |
|
anyone seen this strange issue ? After i flash a card sometimes with atiflash it shows
0 GPU clock and 0 Mem clock above my new flashed values in GPU-z
I've seen this issue before and fixed it sometimes by removing and replacing the card , howeever this time when i replace the card I see the same thing.
Ok now it gets really strange, if i pull that card from the rig, another card in a totally different slot shows the same issue until i replace the card.
this is windows 10 btw, anyone seen and wierdness like this ? My next step i guess is to re-intstall drivers.
Yes. Remove driver and reinstall...
|
|
|
|
|
Marvell1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2996
Merit: 1170
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 07:26:24 AM |
|
anyone seen this strange issue ? After i flash a card sometimes with atiflash it shows
0 GPU clock and 0 Mem clock above my new flashed values in GPU-z
I've seen this issue before and fixed it sometimes by removing and replacing the card , howeever this time when i replace the card I see the same thing.
Ok now it gets really strange, if i pull that card from the rig, another card in a totally different slot shows the same issue until i replace the card.
this is windows 10 btw, anyone seen and wierdness like this ? My next step i guess is to re-intstall drivers.
Yes. Remove driver and reinstall... ok thanks for clarifying
|
Left... the space..
|
|
|
|
Golku
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 07:31:00 AM |
|
dev 2.5   i got the same the miner shows 385 my average is like 335
|
|
|
|
|
_ZET_
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 299
Merit: 100
Crypto mining company | Mining pools
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 07:41:17 AM |
|
Can we expect v.9.0?
It would be great to break 200 H/s from Polaris RX 470 4GB and 300H/s from R9 NANO series.
|
|
|
|
|
Altcoining
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 07:52:33 AM |
|
Can we expect v.9.0?
It would be great to break 200 H/s from Polaris RX 470 4GB and 300H/s from R9 NANO series.
yes
|
|
|
|
|
Farstdury
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 07:55:35 AM |
|
After much hype and many friends asking me to try out Optiminer; I recently tried Optiminer for Windows v0.6 on my test rig.... but found it no better than Claymore V8. I maybe wrong and didn't test in detail because I use my 7x370 test rig just for short while but I see many negatives in using Optiminer - including losing the monitoring aspects of Ethman, excellent controls of temperature management, GPU core & memory settings, etc. etc. in which to me are the REAL hidden gem of ALL Claymore miners, on top of the raw blazing speed. IMHO, Claymore need to unleash v9 (Windows and Linux) and claim who is real king of the hill BECAUSE Optiminer now released his latest version also on Windows. While I begin to understand Claymore's position with SilentArmy issue in v1.1, since Optiminer now has come into the Windows with v0.6 ... I think Claymore v9 (Windows and Linux) is justified. With all this chatter of a successful hardfork and "state clearing"; ETH going POS soon last night*, ZEC stabilizing at the $60s range, XMR went crazy overnight, ZEC (and XMR) mining use LESS power than ETH mining, the answer is clear..... v9 (ZEC) and v10 (XMR)  What say you Mr Claymore? * https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/803858020254027776I did not see any mention of ETH going PoS soon. Anyway, the ZCash is or will be the major GPU coin in the next year. So it is better to implement good miners.
|
|
|
|
|
Jinx99
Member

Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 07:58:34 AM |
|
But I believe you are misinterpreting the info they provide.
I got it after comparing with ETH subpool statistics. But some people can think that there are real cheats.
|
|
|
|
|
Nabicoma
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 08:03:42 AM |
|
But I believe you are misinterpreting the info they provide.
I got it after comparing with ETH subpool statistics. But some people can think that there are real cheats. My displayed hash rate is higher than the local rate, but the share rate is lower than that computed by the hash rate.
|
|
|
|
|
yatta
Member

Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 08:24:56 AM |
|
Question about rx480 - do U use any dummy plugs ? My won't mine with full speed until i connect screen.
|
ETH 0xe3c8d2587e03ac3bdcb86794b8227c000db54d25
|
|
|
|
Altcoining
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 08:30:27 AM |
|
Question about rx480 - do U use any dummy plugs ? My won't mine with full speed until i connect screen.
Actually, i had this problem. It was a riser problem, so i took the card out and re-seated it and i don't have this problem anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
amfofo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 08:35:28 AM |
|
Question about rx480 - do U use any dummy plugs ? My won't mine with full speed until i connect screen.
why did you say you're not running on full speed? what is your hashrate ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altcoining
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 08:40:14 AM |
|
Question about rx480 - do U use any dummy plugs ? My won't mine with full speed until i connect screen.
why did you say you're not running on full speed? what is your hashrate ? I think he means that one would run less then half the speed of the other, for my case GPU 1 would run at 70S/s and 0 would run at 200. Also, maybe it wasn't a riser issue, but i do remember messing with the drivers and something like that fixed it. I also remember "low power state" type thing.
|
|
|
|
|
yatta
Member

Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 08:42:41 AM |
|
Question about rx480 - do U use any dummy plugs ? My won't mine with full speed until i connect screen.
why did you say you're not running on full speed? what is your hashrate ? Without screen connected it does about 36sols, when i connect screen it raises up to 180sol. Funny - it is enough to connect and disconnect.
|
ETH 0xe3c8d2587e03ac3bdcb86794b8227c000db54d25
|
|
|
yatta
Member

Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 09:02:49 AM |
|
Ok, figured it out. If i start pc with connected screen, rx480 does not mine with full speed, until i connect screen. But if i start pc without screen, it goes full speed. Only problem is team viewer at 640x480 
|
ETH 0xe3c8d2587e03ac3bdcb86794b8227c000db54d25
|
|
|
|
Altcoining
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 09:07:50 AM |
|
Ok, figured it out. If i start pc with connected screen, rx480 does not mine with full speed, until i connect screen. But if i start pc without screen, it goes full speed. Only problem is team viewer at 640x480  Try reinstalling to the newest drivers, I'm pretty sure that fixed it for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Jinx99
Member

Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 09:08:33 AM |
|
My displayed hash rate is higher than the local rate, but the share rate is lower than that computed by the hash rate.
Switch to fixed difficulty port. Port 3333 is vardiff, so it's difficult to count exact number of shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
un4given
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 09:08:59 AM |
|
Ok, figured it out. If i start pc with connected screen, rx480 does not mine with full speed, until i connect screen. But if i start pc without screen, it goes full speed. Only problem is team viewer at 640x480  how about Microsoft Remote Desktop or Chrome Remote Desktop?  a way better alternative as @Altcoining stated, its probably the driver problem. hadnt had the problem after i reinstalled mine
|
|
|
|
|
Jinx99
Member

Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 09:17:52 AM |
|
how about Microsoft Remote Desktop or Chrome Remote Desktop?  a way better alternative And what about port forwarding? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
un4given
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 09:21:35 AM |
|
how about Microsoft Remote Desktop or Chrome Remote Desktop?  a way better alternative And what about port forwarding?  didn't need any port forwarding while using Google Chrome Remote Desktop. Very convenient.
|
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
 |
December 01, 2016, 09:34:50 AM |
|
To all:
1. All links to V9 are fake, I don't have it yet, so it's 100% scam and/or virus. 2. I'm still working on new version; as I said before, it takes a lot of time. Next version will be available in a few days.
|
|
|
|
|