|
ghostfaceuk
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 05:06:13 PM |
|
For those, who need comparison data and inerested in Claymore miner progress  vX - version of Zcash miner GPU v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 7870 110 95 65 55 40 35 32 7950 180 155 125 95 70 45 38 7970 200 165 120 95 65 55 48 270x 115 100 67 55 40 35 32 280x 200 165 125 90 65 60 51 285 125 110 85 70 40 36 32 RX 470 4Gb 175 155 145 120 70 60 50 Could you share RX 470 config. Mine just 152 on V8. What level -i are you using and are you using the -nofee switch? I can get 170h/s with fee enable and about 158 with the fee switched off using -i6. Anyone in their right mind would not use the -nofee option, it's slower than with the fee...... I agree but just wanted to check the speed difference. NO additional settings exept pool, -tt and -mport Different Vendors (Gigabyte, Powercolor, ASUS) all stock, but BIOS mod timings (was done for ETH). P.S. That feeling when you accidentally post message while editing it, fix errors, but people start quoting unedited message  I wonder if its your ETH bios settings.
|
|
|
|
|
Mr047
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 05:10:31 PM |
|
I wonder if its your ETH bios settings.
I edited original stock BIOS of each card with timings, so ALL setting are stock (~1200 core/ 6600 memory).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotmetal
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 05:17:24 PM |
|
Have to love v8: (6 x RX480s) 
|
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 05:23:05 PM Last edit: November 24, 2016, 05:57:20 PM by citronick |
|
Bravo Claymore!
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
R9 Nano = 278 H/s
R7 370 = 110 H/s
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
AriesIV10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006
Mine for a Bit
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 05:29:14 PM |
|
Getting 1320 H/s with my RX 470 rig.
GREAT V8.0 Claymore!
|
|
|
|
|
forato
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 05:30:53 PM |
|
Have to love v8: (6 x RX480s)  where did you get this grafic?
|
|
|
|
|
sorry2xs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 05:32:50 PM |
|
|
Please tip the Node 1MPWKB23NsZsXHANnFwVAWT86mL24fqAjF; KO4UX THAT NO GOOD DO GOODER BAT!!!
|
|
|
d57heinz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1453
Merit: 1011
Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 05:44:23 PM |
|
Breaking 305 h/s on my xfx 390x's. It's the 1060mhz 8gb ones. I do have something odd happen on some rigs. Tahitis with3gb ram. Some will do intensity 6 some say not enough ram setting intensity 5. I've ran the usual setx commands. Not really an issue persay. Overall excellent improvements. Thanks claymore Edit. Figured it out. Those rigs that set intensity 5 on tahiti 3gb have the dummy plug in them. So I assume it uses a bit too much ram for display purposes. BR
|
As in nature, all is ebb and tide, all is wave motion, so it seems that in all branches of industry, alternating currents - electric wave motion - will have the sway. ~Nikola Tesla~
|
|
|
|
IOTUSA
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 05:48:55 PM |
|
Bravo Claymore!
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
Can you provide some power consumption data for 290/290x/390? Per card or rig.
|
|
|
|
bmtrader
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 05:54:46 PM |
|
someone with electricity info zec/eth?
|
|
|
|
|
TheChief5055
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:05:20 PM |
|
Bravo Claymore!
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
RX 480 = 172 H/s
2*200 H/s from both RX480's (reference and Gigabyte G1). Stock GPU freq/voltage, 2100Mhz / "1750->2000" strap RAM. So far so good.
|
|
|
|
|
ravikiranb1985
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:07:37 PM |
|
Hello Claymore
Please improve support to 16.x amd cards Thank you in advance
thank you regards
|
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:08:37 PM |
|
Bravo Claymore!
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
R9 Nano = 278 H/s
R7 370 = 110 H/s
Can you provide some power consumption data for 290/290x/390? Per card or rig. the rigs are offsite - will post when I access them tomorrow morning. I updated remotely all the rigs that are with 1600w PSUs = 7x 370s, 5 x 390s, 6 x Nanos, and 6 x 480s. With CDM v7.4, these rigs are mining ETH full speed, ethi 16 and nearly 80-85% of PSU. But with CZM v7, these rigs are well under 65-70% of PSU. Hope the CZM v8 doesnt reach CDM power draw because CZM runs with less heat and significantly lower power - and all these good points will be neutralised when CZM v8 equals CDM v7.4 powerdraw.
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:09:06 PM |
|
Pulling 1560w to get just over 1800 sol/s on my 290x rig 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:10:25 PM |
|
Hello Claymore
Please improve support to 16.x amd cards Thank you in advance
thank you regards
In what way? i'm using 16.11.x across all my RX480 and 290x and Claymore miner works great.
|
|
|
|
|
|
rpg
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:13:18 PM |
|
Fyi xfx 480 8gig for $184 at Newegg when paid with amex
|
|
|
|
|
|
_javi_
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:15:39 PM |
|
i just burned a small psu in a rig with 8.0 which was fine with 7.0 (i knew it was at the brink of its capabilities). No regrets.. it was an old one.
but beware: Definatly usage power increase in this version.
|
|
|
|
|
sorry2xs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:17:21 PM |
|
Bravo Claymore!
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
R9 Nano = 278 H/s
R7 370 = 110 H/s
Can you provide some power consumption data for 290/290x/390? Per card or rig. the rigs are offsite - will post when I access them tomorrow morning. I updated remotely all the rigs that are with 1600w PSUs = 7x 370s, 5 x 390s, 6 x Nanos, and 6 x 480s. With CDM v7.4, these rigs are mining ETH full speed, ethi 16 and nearly 80-85% of PSU. But with CZM v7, these rigs are well under 65-70% of PSU. Hope the CZM v8 doesnt reach CDM power draw because CZM runs with less heat and significantly lower power - and all these good points will be neutralised when CZM v8 equals CDM v7.4 powerdraw. 5x 390,5x480,2x7950s 3 psus total watts 3300 all on a single 240 volts ac circuit 12.5 amps= 3000 watts total hashrate 2.8 Kh/s 
|
Please tip the Node 1MPWKB23NsZsXHANnFwVAWT86mL24fqAjF; KO4UX THAT NO GOOD DO GOODER BAT!!!
|
|
|
|
Hotmetal
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:19:52 PM |
|
Have to love v8: (6 x RX480s)  where did you get this grafic? I built an API layer that allows me to switch between whatever (gpu) coin is (currently) the most profitable automatically. The graphing is just a "nice to look at". I wouldn't mind people using it but I suspect it will land up being DDOS'd rather quickly.
|
|
|
|
|
Havane
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 3
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 06:20:08 PM |
|
Sometimes after few hours or days, with Claymore V7 or V8, One fan of my 6 RX 480 RIG, goes up to 95%, instead of 60%. A reboot solve the problem. Do you know why ?
|
|
|
|
|
|