Bitcoin Forum
January 29, 2026, 12:31:02 PM *
News: Community awards 2025
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 [287] 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 ... 758 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 3839409 times)
antantti
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 07:55:02 PM
 #5721

I guess it is safe to say that rx 480 can do 200 s/s?

Earlier when mining profits were at this level everyone was interested in power consumption, now all I can see is 50 pages of 470 and 480 doing what 160-210?

Someone with some spare time after again hitting tdp, please post your wattage readings. And no gpu-z, from the wall.

tide881155
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 07:56:27 PM
 #5722

did someone have rom for rx480 with 200+ sols? link plz Sad
My rom is 188 h\s with 79Watts from the GPUz.
Jinx99
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91
Merit: 10



View Profile
November 26, 2016, 08:02:18 PM
 #5723

I guess it is safe to say that rx 480 can do 200 s/s?
I run ROM modded non-ref Sapphire RX 480 8 GB 1280/2100 @ ~1.000 Vcore and have 198-200 on Claymore V8.

Do not see any reason why it's unsafe.
maxmad_x
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 250


It takes a lot to build but not much to lose


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 08:06:55 PM
 #5724

I guess it is safe to say that rx 480 can do 200 s/s?
I run ROM modded non-ref Sapphire RX 480 8 GB 1280/2100 @ ~1.000 Vcore and have 198-200 on Claymore V8.

Do not see any reason why it's unsafe.

whats your wattage at GPU-z
Alehandros
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 72
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 08:08:16 PM
 #5725

did someone have rom for rx480 with 200+ sols? link plz Sad
My rom is 188 h\s with 79Watts from the GPUz.

mines a stock 480 its the 8GB "OC" variant though
Jinx99
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91
Merit: 10



View Profile
November 26, 2016, 08:09:19 PM
 #5726

Quote
whats your wattage at GPU-z
85-90 W depending on card.
I posted screenshot already in this topic
Golku
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 263
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 08:21:27 PM
 #5727

Need some advice

I need a couple of new cards i can get these 2

280x for 115 usd
470 for  220 usd

The 470 sounds like more future proof but getting like 180 sol
280x looks much better it can get like 210 sol

sorry2xs
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 08:24:10 PM
 #5728

Need some advice

I need a couple of new cards i can get these 2

280x for 115 usd
470 for  220 usd

The 470 sounds like more future proof but getting like 180 sol
280x looks much better it can get like 210 sol


[/quotehttp://www.ebay.com/itm/Sapphire-AMD-Radeon-RX-480-8GB-GDDR5-PCI-E-Video-Card-HDMI-DP-Crossfire-VR-Ready-/192037361455?hash=item2cb651972f:g:c6cAAOSwj85YOPhh

Please tip the Node 1MPWKB23NsZsXHANnFwVAWT86mL24fqAjF; KO4UX
THAT NO GOOD DO GOODER BAT!!!
RedRockMining
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 128
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 08:27:51 PM
 #5729

Ok, so it looks like everyone else is getting approximately the same hashrate difference for R9 390 vs. RX 480. I get 260 H/s and 190 H/s respectively with mine (both 8 GB). So my question is, is it expected that the 480 hashrate is only 73% of the 390? Is it because of the lower power consumption on the 480? With every other miner/currency so far, my 480s hash at about the same rate as my 390s. Is this something new with v8.0?
tanatana
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 08:30:31 PM
 #5730

https://i.imgur.com/ZcZB2S2.png

is that a problem?
after few hours appears incorrect data

this could be due to excessive overclocking or undervolting.

not overcklock, not undervolt, there is change bios
did not claymore 5, 6, 7 only 8

Try reducing the intensity. Use -i 5 or 4 or 3. The V8 stress the GPU more. I had the same problem with V8.


voltage increases on the problematic card
1,09 -> 1.15
problem again
2*7950 card
-------------------------------------
Now I reduced the intensity of 3
AKRO
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 08:32:03 PM
 #5731

Quote
whats your wattage at GPU-z
85-90 W depending on card.
I posted screenshot already in this topic

my 380 read ~38 watts on gpuz, my 390 is at about 120w and my OC 390 is closer to 200w. it's on a gold 1200w PSU, running in an ambient temp of ~14c, near an open window, VRM temps of 10c at idle.
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4382
Merit: 5809



View Profile
November 26, 2016, 08:35:36 PM
 #5732

Quote
whats your wattage at GPU-z
85-90 W depending on card.
I posted screenshot already in this topic

my 380 read ~38 watts on gpuz, my 390 is at about 120w and my OC 390 is closer to 200w. it's on a gold 1200w PSU, running in an ambient temp of ~14c, near an open window, VRM temps of 10c at idle.

GPU-Z is such bs, look for at the wall readings.
antantti
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 08:38:33 PM
 #5733

Ok, so it looks like everyone else is getting approximately the same hashrate difference for R9 390 vs. RX 480. I get 260 H/s and 190 H/s respectively with mine (both 8 GB). So my question is, is it expected that the 480 hashrate is only 73% of the 390? Is it because of the lower power consumption on the 480? With every other miner/currency so far, my 480s hash at about the same rate as my 390s. Is this something new with v8.0?

No it is not. It is because 290/ 390(x) are high end cards vs 470 low-mid/ 480 mid level, amd has not released that high performance gpu yet.

470/ 480 owners were lucky to enjoy hig end hashing rates at one algo with some bios modding. Today ancient 290 hashes more than 470/ 480 with the same or better hash/ watt ratio, better get used to it.

ps. what where those every other currencies where 480 matched 390?
mishka25
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 08:39:40 PM
 #5734

After the v8, both of my r9 280x have died. Be carefull.

I don't really believe in coincidences... But I'm not sure. Maybe usage went up, and so did temps? Maybe they got hot enough to melt the solder, or something like that. I have a pretty aggressive fan curve on afterburner, even though my cards stay fairly cool. Around 75% fan at all times, or more if temps go anywhere over 80C.
I had same problem, it is thermopaste problem, i changed it and the problem was gone. temp went about 20C down.
AKRO
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 08:45:16 PM
 #5735

Quote
whats your wattage at GPU-z
85-90 W depending on card.
I posted screenshot already in this topic

my 380 read ~38 watts on gpuz, my 390 is at about 120w and my OC 390 is closer to 200w. it's on a gold 1200w PSU, running in an ambient temp of ~14c, near an open window, VRM temps of 10c at idle.

GPU-Z is such bs, look for at the wall readings.

you're more than probably right, I'm just too lazy to order an overpriced wattmeter online or take a bus across town to some sketchy electronic liquidator on my "day off". either way i'm clearly well within my PSU's tolerance margin, and my temps are cooler than ETH, so it can't be THAT far from the truth but being off by 15+ (Huh) watts is hardly accurate either. i can see my 390s being closer to those temps than my 380, no way it's under 40 watts, but there's no way its anywhere near 220 either.
lexele
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 192
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 08:45:34 PM
 #5736

Ok, so it looks like everyone else is getting approximately the same hashrate difference for R9 390 vs. RX 480. I get 260 H/s and 190 H/s respectively with mine (both 8 GB). So my question is, is it expected that the 480 hashrate is only 73% of the 390? Is it because of the lower power consumption on the 480? With every other miner/currency so far, my 480s hash at about the same rate as my 390s. Is this something new with v8.0?

No it is not. It is because 290/ 390(x) are high end cards vs 470 low-mid/ 480 mid level, amd has not released that high performance gpu yet.

470/ 480 owners were lucky to enjoy hig end hashing rates at one algo with some bios modding. Today ancient 290 hashes more than 470/ 480 with the same or better hash/ watt ratio, better get used to it.

ps. what where those every other currencies where 480 matched 390?

While R9 serie has better hash, I don't quite agree about the hash/watt ratio. My RX 470 has better hash ratio than my 290x and the R9 is undervolted, not the the RX.
Simon_Grape
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 41
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 08:59:05 PM
 #5737

Ok, so it looks like everyone else is getting approximately the same hashrate difference for R9 390 vs. RX 480. I get 260 H/s and 190 H/s respectively with mine (both 8 GB). So my question is, is it expected that the 480 hashrate is only 73% of the 390? Is it because of the lower power consumption on the 480? With every other miner/currency so far, my 480s hash at about the same rate as my 390s. Is this something new with v8.0?

The R9 390's have more memory bandwidth (384 bit i believe) which makes them ideal for the Zcash mining algorithm. RX 480's only have 256 bit.
Densitymax
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 437
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 26, 2016, 09:00:59 PM
 #5738

1xR9 290x 250 h/s 270 watt , 1xRX 470 185 h/s 110 watt. I think beter 2xRX 470 370 h/s only 220 watt.

         ▄▄▀▀▄▄
     ▄▄▀▀  ▄▄  ▀▀▄▄
 ▄▄▀▀  ▄▄▀▀  ▀▀▄▄  ▀▀▄▄
█  ▄▄▀▀          ▀▀▄▄  █
█ █   ██▄▄     ▄██   █ █
█ █   ▄ ▀▀█▄▄ ▀▀██   █ █
█ █   ███▄ ▀▀██ ██   █ █
█ █   ██      ▀ ██   █ █
█ █   ██        ██   █ █
█  ▀▀▄▄          ▄▄▀▀  █
 ▀▀▄▄  ▀▀▄▄  ▄▄▀▀  ▄▄▀▀
     ▀▀▄▄  ▀▀  ▄▄▀▀
         ▀▀▄▄▀▀
Modex              
SMART CONTRACT MARKETPLACE
██▄▄
████  ██▄▄
████  ████
████  ████
████  ████
████  ████
████  ████
████  ████

████  ████

████  ████

████  ████

▀▀██  ████

      ▀▀██
TWITTER          LINKEDIN          SLACK
▬▬▬▬▬    FACEBOOK          TELEGRAM    ▬▬▬▬▬
DEVELOP  ●  DISTRIBUTE  ●  DEPLOY
██▄▄
████  ██▄▄
████  ████
████  ████
████  ████
████  ████
████  ████
████  ████

████  ████

████  ████

████  ████

▀▀██  ████

      ▀▀██
██▄▄
████  ██▄▄
████  ████
████  ████
████  ████
████  ████
████  ████
████  ████

████  ████

████  ████

████  ████

▀▀██  ████

      ▀▀██
antantti
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 09:03:43 PM
 #5739

Ok, so it looks like everyone else is getting approximately the same hashrate difference for R9 390 vs. RX 480. I get 260 H/s and 190 H/s respectively with mine (both 8 GB). So my question is, is it expected that the 480 hashrate is only 73% of the 390? Is it because of the lower power consumption on the 480? With every other miner/currency so far, my 480s hash at about the same rate as my 390s. Is this something new with v8.0?

No it is not. It is because 290/ 390(x) are high end cards vs 470 low-mid/ 480 mid level, amd has not released that high performance gpu yet.

470/ 480 owners were lucky to enjoy hig end hashing rates at one algo with some bios modding. Today ancient 290 hashes more than 470/ 480 with the same or better hash/ watt ratio, better get used to it.

ps. what where those every other currencies where 480 matched 390?

While R9 serie has better hash, I don't quite agree about the hash/watt ratio. My RX 470 has better hash ratio than my 290x and the R9 is undervolted, not the the RX.

Look at your 290x bios with hawaiibiosreader, pay some attention to those powerplay tables. Try those core speeds listed in dpm 2-7 + every combination listed in memory dpm 2-7.

Add afterburner -100mV or trixx -200mV and try what works best for you.
tide881155
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 09:04:55 PM
 #5740

did someone have more than 189 h\s on ref rx 480 8Gb?
Pages: « 1 ... 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 [287] 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 ... 758 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!