|
Subw
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 01:21:43 PM |
|
Nice of you to compare people with sheep. This is what YOU believe they are. That is why you set lower fee for encrypted port. To lure them in SSL trap.
|
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 01:25:00 PM |
|
Nice of you to compare people with sheep. This is what YOU believe they are. That is why you set lower fee for encrypted port. To lure them in SSL trap. SSL trap? It seems for any my action someone always finds some evil plan. Just use plain connection as before and forget about SSL!
|
|
|
|
RustNan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 01:29:51 PM |
|
Does anyone have mining speeds for RX460?
yes around 95 It is about 50% of the 470.
|
|
|
|
|
d57heinz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1453
Merit: 1011
Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 01:30:51 PM |
|
Nice of you to compare people with sheep. This is what YOU believe they are. That is why you set lower fee for encrypted port. To lure them in SSL trap. SSL trap? It seems for any my action someone always finds some evil plan. Just use plain connection as before and forget about SSL! I think that has to do with people just tired of being fucked over. Its seems that with all in life there is "catch". Can't blame people for trying to figure out what it is with you. Am sure is nothing. It's all about alleviating risk. BR
|
As in nature, all is ebb and tide, all is wave motion, so it seems that in all branches of industry, alternating currents - electric wave motion - will have the sway. ~Nikola Tesla~
|
|
|
dlx
Member

Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 01:31:21 PM |
|
Claymore: (removed the big quote)
I take your word for granted, and i believe there is no hidden agreement with the pool owners about it. Perhaps an unfortunate coincidence as co-miner said.
Then why the 2% offer? The experienced thief will continue to robb you with the removal of 2.5% fee. No bother for the 2%/SSL method. This 2% "carrot" arouses many doubts.
I suggest to return to the 2.5% fee for all.
And, since that will be now a (political) disaster, i suggest to adjust 2% for all methods, so even the most suspicient users will have nothing to complain for (conspiracy theories). After all, your profit is already (99% * 2%) + (0% * 2.5%) = (100% * 2%). Simple math.
Just my 2c.
|
|
|
|
|
gaah
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 02:01:45 PM |
|
Hi dear Claymore any news on v10.0 how long will it take? 
|
|
|
|
|
Za1n
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1011
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 02:16:59 PM |
|
Hi dear Claymore any news on v10.0 how long will it take?  He's already stated the days of expecting a new release every 2-3 days are over as the miner is getting close to maximum performance. This fact can be further evidenced by the increase in power draw on the last few releases meaning the GPU is starting to be fully utilized. Except for bug fixes and new features, expect further performance increases to being in the low single digit percent range with the releases becoming more spaced out with weeks/months in between, much like it is with his Ethereum version. Please be patient, now it takes a lot of time to improve speed. As I said before, it's possible to get good speedup but don't expect 30-50% speedups anymore and new versions every day, main speed racing is over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
64dimensions
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 02:37:25 PM |
|
Besides the high hash rate race for this mining software, has anyone looked at settings to operate their setup at it's most efficient?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subw
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 02:40:37 PM |
|
Then why the 2% offer? Well... maybe Claymore is SO concerned with user's security that he offered them discounted fee? Win-win for both Claymore and miners! On the other hand if Claymore is so concerned with miner's security he can release his software open source and people would still pay fees regardless especially considering: I expect to lose some money. It's not a problem for me
|
|
|
|
|
Westant
Member

Offline
Activity: 355
Merit: 10
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 02:42:53 PM |
|
Hi dear Claymore any news on v10.0 how long will it take?  Most of the speed increase has been squeezed out. It is very possible that the speed increase will be 5%, with 2% power increase.
|
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 02:50:29 PM |
|
Then why the 2% offer? Well... maybe Claymore is SO concerned with user's security that he offered them discounted fee? Win-win for both Claymore and miners! On the other hand if Claymore is so concerned with miner's security he can release his software open source and people would still pay fees regardless especially considering: I expect to lose some money. It's not a problem for me I have been selling various software for 15 years in different ways so I have some experience. Unfortunately, open source does not work.
|
|
|
|
beIbox
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 02:59:58 PM |
|
Hi dear Claymore any news on v10.0 how long will it take?  Most of the speed increase has been squeezed out. It is very possible that the speed increase will be 5%, with 2% power increase. yeah,, and v.20++ will need nuclear power 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subw
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 03:05:04 PM |
|
I have been selling various software for 15 years in different ways so I have some experience. Unfortunately, open source does not work.
So SSL introduction was not about security of the miners?
|
|
|
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 03:07:19 PM |
|
I have been selling various software for 15 years in different ways so I have some experience. Unfortunately, open source does not work.
So SSL introduction was not about security of the miners? LOL! You're kidding, right?
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
maxmad_x
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
It takes a lot to build but not much to lose
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 03:10:53 PM |
|
Then why the 2% offer? Well... maybe Claymore is SO concerned with user's security that he offered them discounted fee? Win-win for both Claymore and miners! On the other hand if Claymore is so concerned with miner's security he can release his software open source and people would still pay fees regardless especially considering: I expect to lose some money. It's not a problem for me I have been selling various software for 15 years in different ways so I have some experience. Unfortunately, open source does not work. Hey Claymore , What would be a good place to learn how to code in general and how to code for miners in specific? Can you please guide. May be jsut 1 or 2 things that I need to get started. Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
HashZilla
Member

Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 03:11:24 PM |
|
Besides the high hash rate race for this mining software, has anyone looked at settings to operate their setup at it's most efficient?
You mean like trying with, and without SSL to determine if it's worth complaining about? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
rpg
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 03:22:25 PM |
|
SSL was implemented long time ago for mining already but was removed again due to the increased network lag.
Lags can only create a pool if it spends a lot of time to encrypt/decrypt data, am I correct? SSL connection is based on same sockets and it takes almost zero time on client side to encrypt/decrypt 1Kb of data. I'm curious about server load, is it too expensive to use encrypted connections for you? For me? No, not at all but as said before, I've never heard of redirected or attacks (mitm) for miners traffic  it's no problem for me that you're using ssl for securing your miner against no fee wrappers etc but IMHO you should just say so - I believe most people won't have an issue with it Man in the middle doesn't care about encryption lol. Very easy to implement. No need to write network drivers. For the miner the mitm is the pool that can decrypt the packet and forward it to the actual pool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
rpg
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 03:28:00 PM |
|
Then why the 2% offer? Well... maybe Claymore is SO concerned with user's security that he offered them discounted fee? Win-win for both Claymore and miners! On the other hand if Claymore is so concerned with miner's security he can release his software open source and people would still pay fees regardless especially considering: I expect to lose some money. It's not a problem for me I have been selling various software for 15 years in different ways so I have some experience. Unfortunately, open source does not work. Hey Claymore , What would be a good place to learn how to code in general and how to code for miners in specific? Can you please guide. May be jsut 1 or 2 things that I need to get started. Thank you Go to msdn.microsoft.com and download the free version of visual studio. After go to YouTube and watch videos on c# c++ and open CL. In a few years you can write a miner
|
|
|
|
|
woodaxe
Member

Offline
Activity: 129
Merit: 10
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 03:30:31 PM |
|
Then why the 2% offer? Well... maybe Claymore is SO concerned with user's security that he offered them discounted fee? Win-win for both Claymore and miners! On the other hand if Claymore is so concerned with miner's security he can release his software open source and people would still pay fees regardless especially considering: I expect to lose some money. It's not a problem for me Why dont you do something useful for the whole forum and stick your tinfoil hat into a light socket, your not helping to improve mining in any way shape or form your just inventing bullshit for all we know the Zcash coin could crash and never be seen again. Im interested in how to mine efficiently. I dont care how much claymore is earning it must be enough as hes doing upgrades. I aslo dont care if hes left or right handed and all the other crap that people come out with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subw
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 03:33:18 PM |
|
I have been selling various software for 15 years in different ways so I have some experience. Unfortunately, open source does not work.
So SSL introduction was not about security of the miners? LOL! You're kidding, right? Nope. I have always believed in Claymore and genuinely thinks he is about our security and as we all know the most secure software is open source.
|
|
|
|
|
|