ivomm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1933
Merit: 3428
All good things to those who wait
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 11:55:50 AM |
|
Yesterday I moved my rigs to dwarfpool. For the last 24 hours I got at least 15% more ZEC than flypool. I don't trust in general the hashrate statistics, but in flypool it was always 10% less than the miner hashrate. Dwarf always shows 5% above the miner. Also the rejected shares in dwarf are 0.13%, whereas in flypool they were around 0.55%.
|
|
|
|
|
_ZET_
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 299
Merit: 100
Crypto mining company | Mining pools
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 11:59:01 AM |
|
Some people have noticed hashrate drop after they were mining for some time (18-24h), especially with 280x cards. After restart hashrate is back up. Can someone confirm it?
|
|
|
|
|
Demarsac
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 11:59:48 AM |
|
hi all i face unstable current effective hashrate any comment or adding in command line?  Awaiting yr reply I think you should change pool before anything else Use Dwarfpool. For the past 10 days it is way more profitable than any other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bananana
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 12:16:20 PM |
|
hi all i face unstable current effective hashrate any comment or adding in command line?  Awaiting yr reply I think you should change pool before anything else Use Dwarfpool. For the past 10 days it is way more profitable than any other Anybody compared dwarfpool with nanopool?
|
|
|
|
|
Hotmetal
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 12:26:07 PM |
|
hi all i face unstable current effective hashrate any comment or adding in command line?  Awaiting yr reply I think you should change pool before anything else Use Dwarfpool. For the past 10 days it is way more profitable than any other Not just that .. There has been many rumors of flypool stealing shares on the server side (thereby looking like major hash rate fluctuations)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gaglam
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 12:55:23 PM |
|
Same speed as 9.0 and 9.1 on 280x Thanks for update anyway 
|
|
|
|
|
Hanfonan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 01:01:13 PM |
|
Same speed as 9.0 and 9.1 on 280x Thanks for update anyway  That is right. For 280x do not use 9.2.
|
|
|
|
|
Gashans
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 01:03:45 PM |
|
v9.2
280x ~220H/s 390 ~325H/s 290x ~315H/s Fury ~350H/s 480 ~260H/s
stock bios, overclocked, 16.10.3
What about 290 without x? v 9.2 r9 290x ~340 H/s (water cooling) 1170/1250 with modded r9 390x bios r9 290 ~280 H/s (air) 1170/1250 stock bios Running on Crimson-ReLive-16.12.1-Dec7 Drivers
|
|
|
|
|
|
golden0707
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 01:05:12 PM |
|
Yesterday I moved my rigs to dwarfpool. For the last 24 hours I got at least 15% more ZEC than flypool. I don't trust in general the hashrate statistics, but in flypool it was always 10% less than the miner hashrate. Dwarf always shows 5% above the miner. Also the rejected shares in dwarf are 0.13%, whereas in flypool they were around 0.55%.
But what about bad luck finding blocks due to small pool hashrate ?
|
|
|
|
|
d57heinz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1453
Merit: 1011
Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 01:11:45 PM |
|
Yesterday I moved my rigs to dwarfpool. For the last 24 hours I got at least 15% more ZEC than flypool. I don't trust in general the hashrate statistics, but in flypool it was always 10% less than the miner hashrate. Dwarf always shows 5% above the miner. Also the rejected shares in dwarf are 0.13%, whereas in flypool they were around 0.55%.
But what about bad luck finding blocks due to small pool hashrate ? That's no longer an issue since they went over 2 megahashes. Now we find blocks with regularity and variance is not bad anymore. All I can say is try them out for a week. That's long enough to make up your mind  BR
|
As in nature, all is ebb and tide, all is wave motion, so it seems that in all branches of industry, alternating currents - electric wave motion - will have the sway. ~Nikola Tesla~
|
|
|
mettalmag
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1085
Merit: 1003
≡v≡
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 01:11:51 PM |
|
Yesterday I moved my rigs to dwarfpool. For the last 24 hours I got at least 15% more ZEC than flypool. I don't trust in general the hashrate statistics, but in flypool it was always 10% less than the miner hashrate. Dwarf always shows 5% above the miner. Also the rejected shares in dwarf are 0.13%, whereas in flypool they were around 0.55%.
But what about bad luck finding blocks due to small pool hashrate ? what also about coinmine.pl I guess I'm the only one still interested in that pool
|
|
|
|
|
d57heinz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1453
Merit: 1011
Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 01:14:56 PM |
|
Yesterday I moved my rigs to dwarfpool. For the last 24 hours I got at least 15% more ZEC than flypool. I don't trust in general the hashrate statistics, but in flypool it was always 10% less than the miner hashrate. Dwarf always shows 5% above the miner. Also the rejected shares in dwarf are 0.13%, whereas in flypool they were around 0.55%.
But what about bad luck finding blocks due to small pool hashrate ? what also about coinmine.pl I guess I'm the only one still interested in that pool I was showing reduced hr and was getting some weird delays on shares being accepted. Up to 30 second in some case. Since moving to dwarf I never looked back. As of couple days ago tho I finally swapped to nicehash. With the dropping price the 30 coins I accumulated will have to suffice. I'm tired of watching my coins go up and the value of my wallet drop. It's almost faster than I can mine it  BR
|
As in nature, all is ebb and tide, all is wave motion, so it seems that in all branches of industry, alternating currents - electric wave motion - will have the sway. ~Nikola Tesla~
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 01:35:48 PM |
|
v9.2 Linux version is available.
|
|
|
|
arielbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3444
Merit: 1061
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 01:38:06 PM |
|
v9.2
280x ~220H/s 390 ~325H/s 290x ~315H/s Fury ~350H/s 480 ~260H/s
stock bios, overclocked, 16.10.3
What about 290 without x? i don't have one hey what 290x do you have? msi 290x twin frozr gaming. core 1100 memory 1500
|
|
|
|
|
Marvell1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2996
Merit: 1170
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 01:47:26 PM |
|
Yesterday I moved my rigs to dwarfpool. For the last 24 hours I got at least 15% more ZEC than flypool. I don't trust in general the hashrate statistics, but in flypool it was always 10% less than the miner hashrate. Dwarf always shows 5% above the miner. Also the rejected shares in dwarf are 0.13%, whereas in flypool they were around 0.55%.
no ssl on dwarf so the fee is higer
|
Left... the space..
|
|
|
|
golden0707
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 01:59:10 PM |
|
Yesterday I moved my rigs to dwarfpool. For the last 24 hours I got at least 15% more ZEC than flypool. I don't trust in general the hashrate statistics, but in flypool it was always 10% less than the miner hashrate. Dwarf always shows 5% above the miner. Also the rejected shares in dwarf are 0.13%, whereas in flypool they were around 0.55%.
But what about bad luck finding blocks due to small pool hashrate ? what also about coinmine.pl I guess I'm the only one still interested in that pool Im on zec.suprnova.cc and getting all I should , as http://www.coinwarz.com/calculators/zcash-mining-calculator says.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TheRider
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 02:00:13 PM |
|
v9.2 Linux version is available.
Excellent! Thanks! Same hashrates as Windows?
|
|
|
|
|
|
ivcelmik
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 02:01:52 PM |
|
Yesterday I moved my rigs to dwarfpool. For the last 24 hours I got at least 15% more ZEC than flypool. I don't trust in general the hashrate statistics, but in flypool it was always 10% less than the miner hashrate. Dwarf always shows 5% above the miner. Also the rejected shares in dwarf are 0.13%, whereas in flypool they were around 0.55%.
no ssl on dwarf so the fee is higer Dwarfpool is the best pool at this moment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demarsac
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 02:08:11 PM |
|
If anyone gets first readings in speeds for linux version do tell...
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Eliovp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1294
Huh?
|
 |
December 22, 2016, 02:21:37 PM |
|
RX 480 8G doing 265-270 sol , stock miner settings, 1165 core, 2000 mem 380 4G doing 170 sol, 1075/1500 290 310 sol, 1000/1250.
Ubuntu 14.04
nice job Claymore
Greetings
|
|
|
|
|