alpet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1912
Merit: 1020
|
 |
July 30, 2013, 12:29:43 PM |
|
It doesn't hurt to dream, but Bitsyncom was pretty clear. Only refund offered was a full refund.
Yes, but very small time window for make decision. Also timeline two weeks for shipping now exceeded, and order still "Processing". Due large delivery time to Russia (~3 weeks), me very sad. What I can do? Just not pay tax in customs, and unprofitable device returned back to producer?
|
|
|
|
|
jspielberg
|
 |
July 30, 2013, 01:08:05 PM |
|
It doesn't hurt to dream, but Bitsyncom was pretty clear. Only refund offered was a full refund.
Yes, but very small time window for make decision. Also timeline two weeks for shipping now exceeded, and order still "Processing". Due large delivery time to Russia (~3 weeks), me very sad. What I can do? Just not pay tax in customs, and unprofitable device returned back to producer? Do what all the other Batch3 folks are doing who opted not to take the refund... mine with it and hope to turn a profit or try to sell it and hope to turn a profit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pikeadz
|
 |
July 30, 2013, 01:35:23 PM |
|
Looks like they started to mass produce again. 5 Thash/s is working at eligius right now at the avalon adress. They hopefully burn them in and start shipping then.
Wow, over 7TH at one point. If history is any predictor, the next wave should be out the door in the next few hours or days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jspielberg
|
 |
July 30, 2013, 01:50:20 PM |
|
Looks like they started to mass produce again. 5 Thash/s is working at eligius right now at the avalon adress. They hopefully burn them in and start shipping then.
Wow, over 7TH at one point. If history is any predictor, the next wave should be out the door in the next few hours or days. Crikey...How much power would that be? 7TH @ 10W/GH == 70 KW  I wonder if they test them overclocked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
alwind
|
 |
July 30, 2013, 04:17:17 PM |
|
anyone with the 4 module avalon did 325+ or used the --avalon-auto command?
Its a little hot here now so i don't want to try it yet.
|
|
|
|
CoinHoarder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1026
In Cryptocoins I Trust
|
 |
July 30, 2013, 06:09:31 PM |
|
Thanks Avalon. I know I cussed you a few times, but thank you for finally coming through! 
|
|
|
|
|
ibminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2031
Merit: 3474
Goonies never say die.
|
 |
July 30, 2013, 06:11:56 PM |
|
That's a sight for sore eyes 
|
|
|
|
|
Splirow
|
 |
July 30, 2013, 06:59:04 PM |
|
Anyone here knows what to add in the "more options" area? Right now it says --real-quiet (what does this mean?)
|
|
|
|
|
glendall
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1019
|
 |
July 30, 2013, 07:03:31 PM |
|
Thanks Avalon. I know I cussed you a few times, but thank you for finally coming through!  Oh my...! So beautiful ! Arrived finally ! Yayyya !
|
|
|
|
|
|
greaterninja
|
 |
July 30, 2013, 07:28:00 PM |
|
Thanks Avalon. I know I cussed you a few times, but thank you for finally coming through!  Very nice. what order #s were you?
|
|
|
|
|
ibminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2031
Merit: 3474
Goonies never say die.
|
 |
July 30, 2013, 07:29:48 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
ProfMac
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1002
|
 |
July 30, 2013, 07:35:34 PM |
|
Anyone here knows what to add in the "more options" area? Right now it says --real-quiet (what does this mean?)
On my batch #2, I use --avalon-auto --avalon-freq 285-365 --avalon-temp 50 I set chip frequency at 285. The machine starts slowly and ramps up. Mine almost always stays between 343 and 347 MHz, each machine picks it's own characteristic frequency. I am using the ck klovias 20130703 firmware.
|
I try to be respectful and informed.
|
|
|
|
jarhed
|
 |
July 30, 2013, 08:29:52 PM |
|
I set them at 350 and they are doing 110MH/s each.
I seriously doubt that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
therustytrombone
|
 |
July 30, 2013, 09:24:58 PM |
|
I set them at 350 and they are doing 110MH/s each.
I seriously doubt that. My 4-module, batch3 avalon has been up for over 13 hours and has averaged 109.5GH/s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
 |
July 30, 2013, 09:38:59 PM |
|
Bitsyncom can certainly afford to refund people at this point - 600 x BTC25 would only be BTC15k. About the cost of 1.5 boxes of chips.
It would certainly do a lot for their reputation.
|
|
|
|
|
greaterninja
|
 |
July 30, 2013, 09:42:18 PM |
|
Bitsyncom can certainly afford to refund people at this point - 600 x BTC25 would only be BTC15k. About the cost of 1.5 boxes of chips.
It would certainly do a lot for their reputation.
I still have no order information on my batch#2 trade-in and batch #3 orders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
agibby5
|
 |
July 30, 2013, 10:57:31 PM |
|
Bitsyncom can certainly afford to refund people at this point - 600 x BTC25 would only be BTC15k. About the cost of 1.5 boxes of chips.
It would certainly do a lot for their reputation.
If they do that, it would be yet another slap in the face of those who originally requested a refund. If most people who asked for a refund knew this at the time, I'm guessing they would just take delivery on their unit and take the partial refund. I agree though, they would be wise to do this. I don't think they will though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
lastbit
|
 |
July 30, 2013, 11:12:53 PM |
|
Received my 4 module w/PSU unit. Thank you Avalon!
|
|
|
|
|
|
jarhed
|
 |
July 31, 2013, 12:25:03 AM |
|
I set them at 350 and they are doing 110MH/s each.
I seriously doubt that. These are 4-module units so it is just about the same hash rate/module as the Batch 2 units which are doing 82 Mh/s (3-module). GHs. Not MHs. My bold emphasis on your quote. Proper syntax is very important.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pikeadz
|
 |
July 31, 2013, 12:56:31 AM |
|
Anyone here knows what to add in the "more options" area? Right now it says --real-quiet (what does this mean?)
On my batch #2, I use --avalon-auto --avalon-freq 285-365 --avalon-temp 50 I set chip frequency at 285. The machine starts slowly and ramps up. Mine almost always stays between 343 and 347 MHz, each machine picks it's own characteristic frequency. I am using the ck klovias 20130703 firmware. Did you leave cgminer set to the default: "balanced," or change it to failover? Any noticeable difference in average total hash rate if you did? I am kind of scared to try balanced as I've always used failover in the past.
|
|
|
|
|
|