|
|
|
coin123123
|
 |
December 25, 2013, 11:22:09 PM |
|
writer suggest either its ddos attack or a scam ddos would break the servers but mining seems stable op profile said he was online about one hour ago |
|
|
|
|
|
willittobe
|
|
December 25, 2013, 11:25:56 PM |
|
writer suggest either its ddos attack or a scam ddos would break the servers but mining seems stable op profile said he was online about one hour ago If you were mining (or look at the chart where it dropped way down a couple times) that would have been the possible ddosing. I don't see where it is suggested as a scam. |
|
|
|
kalus
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 263
let's make a deal.
|
|
December 25, 2013, 11:39:05 PM
Last edit: December 26, 2013, 12:01:35 AM by kalus |
|
Report from the Mineshaft - The Cost Of Success (Middlecoin and Hashcows)
writer suggest either its ddos attack or a scam ddos would break the servers but mining seems stable op profile said he was online about one hour ago Writer writes a non sequitor argument comparing hashcows with middlecoin. the only thing they have in common is they're multipools. they're run completely differently, by different people, with different philosophies and approaches to business. author has the coingeek charts but fails to credit coingeek for the work. this is plagiarism. author implicates DDOS when in reality, the last week's problem was due to a large influx of users into middlecoin. this is part of coingeek's chart, but author fails to note the significance. Author ignores the relative stable uptime of middlecoin (as evidenced by the plagiarized chart), but does not engage in similar, graphical analysis of hashcow's uptime in the past week. as we don't even know exactly why hashcows was compromised (just some rumblings about SQL injection), the writer is doing nothing but speculate and namedrop two pools to increase hits on a poorly trafficked blog. nothing but speculation and the writer's own opinions. poorly researched, poorly cited. meh. |
DC2ngEGbd1ZUKyj8aSzrP1W5TXs5WmPuiR wow need noms
|
|
|
mattd83
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
December 25, 2013, 11:42:14 PM |
|
Strange behaviour over the last few hours on the site?
Looks like Balance and Unexchanged have not moved at all? Perhaps a broken DB Server?
|
|
|
|
|
Gamer67
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
тσ ¢σιи σя иσт тσ ¢σιи?
|
|
December 25, 2013, 11:51:19 PM |
|
Report from the Mineshaft - The Cost Of Success (Middlecoin and Hashcows)
writer suggest either its ddos attack or a scam ddos would break the servers but mining seems stable op profile said he was online about one hour ago Writer writes a non sequitor argument comparing hashcows with middlecoin. the only thing they have in common is they're multipools. they're run completely differently, by different people, with different philosophies and approaches to business. author has the coingeek charts but fails to credit coingeek for the work. this is plagiarism. author implicates DDOS when in reality, the last week's problem was due to a large influx of users into middlecoin. this is part of coingeek's chart, but author fails to note the significance. Author ignores the relative stable uptime of middlecoin (as evidenced by the plagarized chart), but does not engage in similar, graphical analysis of hashcow's uptime in the past week. as we don't even know exactly why hashcows was compromised (just some rumblings about SQL injection), the writer is doing nothing but speculate and namedrop two pools to increase hits on a poorly trafficked blog. nothing but speculation and the writer's own opinions. poorly researched, poorly cited. meh. +1 |
"I am not Dorian Nakamoto."
|
|
|
Kluge
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1017
|
|
December 25, 2013, 11:57:18 PM |
|
Looks like it just updated.  |
|
|
|
|
mattd83
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
December 26, 2013, 12:02:30 AM |
|
Looks like it just updated. Yeah I see it now, well spotted, the graph now just trails the stats but at least the JSON data has been updated! |
|
|
|
|
|
willittobe
|
|
December 26, 2013, 12:07:16 AM |
|
Report from the Mineshaft - The Cost Of Success (Middlecoin and Hashcows)
writer suggest either its ddos attack or a scam ddos would break the servers but mining seems stable op profile said he was online about one hour ago Writer writes a non sequitor argument comparing hashcows with middlecoin. the only thing they have in common is they're multipools. they're run completely differently, by different people, with different philosophies and approaches to business. author has the coingeek charts but fails to credit coingeek for the work. this is plagiarism. author implicates DDOS when in reality, the last week's problem was due to a large influx of users into middlecoin. this is part of coingeek's chart, but author fails to note the significance. Author ignores the relative stable uptime of middlecoin (as evidenced by the plagiarized chart), but does not engage in similar, graphical analysis of hashcow's uptime in the past week. as we don't even know exactly why hashcows was compromised (just some rumblings about SQL injection), the writer is doing nothing but speculate and namedrop two pools to increase hits on a poorly trafficked blog. nothing but speculation and the writer's own opinions. poorly researched, poorly cited. meh. It's a rambling piece ,i'll give you that. But everybody's a critic. Just thought it was interesting. |
|
|
|
kalus
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 263
let's make a deal.
|
|
December 26, 2013, 12:09:10 AM |
|
It's a rambling piece ,i'll give you that. But everybody's a critic. Just thought it was interesting.
thanks, but in addition to being rambling, author takes coingeek's work and passes it off as original research. even middlecoin.com credits coingeek for the analysis on both front page and individual payout pages. |
DC2ngEGbd1ZUKyj8aSzrP1W5TXs5WmPuiR wow need noms
|
|
|
|
willittobe
|
|
December 26, 2013, 12:18:00 AM |
|
It's a rambling piece ,i'll give you that. But everybody's a critic. Just thought it was interesting.
thanks, but in addition to being rambling, author takes coingeek's work and passes it off as original research. even middlecoin.com credits coingeek for the analysis on both front page and individual payout pages. I didn't get that feeling as it is obvious it's the middlecoin chart (well, I guess because I know what it looks like) and nothing original, but looks like the author already updated to credit coingeek. |
|
|
|
bal3wolf
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Power to the people!
|
|
December 26, 2013, 01:03:43 AM |
|
any more tips on how to get less getwork errors on my 5870 and 6950 the 5870 is on same network as my 7970s that get very few 20/1mbit and the 6950 is on a 20/1mbit alone. Only pool i had this problem never had it on any other i used i even tried the eu server no getwork errors but very low shares per min.
|
|
|
|
|
dalak
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
December 26, 2013, 01:16:31 AM |
|
"stratum is still working; we're still digging/mining. occam's razor suggests site operator taking a holiday."
Nice one. Front-end lagged big time once again, Occam's razor suggests that the site operator doesn't care. I'd be somewhat rebellious if he's on a holiday.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RickJamesBTC
|
|
December 26, 2013, 01:35:03 AM |
|
"stratum is still working; we're still digging/mining. occam's razor suggests site operator taking a holiday."
Nice one. Front-end lagged big time once again, Occam's razor suggests that the site operator doesn't care. I'd be somewhat rebellious if he's on a holiday.
Really? It's christmas day, from all appearances the backend is still working as miners are all getting work and submitting shares. Not worrying about the web graph display isn't that important. |
|
|
|
|
Spencer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
December 26, 2013, 01:52:50 AM |
|
I have something like 450-500 and I get almost .01 per day. It's not anywhere close to a week. It's more like 2 days or so if we have a bad day.
I used to be getting that, but can't tell due to these issues :/ Well I have .008 or so right now. From my guess today was close to a normal day. |
|
|
|
|
|
willittobe
|
|
December 26, 2013, 02:06:47 AM |
|
Yep today is looking to be a fine day as far as the payout goes.
Not having the display stats is a bit annoying, but not at all needed... the backend has been counting shares and divvying the booty, that's the most important part.
Everybody needs a break from this stuff from time to time, including h2o.
|
|
|
|
Spencer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
December 26, 2013, 02:10:04 AM |
|
Everybody needs a break from this stuff from time to time, including h2o.
Yes and for him it's very well deserved. |
|
|
|
|
|
CaptainBeck
|
|
December 26, 2013, 02:10:54 AM |
|
Everybody needs a break from this stuff from time to time, including h2o.
I think H20 more than any of us need a break from us some times!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
willittobe
|
|
December 26, 2013, 02:12:23 AM |
|
Everybody needs a break from this stuff from time to time, including h2o.
I think H20 more than any of us need a break from us some times!!! Especially the newbs, whiners, and people who can't read the answer to their question that has been asked ten times already. It'd be enough to drive me into hermitage. |
|
|
|
|
CaptainBeck
|
|
December 26, 2013, 02:18:18 AM |
|
Everybody needs a break from this stuff from time to time, including h2o.
I think H20 more than any of us need a break from us some times!!! Especially the newbs, whiners, and people who can't read the answer to their question that has been asked ten times already. It'd be enough to drive me into hermitage. For me its people asking what they will get from a certain Mhash rather than looking at people of similar rates, and then complaining when they dont get what people suggest they would get. Thats killing me abit!! |
|
|
|
|
|
