Sitarow
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
|
 |
September 11, 2013, 12:26:51 PM
Last edit: September 11, 2013, 01:38:08 PM by Sitarow |
|
I turned off chip 1 and 57 1 aiFDso 0 0.086 0.476 6 24 0 0 45 [0:0] 733 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 2 1 1 2
2 AIfDSo 55 1.618 1.839 113 1 0 0 174 [0:1] 358 7 8 8 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
3 AIfDSo 55 1.603 1.765 112 3 0 0 167 [0:2] 338 6 7 7 6 7 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4 AIfDSo 55 1.432 1.681 100 1 0 0 159 [0:3] 371 7 7 7 7 6 6 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 AIfDSo 55 1.589 1.670 111 3 0 0 158 [0:4] 330 7 6 6 7 6 7 8 8 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 AIfDSo 55 1.603 1.744 112 2 0 0 165 [0:5] 335 8 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 AIfDSo 55 1.632 1.691 114 1 0 0 160 [0:6] 339 7 7 7 6 7 7 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 AIfDSo 55 1.589 1.617 111 2 0 0 153 [0:7] 375 6 6 8 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 AIfDSo 55 1.174 1.427 82 2 0 0 135 [0:8] 391 5 5 4 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 AIfDSo 55 1.675 1.903 117 3 0 0 180 [0:9] 355 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 7 6 6 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
11 AIfDSo 55 2.019 1.797 141 0 0 0 170 [0:A] 321 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 AIfDSo 55 1.618 1.744 113 1 0 0 165 [0:B] 352 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 AIfDSo 55 1.460 1.786 102 6 0 0 169 [0:C] 363 6 6 7 6 7 6 6 6 6 7 7 6 6 7 7 6 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1
14 AIfDSo 55 1.747 1.765 122 3 0 0 167 [0:D] 361 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 8 8 7 7 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
15 AIfDSo 55 1.718 1.702 120 7 0 0 161 [0:E] 359 7 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 8 7 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0
16 AIfDSo 55 2.004 1.797 140 2 0 0 170 [0:F] 316 8 9 9 9 8 8 9 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 AIfDSo 55 1.990 1.892 139 3 0 0 179 [1:0] 342 8 7 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
18 AIfDSo 55 1.489 1.712 104 5 0 0 162 [1:1] 377 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 7 7 7 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
19 AIfDSo 55 1.976 1.903 138 3 0 0 180 [1:2] 323 8 9 9 9 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 7 8 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
20 AIfDSo 55 1.002 1.733 70 46 0 0 164 [1:3] 501 3 4 7 2 4 2 3 6 5 5 5 4 4 4 7 5 4 3 0 5 3 5 4 1 2 2 2 3 4 4 1 3
21 AIfDSo 55 1.761 1.765 123 2 0 0 167 [1:4] 353 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 6 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
22 AIfDSo 55 1.732 1.807 121 1 0 0 171 [1:5] 340 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
23 AIfDSo 55 1.618 1.723 113 3 0 0 163 [1:6] 359 8 8 7 6 6 7 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
24 AIfDSo 55 1.847 1.755 129 0 0 0 166 [1:7] 339 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 8 8 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
25 AIfDSo 55 1.704 1.829 119 7 0 0 173 [1:8] 365 8 6 8 8 4 7 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
26 AIfDSo 55 1.661 1.733 116 3 0 0 164 [1:9] 351 7 8 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
27 AIfDSo 55 1.646 1.733 115 3 0 0 164 [1:A] 369 8 8 8 8 8 7 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
28 AIfDSo 55 1.346 1.490 94 7 0 0 141 [1:B] 403 6 6 6 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 6 5 6 6 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
29 AIfDSo 55 1.804 1.892 126 5 0 0 179 [1:C] 316 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 7 8 7 8 8 9 9 7 8 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
30 AIfDSo 55 1.961 1.892 137 8 0 0 179 [1:D] 347 9 9 8 7 9 9 9 8 10 8 9 8 9 9 8 8 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1
31 AIfDSo 55 1.976 1.797 138 0 0 0 170 [1:E] 364 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
32 AIfDSo 55 2.190 1.934 153 2 0 0 183 [1:F] 337 10 10 10 10 8 9 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 9 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
33 AIfDSo 55 1.761 1.892 123 2 0 0 179 [2:0] 328 7 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
34 AIfDSo 55 1.661 1.786 116 5 0 0 169 [2:1] 330 7 8 7 7 7 6 7 7 6 8 8 7 7 8 8 8 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
35 AIfDSo 55 1.575 1.998 110 0 0 0 189 [2:2] 319 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
36 AIfDSo 55 1.818 1.955 127 1 0 0 185 [2:3] 319 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
37 AIfDSo 55 1.918 1.966 134 3 0 0 186 [2:4] 307 8 9 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 6 8 8 8 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
38 AIfDSo 55 1.589 1.765 111 8 0 0 167 [2:5] 340 7 7 8 8 7 8 8 6 6 7 7 7 6 6 7 6 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1
39 AIfDSo 55 1.904 1.903 133 6 0 0 180 [2:6] 322 9 9 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 7 6 9 8 9 9 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0
40 AIfDSo 55 1.933 1.776 135 7 0 0 168 [2:7] 356 8 7 9 9 9 8 9 8 8 9 9 7 8 9 9 9 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
41 AIfDSo 55 2.105 1.934 147 3 0 0 183 [2:8] 321 10 10 9 9 8 9 8 9 9 8 9 9 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
42 AIfDSo 55 2.019 1.977 141 4 0 0 187 [2:9] 305 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 7 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
43 AIfDSo 55 2.147 1.903 150 3 0 0 180 [2:A] 318 9 9 9 9 10 9 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
44 AIfDSo 55 1.818 1.881 127 4 0 0 178 [2:B] 312 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 8 9 8 8 7 8 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
45 AIfDSo 55 1.503 1.871 105 17 0 0 177 [2:C] 383 7 6 8 5 6 7 7 7 6 5 6 8 7 7 6 7 1 2 0 3 2 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 1 2 1
46 AIfDSo 55 1.961 1.955 137 1 0 0 185 [2:D] 314 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
47 AIfDSo 55 0.931 1.755 65 32 0 0 166 [2:E] 543 3 1 6 6 5 4 5 3 4 3 5 4 5 4 3 4 3 5 0 0 1 2 1 3 2 3 1 2 1 2 4 2
48 AIfDSo 55 1.861 1.998 130 1 0 0 189 [2:F] 309 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
49 AIfDSo 55 1.689 1.755 118 4 0 0 166 [3:0] 349 8 8 8 6 8 8 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
50 AIfDSo 55 1.918 1.850 134 1 0 0 175 [3:1] 318 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 8 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
51 AIfDSo 55 1.432 1.776 100 0 0 0 168 [3:2] 372 6 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
52 AIfDSo 55 1.518 1.839 106 4 0 0 174 [3:3] 335 7 7 7 6 6 7 7 5 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
53 AIfDSo 55 1.976 1.966 138 3 0 0 186 [3:4] 297 9 9 8 9 9 8 8 8 9 8 9 8 9 9 9 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
54 AIfDSo 55 1.732 1.860 121 10 0 0 176 [3:5] 332 9 8 8 8 7 6 7 8 8 8 7 7 8 6 7 9 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 0
55 AIfDSo 55 1.360 1.723 95 4 0 0 163 [3:6] 347 7 7 6 6 6 5 5 5 6 5 6 6 6 6 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
56 AIfDSo 55 1.804 1.818 126 2 0 0 172 [3:7] 351 8 8 7 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
57 aiFDso 0 0.115 0.571 8 25 0 0 54 [3:8] 712 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 2 3 1 2 1 1
58 AIfDSo 55 1.603 1.934 112 25 0 0 183 [3:9] 336 8 7 8 7 8 9 7 6 8 6 5 5 5 8 8 7 1 2 1 2 1 0 2 3 1 2 3 3 3 0 0 1
59 AIfDSo 55 1.861 1.966 130 2 0 0 186 [3:A] 312 9 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 7 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
60 AIfDSo 55 2.090 1.966 146 2 0 0 186 [3:B] 297 9 9 9 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
61 AIfDSo 55 1.775 1.670 124 1 0 0 158 [3:C] 379 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
62 AIfDSo 55 1.646 1.744 115 2 0 0 165 [3:D] 361 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 7 8 8 7 7 7 7 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
63 AIfDSo 55 1.518 1.913 106 8 0 0 181 [3:E] 324 7 7 7 6 7 7 5 6 7 8 7 6 7 7 6 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
64 AIfDSo 55 2.162 1.924 151 1 0 0 182 [3:F] 297 9 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
speed:3410 noncerate[GH/s]:106.973 (1.671/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:113.581 good:7472 errors:350 spi-err:0 miso-err:0 jobs:375 cores:53% good:62 bad:2 off:0 (best[GH/s]:107.331) Wed Sep 11 05:39:01 2013
0: 825 24.567 26.403 1716 61 0 0 15 1 0 (1.535/chip) 50%
1: 880 27.703 28.591 1935 98 0 0 16 0 0 (1.731/chip) 52%
2: 880 28.504 30.314 1991 97 0 0 16 0 0 (1.782/chip) 55%
3: 825 26.199 28.274 1830 94 0 0 15 1 0 (1.637/chip) 53%
I do have a fan on the boards. Is there a better way to turn off a chip than setting autotune to 'a' and speed to 0? does the best.conf file get overwritten if I put new boards onto the m-board? I'm not sure how tweeking a couple of chips in the first 4 boards would change things so much that it would allow me to put more h-boards on without generating all the errors that I saw in earlier runs - is it that significant? /cet 1 aiFDso 0 0.086 0.476 6 24 0 0 45 [0:0] 733 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 Change the aiFDSo to the example below and what it will look like when its off. 1 aifdso 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 [0:0] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 To turn them off you have to set it to aifdso the number beside it i normally leave it at 55 or for reference points 50 |
|
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
|
September 11, 2013, 12:29:41 PM |
|
Hey guys, is there anything else I can do for this to go past the chip 25?
I got 2 H-Boards with EOL one.
23 AIfDSo 55 1.603 1.945 112 5 0 0 184 [1:6] 122 7 7 7 8 7 7 8 7 7 7 6 7 7 6 7 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
24 AIfDSo 55 1.747 1.934 122 9 1 0 183 [1:7] 51 6 8 7 9 7 8 7 8 8 8 7 8 7 8 8 8 2 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
25 aIfDSo 0 0.000 0.412 0 0 0 0 39 [1:8] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
speed:1320 noncerate[GH/s]:37.252 (1.490/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:41.031 good:2602 errors:177 spi-err:1 miso-err:0 jobs:376 cores:84% good:25 bad:0 off:0 (best[GH/s]:38.784) Wed Sep 11 12:27:28 2013
0: 880 23.408 25.198 1635 126 0 0 16 0 0 (1.463/chip) 86%
1: 440 13.844 15.833 967 51 1 0 9 0 0 (1.538/chip) 80%
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Sitarow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
|
|
September 11, 2013, 12:32:51 PM |
|
Hey guys, is there anything else I can do for this to go past the chip 25?
I got 2 H-Boards with EOL one.
23 AIfDSo 55 1.603 1.945 112 5 0 0 184 [1:6] 122 7 7 7 8 7 7 8 7 7 7 6 7 7 6 7 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
24 AIfDSo 55 1.747 1.934 122 9 1 0 183 [1:7] 51 6 8 7 9 7 8 7 8 8 8 7 8 7 8 8 8 2 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
25 aIfDSo 0 0.000 0.412 0 0 0 0 39 [1:8] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
speed:1320 noncerate[GH/s]:37.252 (1.490/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:41.031 good:2602 errors:177 spi-err:1 miso-err:0 jobs:376 cores:84% good:25 bad:0 off:0 (best[GH/s]:38.784) Wed Sep 11 12:27:28 2013
0: 880 23.408 25.198 1635 126 0 0 16 0 0 (1.463/chip) 86%
1: 440 13.844 15.833 967 51 1 0 9 0 0 (1.538/chip) 80%
Thanks
Chip number 25 is not turned off. You can tell by the fact that there is still numbers on the line and by the big 0 next to the off. I have found you should set the aifdso to all lower case in order to effectively turn off a chip. You can probably get away with putting ai lowercase. However I use letters lowercase text to disable the chip. |
|
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
|
September 11, 2013, 12:38:51 PM |
|
Hey guys, is there anything else I can do for this to go past the chip 25?
I got 2 H-Boards with EOL one.
23 AIfDSo 55 1.603 1.945 112 5 0 0 184 [1:6] 122 7 7 7 8 7 7 8 7 7 7 6 7 7 6 7 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
24 AIfDSo 55 1.747 1.934 122 9 1 0 183 [1:7] 51 6 8 7 9 7 8 7 8 8 8 7 8 7 8 8 8 2 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
25 aIfDSo 0 0.000 0.412 0 0 0 0 39 [1:8] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
speed:1320 noncerate[GH/s]:37.252 (1.490/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:41.031 good:2602 errors:177 spi-err:1 miso-err:0 jobs:376 cores:84% good:25 bad:0 off:0 (best[GH/s]:38.784) Wed Sep 11 12:27:28 2013
0: 880 23.408 25.198 1635 126 0 0 16 0 0 (1.463/chip) 86%
1: 440 13.844 15.833 967 51 1 0 9 0 0 (1.538/chip) 80%
Thanks
Chip number 25 is not turned off. You can tell by the fact that there is still numbers on the line and by the big 0 next to the off. I have found you should set the aifdso to all lower case in order to effectively turn off a chip. You can probably get away with putting ai lowercase. However I use letters lowercase text to disable the chip. Doesn't look like it's going through.  24 AIfDSo 55 1.024 1.171 31 2 0 0 48 [1:7] 725 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 aifdso 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 [1:8] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0speed:1320 noncerate[GH/s]:21.310 (0.852/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:24.611 good:645 errors:43 spi-err:0 miso-err:1 jobs:100 cores:3% good:24 bad:0 off:1 (best[GH/s]:0.000) Wed Sep 11 12:38:07 2013 0: 880 12.819 15.293 388 30 0 1 16 0 0 (0.801/chip) 3% 1: 440 8.491 9.318 257 13 0 0 8 0 1 (0.943/chip) 4% |
|
|
|
|
|
jspielberg
|
|
September 11, 2013, 12:42:44 PM |
|
Hey guys, is there anything else I can do for this to go past the chip 25?
I got 2 H-Boards with EOL one.
23 AIfDSo 55 1.603 1.945 112 5 0 0 184 [1:6] 122 7 7 7 8 7 7 8 7 7 7 6 7 7 6 7 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
24 AIfDSo 55 1.747 1.934 122 9 1 0 183 [1:7] 51 6 8 7 9 7 8 7 8 8 8 7 8 7 8 8 8 2 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
25 aIfDSo 0 0.000 0.412 0 0 0 0 39 [1:8] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
speed:1320 noncerate[GH/s]:37.252 (1.490/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:41.031 good:2602 errors:177 spi-err:1 miso-err:0 jobs:376 cores:84% good:25 bad:0 off:0 (best[GH/s]:38.784) Wed Sep 11 12:27:28 2013
0: 880 23.408 25.198 1635 126 0 0 16 0 0 (1.463/chip) 86%
1: 440 13.844 15.833 967 51 1 0 9 0 0 (1.538/chip) 80%
Thanks
Hey Zurg - I am in the same boat with my EOL card. https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=288109.msg3110570#msg3110570I am going to try jumping with solder bridges to see if I can get past the blockage. Without a multi-meter (and knowledge of how to use it) there is no way to know if the blockage is at the last chip reported... or the next chip. I receive my soldering station today and will report my results tonight. Worst case, I will be taking my EOL board from 6 chips to 5 chips.... Best case I will take it to 15 (though more likely 14). |
|
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
|
September 11, 2013, 12:49:31 PM |
|
Hey guys, is there anything else I can do for this to go past the chip 25?
I got 2 H-Boards with EOL one.
23 AIfDSo 55 1.603 1.945 112 5 0 0 184 [1:6] 122 7 7 7 8 7 7 8 7 7 7 6 7 7 6 7 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
24 AIfDSo 55 1.747 1.934 122 9 1 0 183 [1:7] 51 6 8 7 9 7 8 7 8 8 8 7 8 7 8 8 8 2 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
25 aIfDSo 0 0.000 0.412 0 0 0 0 39 [1:8] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
speed:1320 noncerate[GH/s]:37.252 (1.490/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:41.031 good:2602 errors:177 spi-err:1 miso-err:0 jobs:376 cores:84% good:25 bad:0 off:0 (best[GH/s]:38.784) Wed Sep 11 12:27:28 2013
0: 880 23.408 25.198 1635 126 0 0 16 0 0 (1.463/chip) 86%
1: 440 13.844 15.833 967 51 1 0 9 0 0 (1.538/chip) 80%
Thanks
Hey Zurg - I am in the same boat with my EOL card. https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=288109.msg3110570#msg3110570I am going to try jumping with solder bridges to see if I can get past the blockage. Without a multi-meter (and knowledge of how to use it) there is no way to know if the blockage is at the last chip reported... or the next chip. I receive my soldering station today and will report my results tonight. Worst case, I will be taking my EOL board from 6 chips to 5 chips.... Best case I will take it to 15 (though more likely 14). Keep me in the loop. I am definitely interested in figuring this out.  |
|
|
|
|
cet
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
September 11, 2013, 01:45:01 PM |
|
I had a bunch of issues with mine when I first set them up due to fans. They caused the boards to vibrate slightly and that killed my hashrate.
I moved the fan a LOT further away where they just keep the air moving around the cards. Now there's no problem.
You might be seeing a similar issue depending on your setup.
I'm giving this a try, but I would think that if this were the problem then it would exist on lower count h-board rigs just as much as on bigger rigs. I suspect that something like the power failures we see in block eruptors is more likely the root cause. I'm currently running on a 500 w psu but I think the m-board is likely powered off of one rail. There are two pci jacks coming out of the psu but I think it's likely the same set of lines just inside. Could that make a difference? The power consumption is fine, well under the rated ability of the PSU (ball park of around 100watts at the wall). It looks like 5 h-cards is the tipping point. I can get 121 gh/s out of 5 but at that point I'm starting to see degradation in the hash rate on all boards where if I start the rig with fewer cards then I get greater performance 25gh/s on all of the installed boards. /cet |
|
|
|
|
|
lubah
|
|
September 11, 2013, 02:40:03 PM |
|
I had a bunch of issues with mine when I first set them up due to fans. They caused the boards to vibrate slightly and that killed my hashrate.
I moved the fan a LOT further away where they just keep the air moving around the cards. Now there's no problem.
You might be seeing a similar issue depending on your setup.
I'm giving this a try, but I would think that if this were the problem then it would exist on lower count h-board rigs just as much as on bigger rigs. I suspect that something like the power failures we see in block eruptors is more likely the root cause. I'm currently running on a 500 w psu but I think the m-board is likely powered off of one rail. There are two pci jacks coming out of the psu but I think it's likely the same set of lines just inside. Could that make a difference? The power consumption is fine, well under the rated ability of the PSU (ball park of around 100watts at the wall). It looks like 5 h-cards is the tipping point. I can get 121 gh/s out of 5 but at that point I'm starting to see degradation in the hash rate on all boards where if I start the rig with fewer cards then I get greater performance 25gh/s on all of the installed boards. /cet The old kid's plastic chop-stick trainers significantly cut down vibration caused my air flow for my rig   |
|
|
|
|
|
jddebug
|
|
September 11, 2013, 04:54:12 PM |
|
I keep seeing people refer to EOL boards. What exactly do you mean by that? I looked back and saw a reference to end of line but I'm not sure that I know what that means.
|
|
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
|
September 11, 2013, 04:56:17 PM |
|
I keep seeing people refer to EOL boards. What exactly do you mean by that? I looked back and saw a reference to end of line but I'm not sure that I know what that means.
EOL = End of Line board It was send to people who's 1st board in a 25k kit wasn't running at 25k So the board is essentially has limited hashing power.. 1: 23.078GH/s 2: 14.317GH/s my EOL board is only 14Gh/s |
|
|
|
|
|
pixl8tr
|
|
September 11, 2013, 04:56:22 PM |
|
I keep seeing people refer to EOL boards. What exactly do you mean by that? I looked back and saw a reference to end of line but I'm not sure that I know what that means.
Some H-boards have errors that keep them from communicating properly. Those boards have to be placed at the end of the communication chain or End Of Line. |
who | grep -i blonde | date; cd ~; unzip; touch; finger; bjobs; uptime; strip;. grab; mount; yes; umount; sleep; brun;
Donations: 18ByQvDUmaMKkQbYvUWmnPSu9BWeNxVMoc
|
|
|
|
jddebug
|
|
September 11, 2013, 05:47:39 PM |
|
I keep seeing people refer to EOL boards. What exactly do you mean by that? I looked back and saw a reference to end of line but I'm not sure that I know what that means.
EOL = End of Line board It was send to people who's 1st board in a 25k kit wasn't running at 25k So the board is essentially has limited hashing power.. 1: 23.078GH/s 2: 14.317GH/s my EOL board is only 14Gh/s Most of my cards seem to be about 20GH but a few are 30GH. Would be really great to get them all up to the 30GH somehow. |
|
|
|
|
Cablez
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
I owe my soul to the Bitcoin code...
|
|
September 11, 2013, 06:38:14 PM |
|
You can 'overclock' them with the pencil mod but you cannot do it on a full rig if I am not mistaken.
|
Tired of substandard power distribution in your ASIC setup??? Chris' Custom Cablez will get you sorted out right! No job too hard so PM me for a quote
Check my products or ask a question here: https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=74397.0
|
|
|
|
tom99
|
|
September 11, 2013, 08:14:20 PM |
|
You can 'overclock' them with the pencil mod but you cannot do it on a full rig if I am not mistaken.
You can do full rig but you need some thing to cool down boards or put heatsink on each board. |
|
|
|
|
Cablez
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
I owe my soul to the Bitcoin code...
|
|
September 11, 2013, 08:51:52 PM |
|
You can 'overclock' them with the pencil mod but you cannot do it on a full rig if I am not mistaken.
You can do full rig but you need some thing to cool down boards or put heatsink on each board. I thought that was too much power for the regulator to handle. Definitely agree about upping the cooling. |
Tired of substandard power distribution in your ASIC setup??? Chris' Custom Cablez will get you sorted out right! No job too hard so PM me for a quote
Check my products or ask a question here: https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=74397.0
|
|
|
Soros Shorts
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1618
Merit: 1012
|
|
September 11, 2013, 10:53:25 PM |
|
You can 'overclock' them with the pencil mod but you cannot do it on a full rig if I am not mistaken.
You can do full rig but you need some thing to cool down boards or put heatsink on each board. I thought that was too much power for the regulator to handle. Definitely agree about upping the cooling. I've done it on a full rig, albeit moderately to about 440 GH/s. The regulator and 30A fuse are on each individual H-card. |
|
|
|
|
|
Spotswood
|
|
September 11, 2013, 11:06:35 PM
Last edit: September 11, 2013, 11:53:46 PM by Spotswood |
|
I had a bunch of issues with mine when I first set them up due to fans. They caused the boards to vibrate slightly and that killed my hashrate.
I moved the fan a LOT further away where they just keep the air moving around the cards. Now there's no problem.
You might be seeing a similar issue depending on your setup.
Ha! I thought this could be the reason, vibration induced by the flow, so I removed my fans from Spotswood case. I'll try to have them reversed, so that they suck up air through the cards instead of pushing it, this should cause less vibrations. We'll see. spiccioli Or you could put a bit more downward pressure onto the top edges of the h-boards by "raising" the rig a millimeter or two, by putting washers underneath each spacer ( between the extrusion and the spacer). |
|
|
|
Swimmer63
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1593
Merit: 1004
|
|
September 11, 2013, 11:45:31 PM |
|
Finally had time to make some setup progress. Had a monitor that would not work with the pi. Changed out monitors. Followed the instructions to correct the gateway address to my gateway. I went back and double checked. After two trys it stuck.
But now when I go one of my PC's and type the 192.168.1.249 in I just get "This Page can't be displayed." Tried it on two computers and two different browsers. Any thoughts? I'm close!
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Redacted-
|
|
September 11, 2013, 11:47:23 PM |
|
Double check the "address" entry in that file again, and/or check your router for the ip address. If you successfully changed the gateway, it may have been assigned a different IP address. On the Pi, you should be able to enter the ifconfig command and see a display like this that shows its IP:
pi@bitfury ~ $ ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr b8:27:eb:9c:49:63
inet addr:192.168.2.7 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:263752 errors:0 dropped:1 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:397420 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:37925441 (36.1 MiB) TX bytes:52238648 (49.8 MiB)
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:30462510 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:30462510 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:4767221528 (4.4 GiB) TX bytes:4767221528 (4.4 GiB)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morblias
|
|
September 11, 2013, 11:55:51 PM |
|
I got my replacement M-board after first one was DOA, thanks Dave!
When I use pools that start with stratum+tcp:// it doesn't seem to work. I can connect fine to pools without that at the beginning, but with that it doesn't seem to start.
|
Tips / Donations accepted: 1Morb18DsDHNEv6TeQXBdba872ZSpiK9fY
|
|
|
|
