mRNA vaccines are not new, they have been under development for over 20 years. It's just that they don't work. Also the spike protein doesn't always stay in the muscle tissue, but can escape and float round the body, before settling in important organs. There is no research or information on the effect this will have, but it is certainly not beneficial.
I understand how they work, and they are a step closer to the use of the live virus. I just don't understand why they don't use the live virus to create natural immunity. Oh wait, there isn't any money in that.
you know less than you think you know. and not willing to learn the bits you dont know
to create a 'live virus' that is attenuated to not replicate as much. requires incubating it at low temperatures, over multiple generations until its attained a function that at normal body temperatures it cant function its replication effectively
this was the NIH/Wuhan study of 2016-2020 that conspiracy idiots thought was covid research. . yep they used 2002 sars from bats found 2008-2018 and tried to attenuate them down into being 'live virus that does not replicate'.. and results is. it was to long a production process and unable to be done to then mass produce a vaccine for the world.. yep its not a GAIN of function found in the study. it was actually a study on attenuating down the function..
EG its like
(send a man to the arctic to have kids, grandkids, great grandkids where they get used to having sex in the snow.. then you will find if you take that multi-generational descendant to the carribean. he will be too sunburned and sweaty and heat stroked and not wanna have sex.)
this is the method that usually takes a long time to produce. and does not always work
some say that a live virus has more then just the spike protein identifier and having more then just the spike identifier means more things for immune system to learn about a virus.
the problem is the more different things it tries to learn to attack. the less it can concentrate on any single battle plan. thus making the immune system too diluted with too many differing antibodies.
EG its like
instead of one army training camp trained to recognise al-queda by the black flag with white writing. jetcash's idea is a training camp with small groups of troops. one trained to attack anyone with a head scarf. another small set to attack anyone with sandals and another small troop group to attach anyone without caucasian skin
best action is all troops should go after the guys waving the al-queda flag
by identifying one aspect that really does affect the body. like its spike 'key' into a cells 'lock' to open a cell up for invasion. this can be used more effectively to identify the virus holding the key before it gets to a lock. or identify an intruder if it gets to a cells door with the key
by having antibodies (small little Y shape) trained for the spike. these can latch onto the spike(key) and block it from being able to fit the lock. thus no invasion into a cell. and then send a message to kill the thing they just blocked with the other immuno cells
but if you have a mix of antibodies lokking for different things. the amount of antibodies that wil latch onto the spike is decreased
more varied antibodies=less antibodies for specific function..
in short the simpleist solution is the quickest solution