Single Bet Slips or Multiple Game SL Slip

[Pandu Geddon]

The only problem with single betting is that stake amount, since you are betting on a low value odd would have to bet with a reasonable amount of money  otherwise you would not get anything substantial. The chances of winning multiple games are very low but I think they re safe compared to single bet slips. But if you keep on staking high amounts you might lose a lot in the long run

If I find a low Odds offer, I will choose to place a multiple bet. If the match has attractive Odds, such as a meeting between equally strong teams where the bookmaker usually offers Odds of more than 1.7, I might make a single bet. If you place a single bet on low Odds, of course, it requires a good amount to see satisfying results. As you said, in the long run, it might not be good, because there are other factors that could cause our small consecutive wins to collapse due to one big loss on low Odds.

[Wakate]

The thing is, people who bet on multiple games often choose events with lower odds, while betting on a single match means choosing higher odds. In this case, it's difficult to say where the risks are higher and where they're lower. I understand that the more teams, the lower the probability of winning because you're dependent on many matches, but a single bet doesn't guarantee a win, and betting on low odds is also an unjustified risk.

Betting on multiple games can be profitable than just taking a single bets. Most people that bet on multiple games like adding more games to their bets so they the potential win can be increased and become highly profitable. The only time you may bet on a single game is to increase your stake so that you can have high winning. A 2 odds bet can up with a $100 stake or more.

[DaNNy001]

If you are seeking for opinion about the one you will make your favorite, single bet should be your top choice, the risk of betting is there because the outcome are never known to your until the game comes to an end, but having multiple game on a slip and one game there didn't play as predicted, it will cause you to lose the bet even if all the other games were successful, so you can see the risk of betting on a multiple games in one slip is wide than single bet.

The problem with single games is that you would really need to be sure about the particular one you are going with, selecting a single game can be hectic because your stake is high and you will continue second guessing the options that you want to take...But it is actually the easiest to win because it is not like multiple games has a lot of games which makes it more risky and difficult to win

[MRY]

If you are seeking for opinion about the one you will make your favorite, single bet should be your top choice, the risk of betting is there because the outcome are never known to your until the game comes to an end, but having multiple game on a slip and one game there didn't play as predicted, it will cause you to lose the bet even if all the other games were successful, so you can see the risk of betting on a multiple games in one slip is wide than single bet.

The problem with single games is that you would really need to be sure about the particular one you are going with, selecting a single game can be hectic because your stake is high and you will continue second guessing the options that you want to take...But it is actually the easiest to win because it is not like multiple games has a lot of games which makes it more risky and difficult to win

It takes the least amount of confidence to concentrate on a particular match only, but mathematically speaking they have a high chances of winning as opposed to mixed bets. Continuous hesitation is only natural response to making a decision when all your capital is involved into one decision with no precautionary measures. The ease with which this system works literally gives clarity of opportunity which tends to be hidden in various betting schemes. This risk is rather a focus that is more easily handled than the multi variable forecasting in the field.

[livingfree]

The problem with single games is that you would really need to be sure about the particular one you are going with, selecting a single game can be hectic because your stake is high and you will continue second guessing the options that you want to take..

Even in single or multiple bets, you're not required to stake high for as long as it's in the minimum amount threshold you should be okay with that.

But it is actually the easiest to win because it is not like multiple games has a lot of games which makes it more risky and difficult to win

In multiple bets, that's the real deal there.

It's harder and riskier because it only requires you one bet to lose and all of your bets in that multiple bets you've made will also lose.

[Mayor of ogba]

Single bet option is good because it increases our chances of winning, but since it requires us to stake with a big amount of money before we can win big, I don't fancy single bet option because I don't bet with a big amount of money. I like multiple bet option because it gives me the opportunity to accumulate reasonable odds that I will bet with a small amount of money and have the opportunity for a possible big win.

[Wiwo]

Thank you all and sorry it took me longer to update and lock this thread after my experiment, this was an awesome experiment for me to discover both the good and ugly side of both betting approaches, as much as I enjoy single bets but have lower outcome unless you want to go big in your staking amount on the bets, that means only the whales can enjoy this betting pattern.

Multiple have higher risk of losing, but if you talk about odds accumulation and higher chances of big rewards then Multiple bet plays that role perfectly.

Always apply risk, management to both and rely more on lucks.

[Emeraldo]

It's just how some gamblers assume it about single bets over multiple bets but the reality of it is that non of these strategy makes the bet a guarantee to win because we still can have losing streaks with a single bet strategy while someone with a multiple bet just got lucky to hit a huge profit in one bet which a 3 times single bet profit can't be compared. I think there's nothing much to justify about the two except that the risk difference is in the stakes.

Every bet we do and either single bets or multiple bets, there is no guarantee in any of them. But it depends on the gambler's perspective which of which is a better choice. If it increases the chance of winning, a gambler should their best preference in any of the two. Many here says that they're totally okay doing single bets which can't be changed if that's the preference that have proven them to apply their better strategy and won't be problematic with each of those single bets they make to lose. We know how multiple bets can go bad with a single drawn of loss.

Definitely there's no guarantee for a win in any and it's just a matter of preference, however for a gambler to pick single bet over multiple bets they must be that gambler that has a high staking power because that's the only way to win something big when your bet plays, and you also be ready to lose big funds when your bet fails. Connecting the dots in the two I don't think any can be said to be the best choice.

There is no guarantee and everything lies in the hand of the gambler to know which one they really enjoyed whether a single bet is more profitable for them and easy to make money or multiple bets that contains like 2 or more matches.
You can easily make money from single bet on sport but the problem lies on the small odds and low amount you can win even when you use big amount of money. Majority of gamblers will like to prefer multiple bet because the accumulate can yield huge profits even though the risk might to be higher than single bet.

[lombok]

Single bet option is good because it increases our chances of winning, but since it requires us to stake with a big amount of money before we can win big, I don't fancy single bet option because I don't bet with a big amount of money. I like multiple bet option because it gives me the opportunity to accumulate reasonable odds that I will bet with a small amount of money and have the opportunity for a possible big win.

The various bets can be attractive as they will have good rewards with a small starting sum. You have to understand that the chances of winning an assortment of consecutive games is so minimal that you will lose your money within a minute. The thought should also be clear and this means we are not supposed to engage ourselves in all kinds of gambling since we are not sure of getting rich doing so. This is simply a case of gambling on odds that are fair which is a lethal error and may ruin our economic standing and the future of the whole family.

[SmartGold01]

There is a big difference when placing a bet on multiple bet and single bet, thus, I know where many people do losses is in parlay because they wouldn't be that satisfied with their odds whereas they will be wanting to Increase their odds to have better winning while gambling.
In other hands, place a single bet with minimal odds and you makes your analysis carefully then these chances is of greatly increased.

[Lida93]

Definitely there's no guarantee for a win in any and it's just a matter of preference, however for a gambler to pick single bet over multiple bets they must be that gambler that has a high staking power because that's the only way to win something big when your bet plays, and you also be ready to lose big funds when your bet fails. Connecting the dots in the two I don't think any can be said to be the best choice.

There is no guarantee and everything lies in the hand of the gambler to know which one they really enjoyed whether a single bet is more profitable for them and easy to make money or multiple bets that contains like 2 or more matches.
You can easily make money from single bet on sport but the problem lies on the small odds and low amount you can win even when you use big amount of money. Majority of gamblers will like to prefer multiple bet because the accumulate can yield huge profits even though the risk might to be higher than single bet.

It's actually left in the gamblers hand to know where his profits are majorly made and lean on that and not betting on single bet today and the next day he's making multiple bets. If I have the money for high risk I would bet on singles bets with how easily it is to be in profit, with regular profits you can make huge funds in a long run than accumulating games as it's done in multiple bet where you must have all the games play correctly before you win, and all the games ain't promised to play.

[Cryptmuster]

There is a big difference when placing a bet on multiple bet and single bet, thus, I know where many people do losses is in parlay because they wouldn't be that satisfied with their odds whereas they will be wanting to Increase their odds to have better winning while gambling.
In other hands, place a single bet with minimal odds and you makes your analysis carefully then these chances is of greatly increased.

That is correct in a single bet the chances of winning are much higher, But when we talk about parlays, there is also a huge difference in how many events you combine into one bet. If you take a parlay with two events, the chances of winning are still quite high, but if you try to include five or more events, you significantly reduce your chances of winning. Players who aim for a very high odds to get a big payout at once lose most of their bets precisely because they take this risk. But if a person chooses such a strategy, then perhaps it is justified for them.

[BABY SHOES]

That is correct in a single bet the chances of winning are much higher, But when we talk about parlays, there is also a huge difference in how many events you combine into one bet. If you take a parlay with two events, the chances of winning are still quite high, but if you try to include five or more events, you significantly reduce your chances of winning. Players who aim for a very high odds to get a big payout at once lose most of their bets precisely because they take this risk. But if a person chooses such a strategy, then perhaps it is justified for them.

Some time ago I did a 5 leg combo bet, it never won always failed because some other matches were guessed wrong while the 4 legs were correct, there were also 3 correct legs 2 lost legs, so in parlay betting more than 5 legs does reduce the chances of winning.

By trying parlay bets like this most wins are high and I can judge that two matches are still reliable rather than more than 5, it's too difficult.

[Antotena]

If you are seeking for opinion about the one you will make your favorite, single bet should be your top choice, the risk of betting is there because the outcome are never known to your until the game comes to an end, but having multiple game on a slip and one game there didn't play as predicted, it will cause you to lose the bet even if all the other games were successful, so you can see the risk of betting on a multiple games in one slip is wide than single bet.

The only problem with single betting is that stake amount, since you are betting on a low value odd would have to bet with a reasonable amount of money  otherwise you would not get anything substantial. The chances of winning multiple games are very low but I think they re safe compared to single bet slips. But if you keep on staking high amounts you might lose a lot in the long run

I don't like to bet on a single bet but I can combine single bet to get good odd that are worth the risk. Imagine betting on a 1.2 odd, you are getting 0.2x for risking 1x, that maths doesn't make any sense to me. I can combine two or three events with atleast 1.4 odd on average to give 2 or more odd in total, those are the kind of bet I like to put my money, I don't also like when bet are very long with plenty of bets. It makes me sick and want to give up.

The thing about bet is that you can bet on a single bet and lose everything and bet on multiple bet and make good money out of it. The multiple bet work for many people but I'm not sure why it doesn't work for me. If I combine 10 events and put money, one or two games will spoil everything but with 3 event, I can make good money out of bet, in fact my loss rate is low when I bet on small group of events than when I bet in plenty of multiple bets.

[Fredomago]

That is correct in a single bet the chances of winning are much higher, But when we talk about parlays, there is also a huge difference in how many events you combine into one bet. If you take a parlay with two events, the chances of winning are still quite high, but if you try to include five or more events, you significantly reduce your chances of winning. Players who aim for a very high odds to get a big payout at once lose most of their bets precisely because they take this risk. But if a person chooses such a strategy, then perhaps it is justified for them.

Some time ago I did a 5 leg combo bet, it never won always failed because some other matches were guessed wrong while the 4 legs were correct, there were also 3 correct legs 2 lost legs, so in parlay betting more than 5 legs does reduce the chances of winning.

By trying parlay bets like this most wins are high and I can judge that two matches are still reliable rather than more than 5, it's too difficult.

I agree, in most cases two games for parlay do have a better chance of winning though there are gamblers who use low odds multiple parlay to increase the amount of their possible profits, though the assurance that upset would not going to happen is next to none, but then again, every individual gamblers do have their own perspectives and have their own style of doing their research and placing their bets, either for single or parlay selections.

[Dr.Osh]

Double bets do have a greater risk, but if you win the bet, the results are very satisfying. It could be that 10 losing matches will return the capital, or even more winnings can be obtained. If you bet on a single, the risk is small but the results are also small. If you have enough capital, it is better to play parlay bets, but if you have small capital, it is better to choose a single bet.

[KTChampions]

Thank you all and sorry it took me longer to update and lock this thread after my experiment, this was an awesome experiment for me to discover both the good and ugly side of both betting approaches, as much as I enjoy single bets but have lower outcome unless you want to go big in your staking amount on the bets, that means only the whales can enjoy this betting pattern.

Multiple have higher risk of losing, but if you talk about odds accumulation and higher chances of big rewards then Multiple bet plays that role perfectly.

Always apply risk, management to both and rely more on lucks.

Dude, are you kidding me? Was this whole experiment all in your head? Then why did you even open this thread? You literally posted one single bet and nothing else. Now you say that the experiment is over and write some kind of water in the form of conclusions. Could you explain what that was all about? Maybe I misunderstood something. Is there any actual data from your experiment somewhere? I'm used to people posting real bets in threads like this, not just opening a thread and then closing it.

[Wiwo]

Dude, are you kidding me? Was this whole experiment all in your head? Then why did you even open this thread? You literally posted one single bet and nothing else. Now you say that the experiment is over and write some kind of water in the form of conclusions. Could you explain what that was all about? Maybe I misunderstood something. Is there any actual data from your experiment somewhere? I'm used to people posting real bets in threads like this, not just opening a thread and then closing it.

Oh man sorry I thought I have locked this thread after my last reply I never know I did not hit the lock key, I just got notifications now that you mentioned me, anyways, the experiment involves my and other forum members who cares to mentioned their own personal experience in that games direction and which is better.