Single Bet Slips or Multiple Game SL Slip

[Cyber_warrior]

How are you testing single games selection vs multiple games selection if you are only betting on single game? Didn't you need to do both to compare later the risks and which one was more profitable for you?

I also expect to see the selection of both single games and multiple games selection to make your analysis more accurate because it will be difficult to test for both when you only engage in just one.

This thread is dedicated for a week analysis of sport betting,  using my current on-going sigle game selection of 2.0 odds bets, this is a test of the risks between single games selections vs multiple game's  selections.

Their risks and advantages,.

Let me know what your views is on two betting patterns.

Well there are risks and advantages in both, let's say in general gambling has risk so I wouldn't say any is safer than the other it just depends on luck in my opinion.

Well, I don’t really like betting on single games because of the odds of the selections that I see with high win probability and I will have to stake high to win something reasonable. I prefer multiple selections because of the combination of games which make it easy for me to stake high and increase chances of winning high. In my opinion 2.0 odds not really worth gambling on for me.

[Somto9Light]

[Edited out]

Single bets are lower risk and allow more time for analysis. The downside is that you have to risk more money to get a better return, as most odds are below 1.50. Parlays are more time-consuming because they require analyzing multiple matches, but conversely, the money used can be smaller with attractive returns. Each bettor has their own preferences, and I personally mostly bet on parlays, with a strategy of only including 2/4 matches to minimize risk.

You're right single bet requires heavy stake to enable you get a better return, but if I'm to go with this method I'm not going to stake heavily because betting on a single game does not guarantee wining it is that same experience we have while betting on multiple games that you will have while betting on a single game but there's a little different between them because once a game played you won't be waiting for the remaining games, so I would rather go for single bet no matter how small the stake is. Though this strategy of only including 2/4 matches is also a nice one but I think it is almost the same with multiple bet.

[Z-tight]

Single bet or parlays, does not matter much in terms of winning. Because neither one guarantees you are going to win. Some people like to stake high on single bets, thinking it is safer, but even when they select this 'safe' game, sometimes they lose and when they lose, they lose big and it makes all previous winnings useless.

I prefer parlays, i like to accumulate big odds and i do not stake too much on a single betslip, just a few $. That is how i go about gambling, parlays in mutiple betslips. I like to take my chances, so that if i win, i win good, even with a moderate wager. Works well for me.

[Cointxz]

You're right single bet requires heavy stake to enable you get a better return, but if I'm to go with this method I'm not going to stake heavily because betting on a single game does not guarantee wining it is that same experience we have while betting on multiple games that you will have while betting on a single game but there's a little different between them because once a game played you won't be waiting for the remaining games, so I would rather go for single bet no matter how small the stake is. Though this strategy of only including 2/4 matches is also a nice one but I think it is almost the same with multiple bet.

There are single bets that gives higher return but the risk you are taking is too much since you are betting on a single outcome that has a very low percentage of winning.

Many preferred parlay since they can combined multiple high winning percentage picks until they sum up a good odds amount equivalent to a high risk single bets.

It more on your preference on you want to play with high risk bets.

[Makus]

There are no guarantees of winning just because single bets are safer but it is the best option if you are looking at minimising losses in the long run. multiple bet slips on the other hand are difficult to win, the more games you add on your bet slip it reduces the chances of winning. The only problem with single bets is staking power, if you don't stake high enough you might not really benefit anything substantial from it. staking high is meant for those that can keep up with it not someone that belongs to the average or middle class

[Dunamisx]

This is more of a challenge for one to know their abilities in gambling and playing sports bets, I've seen a similar test like this as well but in trading from this same community, playing in this manner helps understand oneself more, which I like it being presented in such format that we take up a challenge with in knowing more of our individual abilities.

[Stablexcoin]

If you need any kind of public opinion between single bets and multiple bets, I think single bets are a lot kore better and cost efficient when it comes to high stakes. It makes room for higher chances of a win by narrowing the possibility of losses with fewer games and more predictable outcomes.

Compared to multiple best where the higher the number of games the lesser the winning possibility and the more risk of losing your wager. It's quite a risky investment as without that the outcomes are not really assured, there is only a hope for possibilities without assurance so it's normal to feel some kind of insecure for multiple bets.

[KTChampions]

This thread is dedicated for a week analysis of sport betting,  using my current on-going sigle game selection of 2.0 odds bets, this is a test of the risks between single games selections vs multiple game's  selections.

Their risks and advantages,.

Let me know what your views is on two betting patterns.
Image of game at the time of making this thread.

It's very simple: with a single bet, you pay the bookmaker's margin once, while with a multiple bet, you pay the margin as many times as there are outcomes in your bet. Therefore, if a single bet has odds of 2, and a multiple bet of, say, 5 outcomes also has odds of 2, the single bet is much more profitable.
Overall, I didn't quite understand your verification methodology, but I'm always interested in such threads, so I'll be keeping an eye on the it.

[nelson4lov]

How are you testing single games selection vs multiple games selection if you are only betting on single game? Didn't you need to do both to compare later the risks and which one was more profitable for you?

I don't think it matters much because literally everyone on this board would know how a multi bet slip works or what it looks like.

It's very simple: with a single bet, you pay the bookmaker's margin once, while with a multiple bet, you pay the margin as many times as there are outcomes in your bet. Therefore, if a single bet has odds of 2, and a multiple bet of, say, 5 outcomes also has odds of 2, the single bet is much more profitable.
Overall, I didn't quite understand your verification methodology, but I'm always interested in such threads, so I'll be keeping an eye on the it.

I've played countless number of sports bet and I never knew there was something called margin and that there was differences between single and multi bet slip. I've made both types of bets and didn't notice any difference before. Sometimes I put two events in a single slip. Then I go on to play both as singles and odds all seem to tally up every time. But it's worth checking out so I'd do so to ensure I know the value I'm getting when I do single or multi bets.

[terrific]

If you want to play alone and go YOLO = parlay.
If you want to have fun and bet casually = singles.
There are a lot of ways to enjoy gambling by doing that and others are finding it hard for themselves to choose what they think should be done.
Regardless of the option, you have the money to lose for it and so, don't mind testing two of it when you are not used to one or the other.

[khiholangkang]

This is more of a challenge for one to know their abilities in gambling and playing sports bets, I've seen a similar test like this as well but in trading from this same community, playing in this manner helps understand oneself more, which I like it being presented in such format that we take up a challenge with in knowing more of our individual abilities.

This might be dedicated to his own betting, trying to familiarize himself with his betting. However, I think he could have done it himself in a personal betting log on his phone or PC. But it seems he wants to share and find advice on what to do, but this will only fuel speculation that doesn't align with the purpose of this thread. I hope he gets what he needs.

Personally, I think the OP should test how proficient he is at single bets first, rather than treating them as optional and testing both, unless he has a keen analytical mind and can determine a better win.

[Slow death]

Single bets have always been the best option for those who want to win more than they lose. The most important point people need to decide in single bets is what minimum odds they will set. For example, if someone sets minimum odds of @1.40, then they will only have to look for good games with odds of @1.40 or higher. Based on this, the person can create other strategies in single bets. In multi-team bets, however, it's more complicated; the greater the number of teams in the parlay, the greater the chances of losing the entire bet.

[Cookdata]

You're right single bet requires heavy stake to enable you get a better return, but if I'm to go with this method I'm not going to stake heavily because betting on a single game does not guarantee wining it is that same experience we have while betting on multiple games that you will have while betting on a single game but there's a little different between them because once a game played you won't be waiting for the remaining games, so I would rather go for single bet no matter how small the stake is. Though this strategy of only including 2/4 matches is also a nice one but I think it is almost the same with multiple bet.

You don't need heavy stake to win a better return. If you can make 2 odds and play 5 times with the same amount of money you are going to have to the samereturn of you play 10 odds in one sitting. The chance of making money from the two depends how skill you are with bet. Some bettors don't know how to arrange plenty of games in a row, it's best they focus only on single game than trying what they can't win, while some gamblers are very good in betting multiple games.

No matter how confident you are with gambling, don't bet huge funds on games you are not ready to lose. You can bet on any game you want but don't bet an amount on two odd that you are going to regret later. There is nothing like assurance on any game, the same way multiple odds can lose is the same way even a single game can put you on a tight situation.

[mikel_012]

You might think that betting on a single match is easier to win, but this isn't always true, as it depends on the team you choose. You'll only have an advantage on paper when you bet on strong teams in the league; otherwise, if the team you choose is weak or going through a bad patch, it doesn't really give you an advantage over a combined bet where you choose, so to speak, the most logical selection.

Just as updated already,  there have been recorded loses in my single bets slips lately since this experiment started, this shows that asides from the lower risks of losing much often with multiple bets, single bet still have all the other aspects that comes aloong with multiple bet selected games and the noticeable differences i have noticed is this.

Single bets lower your risks of losing often to at least 20% but with a low percentage payout in winning since you be betting on single odd.

But multiple bets increases your rewards if you win you get up to 50% increase because you combine the odds of various game's and so your reward get accumulated.
Risk defines everything.

I still don't understand this. If you make a $10 bet and win $20, then bet $20 in another game and win $40, this is the same thing if you just make a $10 bet in a multiple game slip with both games from the start where if both games win you also get the $40. The difference is that with a multi slip you don't have to go and bet on the second game so you save the time of going to the sportsbook and betting the $20 you had won. But if you make a single bet you can give up on the second one or the odds can change and you get a better ticket.

What kind of experiment you want to make if it's all the same thing and it all comes to this?

[passwordnow]

Single bets have always been the best option for those who want to win more than they lose. The most important point people need to decide in single bets is what minimum odds they will set. For example, if someone sets minimum odds of @1.40, then they will only have to look for good games with odds of @1.40 or higher. Based on this, the person can create other strategies in single bets. In multi-team bets, however, it's more complicated; the greater the number of teams in the parlay, the greater the chances of losing the entire bet.

That is my choice at most times. Even if I get to bet multiple games, I'll still choose to go with all of them in a single bet for each of them. That's because if I do bad with my one bet, the others will not be affected by it. And that's why if someone is going to bet to secure each of what they do, it's best to simply stay with the single bets rather than going with multiple bets. That is my preference and so I do always single bets.

[KTChampions]

It's very simple: with a single bet, you pay the bookmaker's margin once, while with a multiple bet, you pay the margin as many times as there are outcomes in your bet. Therefore, if a single bet has odds of 2, and a multiple bet of, say, 5 outcomes also has odds of 2, the single bet is much more profitable.
Overall, I didn't quite understand your verification methodology, but I'm always interested in such threads, so I'll be keeping an eye on the it.

I've played countless number of sports bet and I never knew there was something called margin and that there was differences between single and multi bet slip. I've made both types of bets and didn't notice any difference before. Sometimes I put two events in a single slip. Then I go on to play both as singles and odds all seem to tally up every time. But it's worth checking out so I'd do so to ensure I know the value I'm getting when I do single or multi bets.

Have you ever noticed that when an event has a 50% chance of happening, bookmakers offer odds of 1.9 for both outcomes (whether it will happen or not)? If you bet on both outcomes, you'll lose 5%—that's the bookmaker's margin (profit).
When you make a multiple bet, it's the same as if you first bet on outcome 1, then if you win, you bet (the entire winning amount) on outcome 2, and so on. As you can see, if you remember that the bookmaker takes their margin, then with a multiple bet, you'll pay it several times.

[Fredomago]

You might think that betting on a single match is easier to win, but this isn't always true, as it depends on the team you choose. You'll only have an advantage on paper when you bet on strong teams in the league; otherwise, if the team you choose is weak or going through a bad patch, it doesn't really give you an advantage over a combined bet where you choose, so to speak, the most logical selection.

No type is easier. With both the signal and the parlay, it's really not easy to choose a straight-winning team; no matter how strong they appear, they could still lose to a smaller team. That's what makes it a game of skill. No matter the type of data we have in our hand, we can only predict, but the real result lies in how those people play that very day, like Man United always seems to surprise us with their outcome.

Yeah even it's a heavy favorite upset can happen and it will ruin your bet, what we can do is to wait and see for the outcome, similar to what you said even how good is your research and how great in form of papers and actual performance but when bad game happen or any affecting injuries take place you still can't avoid losing your bet.

The very reason why bookies able to provide the types of odd offers as they knew that there's always a chance of getting upset or those handicaps will never be covered.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

I hope that at the end of this your experiment, you show us the results of the single bets you took and how it turned out. Let to me alone, I don't gamble on just one pattern like single bet, I mix it up and bet on both single and multiple game slip. I have said some time ago, I do not joke with multiple games betting because when I stake on it and some of the games on the ticket are successful, it normally gives me the opportunity to take cash out which I love taking advantage of, before the game will cut, I have cashed out.

[Wakate]

Single bet or parlays, does not matter much in terms of winning. Because neither one guarantees you are going to win. Some people like to stake high on single bets, thinking it is safer, but even when they select this 'safe' game, sometimes they lose and when they lose, they lose big and it makes all previous winnings useless.

I prefer parlays, i like to accumulate big odds and i do not stake too much on a single betslip, just a few $. That is how i go about gambling, parlays in mutiple betslips. I like to take my chances, so that if i win, i win good, even with a moderate wager. Works well for me.

You can only win less amount when you bet on a single match and there is no way your potential winnings can be increased when people gamble on a single match alone. We tend to make make money whenever we bet on multiple bets because that is where the overall winning potential can be multiplied with bonus too to make it a huge turnout.

[freedomgo]

So, OP, are you saying that a single-bet strategy is more profitable than placing multiple bets? I’m asking this because I haven’t seen any comparison, or maybe I just missed it. For me, it’s hard to justify that a single-bet strategy is more profitable, since there’s no guarantee of winning anyway. The same applies to a multiple-bet strategy.

But if you feel that one approach works better for you, then go ahead and use it. But don't make any statement that it will be best because it may not be favorable to others. Never expect the same outcome as you did.