Single Bet Slips or Multiple Game SL Slip

[Perfectbaby]

In terms of risk measurement we can say that single bet is less risk free or do I have to say that their risk is not higher than expected. But for those who are betting on multiple leg games or parley bet are in one way endangering themselves because it seems to be a higher volatility game where they losing chances are that extremely higher than expected, and again when you are going for a lower odds it also help to reduce the fear of losing everything quickly because the game that large in number.

[Ivystar5]

Lol, is it something you need to test out? it's simple to know, single bet holds lesser risk and is probably going to play out than multiple bets or selections, before you even stake on the game you already have more conviction that it's going to play out as expected but for multiple selections you will only add games which have no clue of but because they are looking convincing in terms of odds set out for it than reality. So it's already in our cognitive or unconscious mind that single bet has more potential to win than multiple selections.

[MRY]

In terms of risk measurement we can say that single bet is less risk free or do I have to say that their risk is not higher than expected. But for those who are betting on multiple leg games or parley bet are in one way endangering themselves because it seems to be a higher volatility game where they losing chances are that extremely higher than expected, and again when you are going for a lower odds it also help to reduce the fear of losing everything quickly because the game that large in number.

Single bets in risk assessment give a more stable ground whose outcome is probable to compute more immediately than the compound risk of a parlay bet. It is also worth highlighting that the multi-leg bets are riskier products as the probabilities are multiplied hence the volatility is very high. It is also worth to mention that decreasing the size of our bet and selection of less risky odds eventually lowers our exposure to capital, which is a less mighty strategy. The effect of this volatility should be put into serious consideration.

[Alphakilo]

Lol, is it something you need to test out? it's simple to know, single bet holds lesser risk and is probably going to play out than multiple bets or selections, before you even stake on the game you already have more conviction that it's going to play out as expected but for multiple selections you will only add games which have no clue of but because they are looking convincing in terms of odds set out for it than reality. So it's already in our cognitive or unconscious mind that single bet has more potential to win than multiple selections.

Am yet to try out the single bet strategy, but I believe it is more efficient than multiple bets because of the lower risk involved and it puts a bettors mind at ease as compared to multiple bets which would always do well to keep you in the edge of your situation because some are playing out while others are not.
The bet amount however for single bets would have to be more so as to get a potential win that is substantial enough as returns.

[BitMaxz]

Am yet to try out the single bet strategy, but I believe it is more efficient than multiple bets because of the lower risk involved and it puts a bettors mind at ease as compared to multiple bets which would always do well to keep you in the edge of your situation because some are playing out while others are not.
The bet amount however for single bets would have to be more so as to get a potential win that is substantial enough as returns.

Isn't it that if you bet on multiple games, your slip will turn into a parlay?
A single bet usually had low odds, so if you had multiple bets, then that's a parlay with potentially high odds, meaning you stake small but you have the potential to win big compared to a single bet.

It seems multiple bets are better than single bets, but if you don't have more knowledge to analyze other games, you are safer with a single bet.

[Felicity_Tide]

This thread is dedicated for a weak analysis of sport betting,  using my current on-going sigle game selection of 2.0 odds bets, this is a test of the risks between single games selections vs multiple game's  selections.

Their risks and advantages,.

Let me know what your views is on two betting patterns.
Image of game at the time of making this thread.

I don't think i've ever tried playing a combo bet before. I have always preferred making a single bet even if I have to play different games at the same time. And besides, I don't know how these casino's combo betting works, because from what I've heard about normal gambling websites, if you have a multiple bet on a single ticket, and any of the game doesn't go as planned, the entire ticket is going to get fried.
_{(I haven't confirmed this)}. I don't know if something similar happens when on regular casino sites.

And as for my preference which is the single betting pattern, I haven't really thought about the risk difference from the multi/combo betting pattern. I guess I'm used to the single betting pattern, so I've to stick with it.

[Charles-Tim]

It seems multiple bets are better than single bets, but if you don't have more knowledge to analyze other games, you are safer with a single bet.

According to what I have experienced in betting on football matches, accumulation/parlay or single bets, none among them is better at all as long as the betting companies are for making profit. The problem is that going for single matches that you have high chance of winning have low odds, turning it to higher odds with parlay makes the chance of winning to be significantly low. None is better in my own opinion. We should just take betting as fun and nothing else.

[Samlucky O]

I am not seeing any comparison of multiple and single on this ticket, maybe you should have bet on multiple parlay or 2odd ×10 on a ticket and also 2odd single in 10 places and see which one is more profitable except what you mean is that you are trying 2odd each day for 1week and then the next week you continue with multiple stake and compear the results. But for me that would be a long time comparison. It could have been better you summarize it in 1 or 2 days.

[lombok]

It seems multiple bets are better than single bets, but if you don't have more knowledge to analyze other games, you are safer with a single bet.

According to what I have experienced in betting on football matches, accumulation/parlay or single bets, none among them is better at all as long as the betting companies are for making profit. The problem is that going for single matches that you have high chance of winning have low odds, turning it to higher odds with parlay makes the chance of winning to be significantly low. None is better in my own opinion. We should just take betting as fun and nothing else.

The thing is that betting systems are constructed in such way that they provide the house with a mathematical advantage, and acquiring regular gains becomes almost unattainable. With large profits the chance of winning is reduced to a hundred, whereas, with single bet, only slight returns are possible, not worth the risk.

The only rational way of ensuring mental and financial security is to treat this activity as another form of entertainment. Such a rational thinking shields us against bigger losses since we know that the design of the game includes losing.

[maydna]

It is about how you manage the risk. If you aware that the risk of losing money will be bigger and if you accept, you will not have a problem with the loss.

But it is better to minimize the chance of loss by only placing a single bet so you don't have to monitor each bet. But if you are sure of the prediction that you can win, you can place multiple bets especially if your fav team has a bigger chance to win.

I can't take big risks in gambling so I choose a single bet using small bet or minimum amount to bet.

[Gozie51]

Their risks and advantages,.

I will prefer to bet on a single game rather than cluster of games that will reduce chances of winning all. If you bet just one game, you have the bigger opportunity to win that slip because all you need is to win just the game.

The reason bettors bet with multiple games is to Increase their potential winning because odds that joine together increase the amount you will be paid if all the games are successful. To tell you that it is more risky, when you keep increasing the numbers of games, it also keep increasing in potential. If you compare a straight multi bet with 20 games in total and compare same number of multi bets of same games and odd but with cutting option, you will see that the amount in the slip with cutting option will reduce drastically. This simply signifies that the risk in multiple bet is higher than risking few games.

[promise444c5]

Both have their risks, but a single game will always turn out better, no matter what you try to experiment with… The thing is, if you plan on selecting all games in a single bet and one of them eventually goes wrong, it ruins everything but with singles, you only lose that one particular game and can still win the others…
The only risk is that people tend to stake more money on singles because the odds may not give a huge return vibe.

[Yablee0]

This thread is dedicated for a weak analysis of sport betting,  using my current on-going sigle game selection of 2.0 odds bets, this is a test of the risks between single games selections vs multiple game's  selections.

Their risks and advantages,.

Let me know what your views is on two betting patterns.
Image of game at the time of making this thread.

You may be thinking any these (short & long slips) is better than the other but that's not true it just depends on the one that works for you at the point being played. However, for me I don't have the patience waiting for multiple games because their are more likely chances of losing than winning, moreover short slips has always been my pattern of game and it has been working for me over the years though it's not really sure that I must win but it  keeps my head stress free than when waiting for multiple games.

[bitzizzix]

When it comes to risk, single bets are generally considered better because they offer lower risk and more consistent long-term profits. However, this all depends on how well you do your research, because anything can happen in football, and sometimes the unexpected does happen. However, if you consistently bet on favorites or big teams against smaller teams with low or even very low odds, there will always be a chance of winning, but the winnings will be smaller.
Parlay bets, or multi-team bets, offer much larger payouts with much higher risks and are also more difficult to win. However, if you consistently place the same bet amount and when your parlay bets are successful, the resulting winnings can offset some of your previous losses and even remain profitable.

I do both, and my parlay bets always involve three or four teams with low odds and sometimes one team with higher odds. And when they work, the results are truly satisfying. Both have their advantages and disadvantages, and as long as you are very careful and don't rush, and do your research very well and thoroughly, there will be good results after bad results.

[Alpha Marine]

You win more bets with single games compared to multi-game bets. But with single games, you have to stake higher, so that means more risk. Also, it's not always you will have the luxury of staking high. Also, A single game of 2 odds means high risk, even though it has more chances of playing than a multiple game of about 10 odds. The more likely outcomes don't have that many odds, so you have to take a little bit more risk.
Let's say you want a single game of Barcelona to score 2.5 goals in today's game. I haven't checked the odds, but I'm sure it's not up to 2 odds, so you have to go for a little higher, like 3.5 goals, which may be up to 2 odds, and that means more risk.

Since people stake high with single games, they tend to go for the most likely outcomes, and this makes the potential winning not become much, and that is why a lot of people go for multiple games.

[BABY SHOES]

It seems multiple bets are better than single bets, but if you don't have more knowledge to analyze other games, you are safer with a single bet.

According to what I have experienced in betting on football matches, accumulation/parlay or single bets, none among them is better at all as long as the betting companies are for making profit. The problem is that going for single matches that you have high chance of winning have low odds, turning it to higher odds with parlay makes the chance of winning to be significantly low. None is better in my own opinion. We should just take betting as fun and nothing else.

Perhaps of all the assumptions which is better for me obviously single bet has a high win with low odds compared to parlay.

Is single bet better for the long term? No because I feel that single bets are still losing.Lol

Parlay betting is much more attractive because we want to find high odds with high risk too, so because we risk a little money then parlay betting is what we often do... losing is not a problem because of a little money, if we win we are happy to be 5x 10x winning from parlay betting.

[fullfitlarry]

Both have their risks, but a single game will always turn out better, no matter what you try to experiment with… The thing is, if you plan on selecting all games in a single bet and one of them eventually goes wrong, it ruins everything but with singles, you only lose that one particular game and can still win the others…
The only risk is that people tend to stake more money on singles because the odds may not give a huge return vibe.

It might be better to look for odds that are higher in a single bet. Let's say in a NBA game, there are teams that are given 1.8x as odds for ML. So that is huge already for a bettor to bet and not look for more higher odds.

But for others who go on multiple bet or parlay, I think it's the obvious that they're looking for like 5.x and so huge risk huge rewards. But sometimes I watch those influencer and if they lost just one game and everything is rekt and so the emotional effect on them is big.

[Apocollapse]

The truth is, you will high likely experience the same, even though betting on single match looks safer and should able to be profitable in the long run, but the reward is small which can't cover your losses.

Since you're used to bet on multiple bets, I think you will not enjoy to bet on single match because the happiness when you win in single bet is smaller than when you win multiple bets. The dopamine you get might not enough and probably you will stake high in order to make it exciting.

[Agbamoni]

This thread is dedicated for a weak analysis of sport betting,  using my current on-going sigle game selection of 2.0 odds bets, this is a test of the risks between single games selections vs multiple game's  selections.

Did you mean week or weak? I'm trying to understand what you meant to say there.

If by week, how many days do you want to test run the strategy of 2 single slips? Uh,m also, what is the problem is from your selections, because you almost lost the first game. Will you accept games from people here? Let me know

[joeperry]

It actually depends on the person's skill whether it will be profitable for them to have a single bet slips or multiple game. Personally I do prefer multiple game slips due to higher reward but of course, the risk is higher too. Before, I only do single bet slips however most of the odds were low and it actually pretty boring for me until I decided to have multiple bets and sometimes I use a bet builder for a single match. Honestly, I lose more than I win since the risk is higher however if you managed to win at least 1-2 games a day, it's guaranteed that you will ended up having a profit but of course most of the time I'm losing so if you ever wanted to try a multi game slips, I suggest to only place a minimum bet as it can easily wreck your bankroll.