Single Bet Slips or Multiple Game SL Slip

[ralle14]

In my experience, multiple games or parlays always felt like a hit or miss. Even if you end up with low odds, it can still disappoint more than you expect. There's always that looming threat where the last leg spoils everything, but at the same time, it can work once in a while if you don't overdo it.

Single bets are always the way to go because the results can be consistent, and don't force yourself to go after bigger payouts unless the amount you're staking is house money. Also, with single bets, you can always backtrack your plans after your pending bet's settled, unlike with parlays, it's a one and done deal, and you're forced to see things through.

[Cityhunter34]

Normally, there's no way we can compare them multiple bets have a bigger chance of losing than winnings, so it's a normal thing to stick with singles. I can't remember the last time I did multiple bets, single bet are my favorite.Yesterday, I bet on Brentford vs Leeds United as a draw and luckily enough they were ended 1-1 full time. Single bets work better for me, and draws have always been my favorite option.

Single bets are my favorites also but there are sometimes that I will go for parlay which has it is advantages. One of the good advantages is that you can use lower amount of money to bet it. It is truly riskier but instead to go for $25 on a single bet, some people will prefer to use $2.5 which is 10 times lower than $25 to go for parlay.

It's a normal thing because sometimes you wouldn't have the money for single bet so you can decide to go for parlay since no one has any right to decide for you.

Apart from that I don't see any advantage because is still the same thing since luck has the final say, as long as you are gambling responsibly there's nothing wrong with parlay because single bet require a huge amount before you can get what you want.

[SOKO-DEKE]

I don’t really like single bets,I prefer multiple bets because I don’t stake a high amount. The reason is that I gamble for fun, not to make money from gambling. For that reason, I don’t see much risk because I always bet with a very small amount of money that I can afford to lose.so even though I want to win, I want to experience a surprise winwinning a reasonable amount from a very small stake. However, if someone is betting to make money, I would advise that person to stick to single bets, as the chances of winning are higher.

Multiple bets always come with high risk. Some people gamble many times when betting on multiple games, and it’s very possible that they may not even win one bet. A single game comes with less risk.

[Pi-network314159]

This thread is dedicated for a week analysis of sport betting,  using my current on-going sigle game selection of 2.0 odds bets, this is a test of the risks between single games selections vs multiple game's  selections.

Their risks and advantages,.

If you want to know the risk and advantage involve in single and multiple game, then it will definitely take more than 1 week. You can't generalized or conclude how the outcome of the both will be without a long term analysis with more prove. I guess you have to doore analysis and spend more quality time to achieve that which you desire, because this pattern will not work from my own understanding. Because of it works out this week, your next week may be different from the previous and so on, that's why I said it is difficult to predict.

[boyptc]

Going with multiple slips should make you that much more concern that there's no pulling back. So, make sure that the odds you have combined with all of the bets you've made in any combo you'd do are worth it.

Because if you still ended up with a small one, you've just increased the risk yet the odds might not be worth it.

Having multiple bets can be appealing and preferred but it's not that easy to get most of it.

[Wiwo]

This thread is dedicated for a week analysis of sport betting,  using my current on-going sigle game selection of 2.0 odds bets, this is a test of the risks between single games selections vs multiple game's  selections.

Their risks and advantages,.

If you want to know the risk and advantage involve in single and multiple game, then it will definitely take more than 1 week. You can't generalized or conclude how the outcome of the both will be without a long term analysis with more prove. I guess you have to doore analysis and spend more quality time to achieve that which you desire, because this pattern will not work from my own understanding. Because of it works out this week, your next week may be different from the previous and so on, that's why I said it is difficult to predict.

I am beginning to agree and think in that direction,  the results i have gotten so far is on the negative  even the last night Manchester United game i gave them straight winning, still you know how unstable Manchester United is their played draw wirh a 4:4 goals,  that mess my bankroll up waiting to make more deposits 

Let see how it goes from Wednesday till weekend.

[mcdouglasx]

You might think that betting on a single match is easier to win, but this isn't always true, as it depends on the team you choose. You'll only have an advantage on paper when you bet on strong teams in the league; otherwise, if the team you choose is weak or going through a bad patch, it doesn't really give you an advantage over a combined bet where you choose, so to speak, the most logical selection.

[Obim34]

You might think that betting on a single match is easier to win, but this isn't always true, as it depends on the team you choose. You'll only have an advantage on paper when you bet on strong teams in the league; otherwise, if the team you choose is weak or going through a bad patch, it doesn't really give you an advantage over a combined bet where you choose, so to speak, the most logical selection.

Of course it's better, than multiple bets on a single slip. From my experience, i have tried multiple games and i don't get a better result than when i go single or max of 2-3 games on parlay.

The bookies are smart, you might have won all the games in your combo, with one to go and instead of being given a considerable amount of cash profits, they will slash the prize leaving you with no choice than considering to take on the risk of allowing the games play completely, last games are usually the toughest, several times i have lost my profits all because of the last game that didn't play accordingly.

[justinlamode]

This thread is dedicated for a week analysis of sport betting,  using my current on-going sigle game selection of 2.0 odds bets, this is a test of the risks between single games selections vs multiple game's  selections.

Their risks and advantages,.

Let me know what your views is on two betting patterns.
Image of game at the time of making this thread.

Single bets definitely have lower risk than multiple games but that depends on a lot of things like the game in question and what you bet on the game. If you direct winnings in the multiple game and also bet direct winning in the single bet, the single bet have lower risk. But if the multiple bet is played 3ways, then the risk will be greatly reduced thereby making it a better option to use than single bet. I can get 2 odds using three matches I played 3ways instead of a single bet of 2 odd.

[rachael9385]

This thread is dedicated for a week analysis of sport betting,  using my current on-going sigle game selection of 2.0 odds bets, this is a test of the risks between single games selections vs multiple game's  selections.

Their risks and advantages,.

Let me know what your views is on two betting patterns.
Image of game at the time of making this thread.

First of all nothing is safe in betting and secondly i was expecting you to make a comparison of both,  meaning that you are supposed bet on a single game and also a multiple game as well. bettng on single games especially on 2 odds or slightly above it increases your chances of winning.A multiple bets slip on the other hand is more risky, it is possible to win but the chances are very low

[Wiwo]

You might think that betting on a single match is easier to win, but this isn't always true, as it depends on the team you choose. You'll only have an advantage on paper when you bet on strong teams in the league; otherwise, if the team you choose is weak or going through a bad patch, it doesn't really give you an advantage over a combined bet where you choose, so to speak, the most logical selection.

Just as updated already,  there have been recorded loses in my single bets slips lately since this experiment started, this shows that asides from the lower risks of losing much often with multiple bets, single bet still have all the other aspects that comes aloong with multiple bet selected games and the noticeable differences i have noticed is this.

Single bets lower your risks of losing often to at least 20% but with a low percentage payout in winning since you be betting on single odd.

But multiple bets increases your rewards if you win you get up to 50% increase because you combine the odds of various game's and so your reward get accumulated.
Risk defines everything.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

This thread is dedicated for a week analysis of sport betting,  using my current on-going sigle game selection of 2.0 odds bets, this is a test of the risks between single games selections vs multiple game's  selections.

Their risks and advantages,.

Let me know what your views is on two betting patterns.
Image of game at the time of making this thread.

The truth of the fact about Sport betting is that both single and multiple, which is also called "Combo" all has it's advantage and disadvantages. And depending on the level of risk as gambler is willing to take, will determine if he is to gamble on either a single game, or try a multiple games, while still having the mindset of getting lucky. But however, one thing I have come to notice about betting on multiple games is the fact whereby it helps you to target huge odds while winning bigger amount with the use of a small amount, of which is not possible with placing a bet on single game, as it limits you to small odd and small risk. But I personally have always been a fan of both.

[Somto9Light]

For me I prefer single bet than betting on multiple games and I think single bets work more faster than multiple bet take for instance you see that manchester city is almost a sure odd for the week instead of accumulating odds or making multiple selection you just stick to that very one that seems sure because you may likely add virus when you decide to add more games I know that even though we bet single game we will definitely loss but I think betting on single game is more better than betting multiple games.

[hyudien]

For me I prefer single bet than betting on multiple games and I think single bets work more faster than multiple bet take for instance you see that manchester city is almost a sure odd for the week instead of accumulating odds or making multiple selection you just stick to that very one that seems sure because you may likely add virus when you decide to add more games I know that even though we bet single game we will definitely loss but I think betting on single game is more better than betting multiple games.

Single bets are lower risk and allow more time for analysis. The downside is that you have to risk more money to get a better return, as most odds are below 1.50. Parlays are more time-consuming because they require analyzing multiple matches, but conversely, the money used can be smaller with attractive returns. Each bettor has their own preferences, and I personally mostly bet on parlays, with a strategy of only including 2/4 matches to minimize risk.

[DaNNy001]

Did you bet on multiple games separately, if yes maybe you should have included that as well..one reason why I don't like single bets even though it is considered to be the safest is because you would have to think about staking high which might be very damaging when you end up losing, this is why it's preferable to bet on multiple games with a low stake even if the chances of winning are very low

[Yaunfitda]

For me I prefer single bet than betting on multiple games and I think single bets work more faster than multiple bet take for instance you see that manchester city is almost a sure odd for the week instead of accumulating odds or making multiple selection you just stick to that very one that seems sure because you may likely add virus when you decide to add more games I know that even though we bet single game we will definitely loss but I think betting on single game is more better than betting multiple games.

Single bets are lower risk and allow more time for analysis. The downside is that you have to risk more money to get a better return, as most odds are below 1.50. Parlays are more time-consuming because they require analyzing multiple matches, but conversely, the money used can be smaller with attractive returns. Each bettor has their own preferences, and I personally mostly bet on parlays, with a strategy of only including 2/4 matches to minimize risk.

I wouldn't say that it's time consuming, yeah you have to analyzed but if you have been in that games for so long, then maybe you can pick your choice very quick base on just which teams are playing against each other. Below 1.50 might be a good pick too, but you need to have that kind of mental discipline that let's say you win that game, then stake it again on the next. As compare to parlay which has the higher odds, but the risk is too big that every game is needed. Otherwise as what we have from a poster here who bets on parlay, just one game and everything is ruined.

[Beparanf]

For me I prefer single bet than betting on multiple games and I think single bets work more faster than multiple bet take for instance you see that manchester city is almost a sure odd for the week instead of accumulating odds or making multiple selection you just stick to that very one that seems sure because you may likely add virus when you decide to add more games I know that even though we bet single game we will definitely loss but I think betting on single game is more better than betting multiple games.

Single bets are lower risk and allow more time for analysis. The downside is that you have to risk more money to get a better return, as most odds are below 1.50. Parlays are more time-consuming because they require analyzing multiple matches, but conversely, the money used can be smaller with attractive returns. Each bettor has their own preferences, and I personally mostly bet on parlays, with a strategy of only including 2/4 matches to minimize risk.

Parlays are time consuming compared to single bets if the bettor is only placing 1 bet on single but this is not always the case since most user open multiple single bet per day which they just converted some into parlays.

Time of analysis is not always the big consideration between choosing the bet type since you have the schedule of the match in advance like weeks before the match.

The dilemma relies on the amount of odds if we compared the same match on single bet and parlay.

[Orpichukwu]

You might think that betting on a single match is easier to win, but this isn't always true, as it depends on the team you choose. You'll only have an advantage on paper when you bet on strong teams in the league; otherwise, if the team you choose is weak or going through a bad patch, it doesn't really give you an advantage over a combined bet where you choose, so to speak, the most logical selection.

No type is easier. With both the signal and the parlay, it's really not easy to choose a straight-winning team; no matter how strong they appear, they could still lose to a smaller team. That's what makes it a game of skill. No matter the type of data we have in our hand, we can only predict, but the real result lies in how those people play that very day, like Man United always seems to surprise us with their outcome.

[batang_bitcoin]

First of all nothing is safe in betting and secondly i was expecting you to make a comparison of both,  meaning that you are supposed bet on a single game and also a multiple game as well. bettng on single games especially on 2 odds or slightly above it increases your chances of winning.A multiple bets slip on the other hand is more risky, it is possible to win but the chances are very low

It is okay, there is no need to compare both of them in actuality because we all know that the single bets have significant lower odds than the multiple bets. They're both okay and whoever prefers to have the higher risk to get more profits, they'd choose the multiples. So, we have to adjust which we think suits our risk appetite and if we're just the usual gambler and down for the lower odds, multiples is what we should choose.

[len01]

Just as updated already,  there have been recorded loses in my single bets slips lately since this experiment started, this shows that asides from the lower risks of losing much often with multiple bets, single bet still have all the other aspects that comes aloong with multiple bet selected games and the noticeable differences i have noticed is this.

Single bets lower your risks of losing often to at least 20% but with a low percentage payout in winning since you be betting on single odd.

But multiple bets increases your rewards if you win you get up to 50% increase because you combine the odds of various game's and so your reward get accumulated.
Risk defines everything.

First, I would like to ask whether you have a specific odds target for conducting this experiment. For example, do you only place bets with odds around @2?

If not, in my opinion, single bets tend to be more comfortable. Although the payouts are lower, the reduced level of risk offers a slightly better chance of securing a win. If you are still losing frequently, I believe a deeper analysis is necessary.

As a suggestion, you might consider trying single bets and placing them during live matches, or betting in the second half to obtain better opportunities.