NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs

[NEMergizer]

Denying old stockholders who forgotten to redeem in time is actually against the core principles of NEM's equal opportunity. These guys joined us in the very early days based on such principle. We have to do the best we can to support them. I do not see this happening up until this moment. Please think it over it is worth turning the wheels to maintain NEM's principles.

The unfortunate part is that NEM has very few doers and lots of talkers. With the limited resources, this ain't happening. Plus, rewinding will also throw everything into disequilibrium because it gives precedent to every other claim.

Equal opportunity has been seeded (like I said earlier, the 80/20 rule. You cannot satisfy them all). Today, it is open equal opportunity. There is no more "spoon fed" equal opportunity. The barrier gate has been lifted and the horses are running in the field. Each man for its own to make the most out of XEM.

Shrillers are going to continue to shrill. Today they are a handful of them in a sea of a few thousand supporters of NEM. 3 years down the road, they will continue to shrill but their voices will be drowned in 10s of thousands of supporters.

NEM as a project is a project without emotions. It will just march forward. People who work on it will continue to build it and that is the single biggest task today. The very premise of it being equal opportunity is now an open field. Those who are still involved in NEM are caretakers of NEM with a responsibility to move forward. It is not about administrating things of past but moving forward. Some administrators of the past have moved on and are not around anymore. People come and people go as they serve NEM.

You can shrill and call it a scam, but it just moves on. Nobody will bother about it.

I note there are less than a handful who are shrilling for their NEMstakes. Many of the rest of the nemsters don't feel about it and don't give a damn. With the passage of time, many more will become indifferent about it. Hence, my meaning of no emotions.

If you lose your wallet in the streets, don't blame anyone else but yourself. Likewise here. It comes with personal responsibility. Call NEM anything, but it still comes with personal responsibility. At the end of the day, that's what counts.

Thanks for the time you've spent in writing your feedback. You have convinced me 100%.

[NEMergizer]

Denying old stockholders who forgotten to redeem in time is actually against the core principles of NEM's equal opportunity. These guys joined us in the very early days based on such principle. We have to do the best we can to support them. I do not see this happening up until this moment. Please think it over it is worth turning the wheels to maintain NEM's principles.

Initial stakeholders who didn't redeem within deadline and extended deadline, as a result,  took away the opportunity of other people's joining in NEM.
At least, they didn't contribute to NEM's wide distribution.

Deadline is deadline.
It's not a word game but a rule.
And deadline was extended. That's enough.
Cruel to say, admitting his own fault and giving up coins is gentleman's beauty.
Sorry.

Alright, you have convinced me. Thanks.

[jabo38]

Is there a stat like page that tells me what can be my harvesting rate once I have my coins vested?

Bump ...

Your PoI is basically your rate assuming that all accounts are harvesting.  In reality all aren't so you will harvest more than your stated PoI.  But since we can't know at any given time how many people or even if all will be competing for any one block the PoI will act as the lowest rate. 

You can see your PoI score in your wallet. 

If your PoI was something like 1.00 ‱ as a base line you would get 1 out of 10,000 blocks or basically 1 block every week.  But none of the funds are being harvested on (by design) and lots of people aren't harvesting on their share, so in reality an account 1.00 ‱ can reliably make at least a couple of blocks a day. 

(I'm not sure if the above is 100% correct.  It is just the way I understand it.  Please somebody else correct me if I am wrong.)

[McDoxy1]

Once If NEM gets onto Azure, adoption should proliferate exponentially as it will be one of the best platforms in Azure.

FTFY

Depends on if Azure knows about NEM and think it's a valuable addition (who knows what their criterias are). As far as I know there haven't been any indicitations of Azure adding NEM.

[patmast3r]

Once If NEM gets onto Azure, adoption should proliferate exponentially as it will be one of the best platforms in Azure.

FTFY

Depends on if Azure knows about NEM and think it's a valuable addition and can do things other platforms can't. As far as I know there haven't been any indicitations of Azure adding NEM.

Yeah...see people don't actually know how azure and the listing on azure works. All these "partnerships" we've seen lately ? Not as big a deal as people think. But people tend to not do their homework around here so I guess I shouldn't be suprised it created so much buzz for those platforms.
Any blockchain solution - and I do mean any - can get listed on azure. It's merely a matter of setting it up correctly so that microsoft approves. I'd be quite suprised if they outright rejected NEM but we'll see.

[McDoxy1]

Once If NEM gets onto Azure, adoption should proliferate exponentially as it will be one of the best platforms in Azure.

FTFY

Depends on if Azure knows about NEM and think it's a valuable addition and can do things other platforms can't. As far as I know there haven't been any indicitations of Azure adding NEM.

Yeah...see people don't actually know how azure and the listing on azure works. All these "partnerships" we've seen lately ? Not as big a deal as people think. But people tend to not do their homework around here so I guess I shouldn't be suprised it created so much buzz for those platforms.
Any blockchain solution - and I do mean any - can get listed on azure. It's merely a matter of setting it up correctly so that microsoft approves. I'd be quite suprised if they outright rejected NEM but we'll see.

That's good to know  Didn't know that either.
So did NEM already apply?

[cryptonit]

i want to share following news
the bitcoin 2.0 platform that after multiple months analyzing
DMD Diamond did choose to utilize will be NEM

DMD Diamond will move in 2016/2017 towards a dual blockchain solution

where DMD chain as we see it now will be the storage and stake solution

and a NEM blockchain based asset bit.diamonds:DMD will be utilized in all the business usecases we try to create for the DMD Diamond ecosystem

mainly around series of products  and services around our target business area: unique crypto assets

please excuse if we cant go in details now

just following facts:

the amount of existing DMD will be always determined by the DMD native blockchain

there is no DMD coin production in the NEM chain

DMD will be moveable between both chains in both directions

Is this confirmed or just a rumor? Source plz?

^

how more official u want it than me posting it 

[Nxtblg]

i want to share following news
the bitcoin 2.0 platform that after multiple months analyzing
DMD Diamond did choose to utilize will be NEM

DMD Diamond will move in 2016/2017 towards a dual blockchain solution

where DMD chain as we see it now will be the storage and stake solution

and a NEM blockchain based asset bit.diamonds:DMD will be utilized in all the business usecases we try to create for the DMD Diamond ecosystem

mainly around series of products  and services around our target business area: unique crypto assets

please excuse if we cant go in details now

just following facts:

the amount of existing DMD will be always determined by the DMD native blockchain

there is no DMD coin production in the NEM chain

DMD will be moveable between both chains in both directions

Is this confirmed or just a rumor? Source plz?

^^ shilling his altcoins

Really? Sounded to me like he was 'shilling'' NEM. Whenever I read that another alt is moving towards interoperability with Bitshares, the news comes from or is echoed by someone with the last name of "Larimer" . That's a pretty good sign that another alt moving to a "bitcoin 2.0 platform" means good news for the platform.IN this case, NEM.

[makoto1337]

Once NEM gets onto Azure, adoption should proliferate exponentially as it will be one of the best platforms in Azure.

THE best platform on Azure

[tyz]

Are there negotiations with Microsoft to bring NEM on the Azure platform soon?

Once NEM gets onto Azure, adoption should proliferate exponentially as it will be one of the best platforms in Azure.

THE best platform on Azure

[zoata87]

Are there negotiations with Microsoft to bring NEM on the Azure platform soon?

Once NEM gets onto Azure, adoption should proliferate exponentially as it will be one of the best platforms in Azure.

THE best platform on Azure

ninja release

[Mineotaur]

I bought and stashed a few XEM last year, can't remember exactly when. I have name.adb and name.wlt, as well as the password I used when creating the wallet. I do not have the private key. When I run the client, it sees the wallet, but when I type the password it tells me:

"Oops!

ERROR 123

NIS: ADDRESS BOOK COULD NOT BE READ"

Is all lost?

Your wallet seems to be fine.  Your address book not so.  

You can try a few things.  

1) You just needs to change the name of file.  If it was more than one word and he used the back up wallet feature, it saved in the wrong format.  Renaming the file will fix it.  (but I forget the trick.  I think it involves put a "_" in between the words)  (Please make a back up copy to play with when doing things like this)


2) He can wait until the next Lightwallet comes out and import into it without the address book as long as it was a wallet with only one account.  

3) If you know the password.  Remove the two wallets from the NCC folder.  Create a new wallet with the same name and same password.  Deleted that wallet but leave the address book file in the NCC folder.  Now paste in the original and good wallet.  If it was just a problem with the address book file, then you will be able to log into your wallet just having lost all your address book contents only.  

If any of these work, please also back up the private key.

Here is a tutorial about locating wallet files.  http://blog.nem.io/how-to-find-export-or-delete-your-wallet-and-address-book-file/

Thankyou, but none of these worked. I don't have a lot of spare time right now to dedicate to this, but I'll try again in the future and hope that perhaps that lightwallet works.
I'm not the only person with this prob btw, I've received a PM from someone with the same issue.
Fingers crossed for the future, don't want to lose those 45,000 coins!
Will report back when I have more free time. Thanks.

Edit: I do not think my files are corrupted. I had them backed up on 4 usb drives. None work, all were taken from the original, working files created by the wallet; not copies of potentially corrupted files. Also, 2nd April 2015 is the date on which these files were created. I'd have been using the most recent wallet on that date to create these files. Just including this info incase it's of any obvious consequence or might give any clues as to why the latest wallet doesn't seem to like my files. Thanks.

[nemestomen]

I was one of the original stakeholders. The rules back then allowed us to claim two stakes, which I did. Later I was called a sockpuppet, which I wasn't, and I lost both of the stakes. I didn't think much about it at then, though of course it pissed me off that I didn't get any coins although I didn't do anything that was against the rules. I know that I could have contacted the devs and sorted it out back then, but for some reason I didn't bother. Maybe because I actually believed it to be a scam then, and kind of rightfully so since the stakes had been taken from me without reason, and that the coin wouldn't last for long. Well I was wrong about the second part. I'm sure that I'm not the only one from whom the stakes were taken away based on wrong claims. This coin has a very ugly past, and I find it hard to believe that it has gained so much popularity lately.

[greentea]

Mijin mentioned in Taiwanese article:

Discusses how companies are moving from bitcoin to blockchain tech.
http://www.ithome.com.tw/news/104558

[tyz]

Could you tell a little bit more how it was mentioned. In a positive or neutral way?

I tried to translate it via Google Translate but the text coming out is unreadable for me.

Mijin mentioned in Taiwanese article:

Discusses how companies are moving from bitcoin to blockchain tech.
http://www.ithome.com.tw/news/104558

[ThePatient]

Hmm, been out of crypto for a while. I remember having had an original stake, I think I might have sold it though.

[yshin365new]

 
It's not late.
NEM is still undervalued.
Buy XEM Now! 

[dimonarka]

It's not late.
NEM is still undervalued.
Buy XEM Now! 

But that is big bullshit:
For transfer 1 XEM - we pay 9 XEM fee or 900%
For transfer 2 XEM - we pay 8 XEM fee or 400%
For transfer 3 XEM - we pay 7 XEM fee or 233%
For transfer 4 XEM - we pay 6 XEM fee or 150%
For transfer 5 XEM - we pay 5 XEM fee or 100%
For transfer 6 XEM - we pay 4 XEM fee or 67%
For transfer 7 XEM - we pay 3 XEM fee or 43%
For transfer 8 XEM - we pay 2 XEM fee or 25%
.......
and only when the amount of the transfer is 200 XEM we pay tolerable 1%

In this case, the cost of a coin can not be more than 0.01$, or 0.000024 BTC for today.

[Tehfiend]

It's not late.
NEM is still undervalued.
Buy XEM Now! 

But that is big bullshit:
For transfer 1 XEM - we pay 9 XEM fee or 900%
For transfer 2 XEM - we pay 8 XEM fee or 400%
For transfer 3 XEM - we pay 7 XEM fee or 233%
For transfer 4 XEM - we pay 6 XEM fee or 150%
For transfer 5 XEM - we pay 5 XEM fee or 100%
For transfer 6 XEM - we pay 4 XEM fee or 67%
For transfer 7 XEM - we pay 3 XEM fee or 43%
For transfer 8 XEM - we pay 2 XEM fee or 25%
.......
and only when the amount of the transfer is 200 XEM we pay tolerable 1%

In this case, the cost of a coin can not be more than 0.01$, or 0.000024 BTC for today.

That would still be an 800% increase

[dimonarka]

It's not late.
NEM is still undervalued.
Buy XEM Now!  

But that is big bullshit:
For transfer 1 XEM - we pay 9 XEM fee or 900%
For transfer 2 XEM - we pay 8 XEM fee or 400%
For transfer 3 XEM - we pay 7 XEM fee or 233%
For transfer 4 XEM - we pay 6 XEM fee or 150%
For transfer 5 XEM - we pay 5 XEM fee or 100%
For transfer 6 XEM - we pay 4 XEM fee or 67%
For transfer 7 XEM - we pay 3 XEM fee or 43%
For transfer 8 XEM - we pay 2 XEM fee or 25%
.......
and only when the amount of the transfer is 200 XEM we pay tolerable 1%

In this case, the cost of a coin can not be more than 0.01$, or 0.000024 BTC for today.

That would still be an 800% increase

It's true... But what will happen after that?? Capitalization of 90 million $ is not enough to become a coin of the world.