[ANN] [XMG] MAGI | CPU mining | mPoW | mPoS | [MagiPay]

[jawitech]

This one is a beast  

I agree. With the improved miners from wolf0 and Joe I doubled my hashrate but yours gets the most out of my crappy old AMD without the problem with the 2 others that my windows gets problems. Spexx, you're a f*cking genius 

That deserves some donations!

Spexx:
9EQ342ssXSxmpDURs6XNxAajB14DQzJDNX

[Spexx]

EDIT: And yet I get 56.5Khash/s using only 5 of my 8 threads...  This should mean I could get about 80 running full speed, no?

No, unfortunately, not quite. With 5/8 running there is very little competition for CPU time and you will see a high hashrate per thread. As you load up towards the maximum 8/8 then the hashrate per thread will reduce a bit, although running 8/8 will give you maximum total hashrate.

[hefty]

EDIT: And yet I get 56.5Khash/s using only 5 of my 8 threads...   This should mean I could get about 80 running full speed, no?

No, unfortunately, not quite. With 5/8 running there is very little competition for CPU time and you will see a high hashrate per thread. As you load up towards the maximum 8/8 then the hashrate per thread will reduce a bit, although running 8/8 will give you maximum total hashrate.

your first miner is still the fastest one on haswells , but only if you load 8 instances for 8 threads this one is fastest one if you load only one instance for 8 threads , but it gives me 2 more khash on phenom than your first one, i need to test on others  

[Mergesort]

I got a i5 2500 @ ~4,5ghz. right now i am getting ~55khs/s, is that normal or is there a way to improve my rate?

[Spexx]

your first miner is still the fastest one on haswells , but only if you load 8 instances for 8 threads this one is fastest one if you load only one instance for 8 threads , but it gives me 2 more khash on phenom than your first one, i need to test on others  

Thanks for the feedback, which is always appreciated.

Yeah that first 64 bit one built with Cygwin64 was not bad at all, except for the multiple threads issue and all the required dll files. This latest version matches the performance without the issues. I will be playing around with AVX and AVX2 support to see what I can do to improve matters there.

I just received some very generous donations. Thank you! I love this coin

[The Frisian]

the block amount is already gone down,
because of the new miners, i suppose

[Spexx]

I got a i5 2500 @ ~4,5ghz. right now i am getting ~55khs/s, is that normal or is there a way to improve my rate?

Is that overclocked?

I would expect you to be able to get a bit more out of it than 55 Kh/s. What operating system do you have and what minerd are you using?

[hefty]

I got a i5 2500 @ ~4,5ghz. right now i am getting ~55khs/s, is that normal or is there a way to improve my rate?

Is that overclocked?

I would expect you to be able to get a bit more out of it than 55 Kh/s. What operating system do you have and what minerd are you using?

thats 13,75 per core thats faster than any amd per core at that clock i5 4690k is hashing 15 per core at 4.6 ghz
i think thats about that but i cant be sure i dont have that cpu, i think that hyperthreaded intels are best with these miners although they have same number of physical cores they give 35/40% better hash.

[NewtonsMthd]

Any way to check via the command line?  Didn't see anything in the header files.

USE: getinfo, and locate a line "expected time ...", notice the expected time is only an estimate.

There is no "expected time..." line in the getinfo output...

[Mergesort]

I got a i5 2500 @ ~4,5ghz. right now i am getting ~55khs/s, is that normal or is there a way to improve my rate?

Is that overclocked?

I would expect you to be able to get a bit more out of it than 55 Kh/s. What operating system do you have and what minerd are you using?

yes it's overclocked, iam on widows 8.1 and iam using your latest 64 bit miner. Would -e cpu_efficiency improve anything

[Spexx]

Any way to check via the command line?  Didn't see anything in the header files.

USE: getinfo, and locate a line "expected time ...", notice the expected time is only an estimate.

There is no "expected time..." line in the getinfo output...

I think Joe meant to say use getmininginfo

[Zywiec]

Magi on Bitcoin event 2015 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
 

LOL Quite impressive! Another proof that this project have proffesional hard working team and a bright future!!
Keep the good job guys!! I'm with you!  

Well done!!!

Welcome new official promo movie of MAGI? I would say YES

[Spexx]

I got a i5 2500 @ ~4,5ghz. right now i am getting ~55khs/s, is that normal or is there a way to improve my rate?

Is that overclocked?

I would expect you to be able to get a bit more out of it than 55 Kh/s. What operating system do you have and what minerd are you using?

yes it's overclocked, iam on widows 8.1 and iam using your latest 64 bit miner. Would -e cpu_efficiency improve anything

No. The -e option is default 100 percent and can only be set to something less. I don't think that the version of source code that I used includes this option anyway. I have an external application that creates the same effect - the XMG Miner Speed Controller :-

https://www.dropbox.com/s/wbtmlktiy32b3xw/XMGMinerSpeed.exe

This is a self-extracting zip file which will unzip to C:\XMGminer\MinerSpeed by default. When unzipped, run the Setup.bat file which creates a startup script and a Desktop icon for you.

EDIT: That overclocking looks extreme. Are you sure that the CPU is not "throttling" due to over-temperature? The miner pushes your CPU to the limit.

2nd EDIT: You might also try running multiple instances of minerd.exe with a single thread each, as opposed to a single instance of minerd.exe with multiple threads. There is a measurable difference.

[Spexx]

Nice lump of cheap XMG on Poloniex right now. 5300 seems a very fair price.

[ulfie]

I will take some of that.

[Spexx]

I will take some of that.

Had a bite myself. No BTC left to buy any more

[ihascryptos]

XMG speed controller is great!  tried it on my old dual core E6600 machine.  set it to 85% speed and it keeps the temps down. My 1st core likes to overheat.

Great program.

I got a i5 2500 @ ~4,5ghz. right now i am getting ~55khs/s, is that normal or is there a way to improve my rate?

Is that overclocked?

I would expect you to be able to get a bit more out of it than 55 Kh/s. What operating system do you have and what minerd are you using?

yes it's overclocked, iam on widows 8.1 and iam using your latest 64 bit miner. Would -e cpu_efficiency improve anything

No. The -e option is default 100 percent and can only be set to something less. I don't think that the version of source code that I used includes this option anyway. I have an external application that creates the same effect - the XMG Miner Speed Controller :-

https://www.dropbox.com/s/wbtmlktiy32b3xw/XMGMinerSpeed.exe

This is a self-extracting zip file which will unzip to C:\XMGminer\MinerSpeed by default. When unzipped, run the Setup.bat file which creates a startup script and a Desktop icon for you.

EDIT: That overclocking looks extreme. Are you sure that the CPU is not "throttling" due to over-temperature? The miner pushes your CPU to the limit.

2nd EDIT: You might also try running multiple instances of minerd.exe with a single thread each, as opposed to a single instance of minerd.exe with multiple threads. There is a measurable difference.

[joelao95]

Any way to check via the command line?  Didn't see anything in the header files.

USE: getinfo, and locate a line "expected time ...", notice the expected time is only an estimate.

There is no "expected time..." line in the getinfo output...

I think Joe meant to say use getmininginfo

Thanks Spexx, should be getmininginfo --> "Expected PoS ..."

[111magic]

CoinMagi has been added to Comkort exchange!
Three markets are live BTC, LTC, DOGE.

Best buy prices:
0.00006220 BTC per 1 XMG - BTC market
0.00775080 LTC per 1 XMG - LTC market
103.36666683 DOGE per 1 XMG - DOGE market

Happy & Profitable Trading!

Reminder Magi (XMG) also on Comkort!

[Mergesort]

I got a i5 2500 @ ~4,5ghz. right now i am getting ~55khs/s, is that normal or is there a way to improve my rate?

Is that overclocked?

I would expect you to be able to get a bit more out of it than 55 Kh/s. What operating system do you have and what minerd are you using?

yes it's overclocked, iam on widows 8.1 and iam using your latest 64 bit miner. Would -e cpu_efficiency improve anything

No. The -e option is default 100 percent and can only be set to something less. I don't think that the version of source code that I used includes this option anyway. I have an external application that creates the same effect - the XMG Miner Speed Controller :-



This is a self-extracting zip file which will unzip to C:\XMGminer\MinerSpeed by default. When unzipped, run the Setup.bat file which creates a startup script and a Desktop icon for you.

EDIT: That overclocking looks extreme. Are you sure that the CPU is not "throttling" due to over-temperature? The miner pushes your CPU to the limit.

2nd EDIT: You might also try running multiple instances of minerd.exe with a single thread each, as opposed to a single instance of minerd.exe with multiple threads. There is a measurable difference.

How do i use one miner for each core, temps are around 60c°(with fans on slow it starts getting hot, but i got enough fans to cool it down) with fans on high thats not much.

Edit: Running the miner with all 4 cores gives me 65-70 khs/s right now. Could the drop be affected by a gpu miner for another coin?
Edit2: speed changed to like ~55khs/s without gpu running anything, so i guess it's no the gpus fault.
Edit3: How to use your miner speed controler? I unziped in ran setup.bat and opened the desktop link, thats it? My miner that was still running doped a view khs/s and is now below 50 khs/s
Edit4: I guess i found out why the hashrate was droping, i started my bitcoin wallet(wich is not up to date and is updating for days now) and that caused the drop, because the wallet used over 30% CPU speed. Closing the wallet gives me again 65 khs/s. the miner now uses around 97-98% cpu
Edit5: The Gpu miner has a low impact of 0-0,1% CPU use, minerd gets around 65-68khs/s is this still low?