[ANN] [XMG] MAGI | CPU mining | mPoW | mPoS | [MagiPay]

[feldenthorne]

The problem you are getting with the file naming is an odd one. When you open a command window and type
date /t
what do you get back? I suspect it gives you the day as well as the date, in fact I am sure of it. That is the cause of the problem. Do you know anything about that? I do not get the problem on vanilla Windows 32 or 64 bit Ultimate editions, nor indeed XP Pro. It might be something to do with the Windows date/time format - very likely actually - dang! More research .... mutter, mutter, mutter ....

It returned

Code:

Wed 04/15/2015

Hopefully that helps a bit. (It looks like it grabbed the proper date and time before, but screwed up with parsing it.)

[111magic]

Guy`s thx for those xmg`s

Even in minecraft we are mining XMG  

Thank you for the great picture!!

Community remember to vote here https://www.cryptsy.com/coinvotes
You can use free votes but also cryptsypoint to vote for Magi.
I have a good feeling about Cryptsy but i received a little advice to get more votes there!

Just bought some votes at Cryptsy for xmg did you allready vote on Cryptsy?

Tip:
If you use 1 cryptsypoint you can give 5 votes!

[111magic]

Question: i notice whitepuma.net is not longer active. Is there a new one were i can tip people with Twitter??

[opus.224]

For those who missed it; an easy way to lay your hands on XMG 250 or more :

http://www.coinmagipuzzle.org/

1st prize: XMG 1,000
2nd prize: XMG 500
3rd to 10th prizes: XMG 250

1st and 2nd Time are probably hard to beat, but plenty opportunities to puzzle your way into the Top 10 and go for XMG 250 !

Hehehe, the 1st is me


XMG's value at https://bittrex.com/ is 11450 too, its nice, but the block value drop under 1 now, lol. I hope some big miners will reduce the hash this time  

  45 seconds

Practise, practise ...  

Shhhhh no hope... i tried it alot but false, its hopeless... you took 500XMG from me forever lol

45 secs, and 128 moves. That's almost 3 moves per second, which is not regular possible.

Hacks

Hmmm... that would be a pity.
The goal of http://www.coinmagipuzzle.org/ is to have the Coin Magi community play the game and share their results with friends, and invite friends through Facebook,
so more new people would get to know Coin Magi. It would be nice if new people could win some XMG and start using the coin.
Now it seems our community itself is playing like madmen to get those prizes themselves.
If they really hacked and cheated on top of that, that would be sad.

No hacks, no cheats...
You need a good strategy to solve puzzle faster.
Here's one of the few strategies you can use to solve puzzle:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLNkDkHlQjE

Although I made several mistakes, I made it under 60 seconds.
I beleive its possible to solve it in 30-35 seconds!
Enjoy practising. 
 

[z0n0]

Here are my 4 "main" computers (all multiplex benchmark):

Code:

System CPU name  : Intel(R) Core(TM) i3 CPU       M 350  @ 2.27GHz 
System CPU type  : 1 Physical CPU(s), 2 Core(s) per CPU, 4 Thread(s) 
CPU clock speed  : 2260.9 MHz 
Benchmark result : 18.43 Kh/s 
Hashrate per core: 4.60 Kh/s 
CPU speed factor : 8.15 hashes/Mcycle 
Core speed factor: 2.03 hashes/Mcycle/core

Code:

System CPU name  : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad  CPU   Q8200  @ 2.33GHz 
System CPU type  : 1 Physical CPU(s), 4 Core(s) per CPU, 4 Thread(s) 
CPU clock speed  : 2333.3 MHz 
Benchmark result : 33.67 Kh/s 
Hashrate per core: 8.41 Kh/s 
CPU speed factor : 14.43 hashes/Mcycle 
Core speed factor: 3.60 hashes/Mcycle/core 

Code:

System CPU name  : Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-4330 CPU @ 3.50GHz 
System CPU type  : 1 Physical CPU(s), 2 Core(s) per CPU, 4 Thread(s) 
CPU clock speed  : 3500.0 MHz 
Benchmark result : 40.70 Kh/s 
Hashrate per core: 10.17 Kh/s 
CPU speed factor : 11.62 hashes/Mcycle 
Core speed factor: 2.90 hashes/Mcycle/core 

Code:

System CPU name  : AMD FX(tm)-8320 Eight-Core Processor            
System CPU type  : 1 Physical CPU(s), 8 Core(s) per CPU, 8 Thread(s) 
CPU clock speed  : 3514.5 MHz 
Benchmark result : 83.60 Kh/s 
Hashrate per core: 10.45 Kh/s 
CPU speed factor : 23.79 hashes/Mcycle 
Core speed factor: 2.97 hashes/Mcycle/core

[The Frisian]

You need a good strategy to solve puzzle faster.
Although I made several mistakes, I made it under 60 seconds.
I beleive its possible to solve it in 30-35 seconds!

You made 130 moves within 60 seconds. That has nothing to do with strategy, I guess.
I needed 94 moves, that's strategy!
But how can you make more than 2 moves per second.....

[z0n0]

You need a good strategy to solve puzzle faster.
Although I made several mistakes, I made it under 60 seconds.
I beleive its possible to solve it in 30-35 seconds!

You made 130 moves within 60 seconds. That has nothing to do with strategy, I guess.
I needed 94 moves, that's strategy!
But how can you make more than 2 moves per second.....

My poker fellas would say: rigged!

[light85bit]

You need a good strategy to solve puzzle faster.
Although I made several mistakes, I made it under 60 seconds.
I beleive its possible to solve it in 30-35 seconds!

You made 130 moves within 60 seconds. That has nothing to do with strategy, I guess.
I needed 94 moves, that's strategy!
But how can you make more than 2 moves per second.....

Oh yes, to think about it:
rank 1: 128 moves / 45 s = 2.84 m/s
rank 2: 102 moves / 49 s = 2.08 m/s
rank 3: 102 moves / 64 s = 1.59 m/s
rank 4:   94 moves / 86 s = 1.09 m/s
rank 5: 170 moves / 102 s = 1.67 m/s

If the rank 1 get 80-90 moves in 45s, it's normal. It's because he's good at stragegy. But 128 moves in 45s, he must be a really fast clicker and fast thinker at the same time  
Click nearly 3 times and think (about next move) 3 times in a second, and in 45 seconds long  
Maybe he just faster than us, than all of us  

[opus.224]

You made 130 moves within 60 seconds. That has nothing to do with strategy, I guess.
I needed 94 moves, that's strategy!

Strategy is to win the puzzle in FASTEST time. Your comment has nothing with common sense, I guess.
If strategy was lowest number of moves, than try to beat this one:

But how can you make more than 2 moves per second.....

That's really simple: just press your mouse button (left one!!) at least twice in a second... 
 

[111magic]

I like to puzzle.
But iám really bad.
I will never finish in the top ten.
Don't forget to share the puzzle with your friends on facebook or twitter!

[opus.224]

I was really pissed off of false accusations:

Time: 37 Seconds Moves: 88   

Now I'm fine!
Practise, practise....
   

[111magic]

Nice opus.224! 

Community remember to vote here https://www.cryptsy.com/coinvotes
You can use free votes but also Cryptsypoint to vote for Magi.
1 Cryptsypoint will give you 5 votes.
I have a good feeling about Cryptsy but i received a little advice to get more votes there!
Yesterday evening around 330 votes now 379 votes! Nice guys keep it up!
In the end Cryptsy will add Magi. Why, Magi can not be missed on Cryptsy!! 

[The Frisian]

Time: 37 Seconds Moves: 88   
Now I'm fine!
Practise, practise....

It's Magical!

[light85bit]

Problem is i didnt get any reward since i sent my coins, Or i missed 1 time. But now it's reducing so the time expected is alway from 20 hrs to 1 day..... and because of it, i'll wont get any reward 

How long ago did you send your coins to yourself and how long ago did you receive those other coins? It sounds as though it must have been at least three weeks ago. If the weight is showing as much less than the balance in the wallet, it is time to send all your coins to yourself again.

The way I do it is to create an incoming address called Staking and send all the coins to that address. It shows up on the transaction list as a payment to yourself. The weight grows from zero over several days and the rewards start coming in very nicely.

Hope this helps

I sent coins to myself at 8 Apr (150XMG), i get 10XMG at 12 Apr, 28 XMG at 13 Apr...
Now my weight is 496, net is 51k, expected time : 1day, lol.
I guess i have to send myself again, ( but all my coins are together in 1 address already) lol

[111magic]

Z0n0 congrats, notice you are senior now!

[light85bit]

I was really pissed off of false accusations:

Time: 37 Seconds Moves: 88   

Now I'm fine!
Practise, practise....
   

I was really pissed off of your words "Practise, practise...."

Now I'm fine!
Practise, practise....

[z0n0]

Z0n0 congrats, notice you are senior now!

 

[opus.224]

I was really pissed off of false accusations:

Time: 37 Seconds Moves: 88   

Now I'm fine!
Practise, practise....
   

I was really pissed off of your words "Practise, practise...."

Now I'm fine!
Practise, practise....

At least, I gave you a good motivation. 
Congrats!
 

[kondiomir]

Never solve this puzzle! Too difficult for me 

[Spexx]

The problem you are getting with the file naming is an odd one. When you open a command window and type
date /t
what do you get back? I suspect it gives you the day as well as the date, in fact I am sure of it. That is the cause of the problem. Do you know anything about that? I do not get the problem on vanilla Windows 32 or 64 bit Ultimate editions, nor indeed XP Pro. It might be something to do with the Windows date/time format - very likely actually - dang! More research .... mutter, mutter, mutter ....

It returned

Code:

Wed 04/15/2015

Hopefully that helps a bit. (It looks like it grabbed the proper date and time before, but screwed up with parsing it.)

That is really frustrating and I have not seen a similar problem for something like twenty years - and that was somebody else's problem at the time. There is always one! I cannot even reproduce that on any of my machines - nothing I do will make it output the date in that format, so maybe I am missing something but at least that shows me that it is a rare thing. I have been using that code snippet for grabbing the date and using the numbers for something like thirty years. It is used in every bit of software currently available from me for XMG certainly. There are some vague references to this on the Web but the options they refer to are not present on my machines. I can use some extra code to get around it, but I will have to patch literally everything. I have put this issue on my watchlist for Autominer V4 currently under development.