Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)

[Demarsac]

Anyone know which driver works best for RX 480?

I am using the latest from ATI website
Never had a problem

[Abcederian]

I'm building 2 rigs i bought 6 rx 470's for my first rig should i buy r9 390's for my second rig ? Less used r9 390 second hands with warranty cost like 255-265 dollar in here(these cards used 2 month without oc) and rx 470's cost me 235 dollar. Any tips ?

6x R9 390 will need a 1600w PSU. A side benefit is you can also heat your house with that rig!
PS I have 3 MSI R9 390's I would sell for $250 each through ebay. $225 each if we can find a arbitrator.

[buckrogers]

im sure its been asked before, but what is the fix for starting the bat file and it auto quits immediately?

thanks!

[jokelo]

After the v8, both of my r9 280x have died. Be carefull.

[tanatana]

https://i.imgur.com/ZcZB2S2.png

is that a problem?
after few hours appears incorrect data

this could be due to excessive overclocking or undervolting.

not overcklock, not undervolt, there is change bios
did not claymore 5, 6, 7 only 8

[Thor78]

After the v8, both of my r9 280x have died. Be carefull.

I have seven r9 280x, everything works fine, temps are betwen 50 and 60.
I dont belive there is somthing wrong with v8.

[BitJunkie556]

GPU #0: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #1: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #2: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #3: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #4: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 968.954 H/s, Total Shares: 10480, Rejected: 35, Time: 06:15
ZEC: GPU0 193.912 H/s, GPU1 194.647 H/s, GPU2 194.623 H/s, GPU3 193.562 H/s, GPU4 192.209 H/s

I've got 2 more 480's coming in myself...

One seems to be better-binned. Running lower stock voltage and hashing about 20 sol/s faster. Both are PowerColor Red Devils, but I think the first one they sent was actually the factory 1333 Mhz one, since it has the seal of solomon on the back, even though it wasn't marked. Must have been a lucky packaging for me.

Anyway, that first one is getting ~200 sol/s, maybe a bit less on average, and the other is doing 180 Sol/s, but again, that second card is running higher voltage and whatnot, and using more power. So probably a silicon lottery thing.

Any other numbers on RX 480's on Clay's 8.0 release? Just trying to see what everyone is getting.

P.S., it seems claymore says we can get 300 sol/s on a 390, but I'm at about 240 sol/s. Might be because I'm using the newer drivers though, not sure.

[Sanguintan]

is that a problem?
after few hours appears incorrect data

this could be due to excessive overclocking or undervolting.

not overcklock, not undervolt, there is change bios
did not claymore 5, 6, 7 only 8

Try reducing the intensity. Use -i 5 or 4 or 3. The V8 stress the GPU more. I had the same problem with V8.

[Alehandros]

GPU #0: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #1: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #2: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #3: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #4: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #5: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 1198.818 H/s, Total Shares: 50, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:51
ZEC: GPU0 201.012 H/s, GPU1 201.321 H/s, GPU2 202.095 H/s, GPU3 198.557 H/s, GPU4 198.267 H/s, GPU5 197.566 H/s

using -i 5

edit: and v8



GPU #0: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
GPU #1: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
GPU #2: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
GPU #3: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
GPU #4: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
GPU #5: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 1231.077 H/s, Total Shares: 100, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:59
ZEC: GPU0 207.173 H/s, GPU1 205.025 H/s, GPU2 204.254 H/s, GPU3 203.212 H/s, GPU4 204.327 H/s, GPU5 207.086 H/s

R9 Nano's
using -i 4, powlim -47

[BitJunkie556]

After the v8, both of my r9 280x have died. Be carefull.

I don't really believe in coincidences... But I'm not sure. Maybe usage went up, and so did temps? Maybe they got hot enough to melt the solder, or something like that. I have a pretty aggressive fan curve on afterburner, even though my cards stay fairly cool. Around 75% fan at all times, or more if temps go anywhere over 80C.

[jadefalke]

might be asked before, but why is there no linux Version?

[sorry2xs]

GPU #0: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #1: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #2: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #3: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #4: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 968.954 H/s, Total Shares: 10480, Rejected: 35, Time: 06:15
ZEC: GPU0 193.912 H/s, GPU1 194.647 H/s, GPU2 194.623 H/s, GPU3 193.562 H/s, GPU4 192.209 H/s

I've got 2 more 480's coming in myself...

One seems to be better-binned. Running lower stock voltage and hashing about 20 sol/s faster. Both are PowerColor Red Devils, but I think the first one they sent was actually the factory 1333 Mhz one, since it has the seal of solomon on the back, even though it wasn't marked. Must have been a lucky packaging for me.

Anyway, that first one is getting ~200 sol/s, maybe a bit less on average, and the other is doing 180 Sol/s, but again, that second card is running higher voltage and whatnot, and using more power. So probably a silicon lottery thing.

Any other numbers on RX 480's on Clay's 8.0 release? Just trying to see what everyone is getting.

P.S., it seems claymore says we can get 300 sol/s on a 390, but I'm at about 240 sol/s. Might be because I'm using the newer drivers though, not sure.

her is my 390GPU #0: Hawaii, 8192 MB available, 40 compute units
GPU #1: Hawaii, 8192 MB available, 40 compute units
GPU #2: Hawaii, 8192 MB available, 40 compute units
GPU #3: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 28 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 987.020 H/s, Total Shares: 41557, Rejected: 161, Time: 24:36
ZEC: GPU0 274.808 H/s, GPU1 275.475 H/s, GPU2 275.217 H/s, GPU3 161.520 H/s

[BitJunkie556]

GPU #0: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #1: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #2: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #3: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #4: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #5: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 1198.818 H/s, Total Shares: 50, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:51
ZEC: GPU0 201.012 H/s, GPU1 201.321 H/s, GPU2 202.095 H/s, GPU3 198.557 H/s, GPU4 198.267 H/s, GPU5 197.566 H/s

using -i 5

edit: and v8

What were your hashrates (average) with the default intensity, 4 I guess?

Trying to see if higher intensity is worth it, since I use my computer while mining. But I'll prob give it a try and see if it's stable at -i 5.

[sorry2xs]

GPU #0: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #1: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #2: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #3: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #4: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #5: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 1198.818 H/s, Total Shares: 50, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:51
ZEC: GPU0 201.012 H/s, GPU1 201.321 H/s, GPU2 202.095 H/s, GPU3 198.557 H/s, GPU4 198.267 H/s, GPU5 197.566 H/s

using -i 5

edit: and v8



GPU #0: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
GPU #1: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
GPU #2: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
GPU #3: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
GPU #4: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
GPU #5: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 1231.077 H/s, Total Shares: 100, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:59
ZEC: GPU0 207.173 H/s, GPU1 205.025 H/s, GPU2 204.254 H/s, GPU3 203.212 H/s, GPU4 204.327 H/s, GPU5 207.086 H/s

R9 Nano's
using -i 4, powlim -47

why only 100 shares in 1:59 minutes that seems low for over 1200 hashes

[Alehandros]

I'm on a high diff port, does that mean less shares?

[Alehandros]

GPU #0: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #1: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #2: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #3: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #4: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #5: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 1198.818 H/s, Total Shares: 50, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:51
ZEC: GPU0 201.012 H/s, GPU1 201.321 H/s, GPU2 202.095 H/s, GPU3 198.557 H/s, GPU4 198.267 H/s, GPU5 197.566 H/s

using -i 5

edit: and v8

What were your hashrates (average) with the default intensity, 4 I guess?

Trying to see if higher intensity is worth it, since I use my computer while mining. But I'll prob give it a try and see if it's stable at -i 5.

didn't test -i 4, but -i 6 always output a random card to 0

[BitJunkie556]

her is my 390GPU #0: Hawaii, 8192 MB available, 40 compute units
GPU #1: Hawaii, 8192 MB available, 40 compute units
GPU #2: Hawaii, 8192 MB available, 40 compute units
GPU #3: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 28 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 987.020 H/s, Total Shares: 41557, Rejected: 161, Time: 24:36
ZEC: GPU0 274.808 H/s, GPU1 275.475 H/s, GPU2 275.217 H/s, GPU3 161.520 H/s

Cool, thanks. Are you on Claymore's recommended 15.12? I used to be at 15.20 and I swore my hashrate was higher when I compared them on 7.0

Actually, I think I'm going to do a system restore and see how the 15.20 works. At 16.x.x, I've only got 230 sol/s on the 390. Pretty bad IMO...

[sorry2xs]

isp went dead

[sorry2xs]

her is my 390GPU #0: Hawaii, 8192 MB available, 40 compute units
GPU #1: Hawaii, 8192 MB available, 40 compute units
GPU #2: Hawaii, 8192 MB available, 40 compute units
GPU #3: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 28 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 987.020 H/s, Total Shares: 41557, Rejected: 161, Time: 24:36
ZEC: GPU0 274.808 H/s, GPU1 275.475 H/s, GPU2 275.217 H/s, GPU3 161.520 H/s

Cool, thanks. Are you on Claymore's recommended 15.12? I used to be at 15.20 and I swore my hashrate was higher when I compared them on 7.0

Actually, I think I'm going to do a system restore and see how the 15.20 works. At 16.x.x, I've only got 230 sol/s on the 390. Pretty bad IMO...

i am on what ever version comes with the asus strix cd.

[Jinx99]

Claymore, any plans for new version? Maybe R9 380x optimisation?