Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)

[toptek]

I'm guessing the R9280 not the X version are maxed out, CM 9 didn't do any thing for it speed wise, time to edit the bios, i guess to see if that does any thing.

it DID improve my R7370 by 10 or so Sol . they were doing 131 to 134 sol tops now they do 143 sol or more  with CM 9 haven't tried my RX 400 series cards, yet .

Nm didn't wait long enough for the R9280 not x version it does 215 Sols up from 209. not much more but it's still more, it looks like it may be reaching it's max limits at stock setting .

[bmtrader]

RX 470 4g - 205/208 H/s
h81 probtc
g1840
4gb ram
win 10

[flekkelek]

173H/s from 140 on 380x

[offon]

same speed on 7950 and 7970

[IOTUSA]

Any numbers on 390x/290/290x from real life testing?

[Taxidermista]

Zec needs to go high now or the next few days or else it will be hammered down by these new faster miner from nvidia and claymore.

You don't have a f**ing clue about math&mining stuff, do you?

[batko]

R9 280x -220sol 1100/1500
Rx 480   -225sol 1300/1950

R9 380 160sol 1010/1550

Thanks clay

[shadabahmed]

R9 280x -220sol 1100/1500
Rx 480   -225sol 1300/1950

R9 380 160sol 1010/1550

Thanks clay

any idea about rx 470 setting?

[IOTUSA]

R9 280x -220sol 1100/1500
Rx 480   -225sol 1300/1950

R9 380 160sol 1010/1550

Thanks clay

I'm still confused as to why 380's seem to run so slow. Well actually not really, memory bandwidth I guess.

[amfofo]

280x toxic stock  1 card @244 others are at 216   -i 7
480 ref 8gb @209-220  -i 8

[spycheast]

HD7970 GHz edition (1150/1525) ~234sol/s (-i 8 )
~5-8sol/s increse compared to v8.0

[Qazo]

v9.0     -i 8

2x480 8 gb

Gpu clock: 1400, voltage: 1100
Memory clock: 2030, voltage: 1000

Gpu1: 240 h/s,   gpu2: 220h/s

390w from wall

[flekkelek]

R9 280x -220sol 1100/1500
Rx 480   -225sol 1300/1950

R9 380 160sol 1010/1550

Thanks clay

I'm still confused as to why 380's seem to run so slow. Well actually not really, memory bandwidth I guess.

TBH it's not a good card, if I couldn't buy on half price my cards, I'd never buy 380s.

[Etolay]

MSI Rx 470 8gb - 212 h/s - 1242/2000
Sapphire R9 290 tri x - 270 h/s - 1100/1250
Sapphire R9 290 dual x - 265 h/s - 1100/1250

Approx 747-750 h/s

60h/s faster than v8 for me.

[vleroybrown]

Any numbers on 390x/290/290x from real life testing?

Same speed on 290

[toptek]

v9.0     -i 8

2x480 8 gb

Gpu clock: 1400, voltage: 1100
Memory clock: 2030, voltage: 1000

Gpu1: 240 h/s,   gpu2: 220h/s

390w from wall

390w from wall for both ?

 wait for the new AMD drives that release tomorrow you may see a drop in Power usages and heat , probable no speeds increase.
 just because the leaked info says in games doesn't mean in games . remember it's leaked info and the tester are still under NDA .

[ghostfaceuk]

I'm guessing the R9280 not the X version are maxed out, CM 9 didn't do any thing for it speed wise, time to edit the bios, i guess to see if that does any thing.

it DID improve my R7370 by 10 or so Sol . they were doing 131 to 134 sol tops now they do 143 sol or more  with CM 9 haven't tried my RX 400 series cards, yet .

Nm didn't wait long enough for the R9280 not x version it does 215 Sols up from 209. not much more but it's still more, it looks like it may be reaching it's max limits at stock setting .

What settings are you using for your 280, I'm on full stock bios and clocks and getting 188h/s?

[mfsmarques]

RX 470 - 202 H/s - 1250/1750
RX 480 - 242 H/s - 1350/2200
R9 390x - 309 H/s - 1100/1500

[shadabahmed]

v8 was working fine for me in v9 system hangs. i have to reboot system manully

[Qazo]

v9.0     -i 8

2x480 8 gb

Gpu clock: 1400, voltage: 1100
Memory clock: 2030, voltage: 1000

Gpu1: 240 h/s,   gpu2: 220h/s

390w from wall

390w from wall for both ?

 wait for the new AMD drives that release tomorrow you may see a drop in Power usages and heat , probable no speeds increase.
 just because the leaked info says in games doesn't mean in games . remember it's leaked info and the tester are still under NDA .

yes from both